Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
2.
Community Ment Health J ; 57(5): 973-978, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32808081

ABSTRACT

The authors sought to determine whether providing a rapid-access ambulatory psychiatry encounter correlated with emergency department utilization during a 6-month follow-up period. Electronic medical records of patients who accessed ambulatory psychiatric care through an urgent care psychiatry clinic that offers treatment exclusively on a walk-in basis over a 1-year period (N = 157) were reviewed retrospectively to track emergency department encounters with and without a psychiatric chief complaint in the 6 months before and after the initial psychiatry evaluation. Among patients who had not previously received ambulatory psychiatric care (N = 88), emergency department utilization decreased from 0.68 visits per patient to 0.36, and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0147). No statistically significant differences were found between the average number of emergency department encounters in the 6 months before and after the rapid-access ambulatory psychiatry encounter, regardless of chief complaint, when all patients were included in the analysis. Providing a rapid-access ambulatory psychiatry encounter may reduce subsequent emergency department utilization among patients who have not previously received ambulatory psychiatric care.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Psychiatry , Ambulatory Care , Electronic Health Records , Humans , Retrospective Studies
3.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 63: 33-38, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30665667

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether continuous virtual monitoring, an intervention that facilitates patient observation through video technology, can be used to monitor suicide risk in the general hospital and emergency department (ED). METHOD: This was a retrospective analysis of a protocol in which select patients on suicide precautions in the general hospital and ED received virtual monitoring between June 2017 and March 2018. The primary outcome was the number of adverse events among patients who received virtual monitoring for suicide risk. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of patients for whom virtual monitoring was discontinued for behavioral reasons and the preference for observation type among nurses. RESULTS: 39 patients on suicide precautions received virtual monitoring. There were 0 adverse events (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.000-0.090). Virtual monitoring was discontinued for behavioral reasons in 4/38 cases for which the reason for terminating was recorded (0.105, 95%CI = 0.029-0.248). We were unable to draw conclusions regarding preference for observation type among nurses due to a low response rate to our survey. CONCLUSIONS: Suicide risk can feasibly be monitored virtually in the general hospital or ED when their providers carefully select patients for low impulsivity risk.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospitals, General , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Observation , Risk Assessment , Suicide Prevention , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
4.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 32(4): 481-489, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31300568

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Accommodating walk-in psychiatry visits in primary care can improve access to psychiatric care for patients from historically underserved groups. We sought to determine whether a walk-in psychiatry model embedded within an integrated care practice could be sustained over time, and to characterize the patients who accessed care through it. METHODS: We reviewed electronic health records linked to 811 psychiatry encounters in an integrated care practice between October 1, 2015 and September 30, 2017. Primary outcomes were the initial and return psychiatry encounters per month. Secondary outcomes were the demographics and diagnoses of patients who accessed their initial visits through walk-in sessions and scheduled appointments. RESULTS: 490 initial psychiatry evaluations and 321 return encounters took place over the 2-year study period. The volume of initial psychiatry evaluations per month did not significantly change, but the volume of psychiatry follow-up encounters significantly increased after the walk-in session expanded. Medicaid recipients (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.0); individuals without a college degree (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.5); individuals who were single, divorced, or separated (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.5); and individuals who identified as Black or Hispanic (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.7 to 3.6) were more likely to access an initial psychiatry evaluation through a walk-in session as opposed to a scheduled appointment. CONCLUSIONS: Providing psychiatric care on a walk-in basis in integrated care is sustainable. Patients from historically underserved groups may access psychiatric care disproportionately through a walk-in option when it is available.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Adult , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Appointments and Schedules , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Middle Aged , Models, Organizational , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Psychiatry/organization & administration , United States , Vulnerable Populations/statistics & numerical data
5.
Psychiatr Serv ; 70(9): 837-839, 2019 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31084294

