CXCR2 antagonist navarixin in combination with pembrolizumab in select advanced solid tumors: a phase 2 randomized trial.

C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2) has a role in tumor progression, lineage plasticity, and reduction of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy. Preclinical evidence suggests potential benefit of CXCR2 inhibition in multiple solid tumors. In this phase 2 study (NCT03473925), adults with previously treated advanced or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer (MSS CRC), or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomized 1:1 to the CXCR2 antagonist navarixin 30 or 100 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks up to 35 cycles. Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed objective response rate (RECIST v1.1) and safety. Of 105 patients (CRPC, n=40; MSS CRC, n=40; NSCLC, n=25), 3 had a partial response (2 CRPC, 1 MSS CRC) for ORRs of 5%, 2.5%, and 0%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 1.8-2.4 months without evidence of a dose-response relationship, and the study was closed at a prespecified interim analysis for lack of efficacy. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 2/48 patients (4%) receiving navarixin 30 mg and 3/48 (6%) receiving navarixin 100 mg; events included grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 transaminase elevation, hepatitis, and pneumonitis. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 70/105 patients (67%) and led to treatment discontinuation in 7/105 (7%). Maximal reductions from baseline in absolute neutrophil count were 44.5%-48.2% (cycle 1) and 37.5%-44.2% (cycle 2) and occurred within 6-12 hours postdose in both groups. Navarixin plus pembrolizumab did not demonstrate sufficient efficacy in this study. Safety and tolerability of the combination were manageable. (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03473925).

A phase 1 study of veliparib (ABT-888) plus weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced solid malignancies, with an expansion cohort in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (ETCTN 8620).

BACKGROUND: Veliparib is a poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, and it has clinical activity with every 3 weeks carboplatin and paclitaxel. In breast cancer, weekly paclitaxel is associated with improved overall survival. We aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of veliparib with weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel as well as safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary clinical activity in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: Patients with locally advanced/metastatic solid tumors and adequate organ function were eligible. A standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was followed by a TNBC expansion cohort. Veliparib doses ranging from 50 to 200 mg orally bid were tested with carboplatin (AUC 2) and paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) given weekly in a 21-day cycle. Adverse events (AE) were evaluated by CTCAE v4.0, and objective response rate (ORR) was determined by RECIST 1.1. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled, of whom 22 had TNBC. Two dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The RP2D was determined to be 150 mg PO bid veliparib with weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel 2 weeks on, 1 week off, based on hematologic toxicity requiring dose reduction in the first 5 cycles of treatment. The most common grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. PK parameters of veliparib were comparable to single-agent veliparib. In 23 patients with evaluable disease, the ORR was 65%. In 19 patients with TNBC with evaluable disease, the ORR was 63%. CONCLUSION: Veliparib can be safely combined with weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin, and this triplet combination has promising clinical activity.

A phase 1 and pharmacodynamic study of chronically-dosed, single-agent veliparib (ABT-888) in patients with BRCA1- or BRCA2-mutated cancer or platinum-refractory ovarian or triple-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE: BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutated cancers (BRCAmut) have intrinsic sensitivity to PARP inhibitors due to deficiency in homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair. There are similarities between BRCAmut and BRCAwt ovarian and basal-like breast cancers. This phase I study determined the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and preliminary efficacy of the PARP inhibitor, veliparib (ABT-888), in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 98) were dosed with veliparib 50-500 mg twice daily (BID). The BRCAmut cohort (n = 70) contained predominantly ovarian (53%) and breast (23%) cancers; the BRCAwt cohort (n = 28) consisted primarily of breast cancer (86%). The MTD, DLT, adverse events, PK, PD, and clinical response were assessed. RESULTS: DLTs were grade 3 nausea/vomiting at 400 mg BID in a BRCAmut carrier, grade 2 seizure at 400 mg BID in a patient with BRCAwt cancer, and grade 2 seizure at 500 mg BID in a BRCAmut carrier. Common toxicities included nausea (65%), fatigue (45%), and lymphopenia (38%). Grade 3/4 toxicities were rare (highest lymphopenia at 15%). Overall response rate (ORR) was 23% (95% CI 13-35%) in BRCAmut overall, and 37% (95% CI 21-55%) at 400 mg BID and above. In BRCAwt, ORR was 8% (95% CI 1-26%), and clinical benefit rate was 16% (95% CI 4-36%), reflecting prolonged stable disease in some patients. PK was linear with dose and was correlated with response and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous veliparib is safe and tolerable. The RP2D was 400 mg BID. There is evidence of clinical activity of veliparib in patients with BRCAmut and BRCAwt cancers.

