An update on a systematic review of the use of geriatric assessment for older adults in oncology.

BACKGROUND: Our previous systematic review of geriatric assessment (GA) in oncology included a literature search up to November 2010. However, the quickly evolving field warranted an update. Aims of this review: (i) provide an overview of all GA instruments developed and/or in use in the oncology setting; (ii) evaluate effectiveness of GA in predicting/modifying outcomes (e.g. treatment decision impact, treatment toxicity, mortality, use of care). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic review of literature published between November 2010 and 10 August 2012. English, Dutch, French and German-language articles reporting cross-sectional or longitudinal, intervention or observational studies of GA instruments were included. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Library. Two researchers independently reviewed abstracts, abstracted data and assessed the quality using standardized forms. A meta-analysis method of combining proportions was used for the outcome impact of GA on treatment modification with studies included in this update combined with those included in our previous systematic review on the use of GA. RESULTS: Thirty-five manuscripts reporting 34 studies were identified. Quality of most studies was moderate to good. Eighteen studies were prospective, 11 cross-sectional and 5 retrospective. Three studies examined treatment decision-making impact and found decisions changed for fewer than half of assessed patients (weighted percent modification is 23.2% with 95% confidence interval (20.3% to 26.1%). Seven studies reported conflicting findings regarding predictive ability of GA for treatment toxicity/complications. Eleven studies examined GA predictions of mortality, and reported that instrumental activities of daily living, poor performance status and more numerous GA deficits were associated with increased mortality risk. Other outcomes could not be meta-analyzed. CONCLUSION: Consistent with our previous review, several domains of GA are associated with adverse outcomes. However, further research examining effectiveness of GA on treatment decisions and oncologic outcomes is needed.

Cabazitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours: results of a Phase I and pharmacokinetic study.

BACKGROUND: Although the taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel are among the most active agents for the treatment of a wide range of cancers, tumours often develop resistance to these treatments. Cabazitaxel is a novel taxane active in both preclinical models of chemotherapy-sensitive and -resistant human tumours and patients with advanced prostate cancer that progressed following docetaxel treatment. AIM: To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of cabazitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cabazitaxel was administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumours. The design allowed intrapatient dose escalation. The primary objective was to determine the MTD. Secondary objectives were to describe the safety profile, establish an appropriate dose, determine the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of cabazitaxel, and assess antitumour activity. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were recruited. The MTD was reached at 30 mg/m(2), at which three of five patients experienced haematologic DLTs during the first cycle. DLTs during subsequent cycles were mainly haematologic and reported at 25 and 30 mg/m(2) dosing levels. Nail disorders and severe alopecia were not reported, and neurotoxicity, fluid retention and hypersensitivity were mild and infrequent. Cabazitaxel demonstrated linear PK, a triphasic elimination profile, with a long half-life and high clearance. Of the 19 patients evaluable for response, one unconfirmed partial response and six occurrences of stable disease were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The 25mg/m(2) dose of cabazitaxel was recommended for use in future clinical studies. In this study, cabazitaxel had an acceptable tolerability profile and activity in cervical, colorectal, endometrial and lung cancers.

Use of geriatric assessment for older adults in the oncology setting: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Geriatric assessment is a multidisciplinary diagnostic process that evaluates the older adult's medical, psychological, social, and functional capacity. No systematic review of the use of geriatric assessment in oncology has been conducted. The goals of this systematic review were: 1) to provide an overview of all geriatric assessment instruments used in the oncology setting; 2) to examine the feasibility and psychometric properties of those instruments; and 3) to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of geriatric assessment in predicting or modifying outcomes (including the impact on treatment decision making, toxicity of treatment, and mortality). METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, Psychinfo, Cinahl, and the Cochrane Library for articles published in English, French, Dutch, or German between January 1, 1996, and November 16, 2010, reporting on cross-sectional, longitudinal, interventional, or observational studies that assessed the feasibility or effectiveness of geriatric assessment instruments. The quality of articles was evaluated using relevant quality assessment frameworks. RESULTS: We identified 83 articles that reported on 73 studies. The quality of most studies was poor to moderate. Eleven studies examined psychometric properties or diagnostic accuracy of the geriatric assessment instruments used. The assessment generally took 10-45 min. Geriatric assessment was most often completed to describe a patient's health and functional status. Specific domains of geriatric assessment were associated with treatment toxicity in 6 of 9 studies and with mortality in 8 of 16 studies. Of the four studies that examined the impact of geriatric assessment on the cancer treatment decision, two found that geriatric assessment impacted 40%-50% of treatment decisions. CONCLUSION: Geriatric assessment in the oncology setting is feasible, and some domains are associated with adverse outcomes. However, there is limited evidence that geriatric assessment impacted treatment decision making. Further research examining the effectiveness of geriatric assessment on treatment decisions and outcomes is needed.

