ABSTRACT
The prognostic significance of tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) response in cutaneous melanoma is controversial. This analysis of data from a prospective, randomized trial included patients with cutaneous melanoma > or = 1.0 mm Breslow thickness who underwent wide local excision and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors associated with TIL response, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). A total of 515 patients were included; TIL response was classified as "brisk" (n = 100; 19.4%) or "non-brisk" (n = 415; 80.6%). Patients in the nonbrisk TIL group were more likely to have tumor-positive SLN (17.6% vs 7%; P = 0.0087). On multivariate analysis, nonbrisk TIL response, increased tumor thickness, and ulceration were significant independent predictors of tumor-positive SLN. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, 5-year DFS rate was 91 per cent for those with a brisk TIL response compared with 86 per cent in the nonbrisk group (P = 0.41). The 5-year OS rates were 95 per cent versus 84 per cent in the brisk versus nonbrisk TIL groups, respectively (P = 0.0083). However, on multivariate analysis, TIL response was not a significant independent factor predicting DFS or OS. TIL response is a significant predictor of SLN metastasis but is not a major predictor of DFS or OS.
Subject(s)
Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating/immunology , Melanoma/immunology , Melanoma/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/immunology , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prognosis , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The significance of mitotic rate (MR) in melanoma remains controversial. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of a prospective randomized trial that included patients with melanoma of 1.0 mm or greater, all patients underwent wide excision and sentinel node (sentinel lymph node [SLN]) biopsy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors predictive of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 551 patients had MR reported. A cut-off point of 6 mitoses/mm(2) best discriminated DFS and OS: 455 patients (82.6%) had MR less than 6/mm(2). SLN were tumor-positive in 14.7% of low MR versus 31.3% of high MR patients (P = .0003). There were significant differences in DFS (P = .0014) and OS (P = .0002) between the 2 groups, however, MR failed to remain significant in the multivariate model. CONCLUSIONS: MR is weakly predictive of SLN status but it is not an independent predictor of survival for melanomas 1.0 mm or thicker.