Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 25(8): 2424-2432, 2019 04 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30563932

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Endometrioid endometrial cancer is strongly associated with obesity and insulin resistance. Metformin, an insulin sensitizer, reduces endometrial tumor growth in vitro. Presurgical window studies allow rapid in vivo assessment of antitumor activity. Previous window studies found metformin reduced endometrial cancer proliferation but these lacked methodological rigor. PREMIUM measured the anti-proliferative effect of metformin in vivo using a robust window study design.Patients and Methods: A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized women with atypical hyperplasia or endometrioid endometrial cancer to receive metformin (850 mg daily for 3 days, and twice daily thereafter) or placebo for 1 to 5 weeks until surgery. The primary outcome was posttreatment IHC expression of Ki-67. Secondary outcomes investigated the effect of metformin on markers of the PI3K-Akt-mTOR and insulin signaling pathways and obesity. RESULTS: Eighty-eight women received metformin (n = 45) or placebo (n = 43) and completed treatment. There was no overall difference in posttreatment Ki-67 between the metformin and placebo arms, in an ANCOVA analysis adjusting for baseline Ki-67 expression (mean difference -0.57%; 95% CI, -7.57%-6.42%; P = 0.87). Metformin did not affect expression of markers of the PI3K-Akt-mTOR or insulin signaling pathways, and did not result in weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment with standard diabetic doses of metformin does not reduce tumor proliferation in women with endometrioid endometrial cancer awaiting hysterectomy. This study does not support a biological effect of metformin in endometrial cancer and casts doubt on its potential application in the primary and adjuvant treatment settings.


Subject(s)
Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Metformin/administration & dosage , Preoperative Care , Uterine Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Insulin/metabolism , Metformin/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/metabolism , Prognosis , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt/metabolism , Signal Transduction , TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Neoplasms/metabolism , Uterine Neoplasms/mortality
2.
Lancet ; 385 Suppl 1: S90, 2015 Feb 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26312913

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Metformin use is associated with reduced cancer risk in several observational studies of patients with type 2 diabetes. Results from preclinical studies in endometrial cancer show that metformin reduces cellular proliferation by inhibition of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway. We tested the hypothesis that metformin would reduce cellular proliferation in vivo in atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We recruited women attending gynaecological oncology clinics in Manchester, UK, with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Women received metformin (850 mg twice daily) or no drug (control) during the 1-4 week presurgical window between cancer diagnosis and hysterectomy according to patient preference. Paired blood and tumour samples were obtained at recruitment and hysterectomy. Cellular proliferation was assessed by Ki-67 proliferation index. Automated scoring on two separate occasions provided consistent replicate scores (SD <10%). This study is registered with the ISRCTN register, number ISRCTN81570194. FINDINGS: Samples from 40 women have been analysed (28 metformin-treated [median age 64 years, IQR 58-69]; 12 control [70, 64-70]). 24 of the patients (60%) were obese. 22 patients (55%) had either undiagnosed diabetes (fasting glucose >7·0 mmol/L, n=4) or insulin resistance (homoeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance >2·8, n=18). Metformin was taken for a median of 20 days (IQR 17-24), and mild gastrointestinal side-effects were reported by 22 metformin-treated patients. In the metformin-treated group, Ki-67 was 12·9% lower at hysterectomy than at recruitment (95% CI 3·7-22·1, p=0·008) after adjustment for baseline Ki-67, Ki-67 change in controls, age, and body-mass index. No significant changes in phosphorylation of AKT or markers of insulin resistance after adjustment for treatment arm were seen. INTERPRETATION: Undiagnosed insulin resistance or diabetes were common in our study population. Short-term presurgical metformin was associated with a reduction in Ki-67 proliferation index. We are now exploring the hypothesis that metformin reduces Ki-67 expression by inducing phosphorylation of AMP-activated kinase and subsequent mTOR proproliferative inhibition, independent of insulin and insulin-like growth factor receptor activation. FUNDING: Wellbeing of Women, Wellcome Trust.

3.
Lancet ; 360(9350): 2001-8, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12504395

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Results of observational studies suggest that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) could reduce the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), but those of randomised trials do not indicate a lower risk in women who use oestrogen plus progestagen. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether or not unopposed oestrogen reduces the risk of further cardiac events in postmenopausal women who survive a first myocardial infarction. METHODS: The study was a randomised, blinded, placebo controlled, secondary prevention trial of postmenopausal women, age 50-69 years (n=1017) who had survived a first myocardial infarction. Individuals were recruited from 35 hospitals in England and Wales. Women received either one tablet of oestradiol valerate (2 mg; n=513) or placebo (n=504), daily for 2 years. Primary outcomes were reinfarction or cardiac death, and all-cause mortality. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. Secondary outcomes were uterine bleeding, endometrial cancer, stroke or other embolic events, and fractures. FINDINGS: Frequency of reinfarction or cardiac death did not differ between treatment groups at 24 months (rate ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.70-1.41, p=0.97). Similarly, the reduction in all-cause mortality between those who took oestrogen and those on placebo was not significant (0.79, 0.50-1.27, p=0.34). The relative risk of any death (0.56, 0.23-1.33) and cardiac death (0.33, 0.11-1.01) was lowest at 3 months post-recruitment. INTERPRETATION: Oestradiol valerate does not reduce the overall risk of further cardiac events in postmenopausal women who have survived a myocardial infarction.


Subject(s)
Estradiol/therapeutic use , Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control , Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Patient Compliance , Postmenopause , Secondary Prevention , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...