What the specific tools of geriatrics and oncology can tell us about the role and status of geriatricians in a pilot geriatric oncology program.

BACKGROUND: Pilot Oncogeriatric Coordination Units (UPCOGs) were created by the French National Cancer Institute (INCA) in order to implement routine geriatric assessment of all cancer patients over 75 years of age. This article examines the role of geriatric and oncologic tools in the organization of medical oncogeriatric activities, focusing on the role and place of geriatricians. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative sociological survey in the West Paris Oncogeriatric Program (POGOP), one of the Pilot Oncogeriatric Coordination Units (UPCOGs) recently created in France. Various qualitative methods were used including a review of the literature, participative observational surveys, and semidirective interviews with medical staff managing elderly cancer patients. RESULTS: The results show that the way in which geriatric assessment procedures are implemented confirms the role of the geriatrician in the diagnosis and prevention of vulnerabilities and fragility at the time of initial diagnosis and medical decision making. Nevertheless, the articulation of these different working methods gives rise to various organizational configurations. CONCLUSIONS: The POGOP has largely contributed to clarifying medical activity in oncogeriatrics: identification of physicians, definition of shared goals, initiation, and structuring of new partnerships. Nevertheless, the geriatrician's tools, expertise, and know-how are often perceived ambiguously.

Quality of life during the course of cancer treatment in older newly diagnosed patients. Results of a prospective pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to report the quality of life (QoL) of older cancer patients during the first year after diagnosis and factors influencing QoL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Newly diagnosed patients aged ≥65 years were recruited for a pilot prospective cohort study at the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada. Participants were interviewed at baseline, and at 1.5, 3, 4.5, 6, and 12 months. QoL was assessed at each interview using the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire with 30 items. Logistic regression was conducted to determine which sociodemographic, health, and functional status characteristics were associated with decline in global health status/QoL between baseline and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: There were 112 participants at baseline (response rate 72%), median age of 74.1, and 70% were women. Between baseline and 12-month follow-up (n=78), 18 participants (23.1%) declined ≥10 points in global health status/QoL, while 34 participants (43.6%) remained stable and 23 participants (33.3%) improved ≥10 points. None of the sociodemographic, health, and functional status variables were associated with decline in logistic regression analyses. CONCLUSION: Almost 25% of older adults experienced clinically relevant decline in their QoL. Further research is needed on which factors influence decline in QoL in older adults.

Potential drug interactions in elderly cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Drug interaction constitutes a major challenge in elderly cancer patients. This study investigated the number and types of medications patients and potential drug interactions in these patients. METHODS: Treatments received by 105 cancer outpatients aged ≥70 years were analyzed using the French Thesaurus to identify drug-drug interactions according to four levels: contraindication, concomitant use not recommended, concomitant medications requiring precautions and concomitant medications to be taken into account. RESULTS: The mean number of medications per patient was 4.7 (range: 0-14). Among 97 patients taking ≥2 drugs, 45 potential interactions were identified, occurring in 32 patients. No contraindication, 2 cases of concomitant use not recommended, 9 cases requiring precautions (20%) and 34 cases of concomitant medications to be taken into account were identified. Drug interactions caused respiratory distress and increased bleeding risk. CONCLUSION: Drug interactions are common in the elderly, but almost half of interactions were moderate.

