Cholesterol Hydroperoxide Co-trafficking in Testosterone-generating Leydig Cells: GPx4 Inhibition of Cytotoxic and Anti-steroidogenic Effects.

Trafficking of intracellular cholesterol (Ch) to and into mitochondria of steroidogenic cells is required for steroid hormone biosynthesis. This trafficking is typically mediated by one or more proteins of the steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) family. Our previous studies revealed that 7-OOH, a redox-active cholesterol hydroperoxide, could be co-trafficked with Ch to/into mitochondria of MA-10 Leydig cells, thereby inducing membrane lipid peroxidation (LPO) which impaired progesterone biosynthesis. These negative effects of 7-OOH were inhibited by endogenous selenoperoxidase GPx4, indicating that this enzyme could protect against 7-OOH-induced oxidative damage/dysfunction. In the present study, we advanced our Leydig focus to cultured murine TM3 cells and then to primary cells from rat testis, both of which produce testosterone. Using a fluorescent probe, we found that extensive free radical-mediated LPO occurred in mitochondria of stimulated primary Leydig cells during treatment with liposomal Ch+7-OOH, resulting in a significant decline in testosterone output relative to that with Ch alone. Strong enhancement of LPO and testosterone shortfall by RSL3 (a GPx4 inhibitor) and reversal thereof by Ebselen (a GPx4 mimetic), suggested that endogenous GPx4 was playing a key antioxidant role. 7-OOH in increasing doses was also cytotoxic to these cells, RSL3 exacerbating this in Ebselen-reversable fashion. Moreover, GPx4 knockdown increased cell sensitivity to LPO with reduced testosterone output. These findings, particularly with primary Leydigs (which best represent cells in intact testis) suggest that GPx4 plays a key protective role against peroxidative damage/dysfunction induced by 7-OOH co-trafficking with Ch.

Hyper-Aggressiveness of Bystander Cells in an Anti-Tumor Photodynamic Therapy Model: Role of Nitric Oxide Produced by Targeted Cells.

When selected tumor cells in a large in vitro population are exposed to ionizing radiation, they can send pro-survival signals to non-exposed counterparts (bystander cells). If there is no physical contact between irradiated and bystander cells, the latter respond to mediators from targeted cells that diffuse through the medium. One such mediator is known to be nitric oxide (NO). It was recently discovered that non-ionizing anti-tumor photodynamic therapy (PDT) can also elicit pro-survival/expansion bystander effects in a variety of human cancer cells. A novel silicone ring-based approach was used for distinguishing photodynamically-targeted cells from non-targeted bystanders. A key finding was that NO from upregulated iNOS in surviving targeted cells diffused to the bystanders and caused iNOS/NO upregulation there, which in turn stimulated cell proliferation and migration. The intensity of these responses depended on the extent of iNOS/NO induction in targeted cells of different cancer lines. Moreover, the responses could be replicated using NO from the chemical donor DETA/NO. This review will focus on these and related findings, their negative implications for clinical PDT, and how these might be averted by using pharmacologic inhibitors of iNOS activity or transcription.

Pro-Tumor Activity of Endogenous Nitric Oxide in Anti-Tumor Photodynamic Therapy: Recently Recognized Bystander Effects.

Various studies have revealed that several cancer cell types can upregulate inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and iNOS-derived nitric oxide (NO) after moderate photodynamic treatment (PDT) sensitized by 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-induced protoporphyrin-IX. As will be discussed, the NO signaled cell resistance to photokilling as well as greater growth and migratory aggressiveness of surviving cells. On this basis, it was predicted that diffusible NO from PDT-targeted cells in a tumor might enhance the growth, migration, and invasiveness of non- or poorly PDT-targeted bystander cells. This was tested using a novel approach in which ALA-PDT-targeted cancer cells on a culture dish were initially segregated from non-targeted bystander cells of the same type via impermeable silicone-rimmed rings. Several hours after LED irradiation, the rings were removed, and both cell populations were analyzed in the dark for various responses. After a moderate extent of targeted cell killing (~25%), bystander proliferation and migration were evaluated, and both were found to be significantly enhanced. Enhancement correlated with iNOS/NO upregulation in surviving PDT-targeted cancer cells in the following cell type order: PC3 > MDA-MB-231 > U87 > BLM. If occurring in an actual PDT-challenged tumor, such bystander effects might compromise treatment efficacy by stimulating tumor growth and/or metastatic dissemination. Mitigation of these and other negative NO effects using pharmacologic adjuvants that either inhibit iNOS transcription or enzymatic activity will be discussed.

