Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 42(13): 1488-1498, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38315944

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Literature evidence suggests that trabectedin monotherapy is effective in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) presenting BRCA mutation and/or BRCAness phenotype. METHODS: A prospective, open-label, randomized phase III MITO-23 trial evaluated the activity and safety of trabectedin 1.3 mg/m2 given once every 3 weeks (arm A) in BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers or patients with BRCAness phenotype (ie, patients who responded to ≥two previous platinum-based treatments) with recurrent OC, primary peritoneal carcinoma, or fallopian tube cancer in comparison with physician's choice chemotherapy in the control arm (arm B; pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, gemcitabine, once-weekly paclitaxel, or carboplatin). The primary end point was overall survival (OS) evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: Overall, 244 patients from 21 MITO centers were randomly assigned (arm A = 122/arm B = 122). More than 70% of patients received ≥three previous chemotherapy lines and 35.7% had received a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) before enrollment. Median OS was not significantly different between the arms: arm A: 15.8 versus arm B: 17.9 months (P = .304). Median progression-free survival was 4.9 months in arm A versus 4.4 months in arm B (P = .897). Among 208 patients evaluable for efficacy, the objective response rate was 17.1% in arm A and 21.4% in arm B, with comparable median duration of response (5.62 v 5.66 months, respectively). No superior effect was observed for trabectedin in the prespecified subgroup analyses according to BRCA mutational status, chemotherapy type, and pretreatment with a PARPi and/or platinum-free interval. Trabectedin showed a higher frequency of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and serious adverse drug reactions compared with control chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Trabectedin did not improve median OS and showed a worse safety profile in comparison with physician's choice control chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Mutation , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Ovarian Neoplasms , Trabectedin , Humans , Female , Trabectedin/therapeutic use , Trabectedin/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Aged , Adult , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Phenotype , Prospective Studies , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , Progression-Free Survival
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 167(3): 436-443, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36220670

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This open-label phase II clinical trial evaluated the antitumor activity and safety of trabectedin in patients with advanced ovarian (OC) or uterine carcinosarcomas (UC). METHODS: Eligible patients were adults (≥18 years) with histologically proven recurrent OC/UC not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy who received up to two prior chemotherapy lines. Trabectedin 1.3 mg/m2 was administered as a 3-h infusion every three weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as per RECIST v.1.1. If at least 8 of 43 patients (18.6%) achieve an objective response, trabectedin would be declared worthy for further investigations. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with either OC (n = 32) or UC (n = 13) from seven MITO centers across Italy were enrolled. The ORR was 11.9% (90% CI: 6-23) and included two patients with a complete response and three with a partial response. Eight patients (19.0%) had disease stabilization for a disease control rate of 31.0% (90% CI: 20-44). Median progression-free survival was 2.01 months (95% CI: 1.78-2.30) and median overall survival was 4.64 months (95% CI: 3.19-8.29). Neutrophil count decreases (n = 8, 18.2%) and transaminase increases (n = 6, 13.6%) were the most common grade 3-5 adverse events related with trabectedin. Two patients died due to trabectedin-related grade 5 hematological toxicity. CONCLUSION: Although trabectedin did not meet the prespecified activity criteria, it confers modest but clinically meaningful benefit to patients with advanced OC/UC as being as effective as any other available treatment for this indication. The toxicity profile appears in line with that previously reported for the drug.


Subject(s)
Ovarian Neoplasms , Tetrahydroisoquinolines , Uterine Neoplasms , Adult , Female , Humans , Trabectedin/adverse effects , Tetrahydroisoquinolines/adverse effects , Dioxoles/adverse effects , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/chemically induced , Progression-Free Survival , Uterine Neoplasms/drug therapy , Uterine Neoplasms/chemically induced , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/adverse effects , Disease-Free Survival
3.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 31(10): 1369-1373, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34607820

