ABSTRACT
In a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial, ciprofloxacin (250 mg orally, twice daily) was compared with cinoxacin (500 mg orally, twice daily) in 60 patients with urinary tract infections. Most patients were women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Escherichia coli was the most common isolate (36 patients). Clinical and microbiologic cure occurred in 20 of 24 (83 percent) evaluable patients treated with ciprofloxacin, compared with 15 of 21 (71 percent) evaluable patients treated with cinoxacin. Ciprofloxacin was well tolerated and had a low incidence of minor side effects that included Candida vaginitis, headache, and gastrointestinal intolerance. Relapse or failed therapy was not associated with the development of resistance.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Cinoxacin/therapeutic use , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Pyridazines/therapeutic use , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cinoxacin/adverse effects , Ciprofloxacin/adverse effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Digestive System/drug effects , Double-Blind Method , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Female , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Random AllocationABSTRACT
In a prospective, randomized trial, norfloxacin (400 mg perorally, twice a day) was compared with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (160-800 mg perorally, twice a day) in 45 patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Escherichia coli was the most common isolate. Infections due to Enterobacter spp., Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas spp., and Staphylococcus spp. were also treated. Norfloxacin was equivalent in effectiveness and safety to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, with a cure rate of 91% at the 5- to 9-day posttherapy visit and 88% at the 4- to 6-week posttherapy visit. It was well tolerated and had a low incidence of side effects.