Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
BMC Cancer ; 14: 485, 2014 Jul 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24996223

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To compare pain response outcomes for patients with spinal bone metastases treated with resistance training of the spinal musculature versus passive physical therapy during radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: In this randomized trial, 60 consecutive patients were treated from September 2011 until March 2013 within one of the two groups: resistance training (Arm A) or passive physical therapy (Arm B) with thirty patients in each group during RT. The course of pain according to visual analog scale (VAS), concurrent medication, and oral morphine equivalent dose (OMED) were assessed at baseline, three months, and six months after RT. Pain response was determined using International Bone Consensus response definitions. RESULTS: The course of VAS in the intervention group (Arm A) was significantly lower both during and after RT (AUC, p < .001). The use of analgetic medication showed the same result, with significantly fewer analgetics being necessary both during and after RT in arm A (p < .001). In the course of time, the OMED decreased in arm A, but increased in arm B. After 6 month, 72.2% of patients in arm A, and 22.2% in arm B were responders (p = .014). CONCLUSION: Our trial demonstrated that guided isometric resistance training of the paravertebral muscles can improve pain relief over a 6-months period in patients with stable spinal metastases. Importantly, the intervention was able to reduce OMED as well as concomitant pain medication. The trial is registered in Clinical trial identifier NCT 01409720 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/) since 2nd of August 2011.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Musculoskeletal Pain/therapy , Resistance Training , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Aged , Bone Neoplasms/complications , Bone Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Case-Control Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement , Spinal Neoplasms/complications , Spinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Treatment Outcome
2.
Radiat Oncol ; 9: 151, 2014 Jul 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24998293

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this trial was to compare the effects of resistance training versus passive physical therapy on quality of life (QoL), fatigue, and emotional distress outcomes during radiation therapy in patients with spinal bone metastases under radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: In this randomized trial, 60 patients were treated from September 2011 until March 2013 into one of the two groups: isometric resistance training or physical therapy with thirty patients in each group during RT. EORTC QLQ-BM22, EORTC QLQ-FA13, and FBK-R10 were assessed at baseline, three months, and six months after RT. RESULTS: Psychosocial aspects in resistance training group (Arm A) were significantly improved after three (p = 0.001) and six months (p = 0.010). Other rated items of the QLQ-BM22 painful site, and pain characteristics were without significant differences. Functional interference showed a positive trend after six months (p = 0.081). After six months, physical fatigue (p = 0.013), and interference with daily life (p = 0.006) according to the QLQ-FA13 assessment improved in Arm A significantly. Emotional distress was in Arm A lower after six months (p = 0.016). The Cohen's effect size confirmed the clinically significant improvement of these findings. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients we were able to show that guided isometric resistance training of the paravertebral muscles can improve functional capacity, reduce fatigue and thereby enhance QoL over a 6-months period in patients with stable spinal metastases. The results offer a rationale for future large controlled investigations to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial identifier NCT01409720.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/therapy , Exercise Therapy/adverse effects , Fatigue/diagnosis , Quality of Life , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/adverse effects , Resistance Training/adverse effects , Spinal Neoplasms/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Neoplasms/complications , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/psychology , Case-Control Studies , Combined Modality Therapy , Fatigue/etiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Pain/diagnosis , Pain/etiology , Prognosis , Radiotherapy Dosage , Spinal Neoplasms/complications , Spinal Neoplasms/pathology , Spinal Neoplasms/psychology , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
3.
BMC Cancer ; 14: 67, 2014 Feb 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24499460

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Spinal bone metastases are commonly diagnosed in cancer patients. The consequences are pain both at rest and under exercise, impairment of activities of daily life (ADL), reduced clinical performance, the risk of pathological fractures, and neurological deficits. The aim of this randomized, controlled pilot trial was to investigate the feasibility of muscle-training exercises in patients with spinal bone metastases under radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints were local control, pain response and survival. METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomized, monocentre, controlled explorative intervention trial to determine the multidimensional effects of exercises for strengthening the paravertebral muscles. On the days of radiation treatment, patients in the control group were physically treated in form of respiratory therapy. Sixty patients were randomized between September 2011 and March 2013 into one of the two groups: differentiated resistance training or physical measure with thirty patients in each group. RESULTS: The resistance training of the paravertebral muscles was feasible in 83.3% of patients (n = 25). Five patients died during the first three months. The exercise group experienced no measurable side effects. "Chair stand test" in the intervention group was significant enhanced with additionally improved analgesic efficiency. Patients in intervention group improved in pain score (VAS, 0-10) over the course (p < .001), and was significant better between groups (p = .003) after 3 months. The overall pain response showed no significant difference between groups (p = .158) There was no significant difference in overall and bone survival (survival from first diagnosed bone metastases to death). CONCLUSIONS: Our trial demonstrated safety and feasibility of an isometric resistance training in patients with spinal bone metastases. The results offer a rationale for future large controlled investigations to confirm these findings.


Subject(s)
Back Muscles/physiopathology , Isometric Contraction , Resistance Training , Spinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Back Pain/diagnosis , Back Pain/physiopathology , Back Pain/prevention & control , Feasibility Studies , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Spinal Neoplasms/mortality , Spinal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...