Postoperative Aortic Regurgitation in Outflow Ventricular Septal Defect: Determinants of Outcome.

Aortic cusp prolapse is an acquired complication and usually precedes the development of aortic regurgitation (AR) in unoperated outflow ventricular septal defect (VSD). However, its impact on postoperative AR-progression is unknown. 161 patients with outflow-VSD and AR who underwent surgery between 2006 and 2012 were studied retrospectively. 31 patients without prolapse (group-I), 87 with only right coronary cusp (RCC) (group-II), 43 with noncoronary cusp (NCC) prolapse (group-III: 23 only NCC (IIIa), 20 both NCC-RCC (IIIb)) were followed postoperatively for a mean 6.05 ± 2.4 years (range 3-12 years). Moderate or severe-AR was present in 4.2%, 36.8%, 52.2% and 80% preoperatively; in 3.2%, 10.3%, 39.1% and 30% patients at follow-up in group-I, II, IIIa, and IIIb, respectively. Although freedom from significant-AR (moderate or severe AR) or aortic valve replacement (AVR) at 10 years was lesser in subaortic-VSD than subpulmonic-VSD (64.3 ± 7.5% vs 87.9 ± 3.6%; P = 0.02), the difference was not significant when compared within prolapse groups (80 ± 8% vs 88.7 ± 4.0%, P = 0.28 in group-II; 40.7 ± 11.8 vs 70 ± 14.5%, P = 0.48 in group-III). The significant-AR or AVR free survival in patients with trivial or mild preoperative-AR was not significantly different between prolapse groups (98.2 ± 1.8% vs 75 ± 21.7% in group-II and III respectively; P = 0.85). However, in those with moderate or severe preoperative-AR it was significantly lesser in group-III than II (30.1 ± 9.8% vs 65.6 ± 8.4%, respectively; P = 0.04). Group-III, compare to group-II, had 3.28 and 5.24-time risk of development of significant-AR or requirement of AVR, respectively. Prolapse of NCC alone or in addition to RCC prolapse has unfavourable impact on the postoperative outcomes, especially in subaortic-VSD after development of more than mild AR preoperatively.

Outflow Ventricular Septal Defect With Aortic Regurgitation: Optimal Timing of Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Ideal time of surgery still remains controversial in outflow ventricular septal defect (VSD) with aortic regurgitation (AR). We aimed to identify the prevalence and predictors of postoperative AR progression. METHODS: A total of 154 patients with outflow VSD and AR who underwent VSD surgery between 2006 and 2012 were studied retrospectively. RESULTS: Eighty patients with subpulmonic VSD and 74 with subaortic VSD were followed up for mean 6.32 ± 2.27 years (range, 3-12 years). Of these, 100 had trivial to mild (group A) and 54 had moderate to severe preoperative AR (group B). At follow-up, there was no significant worsening of mean residual AR grade in group A (P = .16) and subpulmonic VSD of group B (P = .083). However, AR grade worsened significantly in subaortic VSD (1.85 ± 0.87 vs 2.21 ± 1.08, P = .005) of group B. Only 2 (both had subaortic VSD) patients of group A developed moderate AR and none required aortic valve replacement (AVR), while 23 (42.60%) of group B patients developed moderate or severe AR and 7 (30.4%) of them required AVR. Moreover, all who needed AVR had subaortic VSD and had undergone valvuloplasty during VSD closure. The 10 years freedom from moderate or severe AR was significantly lower in group B than group A in both VSDs (subaortic VSD 42.5% ± 10.7% vs 89.3% ± 8.1%, P < .01; subpulmonic VSD 66.7% ± 10.3% vs 100%, P< .01). On multiple regression analysis, postoperative residual AR was the only predictor of AR progression (standardized coefficient, 0.48; P < .001) at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Mild preoperative AR rarely progressed after VSD repair. However, worsening of AR could not be prevented effectively, even with valvuloplasty, after the development of moderate or severe AR. Mild or more postoperative residual AR requires close follow-up, especially in subaortic VSD.

Coronary-Cameral Fistula to Pulmonary Artery: An Innocent Bystander?

Coronary-cameral fistula (CCF) is a rare congenital communication between a coronary artery and a cardiac chamber or a great vessel. Most patients are asymptomatic and these lesions are incidentally detected during coronary angiography, with the reported incidence being up to 0.2%. The most frequent draining sites are right ventricle, right atrium, and pulmonary arteries, with less frequent drainage to the left side of the heart. The majority of CCFs are hemodynamically inconsequential and do not require treatment. However, when large, these lesions can cause myocardial ischemia by causing coronary steal or high-output heart failure, and should be treated. Treatment modalities include transcatheter closure with embolic agents (microcoil or gelfoam) and surgical ligation. Choice of therapy is governed by size of the CCF, tortuosity of the feeder channel, size of the communication to prevent embolization, and concomitant coronary artery disease.

Left Atrial Angiosarcoma: A Rare Cardiac Tumor at an Uncommon Site.

Cardiac angiosarcoma is the most common among primary malignant cardiac tumors in adults. Malignant cardiac tumors commonly arise in the right-sided cardiac chambers unlike benign tumors that commonly arise in the left-sided chambers. Cardiac tumors on the left side need to be carefully assessed for malignant features for deciding treatment strategy and prognostication. We present the case of a 62-year-old female with a large left atrial mass infiltrating the interatrial septum and adjacent myocardial wall. Histology was suggestive of angiosarcoma. Although a radical excision was done, the tumor recurred within 6 months of the postoperative period and she died shortly after the recurrence.

Venous flow patterns after percutaneous atrial septal defect closure: Does the mechanical device decrease right atrial compliance?

INTRODUCTION: Systemic venous flow patterns become abnormal and restrictive after surgical closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) but rarely studied after percutaneous device closure. METHODS: From January 2017 to January 2018, systemic venous Doppler flow patterns were documented prospectively in 50 subjects who underwent percutaneous closure of ASD, prior to, after procedure, and at 6-month follow-up and correlated with defect size and device size. RESULTS: In hepatic veins and superior venacava post device-closure closure, the velocity time integral (VTI) of forward flow in both systole (S) and diastole (D) increased. Overall S was higher than D, and D/S ratio was <1. The D/S ratio increased after device closure significantly reflecting that the improvement in atrial filling increase in diastolic flow more than the increase in systolic flow. Increase in flow velocities was more prominent at 6 months with further increase in D/S VTI ratios. When correlated with the defect size, in those with defect size less than 15 mm/sq.m (mean device size 13.05 ± 3.21 mm), the changes in S- or D-wave, D/S ratio were less prominent and statistically not significant, while in subjects with defect size ≥ 15 mm/sq.m (mean device size 23.02 (±4.77 mm), these changes were greater and statistical significant. CONCLUSION: Residual filling defects with restriction of systolic venous flow were observed in subjects after device closure, correlating with larger device sizes, implying the compliance abnormality conferred by them which progresses at 6 months. Subjects with persistent abnormalities would need careful follow up for incomplete remodeling and increase in atrial size related arrhythmias.

Cardiac Rhabdomyoma Causing Progressive Dynamic Severe Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction in an Infant.

Multiple cardiac masses were incidentally detected in a neonate on twelve day of life. Failure to thrive, feeding difficulty and severe dynamic right ventricular outflow tract obstruction developed at 7 months of age. Surgical resection of intracardiac masses relieved symptoms and histological studies confirmed rhabdomyoma. Progressive increase in the size of rhabdomyoma during infancy is an uncommon presentation and surgery can be life-saving.