Survival of breast cancer patients with meningeal carcinomatosis.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the leading nonhematologic cause of meningeal carcinomatosis (MC). The aim of this study was to report the outcome of patients diagnosed with breast cancer MC and treated in single institution by a high-dose intrathecal methotrexate (MTX) regimen. METHODS: Ninety-one patients were diagnosed with breast cancer MC from 2000 to 2007. Intrathecal treatment was MTX 15 mg/day (days 1-5), hydrocortisone acetate (day 1) and oral folinic acid (days 1-5), repeated every 2 weeks. Patients and tumor characteristics were associated with the early clinical and biological outcome and with the overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The median survival was 4.5 months (range 0-53). In multivariate analysis, adverse prognostic factors at diagnosis were performance status >2 [P = 0.006, response rate (RR) = 0.33 (0.15-0.71)], more than three chemotherapy regimens before MC diagnosis [P = 0.03, RR = 0.40 (0.19-0.93)], negative hormone receptor status [P = 0.02, RR = 0.4 (0.19-0.90)] and high Cyfra 21-1 level [P = 0.048, RR = (0.09-0.99)]. Clinical progression after one cycle and biological response after two cycles were independently associated with OS [P < 0.001, RR = 0.09 (0.02-0.37) and P = 0.003, RR = 3.6 (1.5-8.5), respectively]. We propose a prognostic score in order to define three distinct groups of prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: MC presents a poor prognosis, but 1-year survival rate was 25%. This score may become a useful tool for treatment decision and clinical trials.

Does frailty predict hospitalization, emergency department visits, and visits to the general practitioner in older newly-diagnosed cancer patients? Results of a prospective pilot study.

Research on the use of health care by older newly-diagnosed cancer patients is sparse. We investigated whether frailty predicts hospitalization, emergency department (ED) and general practitioner (GP) visits in older cancer patients in a prospective pilot study. Newly-diagnosed cancer patients aged 65 years and over were recruited in the Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada. One hundred ten patients participated, mean age 74.1, 70% women. During 1 year follow-up, 52 patients (47.3%) had cancer-related hospitalizations, 23 patients (20.9%) had ED visit and 17 patients (15.5%) had GP visit. No frailty marker predicted hospitalization or visits to the GP. Cognitive impairment suspicion was the only frailty marker that predicted ED visits (odds ratio 4.97; 95%CI 1.14-21.69). Although health care use was considerable in this sample, most frailty markers were not associated with health care use in this pilot study.

Clinical experience of cancer specialists and geriatricians involved in cancer care of older patients: A qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer is an important health problem in older persons. The aim of this study was to explore how cancer specialists and geriatricians manage the treatment of older patients with cancer. METHODS: Interviews using semi-structured open-ended questions. SAMPLE: physicians working in oncology and geriatric medicine at McGill affiliated hospitals. ANALYSIS: Grounded-theory approach. RESULTS: 24 cancer specialists and 17 geriatricians participated. There was considerable variability with regard to assessment, treatment plan, and follow-up care and little collaboration between both specialists. The cancer specialists have more older cancer patients in their practice and collaborate with geriatricians mostly to deal with complications of cancer treatment. However, both groups of specialists expressed a desire to collaborate more and had similar research priorities. CONCLUSIONS: There was considerable variability in the management of older patients with cancer. Care for older patients with cancer might be improved by more collaboration between cancer specialists and geriatricians.

Phase II multicenter study of larotaxel (XRP9881), a novel taxoid, in patients with metastatic breast cancer who previously received taxane-based therapy.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options are limited for patients with refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Larotaxel (XRP9881) is a novel taxoid with preclinical activity against taxane-resistant breast cancer. The current phase II trial of larotaxel was conducted in women with taxane-treated MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were stratified by response to prior taxane therapy (resistant or nonresistant). Larotaxel 90 mg/m(2) was administered as a 1-h infusion every 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated for tumor response every two cycles. A blinded external response review committee determined the overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and time to progression (TtP) of the disease. Median survival time (MST) and safety were also evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty patients were treated. In the nonresistant group, the ORR was 42%; median DOR 5.3 months; median TtP 5.4 months; and MST 22.6 months. In the resistant group, the ORR was 19%; median DOR 5.0 months; median TtP 1.6 months; and MST 9.8 months. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (82%), fatigue (15%), diarrhea (12%), febrile neutropenia (9%), neutropenic infection (8%), and sensory neuropathy (7%). CONCLUSIONS: Larotaxel has good activity, manageable toxicity, and a favorable therapeutic index in women with taxane-pretreated MBC.

A dose-escalation study of indisulam in combination with capecitabine (Xeloda) in patients with solid tumours.

