Sunscreen Use for Photoprotection in Skin of Color: A Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: To understand the prevalence and types of publications addressing darker skin types within the existing evidence base for sunscreen use.  Evidence Review: PubMed was searched from 1988, the time point at which the first skin of color (SOC) article was identified, through December 2022 using PubMed's Medical Subject Headings terms and keyword searches in title and abstract, with and without terms for SOC and ethnicity. Identified articles were reviewed for relevance, de-duplicated, and categorized; results are summarized. FINDINGS: Of the 5927 articles on sunscreen overall, only 314 (5.3%) articles addressed SOC, with the majority published since 2007 and representing only 4% to 7% of total publications annually except in 2022 when the proportion of SOC articles was 23.5%. Of the articles on SOC, many reported sunscreen knowledge and patient behaviors (29%), but very few reported clinical trials (5%). The 3 conditions most often discussed were melasma, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, and dyschromia. South Asian ethnicities (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh) had the highest representation within the literature, followed by Hispanics. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although it was assumed there would be fewer papers discussing the use of sunscreen in darker skin types, the scale of the disparity revealed by this study is stark. The increase in a number of articles in 2022 suggests an increasing focus on SOC, but further discussion of the issues presented here will help the SOC community address gaps in the evidence base and better inform discussions on sunscreen and photoprotection between clinicians and patients.J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(7):575-577.  doi:10.36849/JDD.8250.

A Practical Algorithm Integrating Skin Care With Nonenergy and Injectable Dermatologic Procedures to Improve Patient Outcomes and Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: The most rapidly increasing medical aesthetic procedures for facial antiaging comprise nonenergy and injectable treatments. Currently, standards for skin care before, during, and after nonenergy and injectable treatments are lacking. The algorithm on supportive skin care for facial antiaging nonenergy and injectable treatments aims to stimulate healing, reduce downtime, and improve comfort and treatment outcomes.  Methods: A panel of 7 global physicians employed a modified Delphi method and reached a consensus on an algorithm for supportive skin care for nonenergy and injectable antiaging treatments based on the best available evidence and the panel members’ clinical experiences and opinions. RESULTS: The algorithm has a pretreatment (starts 2 – 4 weeks before the procedure) and treatment or ongoing (day of treatment) section, followed by care after the procedure (0 – 7 days) and follow-up care (1 – 4 weeks after the procedure). Applying a broad-spectrum sunscreen with an SPF 30 or higher, combined with protective measures, such as wearing a wide-brimmed hat and sunglasses, is recommended to protect the face from sun exposure. Dyschromia is a significant concern for those with richly pigmented skin. Clinicians may recommend skin care using a gentle cleanser and moisturizer containing vitamins C and E, retinoid, or other ingredients, such as niacinamide, kojic acid, licorice root extract, azelaic acid, and tranexamic acid, depending on the patient's facial skin condition. CONCLUSION: Nonenergy and injectable procedures combined with skin care or topical treatments may improve outcomes and patient satisfaction. Topical antioxidants and free radical quenchers can combat photodamage and may offer a safe alternative to topical hydroquinone.    J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(4):     doi:10.36849/JDD.7918.

Do Women with Skin of Color Think They Are Well Represented in Skin Aging Prevention Information?

Objective: There are clinical differences in healthy skin requirements and skin-aging features by race and ethnicity. However, individuals of color are underrepresented in dermatology-related medical information. We sought to gather information from women of color regarding their attitudes about the importance of the prevention of skin aging, available information, and perception of representation in skin-aging prevention information. Methods: This study involved an observational, cross-sectional, online survey of women aged 18 to 70 years residing in the United States. Participants were placed into one of seven cohorts based on self-reported race/ethnicity. Relative frequencies of responses were compared across cohorts; adjusted logistic regression was used to assess perception of representation in skin-aging prevention information. Results: The mean age of the 1,646 participants was 44.4 years. The mean (standard deviation) rating (from 0, "not at all important" to 10, "extremely important") of the importance of the prevention of skin aging ranged from 7.3 to 8.2 across the seven cohorts. All cohorts reported the most trusted source of information for skin-aging prevention products and treatments was a skin-care professional, but not all cohorts believed they are well represented in available sources of information. Older age, lower median household income, and a race/ethnicity of Black, Asian, "Other," and "More Than One Race" were less likely to report being well represented. Limitations: People without internet access could not participate, potentially excluding some older and lower-income groups. Conclusion: Women of color are less likely to feel represented in available information on the prevention of skin aging.