Trafficking of oxidative stress-generated lipid hydroperoxides: pathophysiological implications.

Lipid hydroperoxides (LOOHs) are reactive intermediates that arise during peroxidation of unsaturated phospholipids, glycolipids and cholesterol in biological membranes and lipoproteins. Non-physiological lipid peroxidation (LPO) typically occurs under oxidative stress conditions associated with pathologies such as atherogenesis, neurodegeneration, and carcinogenesis. As key intermediates in the LPO process, LOOHs are susceptible to one-electron versus two-electron reductive turnover, the former exacerbating membrane or lipoprotein damage/dysfunction and the latter diminishing it. A third possible LOOH fate is translocation to an acceptor membrane/lipoprotein, where one- or two-electron reduction may then ensue. In the case of cholesterol (Ch)-derived hydroperoxides (ChOOHs), translocation can be specifically stimulated by StAR family trafficking proteins, which are normally involved in Ch homeostasis and Ch-mediated steroidogenesis. In this review, we discuss how these processes can be impaired by StAR-mediated ChOOH and Ch co-trafficking to mitochondria of vascular macrophages and steroidogenic cells, respectively. The protective effects of endogenous selenoperoxidase, GPx4, are also discussed. This is the first known example of detrimental ChOOH transfer via a natural Ch trafficking pathway and inhibition thereof by GPx4.

Role of nitric oxide in hyper-aggressiveness of tumor cells that survive various anti-cancer therapies.

Low level nitric oxide (NO) produced by inducible NO synthase (iNOS) in many malignant tumors is known to play a key role in the survival and proliferation of tumor cells. NO can also induce or augment resistance to anti-tumor treatments such as platinum-based chemotherapy (CT), ionizing radiotherapy (RT), and non-ionizing photodynamic therapy (PDT). In each of these treatments, tumor cells that survive the challenge may exhibit a striking increase in NO-dependent proliferative, migratory, and invasive aggressiveness compared with non-challenged controls. Moreover, NO from cells directly targeted by PDT can often stimulate aggressiveness in non- or poorly targeted bystander cells. Although NO-mediated resistance to many of these therapies is fairly-well recognized by now, the hyper-aggressiveness of surviving cells and bystander counterparts is not. We will focus on these negative aspects in this review, citing examples from the PDT, CT, and RT publications. Increased aggressiveness of cells that escape therapeutic elimination is a concern because it could enhance tumor progression and metastatic dissemination. Pharmacologic approaches for suppressing these negative responses will also be discussed, e.g., administering inhibitors of iNOS activity or iNOS expression as therapeutic adjuvants.

The Negative Impact of Cancer Cell Nitric Oxide on Photodynamic Therapy.

Numerous studies have shown that low-flux nitric oxide (NO) in tumors produced mainly by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS/NOS2) can signal for angiogenesis, inhibition of apoptosis, and promotion of cell growth, migration, and invasion. Studies in the authors' laboratory have revealed that iNOS-derived NO in various cancer cell types elicits resistance to cytotoxic photodynamic therapy (PDT) and moreover endows PDT-surviving cells with more aggressive proliferation and migration/invasion. In this chapter, we describe how cancer cell iNOS/NO in vitro can be monitored in different PDT model systems (e.g., a targeted cell-bystander cell model) and how pharmacologic interference with basal and PDT-upregulated iNOS/NO can significantly improve PDT outcomes.

