Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 41
Filter
9.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 43(8): 710-717, 2020 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32653096

ABSTRACT

Initial management of diabetic macular edema (DME) is well-defined, but there is a lack of national or international consensus for patients who do not respond or respond only partially to these treatments. Several studies, mostly retrospective, have assessed medication switches, but currently, the literature contains no randomized studies. The goal of this article is to present an algorithm for switching medications, which can be proposed to DME patients treated with anti-VEGF agents, as defined by a group of French retina experts, supported by the existing literature on the subject. After initiation of an anti-VEGF treatment for DME, the response is usually assessed after 5 monthly injections. A partial anatomical response (reduction of central retinal thickness between 10 and 20%), seen in 30 to 40% of patients, is associated with a favorable visual prognosis according to randomized studies. Continuation of the anti-VEGF injections after the induction phase is thus possible. If the response remains incomplete after 3 additional anti-VEGF injections, a complete ophthalmologic examination should be performed, and a switch to another therapeutic class (corticosteroids) may be proposed in the absence of contraindications. If a complete non-response is seen initially (reduction of central retinal thickness<10%), the switch is proposed immediately after the induction phase.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Drug Substitution/standards , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Drug Substitution/methods , Drug Substitution/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Macular Edema/epidemiology , Ranibizumab/administration & dosage , Ranibizumab/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies
10.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 43(3): 197-204, 2020 Mar.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32000989

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DI) for patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in real life. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric retrospective analysis of the change in visual acuity and central macular thickness (CMT) after intravitreal injection of the DI at peak efficacy (2 months after injection) as well as the timing of reinjections and complications in patients with a loss of vision due to DME. RESULTS: Forty eyes of 33 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 12.6 months. Thirty percent of the eyes experienced an increase in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA)>15 letters at peak efficacy (P<0.05) after each ID injection. Treatment-naive patients had a sustained response after Ozurdex injection, with better visual acuity at 3 months (P=0.02) and 4 months (P=0.04) than non-naïve patients and better visual acuity at 6 months despite identical baseline visual acuity (P<0.05). Anatomical efficacy was good, with approximately 60% of patients with CMT<300 microns at peak efficacy after each injection of ID. Thirty percent of eyes demonstrated ocular hypertension (OHT)>25mmHg at peak efficacy, and 12.5% of eyes required cataract surgery during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The DI has good functional and anatomic efficacy in these patients, with a good safety profile. Treatment-naïve patients with more recent DME had a more sustained increase in visual acuity after the injections and better visual recovery at 6 months. This encourages us to initiate DI therapy early if there is no response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment.


Subject(s)
Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Aged , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/pathology , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Drug Implants , Female , Fovea Centralis/diagnostic imaging , Fovea Centralis/drug effects , Fovea Centralis/pathology , France/epidemiology , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Macular Edema/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Visual Acuity/drug effects
14.
J Ophthalmol ; 2019: 7105246, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31308974

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: When fundus examination is not possible, ultrasonography (US) is an accurate tool for the diagnosis of retinal tears (RT). The aim of this study was to describe the predominant location of RT, the factors influencing their location, and the vitreous status of eyes with RT using US. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in all patients diagnosed with RT by B-scan US (Aviso, Quantel Médical, Clermont-Ferrand, France). The primary endpoint was to assess RT preferential location using US. Secondary endpoints were the rate of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD), number of eyes with multiple RT, and axial length (AL). RESULTS: A total of 101 eyes of 100 patients with RT were included. RT main location was in the superior quadrants (either nasal superior, strictly superior, or temporal superior) in 71% of cases. All patients were diagnosed with PVD by US, and 79% had a vitreous hemorrhage. Twelve eyes (13%) were diagnosed with multiple RT. The mean AL was 24.62 ± 2 mm, and it was significantly longer in eyes without superior RT (25.52 mm versus 24.37 mm; p=0.004). CONCLUSION: In this study, we showed a superior location of RT diagnosed by US in more than two-thirds of cases associated with a significantly shorter AL than in other locations. This finding could increase US sensitivity for RT detection and help to improve the US learning curve of ophthalmologists in training and surgical decision-making when the retina is inaccessible due to opacity media.