A phase I/II study of veliparib (ABT-888) with radiation and temozolomide in newly diagnosed diffuse pontine glioma: a Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium study.

BACKGROUND: A Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium (PBTC) phase I/II trial of veliparib and radiation followed by veliparib and temozolomide (TMZ) was conducted in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). The objectives were to: (i) estimate the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of veliparib with concurrent radiation; (ii) evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of veliparib during radiation; (iii) evaluate feasibility of intrapatient TMZ dose escalation; (iv) describe toxicities of protocol therapy; and (v) estimate the overall survival distribution compared with historical series. METHODS: Veliparib was given Monday through Friday b.i.d. during radiation followed by a 4-week rest. Patients then received veliparib at 25 mg/m2 b.i.d. and TMZ 135 mg/m2 daily for 5 days every 28 days. Intrapatient dose escalation of TMZ was investigated for patients experiencing minimal toxicity. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (65 eligible) were enrolled. The RP2D of veliparib was 65 mg/m2 b.i.d. with radiation. Dose-limiting toxicities during radiation with veliparib therapy included: grade 2 intratumoral hemorrhage (n = 1), grade 3 maculopapular rash (n = 2), and grade 3 nervous system disorder (generalized neurologic deterioration) (n = 1). Intrapatient TMZ dose escalation during maintenance was not tolerated. Following a planned interim analysis, it was concluded that this treatment did not show a survival benefit compared with PBTC historical controls, and accrual was stopped for futility. The 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 37.2% (SE 7%) and 5.3% (SE 3%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Addition of veliparib to radiation followed by TMZ and veliparib was tolerated but did not improve survival for patients with newly diagnosed DIPG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01514201.

Optimal two-stage designs for exploratory basket trials.

The primary goal of an exploratory oncology clinical trial is to identify an effective drug for further development. To account for tumor indication selection error, multiple tumor indications are often selected for simultaneous testing in a basket trial. In this article, we propose optimal and minimax two-stage basket trial designs for exploratory clinical trials. Inactive tumor indications are pruned in stage 1 and the active tumor indications are pooled at end of stage 2 to assess overall effectiveness of the test drug. The proposed designs explicitly control the type I and type II error rates with closed-form sample size formula. They can be viewed as a natural extension of Simon's optimal and minimax two-stage designs for single arm trials to multi-arm basket trials. A simulation study shows that the proposed design method has desirable operating characteristics as compared to other commonly used design methods for exploratory basket trials.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Mass Balance of Veliparib in Combination with Temozolomide in Subjects with Nonhematologic Malignancies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Veliparib is an orally active potent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor currently in phase III clinical trials in solid tumors. This phase I study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and mass balance of veliparib administered alone and in combination with temozolomide, and assessed any potential pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between veliparib and temozolomide. METHODS: This was an open-label, dose-escalation study of veliparib in combination with temozolomide in 42 subjects with nonhematologic malignancies. Veliparib was administered orally at doses ranging from 10 to 80 mg twice daily on days 1-7, and temozolomide was administered orally at 150-200 mg/m2 once daily on days 1-5 of each 28-day cycle. The pharmacokinetics of veliparib, its M8 metabolite, and temozolomide, as well as urinary excretion of unchanged veliparib and its M8 metabolite, were determined. RESULTS: Mean veliparib maximum observed plasma concentration (C max) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve for the first 6 h postdose (AUC6) values increased dose proportionally in the veliparib 10-80 mg twice-daily dose range. The urinary recovery of veliparib dose as the unchanged parent compound alone and together with the M8 metabolite was 73 ± 18 and 90 ± 22%, respectively, over a 12-h dosing interval on day 6 of Cycle 1. Veliparib and temozolomide pharmacokinetic exposures were not affected when administered together. CONCLUSIONS: Veliparib is a Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) Class 1 compound, with no less than 90% of the dose absorbed and an oral bioavailability of at least 73%. Veliparib is primarily eliminated by renal excretion. Veliparib exhibited linear pharmacokinetics in the 10-80 mg twice-daily dose range. No pharmacokinetic interaction was observed when veliparib and temozolomide were administered together. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00526617.

