ABSTRACT
Accurate susceptibility result of temocillin (TMO) is important for treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales. This multicenter study aimed to investigate the performance of routine temocillin testing assays against Enterobacterales challenging strains. Forty-seven selected clinical isolates were blindly analyzed by 12 Belgian laboratories using VITEK® 2 (n = 5) and BD Phoenix™ (n = 3) automated systems, ETEST® gradient strip (n = 3), and disk (3 brands) diffusion method (DD; n = 6) for temocillin susceptibility using standardized methodology. Results were interpreted using EUCAST 2023 criteria and compared to the broth microdilution (BMD; Sensititre™ panel) method used as gold standard. Methods' reproducibility was assessed by testing 3 reference strains in triplicate. A total of 702 organism-drug results were obtained against 33 TMO-susceptible and 14 TMO-resistant isolates. Excluding Proteae species (P. mirabilis and M. morganii), the essential agreement rates were excellent (91.5-100%) for all MIC-based methods. The highest category agreement was achieved by ETEST® (97.5%) followed by VITEK® 2 (93.2%), disk diffusion (91.6%), and BD Phoenix™ (88.5%). BD Phoenix™ and paper disk diffusion overcalled resistance (11.5% and 6.8% of major discrepancies, respectively), while ROSCO tablets diffusion and VITEK® 2 generated higher very major discrepancies (7.1% and 4.2% respectively). Inter-assay reproducibility was unsatisfactory using recommended E. coli ATCC 25922 strain but was excellent with E. coli ATCC 35218 and K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 strains. This interlaboratory study suggests that routine testing methods provide accurate and reproducible TMO categorization results except for Proteae species.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Escherichia coli , Penicillins , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Reproducibility of Results , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Klebsiella pneumoniaeABSTRACT
Background: Empirical treatment of Helicobacter pylori (HP) depends on the local prevalence of clarithromycin resistance but data are lacking and culturing of HP is time-consuming. We evaluated RIDA®GENE Helicobacter pylori assay (r-biopharm), a quantitative PCR assay for detecting HP and clarithromycin resistance mutations in gastric biopsies.Material/methods: Gastric biopsies were obtained from each of 436 consecutive patients referred for gastroscopic investigation and results of qPCR were compared to culture and immunohistochemical staining (IHCS).Results: Of 436 samples, 47 were positive for HP by PCR (11%), 42 by culture (9.7%) and 44 by IHCS (10%). Compared to culture, sensitivity and specificity of the qPCR were 100% and 99%, respectively, and 96% and 99% compared to IHCS. The sensitivity and specificity for clarithromycin resistance detection were 92% and 97%, respectively.Conclusions: RIDA®GENE Helicobacter pylori assay reliably and rapidly detects HP and its resistance to clarithromycin in human gastric biopsies.
