ABSTRACT
The clinical implications of the presence of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR)-specific intrathecal immunoglobulin G synthesis and whether it determines the diagnosis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis have not been thoroughly investigated yet. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the detection of intrathecal anti-NMDAR-specific IgG synthesis contributes to the diagnostic confirmation of anti-NMDAR encephalitis, to disease severity, and to prognosis in patients with positive serum anti-NMDAR-IgG. In this study, patients with detectable anti-NMDAR IgG in serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were included and separated into two groups that either met the 2016 criteria by Graus et al. of definite anti-NMDAR encephalitis (n = 27) or did not (n = 15). In a total, of 80 paired CSF/serum samples, antibody titers were titrated manually and end-point titer levels were carefully determined in a blinded manner to the subgroup attribution. The disease course was assessed via the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and prognosis was estimated by the anti-NMDAR Encephalitis One-Year Functional Status (NEOS) score. With respect to whether the diagnostic Graus criteria for definite anti-NMDAR encephalitis were fulfilled, a significantly unequal distribution of intrathecal anti-NMDAR antibody-specific synthesis could be shown with a high negative predictive value in case of a negative anti-NMDAR antibody-specific index (NMDAR AI, p = .008. OR = 23.9, sensitivity = 1.0, specificity = 0.4, negative predictive value = 1). A weak correlation was found between the CSF antibody titer and mRS value at the time of sample collection (rs = .37, p = .008, 95% CI [.09, .59]). During the disease course a higher delta-mRS value formed of the mRS at initial presentation minus that at the last recorded presentation correlated with a higher NMDAR AI at first lumbar puncture (rs = - .56, p = .017, 95% CI [- .83, - .11]). No association with the prognostic NEOS score was found. In conclusion, a negative antibody-specific index for anti-NMDAR IgG antibodies has a highly negative predictive value for the diagnosis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Yet, a positive NMDAR AI alone does not allow the diagnosis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis.
Subject(s)
Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis , Humans , Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate , Prognosis , Antibodies , Disease ProgressionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: IgPro20 is the first approved subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) preparation for the treatment of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Two different doses of the SCIg preparation were investigated in the pivotal PATH study. Real-world data, and particularly the efficacy of an equivalent dose switch from intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) to SCIg, are still not available. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 41 patients with CIDP treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) were changed to an equivalent (1:1) dose of IgPro20 1 week after last IVIg treatment. Patients were examined at the time of switch from IVIg to SCIg, after 3 and after 6 months and efficacy, treatment preferences and systemic and local reactions were assessed. RESULTS: Various clinical outcome parameters demonstrated overall stability regarding disability, general activity and social participation, grip and muscle strength, as well as gait impairment. Treatment satisfaction remained unchanged between IVIg and SCIg therapy. However, 88% of patients favoured treatment with subcutaneous IgPro20 over IVIg 6 months after switch to IgPro20. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate that the switch of IVIg to an equivalent dose of SCIg represents an effective and preferred treatment option for CIDP patients.
ABSTRACT
(1) Background: Dimethylfumarate (DMF) has been approved for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. However, the mode of action of DMF and its assumed active primary metabolite monomethylfumarate (MMF) is still not fully understood. Former reports suggest a neuroprotective effect of DMF mediated via astrocytes by reducing pro-inflammatory activation of these glial cells. We investigated potential direct effects of DMF and MMF on neuroprotective factors like neurotrophic factors and growth factors in astrocytes to elucidate further possible mechanisms of the mode of action of fumaric acids; (2) Methods: highly purified cultures of primary rat astrocytes were pre-treated in vitro with DMF or MMF and incubated with lipopolysaccharides (LPS) or a mixture of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) plus interleukin 1 beta (IL-1ß) in order to simulate an inflammatory environment. The gene expression of neuroprotective factors such as neurotrophic factors (nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF)) and growth factors (fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), platelet-derived growth factor subunit A (PDGFa), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF)) as well as cytokines (tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-1ß, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)) was examined by determining the transcription level with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR); (3) Results: The stimulation of highly purified astrocytes with either LPS or cytokines changed the expression profile of growth factors and pro- inflammatory factors. However, the expression was not altered by either DMF nor MMF in unstimulated or stimulated astrocytes; (4) Conclusions: There was no direct influence of fumaric acids on neuroprotective factors in highly purified primary rat astrocytes. This suggests that the proposed potential neuroprotective effect of fumaric acid is not mediated by direct stimulation of neurotrophic factors in astrocytes but is rather mediated by other pathways or indirect mechanisms via other glial cells like microglia as previously demonstrated.
