Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil ; 89(8): 611-9, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20531162

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the feasibility of delivering a structured physical therapy (PT) program as part of a multidisciplinary intervention to patients undergoing outpatient radiation therapy for advanced cancer. DESIGN: A single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial at a quaternary medical center outpatient clinic. One hundred three adults undergoing radiation therapy for advanced cancer with prognoses > or =6 mos and 5-yr survival estimates < or =50% were randomized to usual care or participation in eight 90-min, multidisciplinary interventional sessions with 30 mins of each session devoted to PT. PT consisted of truncal and limb isodynamic strengthening targeting major upper- and lower-limb muscle groups as well as education and provision with instructional materials. Physical well-being and fatigue were assessed with Linear Analog Scale of Assessment. The Profile of Mood States-Short form, including Fatigue-Inertia and Vigor-Activity subscales, was also administered. RESULTS: PT session attendance was 89.3%. Relative to baseline, mean physical well-being Linear Analog Self Assessment scores at week 4 improved in the intervention group, 0.4 (SD, 23.6), and declined significantly in the control group, -10.0 (SD, 21.5) (P = 0.02). Fatigue and vigor were not significantly different between the groups. All intergroup differences had resolved at 8 and 27 wks. Baseline characteristics were not associated with the magnitude or direction of change in outcomes related to physical functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Delivery of a standardized resistive exercise PT intervention is feasible during outpatient radiation therapy and is associated with preserved physical well-being. However, benefits were not sustained, and fatigue was not affected.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Physical Therapy Modalities , Quality of Life , Fatigue/epidemiology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital , Single-Blind Method
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 24(4): 635-42, 2006 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16446335

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a structured, multidisciplinary intervention targeted to maintain the overall quality of life (QOL), which is more comprehensive than psychosocial distress, of patients undergoing radiation therapy for advanced-stage cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Radiation therapy patients with advanced cancer and an estimated 5-year survival rate of 0% to 50% were randomly assigned to either an eight-session structured multidisciplinary intervention arm or a standard care arm. The eight 90-minute sessions addressed the five domains of QOL including cognitive, physical, emotional, spiritual, and social functioning. The primary end point of maintaining overall QOL was assessed by a single-item linear analog scale (Linear Analog Scale of Assessment or modified Spitzer Uniscale). QOL was assessed at baseline, week 4 (end of multidisciplinary intervention), week 8, and week 27. RESULTS: Of the 103 participants, overall QOL at week 4 was maintained by the patients in the intervention (n = 49), whereas QOL at week 4 significantly decreased for patients in the control group (n = 54). This change reflected a 3-point increase from baseline in the intervention group and a 9-point decrease from baseline in the control group (P = .009). Intervention participants maintained their QOL, and controls gradually returned to baseline by the end of the 6-month follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Although intervention participants maintained and actually improved their QOL during radiation therapy, control participants experienced a significant decrease in their QOL. Thus, a structured multidisciplinary intervention can help maintain or even improve QOL in patients with advanced cancer who are undergoing cancer treatment.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Quality of Life , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cognition , Emotions , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/pathology , Patient Care Team , Role , Spirituality , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
3.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 29(1): 52-8, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16462503

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fatigue has a significant impact on the quality of life (QOL) of cancer patients. Recent research has suggested that physical activity can reduce fatigue in patients receiving active cancer treatment. In this project, we examined the impact that participation in a randomized controlled trial of a multidisciplinary intervention designed to impact overall QOL had on fatigue for advanced cancer patients actively receiving treatment. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed cancer were randomly assigned to an 8-session structured multidisciplinary intervention or a standard-care arm at the beginning of their course of radiotherapy (RT) designed to impact QOL. Ninety-minute sessions were led by either a psychiatrist or psychologist, collaborating with a nurse, physical therapist, chaplain, or social worker, depending on the session's theme. The fatigue assessments used in this trial included the Linear Analogue Self Assessment (LASA), the Profile of Mood States (POMS), Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS). RESULTS: There were 115 participants enrolled and the 2 randomization arms were well balanced in terms of baseline characteristics and treatment received except for increased commuting distance for the patients in the intervention arm (P = 0.042). Most of scores indicated less fatigue (higher score) in the standard treatment group, but there were no statistically significant differences found at baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 27 except for SDS at week 8 (P = 0.018) with less patients reporting significant fatigue in the standard treatment arm. For the entire participant population, fatigue levels initially worsened with radiotherapy, stabilized at week 8, and returned to baseline by week 27. Disease site, chemotherapy use, and radiotherapy dose did not have a significant impact on fatigue levels. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy initially caused a worsening of fatigue but with time fatigue levels returned to baseline. Clinically, this structured multidisciplinary intervention had no impact on fatigue, and there was the suggestion the multiple sessions may have contributed to worse fatigue during active cancer treatment.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Exercise Therapy , Fatigue/etiology , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Cognition , Emotions , Fatigue/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/psychology , Patient Education as Topic , Radiation Injuries , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...