The prevalence and prescribing patterns of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in older nursing home residents in different European countries and Israel: retrospective results from the EU SHELTER study.

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines (BZDs) and Z-drugs have high potential for developing frequent adverse drug events in older adults (e.g., psychomotor sedation, drug-related dementia, deliria, drug dependence, etc.). Knowledge of the prevalence and patterns of the use of BZDs/Z-drugs in vulnerable older patients is important in order to prevent and reduce the burden caused by their drug-related complications. Our study focused on international comparisons of the prevalence, country-specific prescribing patterns and risk factors of regular BZD/Z-drug use in nursing home (NH) residents. METHODS: This cross-sectional study retrospectively analysed data of 4156 NH residents, prospectively assessed in the Services and Health in the Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) project conducted from 2009 to 2014. Residents aged 65+ in 57 NHs in 7 European countries and Israel were assessed by the InterRAI Long-Term Care Facilities instrument. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression models were used to describe the country-specific prevalence, patterns and risk factors of BZD/Z-drug use. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 83.4 ± 9.4 years, 73% were female and 27.7% used BZDs/Z-drugs. The prevalence of BZD/Z-drug use differed significantly across countries, ranging from 44.1% in Israel to 14.5% in Germany. The most frequently prescribed were zopiclone (17.8%), lorazepam (17.1%) and oxazepam (16.3%). Lorazepam, oxazepam and diazepam were used in most of the countries. Brotizolam, temazepam and zolpidem showed highest prevalence in Israel (99.4% of all regular users of this medication in the sample), the Netherlands (72.6%) and France (50.0%), respectively. Residing in Israel was the most significant factor associated with the use of BZDs/Z-drugs or BZDs only (odds ratio [OR] 6.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.8-9.2 and OR 9.7, 95%CI 6.5-14.5, respectively). The use of Z-drugs only was most significantly associated with residing in France (OR 21.0, 95%CI 9.0-48.9). CONCLUSIONS: Despite global recommendations and warnings, the preference for and extent of use of individual BZDs and Z-drugs in vulnerable NH residents differ significantly across countries. The strong association with country of residence compared to clinical and functional factors denotes that prescribing habits, social, cultural, behavioural, and regulatory factors still play an important role in the current diverse use of these medications.

Pharmacological management of osteoporosis in nursing home residents: the Shelter study.

OBJECTIVE: To prevent osteoporotic fractures in nursing home residents a combination of bisphosphonates, calcium and vitamin D is recommended. This study assessed the prevalence of pharmacological osteoporosis prevention in nursing home residents from eight countries, and assessed its association with patient characteristics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analyses of the SHELTER study data. We assessed the overall prevalence of osteoporosis medication (OM) use (vitamin D, calcium and bisphosphonates) in residents stratified for falls and fractures over last 30 days, health instability with high mortality risk, cognitive impairment, and dependence in walking. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Nursing home residents in the Czech Republic, England, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands and Israel. RESULTS: Of 3832 eligible residents, vitamin D, calcium and bisphosphonates were used by 16.2%, 10.4%, and 4.5% respectively. All 3 classes of OM together were used by 1.5% of all residents. Of residents with a recent fracture, 9.5% used a bisphosphonate (2.7% all 3 OMs). In patients with recent falls, 20.8% used vitamin D and 15.3% calcium. In residents with severe cognitive impairment, 15.5% used vitamin D and 9.3% used calcium. Of the bisphosphonate users, 33.7% also used both vitamin D and calcium, 25.8% used only calcium in addition and 17.4% only vitamin D in addition. The use of any OM varied widely across countries, from 66.8% in Finland to 3.0% in Israel. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: We found substantial pharmacological under-treatment of prevention of osteoporosis in residents with recent falls, fractures and dependence in walking. Only two-thirds of bisphosphonate users also took a vitamin D-calcium combination, despite guideline recommendations. On the other hand, possible over-treatment was found in residents with high mortality risk in whom preventive pharmacotherapy might not have still been appropriate. The prevalence of pharmacological prevention of osteoporosis differed substantially between countries. Efforts are needed to improve pharmacotherapy in residents.

Use of antidepressant medications among older adults in European long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional analysis from the SHELTER study.

