A Rare Case of Sinonasal Lymphoepithelial Carcinoma Presented With Clinically Stage IV Disease.

Sinonasal lymphoepithelial carcinoma (SLEC) is an extremely rare malignancy. We present a case of SLEC in a 77-year-old man who presented with nasal congestion and persistent sinusitis. Imaging revealed a large right nasal mass involving right paranasal sinuses along with bulky bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy. In addition, there was a fluorodeoxyglucose avid L1 vertebral lesion. Biopsy of nasal mass and cervical lymph nodes showed syncytial growth of tumor cells in a lymphoplasmacytic background. Immunohistochemical stains showed positivity for pankeratin, CK5/6, epithelial membrane antigen, p40 (focal), and p63 (focal). An Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA by in situ hybridization was strong and diffusely positive. Based on these pathologic findings and considering the location of tumor, diagnosis of SLEC was rendered. L1 vertebral body lesion was clinical and radiologically considered to be a metastasis. Correlation with radiology to determine the exact location of tumor is extremely important for correct diagnosis due to its histopathologic similarities with relatively more common undifferentiated type of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. No standard treatment protocol has been established for this tumor yet. To our knowledge, this is first ever report of SLEC presented with clinical stage IV disease.

nab-Paclitaxel and cisplatin followed by cisplatin and radiation (Arm 1) and nab-paclitaxel followed by cetuximab and radiation (Arm 2) for locally advanced head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: a multicenter, non-randomized phase 2 trial.

In locally advanced head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC), clinical complete response (cCR) at the primary site, assessed by clinical examination, after induction chemotherapy predicts for a low relapse risk after subsequent chemoradiotherapy. Prior studies showed a cCR rate of 77% with induction nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel given with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (APF). The primary aims of this non-randomized phase 2 trial were to determine the cCR rate after induction nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin (Arm 1) and after nab-paclitaxel monotherapy (Arm 2). Eligibility required LA-HNSCC, T2-T4 stage classification, and suitable (Arm 1) or unsuitable (Arm 2) candidates for cisplatin. Arm 1 patients received nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin, then cisplatin with radiation. Arm 2 patients received nab-paclitaxel, then cetuximab with radiation. The primary endpoint was cCR after two cycles of induction chemotherapy. Each arm enrolled forty patients. cCR at the primary site occurred in 28 patients (70%) after nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin and in 8 patients (20%) after nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. The overall clinical response rate was 98% after nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin and 90% after nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. In subset analyses, cCR rates by T stage classifications (T2, T3, T4) were 54, 86, and 69% after nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin, and 14, 11, and 26% after nab-paclitaxel. cCR rates by human papillomavirus status (p16 positive oropharynx vs other) were 72 and 64% after nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin and 35 and 9% after nab-paclitaxel. The cCR rate after nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin was similar to APF; however, the cCR rate after nab-paclitaxel monotherapy was lower. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02573493 on October 9, 2015.

Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel with cetuximab and carboplatin as first-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: A single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 trial.

OBJECTIVES: Macropinocytosis promotes internalization of albumin into cells to serve as a nutrient supply and is constitutively driven by signaling pathways frequently hyperactivated in head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In this way, drugs bound to albumin may selectively target HNSCC. nab-paclitaxel is a nanoparticle albumin-bound formulation of paclitaxel that improves drug delivery into tumor compared to paclitaxel. The primary aim of this single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 trial was to determine if nab-paclitaxel, cetuximab, and carboplatin (CACTUX regimen) would result in longer progression-free survival (PFS) than the historical regimen (EXTREME: 5-fluorouracil, cetuximab, and a platinum). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated recurrent or metastatic HNSCC received six, three-week cycles of nab-paclitaxel, cetuximab, and carboplatin, followed by maintenance nab-paclitaxel and cetuximab until progression. We hypothesized the median PFS with CACTUX would be 35% longer than with EXTREME (corresponding to 7.6 vs 5.6 months; power 0.80, α = 0.05, one-sided test, n = 70). Secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Seventy-four patients enrolled into the trial; seventy were evaluable. The median PFS was 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.1-7.4). The ORR was 60%. Median follow-up was 18 months (IQR: 4.7-23). The median OS was 17.8 months (95% CI, 8.5-21.7) for all patients, and 19.8 months (95% CI, 10.9-22.0) for human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharynx SCC and 14.0 months (95% CI, 4.6-23.3) for HPV-unrelated HNSCC. CONCLUSION: Among patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC, CACTUX did not result in a longer PFS than historical EXTREME. However, CACTUX did result in a more favorable ORR and OS.

Implementation of a standardized approach to borderline resectable pancreatic cancer in a multisite community oncology program.