This dose escalation study was designed to determine the recommended dose of the multi-targeted cell cycle inhibitor indisulam in combination with capecitabine in patients with solid tumours and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of the combination. Thirty-five patients were treated with indisulam on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Capecitabine was administered two times daily (BID) on days 1-14. Plasma concentrations of indisulam, capecitabine and its three metabolites were determined for pharmacokinetic analysis. The main dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. Hand/foot syndrome and stomatitis were the major non-haematological toxicities. The recommended dose was initially established at indisulam 700 mg m(-2) and capecitabine 1250 mg m(-2) BID. However, during cycle 2 the recommended dose was poorly tolerated in three patients. A dose of indisulam 500 mg m(-2) and capecitabine 1250 mg m(-2) BID proved to be safe at cycle 1 and 2 in nine additional patients. Indisulam pharmacokinetics during cycle 1 were consistent with pharmacokinetic data from phase I mono-therapy studies. However, exposure to indisulam was remarkably increased at cycle 2 due to a drug-drug interaction between capecitabine and indisulam. Partial response was confirmed in two patients, one with colon carcinoma and the other with pancreatic carcinoma. Seventeen patients had stable disease. Indisulam (700 mg m(-2)) in combination with capecitabine (1250 mg m(-2) BID) was well tolerated during the first cycle. A dose of indisulam 500 mg m(-2) and capecitabine 1250 mg m(-2) BID was considered safe in multiple treatment cycles. The higher incidence of toxicities observed during cycle 2 can be explained by a time-dependent pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction.

Relationship between cytochrome 3A activity, inflammatory status and the risk of docetaxel-induced febrile neutropenia: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that cancer-related inflammation might increase the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) induced by docetaxel (DCX, Taxotere), by both affecting the exposure to DCX and the tissue sensitivity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Advanced cancer patients with normal liver function, performance status (PS)<3, were included. Cytochrome P450 3A (CYP 3A) activity was estimated before the first cycle of DCX by a single determination of midazolam plasma concentration, 4 hours after 0.015 mg/kg i.v. bolus. Following the first cycle of 75-100 mg/m2 DCX, clearance and area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) were estimated using a limited sampling strategy. RESULTS: Among 56 assessable patients, 7 FNs occurred after first cycle (13%). In univariate analysis, high midazolam concentration and free DCX AUC were associated with severe neutropenia and FN. In addition to DCX exposure-related parameters, the risk of FN was also correlated with poor PS, baseline lymphopenia and lung cancer, while high ferritin level, indicator of an inflammatory state, reached borderline significance (P=0.07). By multivariate analysis, total DCX AUC and baseline lymphopenia were associated with FN. High midazolam concentration was correlated with elevated ferritin level (r=0.32; P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Inflammatory status and lymphocyte count should be included in the evaluation of the benefice/risk ratio before the initiation of DCX.

Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of docetaxel: role of CYP3A, MDR1, and GST polymorphisms.

OBJECTIVE: Patients initiating docetaxel chemotherapy were genotyped for CYP3A4, CYP3A5, MDR1, GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTM3, and GSTP1 to identify variability factors of docetaxel pharmacokinetics and toxicity. METHODS: Genotyping was performed by direct sequencing (CYP3A4), real-time polymerase chain reaction (CYP3A5), and polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (MDR1 and GST). The clearance and area under the curve of docetaxel were calculated by use of a Bayesian approach. Absolute neutrophil count was recorded twice weekly. RESULTS: With regard to the pharmacokinetic analysis, 58 patients were included. CYP3A4*1B carriers (*1A/*1B, n=4), who are also CYP3A5*1/*3 carriers, had a significantly higher clearance and lower dose-normalized area under the curve of docetaxel than those with the wild genotype (*1A/*1A, n=53): 55.2+/-13.5 L/h versus 37.3+/-11.7 L/h (P=.01) and 31.4+/-6.2 (microg . h/L)/(mg/m(2)) versus 52.7+/-18.2 (microg . h/L)/(mg/m(2)) (P=.005), respectively. No influence of MDR1 was evidenced. With regard to the pharmacodynamic analysis, febrile neutropenia occurred more frequently in GSTP1*A/*B carriers (31.6% versus 3.7% in *A/*A carriers and 0% in *A/*C, *B/*B, and *B/*C carriers) (P=.037). Grade 3 neutropenia occurred more frequently in 3435TT MDR1 genotype carriers: TT, 100%; CT, 77.3%; and CC, 54.5% (P=.046). No influence of GSTM1, GSTT1, or GSTM3 polymorphisms was evidenced on docetaxel toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients carrying the CYP3A*1B allele may have enhanced docetaxel clearance and may be underexposed, whereas those carrying GSTP1*A/*B and 3435TT genotypes may have excessive hematologic toxicity. Further studies are warranted to determine the usefulness of genotyping before docetaxel treatment.