BACKGROUND: Late-life depression is common among older adults living in nursing homes (NHs). Over the last 30 years there has been an increase in the rates of prescription of antidepressant medications across all ages, with the largest rise reported in older adults. This study aimed to describe the pattern of antidepressant medication use among NH residents from 7 European countries and Israel and to examine patient and facilities characteristics that may account for it. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from the SHELTER study, an observational longitudinal cohort study that collected comprehensive resident data using the interRAI Long-Term Care Facility instrument in 7 European Countries and Israel. Descriptive statistics were used to examine sample characteristics. Potential correlates of antidepressant medication use were identified using multiple logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Among 4023 residents entering the study, 32% had depressive symptoms and nearly half of these individuals used antidepressants. Antidepressant medication use varied by country, with a prevalence in the overall sample of 35.6% (n = 1431). Among antidepressant users, 59.9% were receiving selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI). The strongest correlates of antidepressant use included reported diagnosis of anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, pain, falls and high level of social engagement. Age over 85 years, living in facilities located in rural areas and a diagnosis of schizophrenia reduced the likelihood of being prescribed with an antidepressant. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of residents in European long-term care facilities receive antidepressant medications. The decision to prescribe antidepressants to NH residents seems to be influenced by both patient and facility characteristics. Future longitudinal studies should evaluate the efficacy and safety of antidepressant use in NHs thus providing evidence for recommendations for clinical practice.

Delivery of Care to Nursing Home Residents With Diabetes: Results From the SHELTER Study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe health care and preventive service provision to nursing home (NH) residents with diabetes mellitus (DM) and to analyze factors determining use of selected services. DESIGN: In the period between 2009 and 2011, the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) project, a 12-month prospective cohort study, was conducted to assess 4037 NH residents aged 60 years and older residing in 59 NHs in 7 European countries and Israel. METHODS: The InterRAI tool for long-term care facilities was used to assess care needs and provided health care services. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression were applied to describe differences between NH residents with (DR) and without DM (non-DR), and to find factors determining use of services and care provided to both groups. RESULTS: DR more often than non-DR were hospitalized (18.2% vs 14.3%) and required rehabilitation (23.8% vs 18.2%) or clinically complex care (15.9% vs 13.7%). They also more frequently received a repositioning program (26.8% vs 22.7%), a wound care (15.1% vs 9.8%), and some preventive services as yearly eye examination (41.0% vs 35.9%), pneumococcal vaccination (33.5% vs 26.6%), mammography in women (12.1% vs 7.4%), and colonoscopy (5.6% vs 3.6%). Yet, rates of some of them (mammography, colonoscopy, hearing and dental examinations) were very low in both study cohorts with exception of annual influenza vaccination (82.1%) and yearly blood pressure checkup (95.0%). Interestingly, DM enhanced odds only for mammography [odds ratio (OR) 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-2.09, P = .004) and eye examination (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.03-1.42; P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: DR more frequently receive care related to DM clinical complexity; nevertheless, the recommended frequency of preventive procedures is not met both in DR and non-DR.

[Geriatric risk detection and prevention in older elective surgery patients--a novel track in Assuta Medical Centers].

UNLABELLED: As life expectancy rises, so do the rates of operable chronic and/or non-urgent conditions, and the prevalence of the elderly among elective surgery patients. Pre-operative assessments have so far been based on standards of internal and anaesthetic medicine, and focused on the physical aspect. This paper presents a groundbreaking modified assessment for detecting geriatric risks and selecting appropriate interventions. AIMS: An appropriate response to the unique risks and needs of elderly patients in elective surgery, emphasizing each individual's functional, mental, emotional and environmental-supportive aspects, alongside the physical aspects typical of old age. METHODS: In addition to anaesthetic pre-operative assessment, patients aged 75 and older underwent a geriatric screening assessment, identifying those who require in-depth geriatric assessment. This algorithmically triggers persons at selected risks for treatment and intervention. This paper describes the method and its principles, and characterizes patient groups and problems. RESULTS: A total of 18.6% of screened patients showed risks or problems requiring in-depth assessment and intervention. An average of 5.9 treatment and intervention protocols were triggered and activated per in-depth assessee. CONCLUSIONS: The pre-operative geriatric assessment was welcomed by doctors and nurses and by management, as well as patients' families. The success in the preliminary screening and secondary activation of geriatric protocols for elective surgery is expressed in the doubting of proactive calls from surgery wards for the Geriatric team during the first 6 months of service implementation. SUMMARY: The screening of elderly patients above 70 years of age in elective surgery focuses resources on only one fifth of them, who are at geriatric risk. Providing solutions for the individual, the system, the family and the post-discharge services, improves care during hospitalization and afterwards.

