Skin conductance or entropy for detection of non-noxious stimulation during different clinical levels of sedation.

BACKGROUND: State entropy (SE) measures electroencephalographic signals, whereas response entropy (RE) also includes frontal electromyographic activity. In the presence of electromyographic activity, the RE index is larger than the SE index, the difference being denoted as RE-Delta (RE-Delta= RE - SE). Skin conductance (SC) may be expressed by a slow reacting variable, the mean SC level, the derivate of the mean SC level (D-SC), the number of SC fluctuations (NSCF) or the amplitude of the SC fluctuations (ASCF), which directly shows skin sympathetic nerve activity. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether these SC and entropy variables could differentiate between the responses obtained to load sound stimuli at different sedation levels before the induction of general anaesthesia. METHODS: Twenty women scheduled for gynaecological laparotomy were studied. The modified observer's assessment of alertness sedation (OAAS) was used to classify the patients' hypnotic levels. White sounds (98 dB) were given at OAAS level 5 without propofol, at OAAS levels 4-3 and 3-2 with propofol and at OAAS levels 3-2 and < 2 with propofol and remifentanil. RESULTS: RE and SE showed a steady decline from OAAS level 5 to level < 2 (P < 0.01). RE-Delta did not discriminate between any of the OAAS levels (P= NS). The mean SC level discriminated between OAAS levels 4-3 to < 2 (P < 0.01). D-SC discriminated between all the different OAAS levels (P < 0.01). NSCF discriminated between OAAS levels 5 to 3-2 (P < 0.05), but did not discriminate at OAAS level 3-2 between propofol alone or combined with remifentanil, or between OAAS level 3-2 and < 2. ASCF differentiated between OAAS levels 5 and 4 (P < 0.001) and OAAS levels 3-2 and < 2 (P < 0.05) only. CONCLUSION: RE, SE and D-SC showed a similar discrimination between sound responses at the different sedation levels.

Comparison of skin conductance with entropy during intubation, tetanic stimulation and emergence from general anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The number of skin conductance fluctuations (NSCF) expresses sympathetic skin nerve activity. The response entropy (RE) measures electromyographic and electroencephalographic activity in the forehead. The state entropy (SE) measures mainly electroencephalographic activity. When the suppression of frontal muscular activity is complete, RE is equal to SE. RE-Delta is defined as SE minus RE. The purposes of this study were to examine whether NSCF and RE-Delta correlate with signs of clinical stress during intubation and tetanic noxious stimulation and to elucidate how rapidly and accurately entropy and NSCF react during emergence from general anaesthesia. METHODS: Twenty women scheduled for gynaecological laparotomy were studied. During intubation in remifentanil and propofol general anaesthesia, NSCF and RE-Delta were correlated with the clinical stress score. After a wash-out period, two series of tetanic stimuli were given, the first with (R+) and the second without (R-) remifentanil infusion. The tetanic pre-stimuli periods were compared with the tetanic post-stimuli periods, and R+ was compared with R-. During emergence, the responses of entropy and skin conductance were related to the time of extubation. RESULTS: NSCF correlated well with the clinical stress score during intubation (r(2)= 0.73, P < 0.0005). RE-Delta showed a weaker correlation (r(2)= 0.33, P= 0.007). During tetanic stimuli, the NSCF pre-stimuli level was lower than the post-stimuli level (P < 0.001), and the NSCF R+ response was lower than the NSCF R- response (P= 0.002). RE-Delta did not show similar differences. During emergence, RE reacted before NSCF and SE (P= 0.003). CONCLUSION: NSCF was better than RE-Delta for the measurement of clinical stress during intubation, and was sensitive to tetanic stimuli at different opioid analgesic levels, by contrast with RE-Delta. Both modalities were able to predict emergence at the end of anaesthesia, but RE was more rapid.