ABSTRACT
AIMS: We carried out a meta-analysis to determine the risk of treatment-related death associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor use in cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined data from the Medline and Google Scholar databases. We also examined original studies and review articles for cross-references. Eligible studies included randomised phase II and phase III trials of patients with cancer treated with ipilimumab, pembrolizumab; nivolumab; tremelimumab and atezolizumab. The authors extracted relevant information on participants, characteristics, treatment-related death and information on the methodology of the studies. RESULTS: After exclusion of ineligible records, 18 clinical trials were included in the analysis. The odds ratio for treatment-related death for CTLA-4 inhibitors (ipilimumab and tremelimumab) was 1.80 (95% confidence interval 1.25, 2.59; P=0.002) and for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab) was 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.31, 1.30; P=0.22). Treated cancer seems to have no effect on the risk of treatment-related death. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of our data showed that CTLA-4 inhibitors (ipilimumab and tremelimumab) in a higher dose (10 mg/kg) seem to be associated with a higher risk of treatment-related death compared with control regimens, whereas PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab) do not cause the same risk. Clinicians have to be fully aware of these differential risks and council their patients appropriately.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , CTLA-4 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Humans , Neoplasms/mortality , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
AIMS: Fatigue is one of the most prominent side-effects of immune checkpoint inhibition. Therefore, we assessed the risk of fatigue associated with inhibitors of the immune checkpoints. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined data from the Medline and Google Scholar databases. We also examined original studies and review articles for cross-references. Eligible studies included randomised phase II and phase III trials of patients with cancer treated with ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab and tremelimumab. The authors extracted relevant information on participants(') characteristics, all-grade and high-grade fatigue and information on the methodology of the studies. RESULTS: In total, 17 trials were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. The odds ratio for all-grade fatigue for CTLA-4 inhibitors was 1.23 (95% confidence interval 1.07, 1.41; P = 0.003) and for high-grade fatigue was 1.72 (95% confidence interval 1.26, 2.33; P = 0.0005). Moreover, the odds ratio for all-grade fatigue for PD-1 inhibitors was 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.62, 0.84; P < 0.0001) and for high-grade fatigue was 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.23, 0.56; P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of data showed that CTLA-4 inhibitors seem to be associated with a higher risk of all- and high-grade fatigue compared with control regimens, whereas PD-1 inhibitors seem to be associated with a lower risk of all- and high-grade fatigue compared with control regimens.
