Determinants of trabecular bone score and prevalent vertebral fractures in women with fragility fractures: a cross-sectional sub-study of NoFRACT.

Determinants of trabecular bone score (TBS) and vertebral fractures assessed semiquantitatively (SQ1-SQ3) were studied in 496 women with fragility fractures. TBS was associated with age, parental hip fracture, alcohol intake and BMD, not SQ1-SQ3 fractures. SQ1-SQ3 fractures were associated with age, prior fractures, and lumbar spine BMD, but not TBS. INTRODUCTION: Trabecular bone score (TBS) and vertebral fractures assessed by semiquantitative method (SQ1-SQ3) seem to reflect different aspects of bone strength. We therefore sought to explore the determinants of and the associations between TBS and SQ1-SQ3 fractures. METHODS: This cross-sectional sub-study of the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative included 496 women aged ≥ 50 years with fragility fractures. All responded to a questionnaire about risk factors for fracture, had bone mineral density (BMD) of femoral neck and/or lumbar spine assessed, TBS calculated, and 423 had SQ1-SQ3 fracture assessed. RESULTS: Mean (SD) age was 65.6 years (8.6), mean TBS 1.27 (0.10), and 33.3% exhibited SQ1-SQ3 fractures. In multiple variable analysis, higher age (ßper SD = - 0.26, 95% CI: - 0.36,- 0.15), parental hip fracture (ß = - 0.29, 95% CI: - 0.54,- 0.05), and daily alcohol intake (ß = - 0.43, 95% CI - 0.79, - 0.08) were associated with lower TBS. Higher BMD of femoral neck (ßper SD = 0.34, 95% CI 0.25-0.43) and lumbar spine (ßper SD = 0.40, 95% CI 0.31-0.48) were associated with higher TBS. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, age (ORper SD = 1.94, 95% CI 1.51-2.46) and prior fragility fractures (OR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.09-2.71) were positively associated with SQ1-SQ3 fractures, while lumbar spine BMD (ORper SD = 0.75 95% CI 0.60-0.95) was negatively associated with SQ1-SQ3 fractures. No association between TBS and SQ1-SQ3 fractures was found. CONCLUSION: Since TBS and SQ1-SQ3 fractures were not associated, they may act as independent risk factors, justifying the use of both in post-fracture risk assessment.

More reoperations for periprosthetic fracture after cemented hemiarthroplasty with polished taper-slip stems than after anatomical and straight stems in the treatment of hip fractures: a study from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register 2005 to 2016.

AIMS: The aim of this large registry-based study was to compare mid-term survival rates of cemented femoral stems of different designs used in hemiarthroplasty for a fracture of the femoral neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register (NHFR), 20 532 primary cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasties, which were undertaken in patients aged > 70 years with a femoral neck fracture between 2005 and 2016, were included. Polished tapered stems (n = 12 065) (Exeter and CPT), straight stems (n = 5545) (Charnley, Charnley Modular, and Spectron EF), and anatomical stems (n = 2922) (Lubinus SP2) were included. The survival of the implant with any reoperation as the endpoint was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and hazard ratios (HRs), and the different indications for reoperation were calculated using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The one-year survival was 96.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 95.6 to 96.4) for the Exeter stem, 97.0% (95% CI 96.4 to 97.6) for the Lubinus SP2 stem, 97.6% (95% CI 97.0 to 98.2) for the Charnley stem, 98.1% (95% CI 97.3 to 98.9) for the Spectron EF stem, and 96.4% (95% CI 95.6 to 97.2) for the Charnley Modular stem, respectively. The hazard ratio for reoperation after one year was lower for Lubinus SP2 (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.97), Charnley (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.86), and Spectron EF stems (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.67) compared with the Exeter stem. Reoperation for periprosthetic fracture occurred almost exclusively after the use of polished tapered stems. CONCLUSION: We were able to confirm that implant survival after cemented hemiarthroplasty for a hip fracture is high. Differences in rates of reoperation seem to favour anatomical and straight stems compared with polished tapered stems, which had a higher risk of periprosthetic fracture.

Authors' reply Cobb correspondence re: J-E. Gjertsen, S. A. Lie, T. Vinje, et al. More re-operations after uncemented than cemented hemiarthroplasty used in the treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck: An observational study of 11 116 hemiarthroplasties from a national register. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2012;94-B:1113-1119.

We welcome letters to the Editor concerning articles that have recently been published. Such letters will be subject to the usual stages of selection and editing; where appropriate the authors of the original article will be offered the opportunity to reply.