The characteristics of diabetic residents in European nursing homes: results from the SHELTER study.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to describe the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in European nursing homes (NHs), and the health and functional characteristics of diabetic residents (DMR) aged 60 years and older. DESIGN: Between 2009 and 2011, the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) project, a 12-month prospective cohort study, was conducted to assess NH residents across different health care systems in 7 European countries and Israel. METHODS: The study included 59 NHs in 8 countries with a total of 4037 residents living in or admitted to a NH during the 3-month enrollment period. The multidimensional InterRAI instrument for Long-Term Care Facilities (InterRAI-LTCF) was used to assess health and functional status among residents. Descriptive statistics and linear, ordinal, and logistic regression were used to perform the analyses. RESULTS: We found a 21.8% prevalence of DM among NH residents. Residents with DM (DMRs) were significantly younger compared with non-DMRs (82.3, SD ± 7.7; 84.6, SD ± 8.4; P < .001). DMRs were more frequently overweight or obese, and presented more often with ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, and stroke than residents without DM. DMRs also took more drugs, had pressure ulcers (PU) or other wounds more often, and more frequently had urinary incontinence (UI); they also reported worse self-perceived health. DM independently of other factors increased risk of PU occurrence (odds ratio 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.86; P = .036) and decreased probability of higher pain scores (B = -0.28; 95% CI -0.41 to -0.14; P < .001). DM was not associated with ADL dependency, cognitive impairment, and depression in NH residents. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of DM in European NH residents is comparable to US national NH surveys, and to UK and German NH data based on glucose-level testing. DMRs compared with non-DMRs have more comorbid conditions, and a particularly higher incidence of cardiovascular diseases and obesity, PU, and severe UI. DMRs should be regarded as a specific group of residents who require an interdisciplinary approach in medical and nursing care.

Impact of dual sensory impairment on onset of behavioral symptoms in European nursing homes: results from the Services and Health for Elderly in Long-Term Care study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate if dual sensory impairment (DSI) in the form of a combined visual and hearing impairment is associated with the onset of behavioral symptoms in nursing homes. METHODS: A total of 1524 nursing home residents without behavioral symptoms at baseline followed for 12 months in 59 nursing homes from the Czech Republic, England, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, and The Netherlands. The interRAI instrument for long-term care facilities was assessed by trained staff at baseline and 12 months later. RESULTS: Altogether, 11% of residents had a new onset of behavioral symptoms (wandering, verbal abuse, physical abuse, socially inappropriate behavior, public disrobing, and resisting care) at 12-month follow-up. In multivariate analyses adjusted for potential confounders, DSI residents had significantly higher incidence of new behavioral symptoms at 12-month follow-up, irrespective of the severity of vision and hearing impairments [odds ratio (OR) = 2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.3:3.4 for mild DSI, OR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.6:4.0 for moderate DSI, and OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.2:3.7 for severe DSI] compared with residents without sensory impairment. Among the different types of symptoms, only abusive behaviors were less likely to be associated with DSI. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that DSI could play a significant role in the development of behavioral symptoms in nursing home residents. More attention should be paid to DSI even when each of vision and hearing function is only minimally impaired.