Characteristics and outcome of 1755 operable breast cancers in women over 70 years of age.

From 1981 to 1995, 1755 patients aged 70 years or over who had nonmetastatic unilateral breast carcinoma received curative local or regional treatment in our institute. Median follow-up was 8 years. The median age of these patients was 75 years (range: 70-94), and 86% were under 81 years of age. Tumors were classed as T3-4 in 24% of them; 18% had N1b/N2 tumors, and in 12% grade 3 disease was present. Only 19% were both ER and PR negative. The S phase fraction was <5% in 79% of patients. In 1046 patients (60%) modified radical mastectomy was performed, while 20% underwent lumpectomy and in 20% radiotherapy was the only treatment administered. Adjuvant endocrine therapy was given in 463 (26%) cases, and only 3% of patients received chemotherapy. The median overall survival time was 121 months. The overall cancer-related death rate was 49%. The 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 64%, and the 10-year local relapse rate was 14%. Prognostic factors determined on univariate analysis were tumor size, clinical nodal status (ER and PR), and grade. No significant difference in outcome was observed between mastectomy and conservative treatment. Parameters for which correlations with DFS were found on multivariate analysis were clinical nodal status (P < 0.0001), tumor size (P < 0.0001), ER (P < 0.0001), and PR (P = 0.04). Breast cancer in elderly women is frequently hormone-dependent (81%) with a low proliferation index. Prognostic factors are the same as in younger postmenopausal patients. More than 50% of these patients died from a cause other than their breast cancer.

Lack of relationship between EGFR-1 immunohistochemical expression and prognosis in a multicentre clinical trial of 93 patients with advanced primary ovarian epithelial cancer (GINECO group).

Epidermal growth factor receptor 1 (EGFR-1) overexpression is usually described as linked with a worse prognosis in a variety of tumours of epithelial origin. However, its role in ovarian cancer is still controversial. The aim of the present study was to analyse the prognostic impact of EGFR-1 in a retrospective series of 93 stage III-IV primary ovarian epithelial tumours. All patients, enrolled in a multicentre GINECO prospective clinical trial, were treated with the same platinum-based combination chemotherapy, and were followed up with a median of 69 months. Epidermal growth factor receptor 1 plasma membrane expression, assessed by immunohistochemistry on paraffin-embedded tissues, was correlated with clinical parameters as well as immunohistochemical expression results of HER-2 (c-erbB-2), BAX, BCL-2, p53 and anti-Ki-67, previously studied in the same series of patients. Positive immunostaining for EGFR-1 was seen in 31 of the 93 analysed cases (33%). No correlation was found between EGFR-1 expression and clinical parameters. No correlation was found between EGFR-1 expression and other biological markers, except for HER-2, which was limit for significance. Indeed, among the EGFR-1-negative cases, 10.3% expressed HER-2, whereas the HER-2-expressing tumours accounted for 27.6% of EGFR-1-positive cases (P=0.06). Epidermal growth factor receptor 1 overexpression had no prognostic impact on both overall and progression-free survival through univariate and multivariate analyses. The potential effect of EGFR-1 and HER-2 co-expression on targeted therapy against EGFR-1 and/or HER-2 molecules has to be further analysed.

Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on outcome in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma treated with first-line doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to analyze the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in comparison with other prognostic parameters on the outcome of a series of patients with breast carcinoma at time of metastatic recurrence. METHODS: Data from 1430 patients accrued in 8 prospective trials of anthracycline-based first-line chemotherapy conducted at the Institut Curie between 1977 and 1992 were reviewed. RESULTS: Patients who had not received adjuvant chemotherapy had better response rates (66%) than pretreated patients (56%; P < 0.0001). Median overall survival rates after metastatic recurrence were 26 months compared with 19 months, respectively (P < 0.0001). Local and regional recurrences as well as the number of organ sites involved with metastatic disease were reduced in patients who had received adjuvant chemotherapy. In a multivariate analysis, the following parameters if present at the initiation of treatment were associated with poor outcome: elevated lactico dehydrogenase (LDH), low Karnofsky index, short disease free interval, more than two involved sites, liver involvement, and prior adjuvant chemotherapy. This adverse prognostic effect of prior adjuvant chemotherapy was independent of the type of drugs and of the duration of the treatment and was present even in the subgroup patients with prolonged disease free intervals longer than 48 months. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy adversely affects overall response rates and overall survival rates in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma treated with first-line anthracycline based chemotherapy.