More re-operations after uncemented than cemented hemiarthroplasty used in the treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck: an observational study of 11,116 hemiarthroplasties from a national register.

Using data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, 8639 cemented and 2477 uncemented primary hemiarthroplasties for displaced fractures of the femoral neck in patients aged > 70 years were included in a prospective observational study. A total of 218 re-operations were performed after cemented and 128 after uncemented procedures. Survival of the hemiarthroplasties was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and hazard rate ratios (HRR) for revision were calculated using Cox regression analyses. At five years the implant survival was 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97 to 97) for cemented and 91% (95% CI 87 to 94) for uncemented hemiarthroplasties. Uncemented hemiarthroplasties had a 2.1 times increased risk of revision compared with cemented prostheses (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 2.6, p < 0.001). The increased risk was mainly caused by revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (HRR = 17), aseptic loosening (HRR = 17), haematoma formation (HRR = 5.3), superficial infection (HRR = 4.6) and dislocation (HRR = 1.8). More intra-operative complications, including intra-operative death, were reported for the cemented hemiarthroplasties. However, in a time-dependent analysis, the HRR for re-operation in both groups increased as follow-up increased. This study showed that the risk for revision was higher for uncemented than for cemented hemiarthroplasties.

Internal screw fixation compared with bipolar hemiarthroplasty for treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Internal fixation and arthroplasty are the two main options for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. The optimal treatment remains controversial. Using data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, we compared the results of hemiarthroplasty and internal screw fixation in displaced femoral neck fractures. METHODS: Data from 4335 patients over seventy years of age who had internal fixation (1823 patients) or hemiarthroplasty (2512 patients) to treat a displaced femoral neck fracture were compared at a minimum follow-up interval of twelve months. One-year mortality, the number of reoperations, and patient self-assessment of pain, satisfaction, and quality of life at four and twelve months were analyzed. Subanalyses of patients with cognitive impairment and reduced walking ability were done. RESULTS: In the arthroplasty group, only contemporary bipolar prostheses were used and uncemented prostheses with modern stems and hydroxyapatite coating accounted for 20.8% (522) of the implants. There were no differences in one-year mortality (27% in the osteosynthesis group and 25% in the arthroplasty group; p = 0.76). There were 412 reoperations (22.6%) performed in the osteosynthesis group and seventy-two (2.9%) in the hemiarthroplasty group during the follow-up period. After twelve months, the osteosynthesis group reported more pain (mean score, 29.9 compared with 19.2), higher dissatisfaction with the operation result (mean score, 38.9 compared with 25.7), and a lower quality of life (mean score, 0.51 compared with 0.60) than the arthroplasty group. All differences were significant (p < 0.001). For patients with cognitive impairment, hemiarthroplasty provided a better functional outcome (less pain, higher satisfaction with the result of the operation, and higher quality of life as measured on the EuroQol visual analog scale) at twelve months (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly should be treated with hemiarthroplasty.

Hip fracture implants increase serum metal levels.

OBJECTIVE: Hip fractures are disabling accidents in the elderly. The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate systemic exposure to metals from hip implants used for fracture fixation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Serum levels of Cr, Ni and Mo in patients with compression hip screws (n = 22) or cervical fracture screws (n = 23) were measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Blood samples were collected before surgery and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At 3 months, patients with compression hip screws showed higher concentrations of Cr and Ni than did those with cervical screws. Both types of screws led to a 2-fold increase in serum Mo, which was not expected for the freestanding cervical screws. After 12 months, the levels had decreased, but the compression hip screw was still associated with higher values for Cr and Mo. CONCLUSIONS: The difference between the screws is most likely due to the potential for fretting and crevice corrosion between components in the compression hip screws. The apparent short-term systemic elevation of stainless steel elements in patients with hip screws does not support routine removal of asymptomatic hip fracture implants.

[Patients' knowledge of the effects of X-rays]. / Pasienters kunnskap om virkningen av røntgenstråler.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to radiation from different non-medical sources in the community is given more attention in the media. The effects of radiologic examination, however, seldom receive the same amount of interest. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 295 patients were interviewed immediately after an X-ray examination at Haukeland Hospital to investigate what they knew about the effects of X-rays on the human body. In addition we wanted to find out whether referring doctors had informed their patients about possible unwanted effects of the radiological examination. RESULTS: The patients were more aware of possible effects of radiation from high-voltage cables than of the effects from X-raying. Only three patients had been informed by their referring doctors that X-ray examination could have unwanted effects. INTERPRETATION: Information to patients about diagnostic radiation should be improved.