Insomnia in long-term care facilities: a comparison of seven European countries and Israel: the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess insomnia and its correlates as part of the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) study, funded by the 7th Framework Programme of the European Union. DESIGN: Cross-cultural investigation. SETTING: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in eight European countries (Czech Republic, France, Finland, Germany, England, the Netherlands, Italy) and one non-European country (Israel). PARTICIPANTS: Elderly residents (N = 4,156) of 57 LTCFs. MEASUREMENTS: Information on insomnia, age, sex, activities of daily living (ADLs), cognitive status, depression, major stressful life events, physical activity, fatigue, pain, and sleep medication use was extracted from the International Resident Assessment Instrument (interRAI)LTCF instrument. Rates of insomnia and its correlates were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with insomnia, controlling for demographic variables. RESULTS: The prevalence of insomnia was 24% (range 13-30%), with significant differences between countries (P < .001). More insomnia complaints were reported in older than younger residents (P < .001). Higher rates of insomnia were associated with hypnosedatives and depression in all countries (P < .001) and with stressful life events, fatigue, and pain in most countries (P < .001). No associations were found between insomnia and ADLs, physical activity, or cognitive status. Age, depression, stressful life events, fatigue, pain and hypnosedatives were independent significant predictors of insomnia, controlling for all other variables and for country. CONCLUSION: Hypnosedatives and depression were strong predictors of insomnia beyond cultural differences. Overall, psychosocial variables were more strongly related to insomnia than functional and mental capacities.

Prevalence and correlates of hearing and visual impairments in European nursing homes: results from the SHELTER study.

BACKGROUND: Visual and hearing impairments are known to be related to functional disability, cognitive impairment, and depression in community-dwelling older people. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of sensory impairment in nursing home residents, and whether sensory impairment is related to other common clinical problems in nursing homes, mediated by functional disability, cognitive impairment, and depressive symptoms. METHODS: Cross-sectional data of 4007 nursing home residents in 59 facilities in 8 countries from the SHELTER study were analyzed. Visual and hearing impairments were assessed by trained staff using the interRAI instrument for Long-Term Care Facilities. Generalized linear mixed models adjusted for functional disability, cognitive impairment, and depressive symptoms were used to analyze associations of sensory impairments with prevalence of clinical problems, including behavioral symptoms, incontinence, fatigue, falls, problems with balance, sleep, nutrition, and communication. RESULTS: Of the participants, 32% had vision or hearing impairment (single impairment) and another 32% had both vision and hearing impairments (dual impairment). Residents with single impairment had significantly higher rates of communication problems, fatigue, balance problems, and sleep problems, as compared with residents without any sensory impairment. Those with dual impairment had significantly higher rates of all clinical problems assessed in this study as compared with those without sensory impairment. For each clinical problem, the magnitude of the odds ratio for specific clinical problems was higher for dual impairment than for single impairment. CONCLUSION: Visual and hearing impairments are associated with higher rates of common clinical problems among nursing home residents, independent of functional disability, cognitive impairment, and depressive symptoms.

Prevalence and correlates of cardiovascular medication use among nursing home residents with ischemic heart disease: results from the SHELTER study.

OBJECTIVES: Despite being the highest group of users of many medications, older individuals remain underrepresented in clinical trials. This leaves a gap in evidence to guide management of many conditions, such as ischemic heart disease (IHD), in this population. This study aimed to describe factors associated with IHD medication use among nursing home residents in 7 European countries and Israel to depict challenges facing disease management in this population. DESIGN: This study was a retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The sample included 4156 nursing home residents in the SHELTER study. MEASUREMENT: All residents were assessed using the interRAI Long-Term Care Facility (LTCF) instrument. Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and/or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), beta-blocker (BB), antiaggregants (including acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]) and statins was analyzed. Based on the use of these medications, residents were classified into groups by medication use (as nonusers, 1-2 medications, or 3-4 medications). Generalized Estimation Equation modeling was used to explore predictors of medication use from items on the LTCF instrument as well as facility questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the 1050 residents with IHD, medication use was 77.7% overall, but only 16.9% were receiving 3 to 4 medications. Use of antiaggregants was highest at 51.7% and variations in medication use were observed by country (highest in France and lowest in Italy). Functional disability was the strongest predictor of medication use, reducing the likelihood of any or optimal management. Severe cognitive impairment also reduced the likelihood of optimal management, and comorbidity generally increased the likelihood of medication use. Polypharmacy reduced the likelihood of use of 3 to 4 medications for IHD. CONCLUSION: Optimal management of IHD in nursing home residents was low and varied by country. Individual characteristics seemed to predict IHD medication use, suggesting prescribing bias and an effect of population differences from clinical trial cohorts.

