Brief cognitive-behavioral and relaxation training interventions for breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Women with breast cancer (BCa) report elevated distress postsurgery. Group-based cognitive-behavioral stress management (CBSM) following surgery improves psychological adaptation, though its key mechanisms remain speculative. This randomized controlled dismantling trial compared 2 interventions featuring elements thought to drive CBSM effects: a 5-week cognitive-behavioral training (CBT) and 5-week relaxation training (RT) versus a 5-week health education (HE) control group. METHOD: Women with stage 0-III BCa (N = 183) were randomized to CBT, RT, or HE condition 2-10 weeks postsurgery. Psychosocial measures were collected at baseline (T1) and postintervention (T2). Repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) tested whether CBT and RT treatments improved primary measures of psychological adaptation and secondary measures of stress management resource perceptions from pre- to postintervention relative to HE. RESULTS: Both CBT and RT groups reported reduced depressive affect. The CBT group reported improved emotional well-being/quality of life and less cancer-specific thought intrusions. The RT group reported improvements on illness-related social disruption. Regarding stress management resources, the CBT group reported increased reliability of social support networks, while the RT group reported increased confidence in relaxation skills. Psychological adaptation and stress management resource constructs were unchanged in the HE control group. CONCLUSIONS: Nonmetastatic breast cancer patients participating in 2 forms of brief, 5-week group-based stress management intervention after surgery showed improvements in psychological adaptation and stress management resources compared with an attention-matched control group. Findings provide preliminary support suggesting that using brief group-based stress management interventions may promote adaptation among nonmetastatic breast cancer patients.

Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: objective measurements.

PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy was adopted for the staging of the axilla with the assumption that it would reduce the risk of lymphedema in women with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term prevalence of lymphedema after SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone and after SLNB followed by axillary lymph node dissection (SLNB/ALND). PATIENTS AND METHODS: At median follow-up of 5 years, lymphedema was assessed in 936 women with clinically node-negative breast cancer who underwent SLNB alone or SLNB/ALND. Standardized ipsilateral and contralateral measurements at baseline and follow-up were used to determine change in ipsilateral upper extremity circumference and to control for baseline asymmetry and weight change. Associations between lymphedema and potential risk factors were examined. RESULTS: Of the 936 women, 600 women (64%) underwent SLNB alone and 336 women (36%) underwent SLNB/ALND. Patients having SLNB alone were older than those having SLNB/ALND (56 v 52 years; P < .0001). Baseline body mass index (BMI) was similar in both groups. Arm circumference measurements documented lymphedema in 5% of SLNB alone patients, compared with 16% of SLNB/ALND patients (P < .0001). Risk factors associated with measured lymphedema were greater body weight (P < .0001), higher BMI (P < .0001), and infection (P < .0001) or injury (P = .02) in the ipsilateral arm since surgery. CONCLUSION: When compared with SLNB/ALND, SLNB alone results in a significantly lower rate of lymphedema 5 years postoperatively. However, even after SLNB alone, there remains a clinically relevant risk of lymphedema. Higher body weight, infection, and injury are significant risk factors for developing lymphedema.

Locoregional recurrence after mastectomy: incidence and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Locoregional recurrences (LRR) after mastectomy may be ominous events, but incidence and outcomes data are limited by heterogeneous study populations and the time period studied. We sought to evaluate the rate of LRR at a single institution in the era of multimodality therapy, identify predictors for isolated LRR, and examine treatment strategies and outcomes of postmastectomy patients with isolated LRR. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective database, we identified 1,057 patients who underwent mastectomy for invasive cancer at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1995 to 1999. Predictive factors for isolated LRR were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. Treatments and outcomes of patients with isolated LRR were reviewed. All patients with at least 2 years of followup were included. Median followup was 6 years. RESULTS: Overall, LRR developed in 93 of 1,057 (8.8%) patients. Thirty-four (3.2%) had synchronous distant metastases. Distant recurrences developed in thirty-one (2.9%) during the followup period (median followup, 6 years). Twenty-eight patients with LRR (2.6%) remained free of distant disease during the study period. Multivariate analysis showed age less than 35 years, lymphovascular invasion, and multicentricity as major predictors for isolated LRR. In the 28 patients with isolated LRR, 24 had recurrence in the chest wall, 2 in the axilla, and 2 in more than 1 local site. Seventy-eight percent (22 of 28) of patients were rendered disease free with surgery (15 of 22), radiotherapy (13 of 22), chemotherapy (6 of 22), or hormones (9 of 22). CONCLUSIONS: Despite widespread use of adjuvant therapies during the study period, we found an LRR rate after mastectomy of 9%. But for patients presenting with LRR without evidence of distant disease, aggressive multimodality therapy is warranted because many of these patients can be rendered disease free.