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to determine whether a walk-in psychiatry model with longitudinal follow-up capability could improve access for patients who traditionally miss appointments. METHODS: An urgent care clinic that offers treatment exclusively on a walk-in basis was opened within an adult psychiatry practice to accommodate patients who missed prior scheduled appointments. Electronic health records for patients who received an initial psychiatry evaluation at the practice during a 6-month period (N=355) were reviewed retrospectively to track the clinic's productivity and patient demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Eighty patients (23%) accessed their initial psychiatry encounters through the walk-in clinic. Medicaid recipients (odds ratio [OR]=1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.10-3.24) and individuals without a college degree (OR=1.86, 95% CI=1.04-3.32) were more likely than patients with other insurance carriers and those with a college degree, respectively, to access care through a walk-in encounter versus a scheduled appointment. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal walk-in psychiatry services can feasibly be offered through the longitudinal urgent care psychiatry model. This model may serve as a unique access point for patients from historically underserved groups.


Subject(s)
Aftercare/statistics & numerical data , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Process Assessment, Health Care , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States
7.
J Patient Saf ; 14(3): e51-e55, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29957679

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Although the reporting of adverse events (AEs) is widely thought to be a key first step to improving patient safety in hospital systems, underreporting remains a common problem, particularly among physicians. We aimed to increase the number of safety reports filed by psychiatrists in our hospital system. METHODS: We piloted an online survey for psychiatry-specific AE reporting, the Psychiatry Morbidity and Mortality Incident Reporting Tool (PMIRT) for a 1-year period. An e-mail prompt containing a link to the survey was sent on a weekly basis to all psychiatry department clinical staff. The primary outcome was the total number of events reported by psychiatrists through PMIRT; secondary outcomes were the total number of AEs and the number of serious harm events filed by psychiatrists in our hospital's formal event reporting system before and after implementation of the new protocol. RESULTS: Psychiatrists filed 65 reports in PMIRT during the study period. The average number of AEs reported by psychiatrists in the hospital's formal event reporting system significantly increased after the intervention (P = 0.0251), and the average number of serious harm events reported by psychiatrists increased nonsignificantly (P = 0.1394). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of an increase in awareness of event reporting with a psychiatry-specific AE reporting tool resulted in a significant improvement in the number of reports by psychiatrists.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/psychology , Patient Safety/standards , Psychiatry/methods , Risk Management/methods , Humans , Morbidity , Mortality , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
Psychosomatics ; 59(4): 388-393, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29336787

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Boarding of patients with suicide risk in emergency departments (EDs) negatively affects both patients and society. Factors other than clinical severity may frequently preclude safe outpatient dispositions among suicidal patients boarding for psychiatric admission in the ED. OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which nonclinical factors preclude safe outpatient discharge from the ED among patients boarding for psychiatric admission based on suicide risk. METHODS: A survey regarding the importance of 13 clinical and 19 nonclinical barriers to safe outpatient disposition was administered in the ED to 40 adults who were determined by psychiatrists to require inpatient level of psychiatric care due to suicide risk. A second survey regarding whether addressing the nonclinical factors would have enabled a safe outpatient disposition in each case was administered to the psychiatrists who evaluated each patient participant. RESULTS: Out of 40 patient participants, 39 cited at least one nonclinical factor that could have enabled a safe outpatient disposition had it been correctable in the ED. According to the psychiatrists who made the decision to hospitalize, 10 (25%) of the patient participants could have been discharged had social support become available. CONCLUSION: Both clinical and nonclinical factors affect disposition from the ED after an evaluation for suicide risk. Attention to nonclinical factors should be considered in programmatic efforts to reduce ED boarding of patients with suicide risk.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/psychology , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Suicide Prevention , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Risk , Severity of Illness Index , Suicide/psychology
9.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 69(12): 1636-1647, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27720683