Anti-steroidogenic effects of cholesterol hydroperoxide trafficking in MA-10 Leydig cells: Role of mitochondrial lipid peroxidation and inhibition thereof by selenoperoxidase GPx4.

Steroid hormone synthesis in steroidogenic cells requires cholesterol (Ch) delivery to/into mitochondria via StAR family trafficking proteins. In previous work, we discovered that 7-OOH, an oxidative stress-induced cholesterol hydroperoxide, can be co-trafficked with Ch, thereby causing mitochondrial redox damage/dysfunction. We now report that exposing MA-10 Leydig cells to Ch/7-OOH-containing liposomes (SUVs) results in (i) a progressive increase in fluorescence probe-detected lipid peroxidation in mitochondrial membranes, (ii) a reciprocal decrease in immunoassay-detected progesterone generation, and ultimately (iii) loss of cell viability with increasing 7-OOH concentration. No significant effects were observed with a phospholipid hydroperoxide over the same concentration range. Glutathione peroxidase GPx4, which can catalyze lipid hydroperoxide detoxification, was detected in mitochondria of MA-10 cells. Mitochondrial lipid peroxidation and progesterone shortfall were exacerbated when MA-10 cells were treated with Ch/7-OOH in the presence of RSL3, a GPx4 inhibitor. However, Ebselen, a selenoperoxidase mimetic, substantially reduced RSL3's negative effects, thereby partially rescuing the cells from peroxidative damage. These findings demonstrate that co-trafficking of oxidative stress-induced 7-OOH can disable steroidogenesis, and that GPx4 can significantly protect against this.

Intermembrane Translocation of Photodynamically Generated Lipid Hydroperoxides: Broadcasting of Redox Damage.

Lipid hydroperoxides (LOOHs), including cholesterol- and phospholipid-derived species, are reactive intermediates that arise during photosensitized peroxidation of unsaturated lipids in biological membranes. These intermediates may appear in cancer cell membranes during anti-tumor photodynamic therapy (PDT). Photodynamically generated LOOHs have several different fates, including (a) iron-catalyzed one-electron reduction to free radical species which trigger damaging chain peroxidation reactions, (b) selenoperoxidase-catalyzed two-electron reduction to redox-inert alcohols (LOHs), and (c) spontaneous or protein-mediated translocation to other lipid membrane compartments where (a) or (b) may take place. These different LOOH fates will be described in this review, but with special attention to category (c), which the authors were the first to describe and characterize. Seminal early findings on cholesterol hydroperoxide (ChOOH) translocation and its potential negative consequences will be discussed. In reviewing this work, we wish to congratulate Jean Cadet, for his many outstanding accomplishments as a photobiologist and P&P editor.

Pathophysiological potential of lipid hydroperoxide intermembrane translocation: Cholesterol hydroperoxide translocation as a special case.

Peroxidation of unsaturated phospholipids, glycolipids, and cholesterol in biological membranes under oxidative stress conditions can underlie a variety of pathological conditions, including atherogenesis, neurodegeneration, and carcinogenesis. Lipid hydroperoxides (LOOHs) are key intermediates in the peroxidative process. Nascent LOOHs may either undergo one-electron reduction to exacerbate membrane damage/dysfunction or two-electron reduction to attenuate this. Another possibility is LOOH translocation to an acceptor site, followed by either of these competing reductions. Cholesterol (Ch)-derived hydroperoxides (ChOOHs) have several special features that will be highlighted in this review. In addition to being susceptible to one-electron vs. two-electron reduction, ChOOHs can translocate from a membrane of origin to another membrane, where such turnover may ensue. Intracellular StAR family proteins have been shown to deliver not only Ch to mitochondria, but also ChOOHs. StAR-mediated transfer of free radical-generated 7-hydroperoxycholesterol (7-OOH) results in impairment of (a) Ch utilization in steroidogenic cells, and (b) anti-atherogenic reverse Ch transport in vascular macrophages. This is the first known example of how a peroxide derivative can be recognized by a natural lipid trafficking pathway with deleterious consequences. For each example above, we will discuss the underlying mechanism of oxidative damage/dysfunction, and how this might be mitigated by antioxidant intervention.