Primary lymphoma of the breast: a case of marginal zone B-cell lymphoma.

A case of primary marginal zone B-cell lymphoma in an elderly female patient is presented. Primary breast lymphomas are rare, comprising less than 1 per cent of all breast malignancies. These tumors have no clinical, pathologic, or radiologic pathognomonic features to distinguish them from breast adenocarcinoma. The diagnosis is usually made with an excisional biopsy, and more extensive surgery should be avoided. Delivery of radiation therapy and chemotherapy is tailored according to the histologic grade, stage of disease, and overall patient condition. This report summarizes the current knowledge reflected in the literature.

Postlactational microcalcifications.

A case of postlactational microcalcifications is reported. A 42-year-old woman presented for screening mammography 2 months after completion of breast-feeding. Comparison to her pregravid screening mammogram revealed the appearance of multiple groups of indeterminate microcalcifications bilaterally (BIRADS IV). She underwent bilateral stereotactic core biopsies of representative areas, yielding benign pathology. There have been anecdotal accounts and five reported cases of lactational microcalcifications in the radiology literature. We discuss the possible etiologies as well as implications of this mammographic finding.

Lobular carcinoma in ectopic axillary breast tissue.

Accessory mammary tissue is reported to occur in 2 per cent to 6 per cent of women and results from failure of regression of a portion of the galactic band, which runs from the axilla to the groin during embryogenesis. The differential diagnosis of a mass located along the course of the primitive milk line must include accessory breast tissue. This tissue is subject to the same physiologic and pathologic changes as in the breast proper. There are numerous case reports of masses arising in accessory breast tissue ranging from fibroadenomas and phyllodes tumors to invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma. The predominant pathology, as with the pectoral breast, is that of invasive ductal carcinoma. We present the case of a lobular carcinoma arising in axillary ectopic breast tissue. Although this has previously been reported, it is a rare entity.

Breast conservation in patients with multiple ipsilateral synchronous cancers.

BACKGROUND: Because breast cancer survival after breast conservation has proved comparable to mastectomy, contraindications to mastectomy are increasingly being challenged. We treated the majority of our patients with multiple synchronous ipsilateral cancers with breast conservation and we compared them with patients who underwent mastectomy for comparable disease during the same interval. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with multiple ipsilateral synchronous breast cancers between 1989 and 2002 were identified from prospective databases maintained by us. A comparison was made between 36 patients treated with lumpectomy and 19 patients treated with mastectomy. RESULTS: There were no significant (all p values >0.2) differences between mastectomy and breast conservation patients in age, racial distribution, size of cancers, pathology, tumor differentiation, nodal involvement, or hormone receptor positivity. The majority of patients treated with breast conservation underwent at least one reexcision to obtain clear pathologic margins, and they were more likely to receive postoperative radiotherapy than patients treated with mastectomy. There were no significant differences in the local (97% versus 100%, p = 0.54) or distant (97% versus 95%, p = 0.20) 5-year disease- free survival between the group treated with breast conservation and the group treated with mastectomy. One patient in each group developed distant metastases. One patient in the breast conservation group developed local recurrence at both primary sites simultaneously 39 months after lumpectomies. She is free of disease 78 months after mastectomy. The remaining 52 patients are alive and free of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Breast conservation is an effective treatment for patients with synchronous ipsilateral breast cancers.