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients have a poor prognosis and few treatment options are available. Preclinical and clinical data demonstrated that the combination of poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors could have a synergistic antitumor activity in this setting of patients. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of niraparib plus dostarlimab compared with chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer patients not suitable for platinum treatment. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: This trial will assess the hypothesis that niraparib plus dostarlimab therapy is effective to increase overall survival, progression-free survival, and time to first subsequent therapy respect to chemotherapy alone, with an acceptable toxicity profile. TRIAL DESIGN: This is a phase III, multicenter trial, where recurrent ovarian cancer patients not eligible for platinum re-treatment will be randomized 1:1 to receive niraparib plus dostarlimab vs physician's choice chemotherapy until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of patient consent. The study will be performed according to European Network for Gynaecological Oncological Trial groups (ENGOT) model B and patients will be recruited from 40 sites across MITO, CEEGOG, GINECO, HeCOG, MANGO, and NOGGO groups. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Eligible patients must have recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer not eligible for platinum retreatment. Patients who received previous treatment with poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors will be eligible. No more than two prior lines of treatment are allowed. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: The primary endpoint is overall survival defined as the time from the randomization to the date of death by any cause. SAMPLE SIZE: 427 patients will be randomized. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: June 2024 TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04679064.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Indazoles/administration & dosage , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Piperidines/administration & dosage , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
4.
Target Oncol ; 16(1): 59-68, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33369704

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Targeted agents, such as antiangiogenic drugs (e.g., bevacizumab) and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (e.g., rucaparib), have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent ovarian cancer. Evidence suggests that combinations of these two classes of targeted agents may result in synergistic antitumor activity. OBJECTIVE: The phase I portion of MITO 25 was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics, and the safety profile of rucaparib when administered in combination with bevacizumab as maintenance treatment for patients with high-grade epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. METHODS: This was a single-arm, phase I dose-escalation study. Cohorts of three patients were recruited to receive increasing rucaparib doses of 400 mg, 500 mg, or 600 mg twice daily for 28 days. Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg was administered at day 1 every 21 days. RESULTS: We enrolled nine patients. Two patients in the rucaparib 600-mg group had four grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events: increased in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels, depression, and hallucinations. These were deemed to be dose-limiting toxicities related to rucaparib. Because these dose-limiting toxicities occurred in the 600-mg group and affected more than one in three patients, the maximum tolerated dose for rucaparib was considered 500 mg twice daily when combined with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg at day 1 every 21 days. There were no new safety concerns from using the combination. No substantial difference in pharmacokinetic parameters was found between the cohorts or in the pharmacokinetic profiles of rucaparib administered alone or with bevacizumab with respect to historical controls. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose of rucaparib is 500 mg twice daily when co-administered with bevacizumab. The plasma concentration-time profiles of rucaparib in combination with bevacizumab suggest no pharmacokinetic interactions between the drugs. The randomized phase II portion of MITO 25 will further investigate rucaparib maintenance treatment with or without bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed stage III-IV ovarian cancer who responded to carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03462212; registered March 2018.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/pharmacokinetics , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Indoles/pharmacokinetics , Indoles/therapeutic use , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Middle Aged
5.
Haematologica ; 106(2): 474-482, 2021 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32107331

ABSTRACT

The human fetal γ-globin gene is repressed in the adult stage through complex regulatory mechanisms involving transcription factors and epigenetic modifiers. Reversing γ-globin repression, or maintaining its expression by manipulating regulatory mechanisms, has become a major clinical goal in the treatment of ß-hemoglobinopathies. Here, we identify the orphan nuclear receptor Coup-TFII (NR2F2/ARP-1) as an embryonic/fetal stage activator of γ-globin expression. We show that Coup-TFII is expressed in early erythropoiesis of yolk sac origin, together with embryonic/fetal globins. When overexpressed in adult cells (including peripheral blood cells from human healthy donors and ß039 thalassemic patients) Coup-TFII activates the embryonic/fetal globins genes, overcoming the repression imposed by the adult erythroid environment. Conversely, the knock-out of Coup-TFII increases the ß/γ+ß globin ratio. Molecular analysis indicates that Coup-TFII binds in vivo to the ß-locus and contributes to its conformation. Overall, our data identify Coup-TFII as a specific activator of the γ-globin gene.


Subject(s)
Orphan Nuclear Receptors , gamma-Globins , COUP Transcription Factor II/genetics , COUP Transcription Factor II/metabolism , Carrier Proteins/genetics , Humans , Promoter Regions, Genetic , gamma-Globins/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...