A survey of primary care physicians' perceptions of their patients' use of complementary medicine.

PURPOSE: To study the perceptions and attitudes of primary care physicians concerning their patients' use of complementary medicine. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to all 165 primary care physicians attending a routine continuing-medicine education program. Items included physicians' estimated rates of patient utilization of complementary medicine or herbal remedies and of patient reportage of such use; physicians' knowledge about side effects and interactions of herbal remedies; and frequency with which physicians questioned their patients on the use of complementary medicine and herbal remedies. RESULTS: The compliance rate was 90.0% (n=150). Sixty-eight percent of physicians estimated that up to 15% of their patients use complementary medicine; 58% always or often asked their patients about it; 50% estimated that 10% of patients report use of complementary medicine, and 60% estimated the same rate for herbal remedies; 51% believed that herbal remedies have no or only mild side effects; more than 70% claimed that they had little or no knowledge about what herbal remedies are; 24% never referred patients for complementary medicine, and 69% did so occasionally. Twenty-five percent had some training in complementary medicine, and 31% practiced some kind of complementary medicine. Most of the physicians believed that people turn to alternative methods when they are dissatisfied with conventional medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians underestimate the rate of complementary medicine use by patients, suggesting that many patients do not report such use to their physician. Since alternative treatments are potentially harmful and may interact with conventional medications, physicians should be encouraged to communicate with patients about complementary medicine in general and herbal remedies in particular, and they should regularly include questions about their use when taking histories. They should also inform themselves about risks of alternative treatments particularly with herbal remedies, and have access to appropriate information systems.

Behavior of patients with flu-like symptoms: consultation with physician versus self-treatment.

BACKGROUND: The reasons that patients consult the clinic physician for common minor symptoms are not clearly defined. For seasonal epidemic events such as flu-like symptoms this characterization is relevant. OBJECTIVES: To identify the factors that prompt patients to seek medical attention, and correlate patient behavior with different demographic and disease variables. METHODS: A random sample of 2,000 enrolled people aged 18-65 years and registered with eight primary care clinics located throughout Israel were asked to report whether they had had flu-like symptoms within the previous 3 months. Those who responded affirmatively (n = 346) were requested to complete an ad hoc questionnaire evaluating their treatment-seeking behavior. RESULTS: A total of 318 patients completed the questionnaire (92% response rate), of whom 271 (85%) consulted a physician and 47 (15%) did not. Those who sought medical assistance had more serious symptoms as perceived by them (cough, headache and arthralgia) (P < 0.05), and their main reason for visiting the doctor was "to rule out serious disease." Self-employed patients were more likely than salaried workers to visit the clinic to rule out serious disease (rather than to obtain a prescription or sick note or to reassure family). They also delayed longer before seeking treatment (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In our study the majority of individuals with flu symptoms tended to consult a physician, though there were significant variations in the reasons for doing so, based on a combination of sociodemographic variables. We believe these findings will help primary care physicians to characterize their practices and to program the expected demand of flu-like symptoms.

Patient adherence to family practitioners' recommendations for breast cancer screening: a historical cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy among women in Israel, and routine screening is recommended for early detection. In 1997, a health management organization primary care centre in rural Israel established a 1-year programme wherein family physicians were encouraged to remind their patients to undergo breast cancer examinations. This study evaluates the impact of the physicians' intervention on patient compliance. METHODS: Family practitioners from two practices were requested to discuss the importance of early breast cancer detection with all eligible patients who visited the clinic for any reason and to assist them in scheduling an appointment for screening. The files of the patients who received the recommendation were stamped accordingly. On completion of the programme, the physicians' files were audited, and the potential candidates for breast cancer screening were divided into two groups: those who had received the intervention (n = 251) and those who had not (n = 187); results were also compared with those of a third group of patients who had gone for an examination on their own initiative (n = 100) prior to the study (i.e. did not require intervention). A random sample of half the patients also completed an ad hoc questionnaire covering sociodemographic variables and the impact of the doctors' intervention on their behaviour. RESULTS: Patients in the intervention group showed a significantly greater change in behaviour regarding breast cancer screening than the controls (32% versus 13%, P = 0.001). This change was manifested particularly in the group of women aged 50-74 years who received the recommendation for mammography to be performed (according to the guidelines). CONCLUSION: Although this is a study in only two practices, the results suggest that primary care physicians can significantly alter the behaviour of their patients regarding regular breast examinations. The use of a special reminder can also help the individual doctor to ensure that each patient has been properly instructed.

Factors associated with family physicians' involvement in research in Israel.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the factors that encourage or deter family medicine physicians and residents in Israel from participating in research. METHOD: In October 1995, a questionnaire containing items on demographic variables, research attitudes, and academic and research activities in primary care settings was mailed to a random sample of 200 family medicine physicians and residents (out of approximately 600) employed by the General Sick Fund, the largest health maintenance organization in Israel. The questionnaire also contained items regarding difficulties in participating in research and asked for opinions about several general statements about research in family practice. RESULTS: In all, 190 physicians responded, for a response rate of 95%. Based on their responses, the respondents were divided into four groups by amount of research involvement. Univariate analysis using the chi-square test was used for the comparison of variables among the four groups. The respondents reporting greater knowledge of and involvement in research were, by and large, men (p = .01) who were qualified specialists with academic status (p < .00001). They also taught students (p = .0005) and residents (p < .0005), participated in more conferences (p < .0005), and while in residency training had had a mentor who encouraged involvement in research (p = .0001). CONCLUSION: Research is essential to family medicine with regard to both primary care practice and academic activities, its development, however, has been inhibited. Given the results of this preliminary study, family medicine residency programs would be well advised to assign a research mentor to every resident; also, time and resources should be devoted to research in postgraduate training programs. Perhaps more important, women physicians in Israel should be encouraged to participate more actively in research, and support for them in their special needs should be made available.