Treatment of pain in European nursing homes: results from the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm Care (SHELTER) study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain management approaches and associated factors in nursing home residents across Europe. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: Cross-sectional study with 4156 residents who were assessed using the interRAI instrument for Long Term Care Facilities (interRAI LTCF), including pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain management modalities. Those reporting pain were included in the analyses (n = 1900). A deeper analysis was performed for the subsample of residents who reported "current pain," defined as pain at least 1 day within the past 3 days (n = 838), and those who reported "current pain of moderate to severe intensity" (n = 590). RESULTS: Up to 24% of residents who reported pain did not receive any pain medication and up to 11% received it only PRN (as-needed basis), independent of current pain-intensity levels; 61% did not receive any nonpharmacological treatment and 21% received neither pharmacological nor nonpharmacological pain modalities. Considerable differences could be demonstrated across European countries. Factors positively associated with pharmacological pain management were being of female gender, reporting cancer, and having moderate or severe pain. High turnover rates of regular staff and low-to-moderate physicians' availability were negatively associated. Factors positively associated with nonpharmacological treatment were fractures and need of assistance in activities of daily living. Dementia, large nursing home facilities, above-average and high turnover rates of nursing staff, a low physicians' availability, and severe pain intensity were negatively associated. CONCLUSION: Despite some advances in recent years, pain treatment in European nursing home residents remains to be suboptimal and requires further improvement.

Polypharmacy and mortality among nursing home residents with advanced cognitive impairment: results from the SHELTER study.

INTRODUCTION: Older adults with advanced cognitive impairment have a limited life expectancy and the use of multiple drugs is of questionable benefit in this population. The aim of the present study was to assess if, in a sample of nursing home (NH) residents with advanced cognitive impairment, the effect of polypharmacy on mortality differs depending on estimated life expectancy. METHODS: Data were from the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) project, a study collecting information on residents admitted to 57 NHs in 8 European countries. Polypharmacy was defined as the concomitant use of 10 or more drugs. Limited life expectancy was estimated based on an Advanced Dementia Prognostic Tool (ADEPT) score of 13.5 or more. A Cognitive Performance Scale score of 5 or more was used to define advanced cognitive impairment. Participants were followed for 1 year. RESULTS: Mean age of 822 residents with advanced cognitive impairment entering the study was 84.6 (SD 8.0) years, and 630 (86.6%) were women. Overall, 123 participants (15.0%) had an ADEPT score of 13.5 or more (indicating limited life expectancy) and 114 (13.9%) were on polypharmacy. Relative to residents with ADEPT score less than 13.5, those with ADEPT score of 13.5 or higher had a lower use of benzodiazepines, antidementia drugs, and statins but a higher use of beta-blockers, digoxin, and antibiotics. Polypharmacy was associated with increased mortality among residents with ADEPT score of 13.5 or more (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-4.17), but not among those with ADEPT score less than 13.5 (adjusted HR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.71-1.71). DISCUSSION: Polypharmacy is associated with increased mortality in NH residents with advanced cognitive impairment at the end of life. CONCLUSION: These findings underline the need to assess life expectancy in older adults to improve the prescribing process and to simplify drug regimens.

The calculation of quality indicators for long term care facilities in 8 countries (SHELTER project).

BACKGROUND: Performance indicators in the long term care sector are important to evaluate the efficiency and quality of care delivery. We are, however, still far from being able to refer to a common set of indicators at the European level.We therefore demonstrate the calculation of Long Term Care Facility Quality Indicators (LTCFQIs) from data of the European Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm Care (SHELTER) project. We explain how risk factors are taken into account and show how LTC facilities at facility and country level can be compared on quality of care using thresholds and a Quality Indicator sum measure. METHODS: The indicators of Long Term Care Facility quality of care are calculated based on methods that have been developed in the US. The values of these Quality Indicators (QIs) are risk adjusted on the basis of covariates resulting from logistic regression analysis on each of the QIs. To enhance the comparison of QIs between facilities and countries we have used the method of percentile thresholds and developed a QI sum measure based on percentile outcomes. RESULTS: In SHELTER data have been collected with the interRAI Long Term Care Facility instrument (interRAI-LTCF). The data came from LTC facilities in 7 European countries and Israel. The unadjusted values of the LTCF Quality Indicators differ considerably between facilities in the 8 countries. After risk adjustment the differences are less, but still considerable. Our QI sum measure facilitates the overall comparison of quality of care between facilities and countries. CONCLUSIONS: With quality indicators based on assessments with the interRAI LTCF instrument quality of care between LTC facilities in and across nations can be adequately compared.

