Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32992629

ABSTRACT

A group of 142 bakers was studied in order to investigate the relationship between higher/lower respiratory signs/symptoms and inflammation biomarkers and occupational exposure to flour dust. A complete upper and lower respiratory tract evaluation was performed. Seven percent of bakers complained of lower respiratory symptoms, while 22% of them complained of upper respiratory symptoms. Fifty five percent of the bakers were allergic, and 37.1% showed sensitization to occupational allergens. Abnormal spirometries were found in 15% of bakers, while fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) was above the normal reference in 24.5% of them. Moreover, 23.8% of bakers were found to be hyposmic. Population mean peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) was in the normal range even if almost all the workers suffered from neutrophilic rhinitis at nasal cytology with the number of nasal neutrophils increasing with the increase of the duration of exposure to flour dust (p = 0.03). PNIF and FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in the 1st second) showed a positive correlation (p = 0.03; r = 0.19). The Tiffeneau index decreased with the increase of dust (p = 0.017). A similar result was obtained once we divided our population into smokers and non-smokers (p = 0.021). Long-term exposure to bakery dusts can lead to a status of minimal nasal inflammation and allergy.


Subject(s)
Hypersensitivity , Occupational Diseases , Occupational Exposure , Dust , Flour , Humans , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects
2.
Am J Ind Med ; 52(8): 596-602, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19533676

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since previous studies have provided conflicting results, we investigated the relationship between the risk of benign asbestos-related diseases and different aspects of asbestos exposure in previous asbestos workers who underwent low-dose computed tomography (CT). METHODS: CT scans were carried out in 772 subjects. A questionnaire was employed to collect data on smoking habits and duration, peak and cumulative exposure, and time since first exposure to asbestos. Multiple logistic regression models with stepwise selection of variables were used to evaluate the associations. RESULTS: Fourteen (1.8%) cases of asbestosis, 187 (24.2%) of pleural plaques (PP), and 50 (6.5%) of diffuse pleural thickening (DPT) were found. The significant risk factors were: cumulative exposure for asbestosis (P for trend = 0.004); time since first exposure (P for trend <0.001), and peak exposure (P for trend <0.001) for PP; and time since first exposure for DPT (P for trend = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Parenchymal asbestosis and PP are associated with different aspects of asbestos exposure. DPT appears to be less specific for asbestos exposure.


Subject(s)
Asbestos/toxicity , Asbestosis/epidemiology , Dose-Response Relationship, Immunologic , Lung Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Pleural Diseases/epidemiology , Asbestosis/diagnosis , Asbestosis/etiology , Confidence Intervals , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Lung Diseases/diagnosis , Lung Diseases/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Pleural Diseases/etiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
3.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 58(3): 175-80, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18346953

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low-dose computed tomography (CT) has been found to detect more Stage IA lung cancer than chest x-ray. AIMS: To investigate whether lung cancer screening with CT was effective and acceptable in former asbestos workers. METHODS: CT scanning was carried out following the protocol previously described in the literature. A questionnaire was used to assess cumulative asbestos exposure. An economic analysis was also performed. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. RESULTS: A total of 1119 male asbestos workers (58% of invited) were examined, of whom 65% were smokers or ex-smokers. Mean age was 57.1 years with mean cumulative exposure to asbestos of 123 fibres/ml x years. Pleural plaques were found in 375 workers (32%), while 338 workers (29%) were included in the radiological follow-up, which led to 25 biopsies (13 of lung, 9 of pleura, 3 of both) and five screen-detected lung cancers (0.4%), one in Stage I. Incidence rate was 149 per 10(5), equal to that in the male general population of similar age. The expenses for diagnosis were 1014 and 244962 Euro per screened subject and screen-detected lung cancer case, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Screening adherence and frequency of detection were low, while costs and radiation dose were high. In spite of a high cumulative asbestos exposure, lung cancer risk was not increased relative to the general population. The screening programme was not felt to be cost-effective from the perspective of the government as a third-party funding agency.


Subject(s)
Asbestos , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mass Screening/methods , Mesothelioma/diagnostic imaging , Occupational Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Costs and Cost Analysis , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/economics , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure , Pleural Diseases/diagnosis , Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics
5.
Soz Praventivmed ; 48(1): 65-9, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12756890

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To report the occurrence of mesotheliomas in Italy among subjects who worked, when migrant, at a cement-asbestos factory in Niederurnen, Switzerland, and had resettled to the home country. METHODS: Information about the disease and on the working history of subjects was collected by regional mesothelioma registries. Only cases diagnosed by means of histo-pathological examinations have been considered here. RESULTS: 15 mesotheliomas (13 pleural, 2 perithoneal; 12 among males, 3 among females) have been identified among Italians, who had worked at the factory. None of them had other occupational exposure to asbestos. The majority was living in the Veneto Region (North East of Italy), and in Puglia (Southern Italy). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to asbestos at this factory has already caused an important number of occupational cancers among the employees, a large fraction being constituted of migrants. In order to avoid under-estimation of risks and to allow compensation, diseases which occur among foreign workers returned to their home country should be evaluated. Migration for work is at the genesis of asbestos-related mesotheliomas now occurring in Italy.


Subject(s)
Asbestos/adverse effects , Construction Materials/adverse effects , Industry , Mesothelioma/epidemiology , Pleural Neoplasms/epidemiology , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emigration and Immigration , Female , Humans , Incidence , Italy/ethnology , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Switzerland , Workers' Compensation/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...