Photodynamic Therapy as an Oxidative Anti-Tumor Modality: Negative Effects of Nitric Oxide on Treatment Efficacy.

Anti-tumor photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a unique oxidative stress-based modality that has proven highly effective on a variety of solid malignancies. PDT is minimally invasive and generates cytotoxic oxidants such as singlet molecular oxygen (1O2). With high tumor site-specificity and limited off-target negative effects, PDT is increasingly seen as an attractive alternative or follow-up to radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Nitric oxide (NO) is a short-lived bioactive free radical molecule that is exploited by many malignant tumors to promote cell survival, proliferation, and metastatic expansion. Typically generated endogenously by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS/NOS2), low level NO can also antagonize many therapeutic interventions, including PDT. In addition to elevating resistance, iNOS-derived NO can stimulate growth and migratory aggressiveness of tumor cells that survive a PDT challenge. Moreover, NO from PDT-targeted cells in any given population is known to promote such aggressiveness in non-targeted counterparts (bystanders). Each of these negative responses to PDT and their possible underlying mechanisms will be discussed in this chapter. Promising pharmacologic approaches for mitigating these NO-mediated responses will also be discussed.

Nitric Oxide-elicited Resistance to Antitumor Photodynamic Therapy via Inhibition of Membrane Free Radical-mediated Lipid Peroxidation.

This review focuses on the ability of nitric oxide (NO) to antagonize antitumor photodynamic therapy (PDT). NO's anti-PDT effects were recognized relatively recently and require a better mechanistic understanding for developing new strategies to improve PDT efficacy. Many PDT sensitizers (PSs) are amphiphilic and tend to localize in membrane compartments of tumor cells. Unsaturated lipids in these compartments can undergo peroxidative degradation after PS photoactivation. Primary Type I (free radical) vs. Type II (singlet oxygen) photochemistry of lipid peroxidation is discussed, along with light-independent turnover of primary lipid hydroperoxides to free radical species. Chain lipid peroxidation mediated by the latter exacerbates membrane damage and cytotoxicity after a PDT challenge. Our studies have shown that NO from chemical donors can suppress chain peroxidation by intercepting lipid-derived free radical intermediates, thereby protecting cancer cells against photokilling. More recent evidence has revealed that inducible NO synthase (iNOS) is dramatically upregulated in several cancer cell types after a photodynamic challenge, and that iNOS-derived NO enhances resistance as well as growth and migratory aggressiveness of surviving cells. Chain breaking by NO and other possible NO-based resistance mechanisms are discussed, along with novel pharmacologic approaches for overcoming these negative effects.

Nitric oxide-elicited resistance to anti-glioblastoma photodynamic therapy.

Glioblastoma multiforme is a highly aggressive primary brain malignancy that resists most conventional chemoand radiotherapeutic interventions. Nitric oxide (NO), a short lived free radical molecule produced by inducible NO synthase (iNOS) in glioblastomas and other tumors, is known to play a key role in tumor persistence, progression, and chemo/radiotherapy resistance. Site-specific and minimally invasive photodynamic therapy (PDT), based on oxidative damage resulting from non-ionizing photoactivation of a sensitizing agent, is highly effective against glioblastoma, but resistance also exists in this case. Studies in the authors' laboratory have shown that much of the latter is mediated by iNOS/NO. For example, when glioblastoma U87 or U251 cells sensitized in mitochondria with 5-aminolevulinic acid -induced protoporphyrin IX were exposed to a moderate dose of visible light, the observed apoptosis was strongly enhanced by an iNOS activity inhibitor or NO scavenger, indicating that iNOS/NO had increased cell resistance to photokilling. Moreover, cells that survived the photochallenge proliferated, migrated, and invaded more aggressively than controls, and these responses were also driven predominantly by iNOS/NO. Photostress-upregulated iNOS rather than basal enzyme was found to be responsible for all the negative effects described. Recognition of NO-mediated hyper-resistance/hyper-aggression in PDT-stressed glioblastoma has stimulated interest in how these responses can be prevented or at least minimized by pharmacologic adjuvants such as inhibitors of iNOS activity or transcription. Recent developments along these lines and their clinical potential for improving anti-glioblastoma PDT are discussed.