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Facial self-inflicted gunshot wounds (SIGSWs) cause a devastating midfacial defect and pose a challenging problem to the reconstructive surgeon. Face transplantation (FT) has the potential for near-normal restoration in otherwise non-reconstructible defects. Two out of 7 FT recipients at Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) sustained SIGSWs. In this study, we illustrate the role of FT in the management of SIGSWs through an aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial examination of outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of individuals with SIGSWs who were screened at BWH between 2008 and 2015. We then collected data of the injuries, modes of conventional reconstruction (CR), and deficits. For the FT recipients, we critically reviewed the psychosocial screening process and post-transplantation aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial outcomes. RESULTS: A total of six individuals post-SIGSWs were screened for FT. All of them had undergone CR, with five receiving loco-regional flaps and free tissue transfers, and one undergoing serial debridement and primary soft-tissue repair. Following CR, all suffered from residual functional and aesthetic deficits. Two underwent partial FT and one is currently undergoing FT screening. We describe the pre-transplant psychosocial screening process and the aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial outcomes of the SIGSW FT recipients. CONCLUSIONS: We examined the facial SIGSW injury, outcomes of CR, and the mechanism of FT to offer a potential solution to the shortcomings of CR. More importantly, we highlight the critical nature of the psychosocial component of the multidisciplinary evaluation given the history of mental illness and suicidal behavior in this subset of patients.


Subject(s)
Bone Transplantation , Facial Injuries , Facial Transplantation , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Self-Injurious Behavior/diagnosis , Wounds, Gunshot , Adult , Bone Transplantation/adverse effects , Bone Transplantation/methods , Decision Making, Computer-Assisted , Facial Injuries/etiology , Facial Injuries/physiopathology , Facial Injuries/psychology , Facial Injuries/surgery , Facial Transplantation/adverse effects , Facial Transplantation/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Psychological Techniques , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Flaps , Treatment Outcome , United States , Wounds, Gunshot/diagnosis , Wounds, Gunshot/surgery
10.
J Psychosom Res ; 89: 11-5, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27663104

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Missed appointments decrease clinic capacity and negatively affect health outcomes. The objective of this study was to increase the proportion of filled initial psychiatry appointments in an urban, hospital-based primary care practice. METHODS: Patients were identified as having a high or low risk of missing their initial psychiatry appointments based on prior missed medical appointments. High-risk patients were referred to a walk-in clinic instead of a scheduled appointment. The primary outcome was ratio of filled appointments to booked appointments. We used a statistical process control chart (p chart) to measure improvement. Secondary outcomes were percentages of patients from historically underserved groups who received an initial psychiatry evaluation before and after the intervention. RESULTS: The average ratio of filled to booked initial appointments increased from 59% to 77% after the intervention, and the p chart confirmed that this change represented special cause variation. No statistically significant demographic differences between the patients who received psychiatric evaluations before and after the intervention were found. CONCLUSIONS: Missed initial psychiatry appointments can be accurately predicted by prior missed medical appointments. A referral-based walk-in clinic is feasible and does not reduce access to care for historically underserved patient groups.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/trends , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/trends , Patient Compliance/psychology , Primary Health Care/trends , Psychiatry/trends , Referral and Consultation/trends , Adult , Appointments and Schedules , Female , Humans , Male , Primary Health Care/methods , Psychiatry/methods
11.
Psychosomatics ; 56(1): 52-8, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25619674