Pain characteristics and pain control in European nursing homes: cross-sectional and longitudinal results from the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) study.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: Few studies have compared cross-national characteristics of residents with pain in European long term care facilities. The SHELTER project, a cross-national European study on nursing home residents, provides the opportunity to examine this issue. The present study aimed to evaluate key figures about pain and compare them with seven European countries and Israel. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: A total of 3926 nursing home residents were assessed by the interRAI instrument for Long Term Care Facilities (interRAI LTCF). Prevalence of pain, frequency, intensity, consistency, and control were estimated and compared cross-nationally. Correlates between patient-related characteristics and inadequate pain management were tested using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 1900 (48.4%) residents suffered from pain. Pain prevalence varied significantly among countries, ranging from 19.8% in Israel to 73.0% in Finland. Pain was positively associated with female gender, fractures, falls, pressure ulcers, sleeping disorders, unstable health conditions, cancer, depression, and number of drugs. It was negatively associated with dementia. In a multivariate logistic regression model, all associations remained except for sleeping disorders. Clinical correlations varied considerably among countries. Although in 88.1% of cases, pain was self-rated by the residents as sufficiently controlled, in only 56.8% of cases was pain intensity self-rated as absent or mild. Pain control and intensity improved within 1 year. CONCLUSION: Pain prevalence is high and varies considerably across Europe. Although most residents considered pain as adequately controlled, a closer look confirmed that many still suffer from high pain intensities. Analyzing the reasons behind these differences may help to improve pain management.

Polypharmacy in nursing home residents with severe cognitive impairment: results from the SHELTER Study.

OBJECTIVE: Pharmacological treatment of older adults with cognitive impairment represents a challenge for prescribing physicians, and polypharmacy is common in these complex patients. The aim of the current study is to assess prevalence and factors related to polypharmacy in a sample of nursing home (nursing home) residents with advanced cognitive impairment. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1449 nursing home residents with advanced cognitive impairment participating to the Services and Health for Elderly in Long Term Care (SHELTER) project, a study collecting information on residents admitted to 57 nursing home in eight countries. Data were collected using the International Resident Assessment Instrument (InterRAI) for long-term care facilities. Polypharmacy status was categorized into three groups: nonpolypharmacy (zero to four drugs), polypharmacy (five to nine drugs), and excessive polypharmacy (≥10 drugs). RESULTS: Polypharmacy was observed in 735 residents (50.7%) and excessive polypharmacy was seen in 245 (16.9%). Compared with nonpolypharmacy, excessive polypharmacy was associated directly with ischemic heart disease (odds ratio [OR], 3.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.01-6.74), diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.66; 95% CI; 1.46-4.84), Parkinson's disease (OR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.36-5.85), gastrointestinal symptoms (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.43-3.39), pain (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.99-4.89), dyspnea (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.31-5.07), and recent hospitalization (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.36-5.85). An inverse relation with excessive polypharmacy was shown for age (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59-0.93), activities of daily living disability (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.99) and presence of a geriatrician on the nursing home staff (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.64). CONCLUSION: Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy are common among nursing home residents with advanced cognitive impairment. Determinants of polypharmacy status includes not only comorbidities, but also specific symptoms, age, and functional status. A geriatrician in the facility is associated with lower prevalence of excessive polypharmacy.

Inappropriate drugs in elderly patients with severe cognitive impairment: results from the shelter study.