Nitric Oxide Inhibition of Chain Lipid Peroxidation Initiated by Photodynamic Action in Membrane Environments.

Iron-catalyzed, free radical-mediated lipid peroxidation may play a major role in tumor cell killing by photodynamic therapy (PDT), particularly when membrane-localizing photosensitizers are employed. Many cancer cells exploit endogenous iNOS-generated NO for pro-survival/expansion purposes and for hyper-resistance to therapeutic modalities, including PDT. In addition to inhibiting the pro-oxidant activity of Fe(II) via nitrosylation, NO may intercept downstream lipid oxyl and peroxyl radicals, thereby acting as a chain-breaking antioxidant. We investigated this for the first time in the context of PDT by using POPC/Ch/PpIX (100:80:0.2 by mol) liposomes (LUVs) as a model system. Cholesterol (Ch or [14C]Ch) served as an in-situ peroxidation probe and protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) as photosensitizer. PpIX-sensitized lipid peroxidation was monitored by two analytical methods that we developed: HPLC-EC(Hg) and HPTLC-PI. 5α-hydroperoxy-Ch (5α-OOH) accumulated rapidly and linearly with irradiation time, indicating singlet oxygen (1O2) intermediacy. When ascorbate (AH-) and trace lipophilic iron [Fe(HQ)3] were included, 7α/7ß-hydroperoxy-Ch (7-OOH) accumulated exponentially, indicating progressively greater membrane-damaging chain lipid peroxidation. With AH-/Fe(HQ)3 present, the NO donor SPNO had no effect on 5α-OOH formation, but dose-dependently inhibited 7-OOH formation due to NO interception of chain-carrying oxyl and peroxyl radicals. Similar results were obtained when cancer cells were PpIX/light-treated, using SPNO or activated macrophages as the NO source. These findings implicate chain lipid peroxidation in PDT-induced cytotoxicity and NO as a potent antagonist thereof by acting as a chain-breaking antioxidant. Thus, unless NO formation in aggressive tumors is suppressed, it can clearly compromise PDT efficacy.

Negative effects of tumor cell nitric oxide on anti-glioblastoma photodynamic therapy.

Glioblastomas are highly aggressive brain tumors that can persist after exposure to conventional chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Nitric oxide (NO) produced by inducible NO synthase (iNOS/NOS2) in these tumors is known to foster malignant cell proliferation, migration, and invasion as well as resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy. Minimally invasive photodynamic therapy (PDT) sensitized by 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-induced protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) is a highly effective anti-glioblastoma modality, but it is also subject to NO-mediated resistance. Studies by the authors have revealed that glioblastoma U87 and U251 cells use endogenous iNOS/NO to not only resist photokilling after an ALA/light challenge, but also to promote proliferation and migration/invasion of surviving cells. Stress-upregulated iNOS/NO was found to play a major role in these negative responses to PDT-like treatment. Our studies have revealed a tight network of upstream signaling events leading to iNOS induction in photostressed cells and transition to a more aggressive phenotype. These events include activation or upregulation of pro-survival/ pro-expansion effector proteins such as NF-κB, phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K), protein kinase-B (Akt), p300, Survivin, and Brd4. In addition to this upstream signaling and its regulation, pharmacologic approaches for directly suppressing iNOS at its activity vs. transcriptional level are discussed. One highly effective agent in the latter category is bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) inhibitor, JQ1, which was found to minimize iNOS upregulation in photostressed U87 cells. By acting similarly at the clinical level, a BET inhibitor such as JQ1 should markedly improve the efficacy of anti-glioblastoma PDT.