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The number of interested candidates for psychosomatic medicine (PM) training programs has not matched the growing need for psychiatrists trained to care for complex medically ill patients. The reasons for this lack of growth may be found in the experience of new entrants into the subspecialty. OBJECTIVE: To investigate this issue, we conducted a survey of early career psychiatrists (ECPs) practicing PM to identify the personal and professional characteristics of ECP PM specialists and to examine the relevance of PM training to professional practice. METHODS: ECPs who attended the 2012 Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine annual meeting or who were registered members of the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine completed a survey on training and work experiences. Decisional factors associated with pursuit of subspecialty fellowship education and professional practice patterns were identified using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. RESULTS: A total of 102 ECPs completed the survey. Of the respondents, 67 (67%) had completed a PM fellowship. Motivating factors for pursuing fellowship training included (1) obtaining additional clinical training, (2) developing a special interest in PM training, and (3) improving job candidacy. Overall, 80% of ECPs desired inpatient consultation-liaison positions at the time of fellowship graduation. Overall, 22% reported difficulty in obtaining employment in PM after training. Chi-square tests between subjects who pursued a PM fellowship and those who did not proved nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: PM fellowship training remains relevant and important to ECPs in this sample. The survey results can be used to shape institutional and professional supports to better meet early career transition needs for PM psychiatrists.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Graduate , Fellowships and Scholarships , Professional Practice , Psychiatry/education , Psychosomatic Medicine/education , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence , Female , Humans , Male , Specialization
12.
Psychosomatics ; 55(5): 438-49, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25016348

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates that residents in psychiatry training programs learn to provide psychiatric consultation to other medical and surgical services. The ACGME, however, offers little information to instruct academic faculty and institutions to what constitutes a quality educational experience in psychosomatic medicine/consultation-liaison psychiatry for the resident trainee. METHODS: These recommendations were developed through a collaborative process between educators in C-L psychiatry and members of the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine's Residency Education Subcommittee. RESULTS: This manuscript provides a broad framework for what constitutes a well-rounded clinical and academic resident rotation on psychiatric consultation-liaison services. A rotation that is viewed positively by residents is important as it likely provides a foundation for a growing interest in Psychosomatic Medicine and the development of future fellows and subspecialty trained physicians.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Graduate/standards , Internship and Residency , Psychosomatic Medicine/education , Curriculum/standards , Humans , United States
13.
Ann Emerg Med ; 60(2): 162-71.e5, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22555337

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify patient and clinical management factors related to emergency department (ED) length of stay for psychiatric patients. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 1,092 adults treated at one of 5 EDs between June 2008 and May 2009. Regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with ED length of stay and its 4 subcomponents. Secondary analyses considered patients discharged to home and those who were admitted or transferred separately. RESULTS: The overall mean ED length of stay was 11.5 hours (median 8.2 hours). ED length of stay varied by discharge disposition, with patients discharged to home staying 8.6 hours (95% confidence interval 7.7 to 9.5 hours) and patients transferred to a hospital outside the system of care staying 15 hours (95% confidence interval 12.7 to 17.6 hours) on average. Older age and being uninsured were associated with increased ED length of stay, whereas race, sex, and homelessness had no association. Patients with a positive toxicology screen result for alcohol stayed an average of 6.2 hours longer than patients without toxicology screens, an effect observed primarily in the periods before disposition decision. Diagnostic imaging was associated with an average 3.2-hour greater length of stay, prolonging both early and late components of the ED stay. Restraint use had a similar effect, leading to a length of stay 4.2 hours longer than that of patients not requiring restraints. CONCLUSION: Psychiatric patients spent more than 11 hours in the ED on average when seeking care. The need for hospitalization, restraint use, and the completion of diagnostic imaging had the greatest effect on postassessment boarding time, whereas the presence of alcohol on toxicology screening led to delays earlier in the ED stay. Identification and sharing of best practices associated with each of these factors would provide an opportunity for improvement in ED care for this population.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Length of Stay , Mental Disorders/therapy , Adult , Age Factors , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Insurance Coverage , Male , Mental Disorders/psychology , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Regression Analysis , Time Factors
15.
Ann Emerg Med ; 58(2): 127-136.e1, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21227544