Smoking History Predicts Sensitivity to PARP Inhibitor Veliparib in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Tobacco-related NSCLC is associated with reduced survival and greater genomic instability. Veliparib, a potent poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, augments platinum-induced DNA damage. A phase 2 trial of untreated advanced NSCLC showed a trend for improved outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80, 95% confidence interval: 0.54-1.18, p = 0.27 for overall survival and HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.45-1.15, p = 0.17 for progression-free survival) when veliparib was added to carboplatin/paclitaxel. Here we report an exploratory analysis by smoking history. METHODS: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive carboplatin/paclitaxel with veliparib, 120 mg (n = 105), or placebo (n = 53). Patients were stratified by histologic subtype and smoking history (recent smokers [n = 95], former smokers [n = 42], and never-smokers [n = 21]). Plasma cotinine level was measured as a chemical index of smoking. Mutation status was assessed by whole exome sequencing (n = 38). RESULTS: Smoking history, histologic subtype, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, sex, and geographic region predicted veliparib benefit in univariate analyses. In multivariate analysis, history of recent smoking was most predictive for veliparib benefit. Recent smokers treated with veliparib derived significantly greater progression-free survival and overall survival benefits (HR = 0.38 [p < 0.01] and HR = 0.43 [p < 0.01]) than former smokers (HR = 2.098 [p = 0 0208] and HR = 1.62 [p = 0.236]) and never-smokers (HR = 1.025 [p = 0.971] and HR = 1.33 [p = 0.638]). Sequencing data revealed that mutational burden was not associated with veliparib benefit. The rate of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was higher in recent smokers with veliparib treatment; all-grade and serious adverse events were similar in both treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking history predicted for efficacy with a veliparib-chemotherapy combination; toxicity was acceptable regardless of smoking history. A prespecified analysis of recent smokers is planned for ongoing phase 3 studies of veliparib in NSCLC.

A randomized Phase II study of veliparib with temozolomide or carboplatin/paclitaxel versus placebo with carboplatin/paclitaxel in BRCA1/2 metastatic breast cancer: design and rationale.

Veliparib is an orally administered poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor that is being studied in Phase I-III clinical trials, including Phase III studies in non-small-cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer and breast cancer. Tumor cells with deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations are deficient in homologous recombination DNA repair and are intrinsically sensitive to platinum therapy and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We describe herein the design and rationale of a Phase II trial investigating whether the addition of veliparib to temozolomide or carboplatin/paclitaxel provides clinical benefit over carboplatin/paclitaxel with placebo in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer harboring a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation (Trial registration: EudraCT 2011-002913-12, NCT01506609).

Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study of Veliparib in Combination with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel for Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Purpose: PARP plays an important role in DNA repair. Veliparib, a PARP inhibitor, enhances the efficacy of platinum compounds and has been safely combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel. The primary endpoint of this phase II trial determined whether addition of veliparib to carboplatin and paclitaxel improved progression-free survival (PFS) in previously untreated patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.Experimental Design: Patients were randomized 2:1 to carboplatin and paclitaxel with either veliparib or placebo. Veliparib (120 mg) or placebo was given on days 1 to 7 of each 3-week cycle, with carboplatin (AUC = 6 mg/mL/min) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) administered on day 3, for a maximum of 6 cycles.Results: Overall, 158 were included (median age, 63 years; male 68%, squamous histology 48%). Median PFS was 5.8 months in the veliparib group versus 4.2 months in the placebo group [HR, 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-1.15; P = 0.17)]. Median overall survival (OS) was 11.7 and 9.1 months in the veliparib and placebo groups, respectively (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.54-1.18; P = 0.27). In patients with squamous histology, median PFS (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.26-1.12; P = 0.098) and OS (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.43-1.24; P = 0.24) favored veliparib treatment. Objective response rate was similar between groups (veliparib: 32.4%; placebo: 32.1%), but duration of response favored veliparib treatment (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.16-1.42; P = 0.18). Grade III/IV neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were comparable between groups.Conclusions: Veliparib combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel was well-tolerated and demonstrated a favorable trend in PFS and OS versus chemotherapy alone. Patients with squamous histology had the best outcomes with veliparib combination. Clin Cancer Res; 23(8); 1937-44. ©2016 AACR.

Phase I Study of Veliparib (ABT-888) Combined with Cisplatin and Vinorelbine in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and/or BRCA Mutation-Associated Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Cisplatin is synergistic with vinorelbine and the PARP inhibitor veliparib, and has antineoplastic activity in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and BRCA mutation-associated breast cancer. This phase I study assessed veliparib with cisplatin and vinorelbine. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A 3+3 dose-escalation design evaluated veliparib administered twice daily for 14 days with cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2) days 1, 8) every 21 days, for 6 to 10 cycles, followed by veliparib monotherapy. Pharmacokinetics, measurement of poly(ADP-ribose) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and preliminary efficacy were assessed. IHC and gene-expression profiling were evaluated as potential predictors of response. RESULTS: Forty-five patients enrolled in nine dose cohorts plus five in an expansion cohort at the highest dose level and recommended phase II dose, 300 mg twice daily. The MTD of veliparib was not reached. Neutropenia (36%), anemia (30%), and thrombocytopenia (12%) were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events. Best overall response for 48 patients was radiologic response with 9-week confirmation for 17 (35%; 2 complete, 15 partial), and stable disease for 21 (44%). Germline BRCA mutation presence versus absence was associated with 6-month progression-free survival [PFS; 10 of 14 (71%) vs. 8 of 27 (30%), mid-P = 0.01]. Median PFS for all 50 patients was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval, 4.1-6.7). CONCLUSIONS: Veliparib at 300 mg twice daily combined with cisplatin and vinorelbine is well tolerated with encouraging response rates. A phase II randomized trial is planned to assess veliparib's contribution to cisplatin chemotherapy in metastatic TNBC and BRCA mutation-associated breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 22(12); 2855-64. ©2016 AACR.

A phase 1 study evaluating the pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of veliparib (ABT-888) in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel in Japanese subjects with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

