Patient- versus physician-reported outcomes in a low-dose tamoxifen trial in noninvasive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: We recently conducted a de-escalation trial of low-dose tamoxifen 5 mg/day ("babytam", BT) or placebo given for 3 years in 500 women with noninvasive breast cancer. Women on babytam had a 52% reduction of recurrence (invasive breast cancer or DCIS) after 5 years. Since menopausal symptoms are major reasons for treatment withdrawal during tamoxifen preventive therapy, we compared and analyzed the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with the physician-reported adverse events and studied their association with recurrence. METHODS: Menopausal symptoms recorded by physicians using the Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAEs) were compared with a patient self-reported validated questionnaire reviewed by a research nurse at baseline and every 6 months up to 36 months. Hot flashes (HF), the main outcome measure, were detected through a self-report 7-day diary for frequency and intensity. Treatment adherence and efficacy were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier curves and the Cox model. RESULTS: The number of HF events at 12, 24, and 36 months for PROs versus CTCAEs was 246 versus 12, 238 versus 8, and 210 versus 4, respectively. The majority of events were grade 1. There was no difference in PROs between babytam and placebo except for HF daily frequency, which increased by 1.5 events (95% CI, 1.1-1.8) on placebo to 2.1 on babytam (95% CI, 1.7-2.5, p = 0.05). The presence of HF at baseline was a favorable prognostic factor for recurrence and a predictive factor for response to babytam. Adherence was similar between babytam and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PROs is effective for identifying frequent mild grade menopausal symptoms which are underestimated by physicians but important prognostic and predictive factors. Research nurse can use these results as a tool to reassure patients about symptoms, improve adherence to treatment, and limit dropouts.

Home Se-Cure: A Home Care Service for Cancer Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Cancer patients are exposed to a greater risk of COVID-19 infection, resulting in treatment delays and unnecessary hospitalizations. International authorities have suggested reducing visits to hospitals and guarantee continuity of care. We developed a home care project called Home Se-Cure (HSC) to guarantee the continuity of oral, intramuscular, and subcutaneous cancer therapy during COVID-19. The Home Se-Cure project included cancer patients living near Galliera Hospital. Patients received home visits by registered nurses (RNs), whoperformed blood tests and delivered cancer therapies. Patients were instructed to take drugs after blood test results and therapy confirmation by oncologists. Sixty-six patients decided to participate and 38 declined the service. A customer satisfaction questionnaire was administered to a subgroup of patients participating in the project. The most prevalent disease in the HSC group was prostate cancer. The mean age of the patients in HSC was 78.4 years and 68.9 in the decliner group. The majority of the HSC participants appreciated the project because they could stay at home (71%) and reduce the risk of COVID-19 contagion (67.7%). Compared to decliners, the time the study group saved was 2033 hours. HSC guaranteed the continuity of care during the COVID-19 pandemic by reducing the number of patients in the hospital and avoiding crowds in the waiting room.

Estimating the magnitude of clinical benefit of systemic therapy in patients with DCIS or pre-invasive disease of the breast.

The challenge of effective management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and other pre-malignant disorders of the breast is to select patients who will not progress to invasive carcinoma from those at the highest risk who require radiotherapy and/or endocrine therapy to minimize the risk of a subsequent invasive recurrence. Although IBIS-II and NSABP-B35 DCIS phase III trials proved that tamoxifen 20 mg/day and anastrozole reduce the risk of ipsilateral and contralateral events, the toxicities of both drugs have hampered the drug uptake by high-risk women. We recently reported results of a 3-year placebo-controlled trial of low-dose (5 mg/d) tamoxifen in 500 women with intraepithelial neoplasia (70% DCIS). At a median follow-up of 5 years, women randomly assigned to low-dose tamoxifen had half the number of subsequent diagnoses of DCIS or invasive cancer compared with those randomly assigned to placebo but no increase in thromboembolic events or endometrial cancers. The 5-year number needed to treat was 22 (95% CI, 20-27). Our attention is now focused on prognostic and predictive markers to identify patients who can derive the greatest benefits from low dose tamoxifen, such as for instance the expression of 23 genes involved in cell cycle progression (CCP). In conclusion, we endorse an active treatment of DCIS as the standard of care.

Detection of HIV-1 dual infections in highly exposed treated patients.

BACKGROUND: Genetic characterization of HIV-1 in Argentina has shown that BF recombinants predominate among heterosexuals and injecting drug users, while in men who have sex with men the most prevalent form is subtype B. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work was to investigate the presence of HIV dual infections in HIV-infected individuals with high probability of reinfection STUDY DESIGN: Blood samples were collected from 23 HIV positive patients with the risk of reinfection from Buenos Aires. A fragment of the HIV gene pol was amplified and phylogenetic analyses were performed. Antiretroviral drug resistance patterns of all the sequences were analyzed. RESULTS: Five dual infections were detected with four patients coinfected with subtype B and BF recombinants and one patient was coinfected with two BF recombinants presenting different recombination patterns. Prolonged infection with a stable clinical condition was observed in the five individuals. Resistance mutation patterns were different between the predominant and the minority strains. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that HIV dual infection can occur with closely related subtypes, and even with different variants of the same recombinant form in certain populations. Clinical observations showed neither aggressive disease progression nor impact on the resistance patterns in the dually-infected patients.