BACKGROUND: It has been estimated that Nursing Home (NH) residents with impaired cognitive status receive an average of seven to eight drugs daily. The aim of this study was to determine prevalence and factors associated with use of inappropriate drugs in elderly patients with severe cognitive impairment living in NH in Europe. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from a sample of 1449 NH residents with severe cognitive impairment, participating in the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) study were analysed. Inappropriate drug use was defined as the use of drugs classified as rarely or never appropriate in patients with severe cognitive impairment based on the Holmes criteria published in 2008. RESULTS: Mean age of participating residents was 84.2±8.9 years, 1087 (75.0%) were women. Inappropriate drug use was observed in 643 (44.9%) residents. Most commonly used inappropriate drugs were lipid-lowering agents (9.9%), antiplatelet agents (excluding Acetylsalicylic Acid - ASA -) (9.9%), acetylcholinesterase, inhibitors (7.2%) and antispasmodics (6.9%). Inappropriate drug use was directly associated with specific diseases including diabetes (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.21-2.24), heart failure (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.04-2.09), stroke (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.06-1.93), and recent hospitalization (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.20-2.39). An inverse relation was shown between inappropriate drug use and presence of a geriatrician in the facility (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.39-0.77). CONCLUSION: Use of inappropriate drugs is common among older EU NH residents. Determinants of inappropriate drug use include comorbidities and recent hospitalization. Presence of a geriatrician in the facility staff is associated with a reduced rate of use of these medications.

Assessment of nursing home residents in Europe: the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) study.

BACKGROUND: Aims of the present study are the following: 1. to describe the rationale and methodology of the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) study, a project funded by the European Union, aimed at implementing the interRAI instrument for Long Term Care Facilities (interRAI LTCF) as a tool to assess and gather uniform information about nursing home (NH) residents across different health systems in European countries; 2. to present the results about the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the interRAI LTCF instrument translated into the languages of participating countries; 3 to illustrate the characteristics of NH residents at study entry. METHODS: A 12 months prospective cohort study was conducted in 57 NH in 7 EU countries (Czech Republic, England, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands) and 1 non EU country (Israel). Weighted kappa coefficients were used to evaluate the reliability of interRAI LTCF items. RESULTS: Mean age of 4156 residents entering the study was 83.4 ± 9.4 years, 73% were female. ADL disability and cognitive impairment was observed in 81.3% and 68.0% of residents, respectively. Clinical complexity of residents was confirmed by a high prevalence of behavioral symptoms (27.5% of residents), falls (18.6%), pressure ulcers (10.4%), pain (36.0%) and urinary incontinence (73.5%). Overall, 197 of the 198 the items tested met or exceeded standard cut-offs for acceptable test-retest and inter-rater reliability after translation into the target languages. CONCLUSION: The interRAI LTCF appears to be a reliable instrument. It enables the creation of databases that can be used to govern the provision of long-term care across different health systems in Europe, to answer relevant research and policy questions and to compare characteristics of NH residents across countries, languages and cultures.

Polypharmacy in nursing home in Europe: results from the SHELTER study.

BACKGROUND: This study assesses prevalence and patients characteristics related to polypharmacy in a sample of nursing home residents. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis on 4,023 nursing home residents participating to the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) project, a study collecting information on residents admitted to 57 nursing home in 8 countries. Data were collected using the interRAI instrument for long-term care facilities. Polypharmacy status was categorized in 3 groups: non-polypharmacy (0-4 drugs), polypharmacy (5-9 drugs) and excessive polypharmacy (≥ 10 drugs). RESULTS: Polypharmacy was observed in 2,000 (49.7%) residents and excessive polypharmacy in 979 (24.3%) residents. As compared with non-polypharmacy, excessive polypharmacy was directly associated not only with presence of chronic diseases but also with depression (odds ratio [OR] 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-2.37), pain (OR 2.31; 95% CI 1.80-2.97), dyspnoea (OR 2.29; 95% CI 1.61-3.27), and gastrointestinal symptoms (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.35-2.21). An inverse association with excessive polypharmacy was shown for age (OR for 10 years increment 0.85; 95% CI 0.74-0.96), activities of daily living disability (OR for assistance required vs independent 0.90; 95% CI 0.64-1.26; OR for dependent vs independent 0.59; 95% CI 0.40-0.86), and cognitive impairment (OR for mild or moderate vs intact 0.64; 95% CI 0.47-0.88; OR for severe vs intact 0.39; 95% CI 0.26-0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy are common among nursing home residents in Europe. Determinants of polypharmacy status include not only comorbidity but also specific symptoms, age, functional, and cognitive status.

For-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes in Israel: do they differ with respect to quality of care?