INTRODUCTION: Veliparib is a potent, orally bioavailable PARP inhibitor that enhances efficacy of DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic agents. The study objectives were to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RPTD) of veliparib plus carboplatin and paclitaxel, and assess pharmacokinetics (PK), tolerability, and preliminary efficacy in Japanese patients with solid tumors. METHODS: Carboplatin (AUC 6 mg/mL min) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) were administered on day 3 of a 21-day cycle. Oral veliparib (40, 80, or 120 mg BID) was administered on days 1-7. Patients received ≤6 cycles. Adverse events (AEs) were reported using NCI-CTCAE version 4.03, PK parameters were analyzed using noncompartmental methods, and responses were measured by RECIST version 1.1. RESULTS: Twelve patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated. Common treatment-emergent AEs, consistent with toxicities associated with carboplatin and paclitaxel, included leukopenia (100 %), neutropenia (100 %), anemia (83 %), thrombocytopenia (75 %), increased alanine aminotransferase (67 %), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (67 %). Grade 3/4 AEs (in ≥2 patients) included neutropenia (100 %), leukopenia (33 %), anemia (25 %), and hyponatremia (17 %). No AEs led to veliparib, carboplatin, or paclitaxel interruption; no DLTs were observed. The RPTD was determined to be 120 mg BID. Veliparib C max and AUC were approximately dose proportional. Six partial responses were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Veliparib PK was not impacted by carboplatin and paclitaxel. The safety profile was manageable. The 120 mg BID RPTD confirmed in Japanese patients is the dose being evaluated in global studies of veliparib. Preliminary efficacy suggests veliparib may enhance carboplatin and paclitaxel activity, providing benefit to patients with NSCLC.

Veliparib in combination with whole brain radiation therapy in patients with brain metastases: results of a phase 1 study.

Veliparib, a potent, oral PARP inhibitor, potentiates the antitumor activity of radiation therapy and crosses the blood-brain barrier. This was a phase 1 dose-escalation study evaluating the safety, and secondarily the antitumor activity of veliparib in combination with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in patients with brain metastases, in order to power future trials. Patients with brain metastases from primary solid tumors were treated with WBRT (30.0 or 37.5 Gy in 10 or 15 fractions) and veliparib (escalating doses of 10-300 mg, orally BID). Safety and tumor response were assessed. Observed survival was compared to predicted survival based on a published nomogram. Eighty-one patients (median age 58 years) were treated. The most common primary tumor types were non-small cell lung (NSCLC; n = 34) and breast cancer (n = 25). The most common AEs deemed possibly related to veliparib (AEs, ≥15 %) were fatigue (30 %), nausea (22 %), and decreased appetite (15 %). Fatigue (5 %), hypokalemia and hyponatremia (3 % each) were the only Grade 3/4 AEs deemed possibly related to veliparib observed in ≥2 patients. Although this was an uncontrolled study, preliminary efficacy results were better than predicted: the median survival time (MST, 95 % CI) for the NSCLC subgroup was 10.0 mo (3.9-13.5) and for the breast cancer subgroup was 7.7 mo (2.8-15.0) compared to a nomogram-model-predicted MST of 3.5 mo (3.3-3.8) and 4.9 mo (4.2-5.5). The addition of veliparib to WBRT did not identify new toxicities when compared to WBRT alone. Based on encouraging safety and preliminary efficacy results, a randomized, controlled phase 2b study is ongoing.

A phase 1 study to evaluate effect of food on veliparib pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability in subjects with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: A phase 1 study was conducted to evaluate the bioavailability and food effect of a new veliparib formulation in subjects with solid tumors. METHODS: Subjects (planned: Stage I, N = 20; Stage II, N = 16) received four regimens of a single oral dose of veliparib utilizing a group-sequential design. Subjects were administered single doses of 40 mg veliparib supplied as four 10 mg current formulation, four 10 mg new formulation and one 40 mg new formulation under fasting conditions and under non-fasting conditions. Serial blood samples were collected for the determination of veliparib pharmacokinetics. At the end of Stage I, the relative bioavailability between each pair of regimens was assessed by a two one-sided tests procedure from the analyses of the natural logarithms of C(max) and AUC. A 92.7 % confidence interval within the 0.80-1.25 range between each regimen pair determined bioequivalence. RESULTS: Four 10 mg current formulation capsules, four 10 mg new formulation and one 40 mg new formulation were bioequivalent with respect to C(max) and AUC under fasting conditions. The administration of a high-fat meal did not have a significant effect on AUC and only caused a slight decrease in veliparib C(max) (17 %) and a delay of approximately 1 h in T(max). CONCLUSIONS: The 40 mg new capsule was bioequivalent to currently used formulation. Food had no effect on the extent of veliparib absorption and only a small (17 %) decrease in peak exposure of veliparib.