16.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 41(10): 904-909, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30470488

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess in a real life setting the progression of central retinal thickness (CRT) during the first month after surgery in diabetic patients without previous diabetic macular edema (DME) and to identify potential risk factors for DME leading to increased postoperative follow-up. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of diabetic patients without history of DME who underwent uncomplicated cataract surgery. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and SD-OCT were performed 7 days and 1 month after surgery. We assumed absence of preoperative DME when there was no edema of SD-OCT at D7. Our primary endpoint was the central retinal thickness (CRT) variation between 7 days and 1 month after cataract surgery in patients without previous history of DME. RESULTS: We included 55 eyes of 42 patients. BCVA was 0.57±0.72 logMar (20/80) prior to surgery and increased significantly to 0.11±0.17 (20/25) at one month (P=0.001) post-surgery. The mean baseline CRT was 209±35µm and 229±69µm (P=0.06) one month after surgery. Four eyes (7.4%) developed macular edema at one month. We found no linear correlation between HbA1C and CRT. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: We found no link between a high level of HbA1C and postoperative increase in CRT. We found that cataract surgery in diabetic patients without previous DME has no negative impact on CRT, and visual outcomes are good. We suggest that in diabetic patients without complete visual recovery at 1-month post-cataract surgery, OCT examination should be performed in order to detect an early stage of DME.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction , Diabetic Retinopathy/surgery , Macular Edema/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Retina/diagnostic imaging , Retina/pathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cataract/complications , Cataract/diagnosis , Cataract/pathology , Cataract Extraction/adverse effects , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/surgery , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Diabetic Retinopathy/pathology , Disease Progression , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Macular Edema/etiology , Macular Edema/pathology , Organ Size , Postoperative Complications/pathology , Postoperative Period , Prognosis , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Treatment Outcome
18.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 41(4): 363-367, 2018 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29678344

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Current screening recommendations for chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) retinopathy are based on central 10°C static perimetry and a high-resolution SD-OCT with a special attention to the inferior part of the macula where the toxicity usually starts by ellipsoid zone disruption. However, Melles and Marmor, have recently shown a great variability in the topography of the initial toxicity observed among various ethnicities, which is important to keep in mind so as not to miss early toxicity in certain subgroups of patients. METHODS: Review of the literature. RESULTS: Ethnic differences have been shown regarding the topography of the initial retinal toxicity of CQ and HCQ, particularly between Caucasian and Asian subjects. In Caucasians, the first signs of toxicity are more often localized in the inferior para-foveal area associated with a decrease in retinal sensitivity in the upper 10°C visual field. However, in Asian subjects, the first signs of toxicity appear more pericentral (still inferior) with an extramacular pattern that could be missed by the usual 10°C visual field screening. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The pathophysiology of these ethnic differences is unknown and may be due to distinct genetic predisposition to CQ and HCQ toxicity. Screening strategies should be adjusted to the ethnicity and performed in Asian subjects with larger visual fields (30°C), along with SD-OCT, looking for ellipsoid disruption≥8°C from the fovea. The recognition of this pericentral topography and an adjusted screening protocol should avoid late diagnosis in Asians treated with CQ and HCQ.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Chloroquine/adverse effects , Ethnicity , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Retina/pathology , Retinal Diseases/ethnology , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Asian People/genetics , Chloroquine/therapeutic use , Delayed Diagnosis , Early Diagnosis , Electroretinography , Ethnicity/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Macula Lutea/drug effects , Macula Lutea/pathology , Optical Imaging , Retina/drug effects , Retinal Diseases/chemically induced , Retinal Diseases/pathology , Retinal Diseases/physiopathology , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Visual Field Tests/methods , Visual Fields , White People/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...