Nitric Oxide-Mediated Resistance to Antitumor Photodynamic Therapy.

As an antitumor modality based on sensitizer photoexcitation by tumor-directed light, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has the advantage of being site-specific compared with conventional chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Like these other therapies, however, PDT is often limited by pre-existing or acquired resistance. One type of resistance, discovered in the author's laboratory, involves nitric oxide (NO) generated by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in tumor cells. Using human breast, prostate and brain cancer cell lines, we have shown that iNOS is dramatically upregulated after a moderate PDT challenge sensitized by 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX. The elevated NO not only elicited a greater resistance to cell photokilling, but also an increase in the growth and migration/invasion rate of surviving cells. Greater iNOS/NO-based resistance was also demonstrated at the in vivo level using a breast tumor xenograft model. More recent studies have shown that NO from PDT-targeted cells can stimulate a progrowth/promigration response in non-targeted bystander cells. These novel effects of NO, their negative impact on PDT efficacy and possible mitigation thereof by anti-iNOS/NO pharmacologic agents will be discussed.

Upregulation of pro-tumor nitric oxide by anti-tumor photodynamic therapy.

Many malignant tumors use endogenous nitric oxide (NO) to promote survival, growth, and metastatic migration. This NO, which is typically generated by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), can also antagonize various anti-cancer therapies and its source is most often assumed to be constitutive or pre-existing iNOS. In this paper, we provide evidence (i) that many different cancer cells exhibit resistance to oxidative killing by photodynamic therapy (PDT), and (ii) that cells surviving the challenge grow, migrate and invade more aggressively, as do non-targeted bystander cells. Accompanying these effects are activation or upregulation of pro-survival/progression effector proteins such as NF-κB, Akt, and Survivin. Observed in the author's laboratory, these responses were not attributed to basal iNOS/NO in most cases, but rather to NO from enzyme that was strongly upregulated by photodynamic stress. Each of these effects and how they can be mitigated by inhibitors of iNOS activity or transcription, or by NO scavengers will be discussed. When approved for clinical use, such pharmacologic agents could improve PDT efficacy as well as reduce potentially negative side-effects of this therapy.

Bystander Effects of Nitric Oxide in Cellular Models of Anti-Tumor Photodynamic Therapy.

Tumor cells exposed to stress-inducing radiotherapy or chemotherapy can send signals to non- or minimally exposed bystander cells. Bystander effects of ionizing radiation are well established, but little is known about such effects in non-ionizing photodynamic therapy (PDT). Our previous studies revealed that several cancer cell types upregulate inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and nitric oxide (NO) after a moderate 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-based PDT challenge. The NO signaled for cell resistance to photokilling as well as greater growth, migration and invasion of surviving cells. Based on this work, we hypothesized that diffusible NO produced by PDT-targeted cells in a tumor might elicit pro-growth/migration responses in non-targeted bystander cells. In the present study, we tested this using a novel approach, in which ALA-PDT-targeted human cancer cells on culture dishes (prostate PC3, breast MDA-MB-231, glioma U87, or melanoma BLM) were initially segregated from non-targeted bystanders via impermeable silicone-rimmed rings. Several hours after LED irradiation, rings were removed, and both cell populations analyzed for various post-hν responses. For a moderate and uniform level of targeted cell killing by PDT (~25%), bystander proliferation and migration were both enhanced. Enhancement correlated with iNOS/NO upregulation in surviving targeted cells in the following order: PC3 > MDA-MB-231 > U87 > BLM. If occurring in an actual tumor PDT setting and not suppressed (e.g., by iNOS activity or transcription inhibitors), then such effects could compromise treatment efficacy or even stimulate disease progression if PDT's anti-tumor potency is not great enough.