A phase I trial of veliparib (ABT-888) and temozolomide in children with recurrent CNS tumors: a pediatric brain tumor consortium report.

BACKGROUND: A phase I trial of veliparib (ABT-888), an oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, and temozolomide (TMZ) was conducted in children with recurrent brain tumors to (i) estimate the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) or recommended phase II doses (RP2Ds) of veliparib and TMZ; (ii) describe the toxicities of this regimen; and (iii) evaluate the plasma pharmacokinetic parameters and extent of PARP inhibition in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) following veliparib. METHODS: TMZ was given once daily and veliparib twice daily for 5 days every 28 days. Veliparib concentrations and poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) levels in PBMCs were measured on days 1 and 4. Analysis of pharmacokinetic and PBMC PAR levels were performed twice during study conduct to rationally guide dose modifications and to determine biologically optimal MTD/RP2D. RESULTS: Twenty-nine evaluable patients were enrolled. Myelosuppression (grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) were dose limiting. The RP2Ds are veliparib 25 mg/m(2) b.i.d. and TMZ 135 mg/m(2)/d. Only 2 out of 12 patients treated at RP2Ds experienced dose-limiting toxicities. Although no objective response was observed, 4 patients had stable disease >6 months in duration, including 1 with glioblastoma multiforme and 1 with ependymoma. At the RP2D of veliparib, pediatric pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to those in adults. CONCLUSIONS: Veliparib and TMZ at the RP2D were well tolerated in children with recurrent brain tumors. A phase I/II trial to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of veliparib, TMZ, and radiation in children with newly diagnosed brainstem gliomas is in progress.

Targeting DNA repair with combination veliparib (ABT-888) and temozolomide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Androgen receptor-mediated transcription is directly coupled with the induction of DNA damage, and castration-resistant tumor cells exhibit increased activity of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-1, a DNA repair enzyme. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of low dose oral PARP inhibitor veliparib (ABT-888) and temozolomide (TMZ) in docetaxel-pretreated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in a single-arm, open-label, pilot study. Patients with mCRPC progressing on at least one docetaxel-based therapy and prostate specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 2 ng/mL were treated with veliparib 40 mg twice daily on days 1-7 and TMZ once daily (150 mg/m(2)/day cycle 1; if well tolerated then 200 mg/m(2)/day cycle 2 onwards) on days 1-5 q28 days. Patients received 2 (median) treatment cycles (range, 1-9). The primary endpoint was confirmed PSA response rate (decline ≥ 30 %). Twenty-six eligible patients were enrolled, 25 evaluable for PSA response. Median baseline PSA was 170 ng/mL. Two patients had a confirmed PSA response (8.0 %; 95 % CI: 1.0-26.0), 13 stable PSA, and 10 PSA progression. The median progression-free survival was 9 weeks (95 % CI: 7.9-17) and median overall survival 39.6 weeks (95 % CI: 26.6-not estimable). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were thrombocytopenia (77 %), anemia (69 %), fatigue (50 %), neutropenia (42 %), nausea (38 %), and constipation (23 %). Grade 3/4 AEs occurring in > 10 % of patients were thrombocytopenia (23 %) and anemia (15 %). Veliparib and TMZ combination was well tolerated but with modest activity. Biomarker analysis supported the proof of concept that this combination has some antitumor activity in mCRPC.

