Preventing eating disorders in young women: An RCT and mixed-methods evaluation of the peer-delivered Body Project.

OBJECTIVES: Young women are at increased risk for eating disorders during adolescence (age range = 16-19), and there is the need for effective, sustainable prevention programs delivered during this critical window of development. The Body Project is a dissonance-based program that reduces key risk factors for disordered eating. Few studies have evaluated the program or the participant experience when peer-delivered at the high school level. The objective of this study was to evaluate using mixed-methods the Body Project program when peer-delivered among high school women. METHOD: Three studies were conducted among young women in high school in the United States: (a) an open trial evaluation of a peer-delivered Body Project program (n = 112), (b) a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the Body Project with assessment-only control (n = 74), and (c) a qualitative investigation of participants' experiences (n = 131). RESULTS: Open trial participants reported significant reductions in eating disorder risk factors and improvements in mood and self-attitude constructs over the intervention period (ds = .32-.77, ps < .01). Intervention effects for Body Project participants in the RCT compared with control were significant for body dissatisfaction, thin ideal internalization, dietary restraint, self-compassion, body surveillance, and loneliness (ds = .55-1.38, ps < .02). Thematic analyses of qualitative data highlight considerations for program delivery and engagement, including insights about why women join the program and perspectives on peer leaders. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the effectiveness of the peer-delivered Body Project with high school-aged women and highlight key recommendations for increasing engagement and strengthening prevention programs among young women. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Self-Evaluation and Depressive Symptoms: A Latent Variable Analysis of Self-esteem, Shame-proneness, and Self-criticism.

This paper examined the unique associations of latent self-esteem with symptoms of depression, over-and-above latent shame-proneness (study 1) and latent self-criticism (study 2), among two samples of undergraduate students. In study 1, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed convergent and discriminant validity for most measures of shame-proneness and self-esteem. Shame-proneness and self-esteem (taken separately) were strongly related to depressive symptoms. Controlling for each other, self-esteem but not shame-proneness remained associated with depressive symptoms. In study 2, CFA showed convergent validity but not discriminant validity for measures of self-criticism and low self-esteem. Self-esteem and self-criticism (taken separately) were strongly related to depressive symptoms. Controlling for each other, however, neither construct was significantly associated with depressive symptoms. Findings suggest that (a) self-esteem and shame-proneness have good discriminant validity, (b) self-esteem is uniquely related to depressive symptoms above and beyond shame-proneness, and (c) self-report measures of self-criticism and self-esteem have poor discriminant validity.