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We ascertain the components of emergency department (ED) length of stay for adult patients receiving psychiatric evaluation and to examine their variability across 5 hospitals within a health care system. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 1,092 adults treated between June 2008 and May 2009. Research staff abstracted length of stay and clinical information from the medical records. Clinicians completed a time log for each patient contact. Main outcomes were median times for the overall ED length of stay and its 4 components, or time from triage to request for psychiatric evaluation, request to start of psychiatric evaluation, start to completion of psychiatric evaluation with a disposition decision, and disposition decision to discharge from the ED. RESULTS: The overall median length of stay was more than 8 hours. Median times for the components were 1.8 hours from triage to request, 15 minutes from request to start of psychiatric evaluation, 75 minutes from start of psychiatric evaluation to disposition decision, and nearly 3 hours from disposition decision to ED discharge. The median disposition decision to discharge time was substantially shorter for patients who went home (40 minutes) than for patients who were admitted (2.5 hours) or transferred for psychiatric admission at other facilities (6.3 hours). When adjustments for patient and clinical factors were made, differences in ED length of stay persisted between hospitals. CONCLUSION: ED length of stay for psychiatric patients varied greatly between hospitals, highlighting differences in the organization of psychiatric services and inpatient bed availability. Findings may not generalize to other settings or populations.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Academic Medical Centers/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Hospitals, Community/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Massachusetts , Mental Disorders/therapy , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
19.
Eur. j. psychiatry ; 20(3): 165-171, jul.-sept. 2006.
Article in En | IBECS | ID: ibc-054372

ABSTRACT

No disponible


Background and Objectives: In the past, Psychosomatic Medicine (PM) has had ambiguous connotations, and there have been many other names for this specialized fields, including Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. The objective of this report is to briefly review the background, the history and current status of PM, which recently was recognized in the U.S. a psychiatric subspecialty. Methods: Historical review and review of the literature. Results: PM has a rich history. Psychoanalysts and psychophysiologists pioneered the study of mind-body interactions, and crucial events in the development include the funding of PM units in several U.S. teaching hospitals by the Rockefeller Foundation, and the training grants and a research development program funded by the National Institute of Mental Health. By the 1980s, all psychiatry residency programs were requiered to provide substancial clinical experience in the field, and as of 2005 there were 32 fellowship programs in the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine's (APM) directory. In 2001, The Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine (APM) applied for the recognition of PM as a subspecialty of psychiatry, and formal approval was granted by the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) in March 2003. The foundation of PM is a specialized body of scientific knowledge regarding psychiatric aspects of medical illness. This has been articulated in contemporary textbooks, journals and regular scientificic meetings of national and international societies A cadre of scholars and researchers has emerged, and important contributions have occurred. A major goal of the PM field is to improve the psychiatric care of patients with complex medical conditions. There are a number of obstacles and challenges ahead in pursuing optimal integration of PM services into existing service delivery systems of care, but anticipated expansion of accredited fellowship programs in PM will hopefully help address this shortfall. In the past 20 years an international PM network has developed with increasing scientific exchanges, and the US paradigm is regarded as important for the development of PM as a subspecialty internationally. Conclusion: Formal recognition as a subspecialty in the U.S. has and will strengthen PM and will enhance its growth internationally (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Psychophysiologic Disorders , Psychosomatic Medicine/trends , Medicine/trends , Psychophysiology , Psychosomatic Medicine/education
20.
Psychosomatics ; 46(1): 65-70, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15765823

ABSTRACT

Two hundred public psychiatric hospitals were surveyed regarding their management of inpatients with serious medical problems. Of the 102 hospitals responding, 98 had a formal arrangement with a medical facility for transfer and treatment. Fifty of the respondents felt they regularly had difficulty in receiving acceptable information from the receiving hospital, and 37 perceived that their patients regularly received less than optimal care. There was a significant direct correlation between difficulty obtaining information and the perception of suboptimal care. Seventy-nine hospitals had developed a referral form for the transfer of information to the receiving facility. The results point to an important area of discontinuity in the care of the seriously mentally ill.


Subject(s)
Acute Disease/therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Interprofessional Relations , Mental Disorders/therapy , Patient Admission , Patient Transfer , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Attitude of Health Personnel , Continuity of Patient Care , Data Collection , Forms and Records Control , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Medical Record Linkage , Pilot Projects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL