ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: South Asia is experiencing rapid urbanization, which may be changing the risk factor profile for ocular trauma. The objective of this study was to compare risk factors for traumatic corneal abrasions in rural versus urban Nepal, and to assess if any risk factors were associated with a poor outcome. METHODS: In a prospective, cross-sectional, community-based study performed as part of a cluster-randomized trial, community health workers from Nepal were trained to diagnose and treat traumatic corneal abrasions. Participants with an abrasion were invited to complete a risk factor survey. The main exposure variable was the object of eye injury, stratified by rural-urban residence. The main outcome measure was a lack of corneal healing after a three-day course of antimicrobials. RESULTS: Of 3657 participants diagnosed with a corneal abrasion, 2265 completed a survey. Eye trauma occurred most frequently during agricultural activities. The most common object of injury was vegetative matter, accounting for approximately 40% of injuries in rural, peri-urban, and urban communities. Wood injuries were more common in rural communities (24%) compared with urban or peri-urban communities (13%). Eye injury from an animal was more likely to result in a non-healing corneal abrasion after 3 days of treatment compared with other types of trauma (prevalence ratio 2.59, 95%CI 1.16-5.76). CONCLUSIONS: Health promotion activities for prevention of corneal ulcers in Nepal should focus on agricultural trauma in both rural and urban areas. Community members experiencing eye trauma from an animal may benefit from early referral to an eye clinic.
Subject(s)
Corneal Injuries , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Nepal , Prospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of smartphone corneal photography in detecting corneal opacities in a community-based setting. Methods: A case-control, diagnostic accuracy study was nested in a cluster-randomized trial of a corneal ulcer prevention intervention in Nepal. Smartphone corneal photography was performed annually on community members self-reporting a potential risk factor for a corneal infection. Corneal photographs were graded for the presence or absence of an opacity. All cases with an opacity on smartphone photography and an equal number of controls were invited for a comprehensive eye examination with a slit lamp biomicroscope at an eye hospital. A mobile team visited participants unable to come to the hospital, conducting a limited examination with a penlight. Results: Of 1332 study participants (666 cases and 666 controls), 1097 had a penlight examination (535 cases and 562 controls) and 191 had a slit lamp examination (120 cases and 71 controls). When penlight examination was considered the reference standard, smartphone diagnosis of a corneal opacity had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 47% (95% confidence interval 43-52%) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 95% (93-97%). When slit lamp examination was considered the reference standard, the overall PPV and NPV were 71% (62-78%) and 80% (70-88%), respectively. The NPV was greater for detection of opacities > 1mm, estimated at 95% (90-98%). Conclusions: Corneal photography performed in a resource-limited community-based setting using a smartphone coupled to an external attachment had acceptable diagnostic accuracy for detection of corneal opacities large enough to be clinically meaningful.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Macular corneal dystrophy (MCD) is a rare autosomal recessive stromal dystrophy. The prevalence of inherited diseases varies in different communities. It is not commonly observed in Nepal. CASE: A 14-year male presented with bilateral gradual and painless blurred vision with photophobia of three years duration. Cornea of both eyes showed focal grayish opacities in anterior and mid stroma with intervening stromal haze. There was no history of consanguinity in the family. Anterior segment ocular coherence tomography showed thinning of cornea and deposits in corneal stroma. Macular corneal dystrophy was the clinical diagnosis and the patient underwent deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in the right eye. Histopathological examination and histochemical staining with Alcian Blue supported the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Significant improvement in vision was observed in the operated eye. MCD may be present in communities without evidence of consanguinity. It can cause visual impairment at an early age. Timely intervention improves vision and quality of life.
