Recurrence and malignant transformation rates of high grade oral epithelial dysplasia over a 10 year follow up period and the influence of surgical intervention, size of excision biopsy and marginal clearance in a UK regional maxillofacial surgery unit.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the overall recurrence rate (RR) and malignant transformation rate (MTR) of high grade oral mucosal epithelial dysplasias (HGOED). MATERIALS & METHODS: A clinicopathological review of records of patients diagnosed with a unifocal HGOED between 2004 and 2016 on incisional biopsy who then underwent excision. The mean duration of follow-up was 47.7 months (±29.9 SD). RESULTS: Full demographic, historical and histopathological data were available for 120 patients. Six were lost to follow-up after excisional biopsy. Invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was present in 19 (18.3%) excisions. HGOED affected the lateral and ventral tongue in 58% of patients. Fourteen (11.7%) were not treated surgically but kept under surveillance. The overall RR was 34.7% (33 patients) and MTR 17.8% (17 patients). Four of the 14 (28.6%) patients who had not had the HGOED excised developed SCC, by contrast to the 13 of the 106 (12.3%) who had been treated. RR was significantly associated with positive excision margins (p = 0.007; OR = 3.6) and a clinical presentation of erythroplakia (p = 0.023; OR = 1.5). MTR was significantly associated with age (p = 0.034), clinical appearance (p = 0.030), site (p = 0.007), treatment received (p = 0.012) and positive excision margins (p = 0.007). The mean time for recurrence to develop was 62 months (±31.5 SD) (range 22-144 months), that for malignant transformation was 50 months (±32.5 SD) (range 8-97 months). CONCLUSION: Patients with HGOED require follow-up for at least 10 years after treatment. Younger age, homogeneous clinical appearance, complete excision, a larger excision specimen and clear margins all improve prognosis.

Investigating the appropriateness of surgical endodontic referrals to a West Sussex regional referral unit.

Aim To audit the appropriateness, after triage, of surgical endodontic referrals to Queen Victoria Hospital, a regional referral unit in West Sussex. To discuss the current referral pathway with the aim of improving general dental practitioner (GDP) understanding of indications for surgical endodontics via the referral process.Methodology A three-year retrospective review of all surgical endodontic referrals made to Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead was completed. This was inclusive of all referrals made via the National Health Service (NHS) Vantage Rego e-referral system and GDP referral letters. The quality of referrals was analysed as indicated or contraindicated in accordance with the Royal College of Surgeons guidelines for surgical endodontics and periradicular surgery.Results Out of the 34 referrals included in data analysis, 50% contained one or more contraindication for surgical intervention. The most commonly recorded contraindications to treatment were poor-quality root canal treatment, periodontal disease compromising the long-term success of treatment and a poor coronal seal deeming the tooth unrestorable post-surgical intervention.Conclusions A more efficient surgical endodontic referral system will aid resource allocation within the NHS. These results are a first step to aiding necessary modification of the primary care referral pathway to achieve a more effective service for patients, with improved acceptance rate of referrals and better surgical outcomes.

What is the optimal site and biopsy technique for the diagnosis of oral mucosal autoimmune blistering disease?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine which biopsy method produces the best diagnostic yield in patients presenting with autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs) of the oral mucosa. METHODS: This was a retrospective audit of patients who were biopsied at least once for a suspected AIBD of the oral mucosa. The type (incisional or punch) and site of biopsies were recorded in conjunction with case notes, electronic records and histopathological reports in order to calculate sensitivity, specificity and the method of biopsy which produced the superior diagnostic yield. RESULTS: A total of 125 biopsy samples from 66 patients were identified and reviewed. A diagnosis of AIBD was established in 49 (74%) patients. The chi-square test showed there was a statistically significantly higher (P = 0.0016) diagnostic yield using the punch biopsy technique compared to the scalpel method. The gingiva was the best biopsy site in terms of achieving a definitive diagnosis (P = 0.0001) regardless of the biopsy method used. CONCLUSIONS: A punch biopsy is more likely than scalpel biopsy to obtain a definitive diagnosis in patients presenting with a suspected oral AIBD. The gingiva is the optimal site to sample.