There has long been concern whether care is better in for-profit (FP) or not-for-profit (NFP) nursing homes (NHs). In order to answer this question in the Israeli context, a cross-sectional study of quality was undertaken, as measured by the Ministry of Health (MoH) assessment teams. We examined a convenience sample of 127 NHs (48 NFP, 79 FP), comprising approximately three quarters of Israel's 193 such institutions at the time of the study (1998-2001). A 100-point composite scale was designed derived from the detailed assessments of seven different professions. The quality of care on average was better in NFP (67/100 points) compared to FP (55/100 points) institutions (p<0.01). This differential was maintained even after adjusting for potential confounders such as the daily rate paid, institutional size and staffing levels. While homes belonging to both sectors were to be found among those receiving good to excellent grades, only FPs received lower quality scores. We conclude that in Israel, as in many other jurisdictions studied, FP NHs provide poorer care than NFPs, possibly due to a conflict between the demands of patient care and the desire to maximize profits in the FP institutions.

Predictors of rehabilitation outcomes: a comparison of Israeli and Italian geriatric post-acute care (PAC) facilities using the minimum data set (MDS).

OBJECTIVES: To understand the relative contribution of sociodemographic, clinical, and health care features to rehabilitation outcomes in Israel and in Italy in post-acute care (PAC) facilities. DESIGN: Prospective cross-national study SETTING: Two hospital geriatric PAC departments: Harzfeld Geriatric Hospital, Gedera, Israel, and Catholic University of Sacred Heart Geriatric Hospital, Rome, Italy. PARTICIPANTS: Post-acute care patients aged 65 and older admitted consecutively for stabilization, improvement, or rehabilitation to 3 departments in Harzfeld Geriatric Hospital, Gedera, Israel from April, 1999 through February, 2002 (N = 364), and to the post-acute Geriatric Rehabilitation Unit of the "A. Gemelli" Hospital, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy, between February, 1999, and April, 2002 (N = 351), for whom there were complete assessments at admission and discharge (the total number admitted in Israel was 505, and in Italy, 409). MEASUREMENTS: Minimum Data Set for Post-Acute Care (MDS-PAC) assessments conducted within 4 days of admission and at discharge; data collected identically in both sites. Predictors of functional recovery> were identified using multivariate binary logistic regression. The dependent variable: improvement of 1 or more points in the ADL scale. RESULTS: The staffing pattern of the PAC department in Italy had about double the physicians and physio- and occupational therapists than in Israel, but about the same number of nurses and somewhat fewer aides than in Israel. Multivariate binary logistic regression that includes country, age, sex, and marital status, found that the patients in Italy had about triple the probability of improvement in ADL function (OR 3.3, CI 2.4-4.6) (P < .001) than PAC patients in Israel. Even after health system characteristics were added to the model, ADL improvement was most significantly associated with higher cognitive ability and a diagnosis of hip fracture, as well as longer length of stay and being admitted to PAC directly from an acute hospital. For each additional point (worse cognition) in a cognitive scale, there was a 30% decrease in the probability of ADL improvement (OR 0.7, CI 0.6-0.8, P < .001). Those who had a stroke were about half as likely to show ADL improvement (OR 0.5, CI 0.3-0.7) than those without stroke, but those with a hip fracture had more than double the probability of ADL improvement (OR 2.7, CI 1.7-4.2) than those without hip fracture. Those who stayed in the PAC ward an additional block of time had a 30% higher probability of ADL improvement (P < .1), and those who were admitted directly to PAC from an acute hospital had more than 4 times the probability of ADL improvement (OR 4.1, CI 2.3-7.0, P < .001) than those who were admitted from a private home. CONCLUSIONS: We found support for the hypothesis that differences in sociodemographic and clinical factors cannot account for all differences in ADL improvement, and that the organization of care and constraints of the health system also influence functional outcomes. Policymakers should examine the policy-amenable features of the Italian and Israeli systems so that optimal ADL recovery can be encouraged. Any reduction in disability will help both patients and the health care system; slightly higher short-term PAC treatment costs may have large long-term future benefits, if they result in the reduction of ADL disability. This study is one of the first to examine outcomes of PAC in 2 countries, and can provide an initial assessment of how rehabilitation can be enhanced or limited by health policies and staffing patterns.