BACKGROUND: Treatment paradigms for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer are evolving with increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Variations in the definition of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and neoadjuvant approaches have made standardizing care for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer difficult. We report an effort to standardize management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer throughout Sanford Health, a large community oncology network. METHODS: Starting in October 2013, cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma without known metastatic disease were categorized as borderline resectable pancreatic cancer if they met ≥ 1 of the following criteria: (1) abutment of superior mesenteric, common hepatic, or celiac arteries with < 180° involvement, (2) venous involvement deemed potentially suitable for reconstruction, and/or (3) biopsy-proven lymph node involvement. Patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by reimaging and surgery if venous involvement had improved; if disease remained borderline resectable, patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical exploration as long as reimaging did not reveal evidence of progressive disease. RESULTS: Forty-three patients from October 2013 to April 2017 were diagnosed with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Twelve of 42 (29%) patients proceeded to surgical exploration directly after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 23 (55%) received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Overall, 28/43 (65%) underwent exploration with 19 (44%) able to undergo resection. Of those, 14/19 (74%) attained R0 resection and 11/19 (58%) were pathologic N0. No pretreatment or treatment variables were associated with resection rates; resection was the only variable associated with survival. CONCLUSION: This report demonstrates the feasibility of implementing a standardized approach to borderline resectable pancreatic cancer across multiple sites over a wide geographic area. Adherence to protocol therapies was good and surgical outcomes are similar to many reported series.

Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab With Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Phase IB Study.

PURPOSE: Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks interaction between programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) and its ligands (PD-L1, PD-L2). Although pembrolizumab is approved for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), its role in the management of locally advanced (LA) disease is not defined. We report a phase IB study evaluating the safety and efficacy of adding pembrolizumab to cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy in patients with LA HNSCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients included those with oral cavity (excluding lip), oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, or laryngeal stage III to IVB HNSCC (according to American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition, staging system) eligible for cisplatin-based, standard-dose (70 Gy) chemoradiotherapy. Pembrolizumab was administered concurrently with and after chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin. Safety was the primary end point and was determined by incidence of chemoradiotherapy adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs (irAEs). Efficacy was defined as complete response (CR) rate on end-of-treatment (EOT) imaging or with pathologic confirmation at 100 days postradiotherapy completion. Key secondary end points included overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: The study accrued 59 patients (human papillomavirus [HPV] positive, n = 34; HPV negative, n = 25) from November 2015 to October 2018. Five patients (8.8%) required discontinuation of pembrolizumab because of irAEs, all of which occurred during concurrent chemoradiotherapy; 98.3% of patients completed the full planned treatment dose (70 Gy) of radiotherapy without any delays ≥ 5 days; 88.1% of patients completed the goal cisplatin dose of ≥ 200 mg/m2. EOT CR rates were 85.3% and 78.3% for those with HPV-positive and -negative HNSCC, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab in combination with weekly cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy is safe and does not impair delivery of curative radiotherapy or chemotherapy in HNSCC. Early efficacy data support further investigation of this approach.

Delivering Precision Oncology in a Community Cancer Program: Results From a Prospective Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Precision oncology (PO) is a growing treatment approach in the era of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and matched therapies. Effective delivery of PO in the community has not been extensively studied. Our program developed a virtual molecular tumor board (MTB) strategy to help guide PO care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over 18 months, eligible adult patients with advanced, incurable solid tumor malignancies were enrolled in a molecular profiling (MP) study using the Foundation Medicine NGS panel. Results were reviewed through a weekly, videoconferenced MTB conducted across our largely rural integrated health system. Recommendations from the MTB were used to identify actionable alterations (AAs). Feasibility of PO care delivery was assessed as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of AAs, genomic matched treatments, genomic matched clinical trial enrollment, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 120 participants with a variety of advanced tumor types were enrolled. Of these, 109 (90.8%) had successful MP. Treatment on the basis of an AA was recommended by the MTB in 58% of patients (63 of 109) who had a successful MP result. For those completing MP, treatments included enrollment in a genomic matched clinical trial (n = 16; 14.6%) and genomic matched treatment with a Food and Drug Administration-approved agent (n = 23; 21.1%). Response and survival data were similar regardless of the matched treatment option chosen. CONCLUSION: A video-conferenced MTB-facilitated NGS testing and treatment delivery system was implemented in our integrated community oncology program. Continued use of this model aims to increase understanding of the impact of PO in this setting.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a well recognized, potentially life-threatening, complication of heparin therapy. It is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis which can be sometimes fatal. Making the diagnosis of HIT can be quite challenging for the clinician as it requires recognition of the tell-tale clinical presentation as well as positive confirmation with appropriate laboratory diagnostic tests. This paper reviews the pathophysiology, recognition, treatment and prevention of HIT for the clinical physician.