Upstream signaling events leading to elevated production of pro-survival nitric oxide in photodynamically-challenged glioblastoma cells.

Nitric oxide (NO) generated endogenously by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) promotes growth and migration/invasion of glioblastoma cells and also fosters resistance to chemotherapy and ionizing radiotherapy. Our recent studies revealed that glioblastoma cell iNOS/NO also opposes the cytotoxic effects of non-ionizing photodynamic therapy (PDT), and moreover stimulates growth/migration aggressiveness of surviving cells. These negative responses, which depended on PI3K/Akt/NF-κB activation, were strongly suppressed by blocking iNOS transcription with JQ1, a BET bromodomain inhibitor. In the present study, we sought to identify additional molecular events that precede iNOS transcriptional upregulation. Akt activation, iNOS induction, and viability loss in PDT-challenged glioblastoma U87 cells were all strongly inhibited by added l-histidine, consistent with primary involvement of photogenerated singlet oxygen (1O2). Transacetylase p300 not only underwent greater Akt-dependent activation after PDT, but greater interaction with NF-κB subunit p65, which in turn exhibited greater K310 acetylation. In addition, PDT promoted intramolecular disulfide formation and inactivation of tumor suppressor PTEN, thereby favoring Akt and p300 activation leading to iNOS upregulation. Importantly, deacetylase Sirt1 was down-regulated by PDT stress, consistent with the observed increase in p65-acK310 level, which fostered iNOS transcription. This study provides new mechanistic insights into how glioblastoma tumors can exploit iNOS/NO to not only resist PDT, but to attain a more aggressive survival phenotype.

Nitric Oxide Antagonism to Anti-Glioblastoma Photodynamic Therapy: Mitigation by Inhibitors of Nitric Oxide Generation.

Many studies have shown that low flux nitric oxide (NO) produced by inducible NO synthase (iNOS/NOS2) in various tumors, including glioblastomas, can promote angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and migration/invasion. Minimally invasive, site-specific photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a highly promising anti-glioblastoma modality. Recent research in the authors' laboratory has revealed that iNOS-derived NO in glioblastoma cells elicits resistance to 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-based PDT, and moreover endows PDT-surviving cells with greater proliferation and migration/invasion aggressiveness. In this contribution, we discuss iNOS/NO antagonism to glioblastoma PDT and how this can be overcome by judicious use of pharmacologic inhibitors of iNOS activity or transcription.

Cholesterol Peroxidation as a Special Type of Lipid Oxidation in Photodynamic Systems.

Like other unsaturated lipids in cell membranes and lipoproteins, cholesterol (Ch) is susceptible to oxidative modification, including photodynamic oxidation. There is a sustained interest in the pathogenic properties of Ch oxides such as those generated by photooxidation. Singlet oxygen (1 O2 )-mediated Ch photooxidation (Type II mechanism) gives rise to three hydroperoxide (ChOOH) isomers: 5α-OOH, 6α-OOH and 6ß-OOH, the 5α-OOH yield far exceeding that of the others. 5α-OOH detection is relatively straightforward and serves as a definitive indicator of 1 O2 involvement in a reaction, photochemical or otherwise. Like all lipid hydroperoxides (LOOHs), ChOOHs can disrupt membrane or lipoprotein structure/function on their own, but subsequent light-independent reactions may either intensify or attenuate such effects. Such reactions include (1) one-electron reduction to redox-active free radical intermediates, (2) two-electron reduction to redox-silent alcohols and (3) translocation to other lipid compartments, where (1) or (2) may take place. In addition to these effects, ChOOHs may act as signaling molecules in reactions that affect cell fates. Although processes a-c have been well studied for ChOOHs, signaling activity is still poorly understood compared with that of hydrogen peroxide. This review focuses on these various aspects Ch photoperoxidation and its biological consequences.