Population pharmacokinetic modeling of veliparib (ABT-888) in patients with non-hematologic malignancies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Veliparib (ABT-888) is a potent oral inhibitor of Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase enzyme that is currently in development for the treatment of non-hematologic and hematologic malignancies. This analysis characterizes the population pharmacokinetics of veliparib, including developing a structural pharmacokinetic model and testing patient demographics and covariates for potential influence on veliparib pharmacokinetics in patients with non-hematologic malignancies. METHODS: The analysis dataset included 3,542 veliparib concentration values from 325 patients with non-hematologic malignancies enrolled in three phase I and one phase II studies. Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using NONMEM. The likelihood ratio test was used for comparison of nested models, and visual predictive check was employed for model qualification. Covariates tested included body size measures, creatinine clearance (CLCR), formulation, age, sex, race, liver function tests, and coadministration with temozolomide. RESULTS: A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination adequately described veliparib pharmacokinetics. The final model included fixed effects for CLCR on veliparib oral clearance (CL/F) and lean body mass (LBM) on volume of distribution (V d/F). CL/F and V d/F were 20.9 L/h (for a CLCR of 100 mL/min) and 173 L (for an LBM of 56 kg), respectively. CONCLUSION: Only LBM and CLCR were found to be determinants of veliparib V d/F and CL/F, respectively. Dosage adjustments of veliparib on the basis of body size, age, sex, race, liver function, and temozolomide coadministration are not necessary in patients with non-hematologic malignancies. This is the first study to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of veliparib, and the developed model will be used to conduct simulations and evaluate veliparib exposure-response relationships.

Hit to Lead optimization of a novel class of squarate-containing polo-like kinases inhibitors.

A high throughput screening (HTS) hit, 1 (Plk1 K(i)=2.2 µM) was optimized and evaluated for the enzymatic inhibition of Plk-1 kinase. Molecular modeling suggested the importance of adding a hydrophobic aromatic amine side chain in order to improve the potency by a classic kinase H-donor-acceptor binding mode. Extensive SAR studies led to the discovery of 49 (Plk1 K(i)=5 nM; EC(50)=1.05 µM), which demonstrated moderate efficacy at 100 mpk in a MiaPaCa tumor model, with no overt toxicity.

PARP inhibitors attenuate chemotherapy-induced painful neuropathy.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major toxicity of chemotherapy treatment for which no therapy is approved. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)1/2 are nuclear enzymes activated upon DNA damage, and PARP1/2 inhibition provides resistance against DNA damage. A role for PARP inhibition in sensory neurotransmission has also been established. PARP inhibitors attenuate pain-like behaviors and neuropathy-associated decreased peripheral nerve function in diabetic models. The hypothesis tested was that PARP inhibition protects against painful neuropathy. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the novel, selective PARP1/2 inhibitors (ABT-888 and related analogues) would attenuate development of mechanical allodynia in vincristine-treated rats. PARP inhibitors were dosed for 2 days, and then co-administered with vincristine for 12 days. Mechanical allodynia was observed in rats treated with vincristine. PARP1/2 inhibition significantly attenuated development of mechanical allodynia and reduced poly ADP-ribose (PAR) activation in rat skin. The data presented here show that PARP inhibition attenuates vincristine-induced mechanical allodynia in rats, and supports that PARP inhibition may represent a novel therapeutic approach for CIPN.

Discovery and SAR of orally efficacious tetrahydropyridopyridazinone PARP inhibitors for the treatment of cancer.

PARP-1, the most abundant member of the PARP superfamily of nuclear enzymes, has emerged as a promising molecular target in the past decade particularly for the treatment of cancer. A number of PARP-1 inhibitors, including veliparab discovered at Abbott, have advanced into different stages of clinical trials. Herein we describe the development of a new tetrahydropyridopyridazinone series of PARP-1 inhibitors. Many compounds in this class, such as 20w, displayed excellent potency against the PARP-1 enzyme with a K(i) value of <1nM and an EC(50) value of 1nM in a C41 whole cell assay. The presence of the NH in the tetrahydropyridyl ring of the tetrahydropyridopyridazinone scaffold improved the pharmacokinetic properties over similar carbon based analogs. Compounds 8c and 20u are orally available, and have demonstrated significant efficacy in a B16 murine xenograft model, potentiating the efficacy of temozolomide (TMZ).