Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Gynecol Oncol Rep ; 38: 100878, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34926759

ABSTRACT

Primary vaginal cancer is a rare malignancy with a lack of international guidelines and supporting clinical trial evidence to guide decision making. Historical results have shown poor outcomes with chemotherapy for stage IVB vaginal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The evolving role of checkpoint inhibitors in rare gynaecological cancers prompted us to investigate the role of pembrolizumab in this setting. The efficacy of pembrolizumab in vaginal SCC has never been investigated in any clinical trial. There is established data to support the use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in gynaecological cancers, however, the data for concurrent use of immunotherapy and radiotherapy is still lacking but is the subject of several clinical trials. We herein present the first reported case of chemotherapy refractory vaginal SCC with complete response to pembrolizumab and concurrent pelvic radiotherapy. We also present wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia (WEBINO) as a rare but new immune related adverse event.

2.
Mol Clin Oncol ; 15(4): 214, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34476098

ABSTRACT

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), such as nivolumab, have transformed the treatment paradigm for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The combination of CPIs and radiotherapy (RT) constitutes a multimodal treatment approach that may work synergistically and facilitate augmented systemic responses. The aim of the present retrospective study was to assess the efficacy and safety of continuation of nivolumab treatment with the addition of RT in patients with mNSCLC and mRCC who develop oligometastatic disease progression on single-agent nivolumab. All patients with mNSCLC and mRCC who received nivolumab at the Department of Oncology, Prince Sultan Military Medical City (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) between November 2016 and April 2018 were identified. The records of patients who developed oligometastatic disease progression during nivolumab treatment and were subsequently treated with RT, with nivolumab continued beyond disease progression, were retrospectively reviewed. Details of RT, clinical outcomes and toxicity data were collected. Of the 96 patients who received nivolumab, 22 received multiple courses of RT. A total of 39 sites were irradiated: Bone (n=15), lung (n=9), brain (n=8), adrenal gland (n=2), renal bed (n=2), skin (n=1), ethmoid sinus (n=1) and scalp (n=1). Partial response and complete response were noted at 25 (64%) and 3 (8%) sites, respectively. Stable disease was noted at 6 sites (15%) and disease progression was noted at 5 sites (13%). The median time on nivolumab from the date of the first fraction of RT was 4.5 months (range, 1.5-29 months) for patients with mNSCLC and 5 months (range, 1-38.5 months) for patients with mRCC. No patients developed grade 3-4 toxicities. Grade 2 pneumonitis was noted in 3 patients receiving lung RT. The addition of RT appeared to initiate a response and prolong the duration of nivolumab treatment. Therefore, the combination of nivolumab and RT was found to be well tolerated, with response rates exceeding those in published studies of nivolumab monotherapy.

3.
Medicines (Basel) ; 5(2)2018 Jun 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29899241

ABSTRACT

Background: The effect of synchronous chemotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has been modelled as additional Biologically Effective Dose (BED) or as a prolonged tumour cell turnover time during accelerated repopulation. Such models may not accurately predict the local control seen when hypofractionated accelerated radiotherapy is used with synchronous chemotherapy. Methods: For the purposes of this study three isoeffect relationships were assumed: Firstly, from the RTOG 0129 trial, synchronous cisplatin chemotherapy with 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 46 days results in equivalent local control to synchronous cisplatin chemotherapy with 36 Gy in 18# followed by 36 Gy in 24# (2# per day) over a total of 39 days. Secondly, in line with primary local control outcomes from the PET-Neck study, synchronous cisplatin chemotherapy with 70 Gy in 35# over 46 days results in equivalent local control to synchronous cisplatin chemotherapy delivered with 65 Gy in 30# over 39 days. Thirdly, from meta-analysis data, 70 Gy in 35# over 46 days with synchronous cisplatin results in equivalent local control to 84 Gy in 70# over 46 days delivered without synchronous chemotherapy. Using the linear quadratic equation the above isoeffect relationships were expressed algebraically to determine values of α, α/β, and k for SCCHN when treated with synchronous cisplatin using standard parameters for the radiotherapy alone schedule (α = 0.3 Gy−1, α/β = 10 Gy, and k = 0.42 Gy10day−1). Results: The values derived for α/β, α and k were 2 Gy, 0.20 and 0.21 Gy−1, and 0.65 and 0.71 Gy2day−1. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the assumptions made, this model suggests that accelerated repopulation may remain a significant factor when synchronous chemotherapy is delivered with radiotherapy in SCCHN. The finding of a low α/β for SCCHN treated with cisplatin suggests a greater tumour susceptibility to increasing dose per fraction and underlines the importance of the completion of randomized trials examining the role of hypofractionated acceleration in SCCHN.

4.
Case Rep Oncol ; 11(3): 861-870, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30687063

ABSTRACT

Intracardiac metastases in the absence of inferior vena cava involvement is a rare occurrence in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). There is limited evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of standard treatment modalities for mRCC patients with intracardiac metastases. Presence of intracardiac metastases is known to indicate poor prognosis and may potentially increase risk of treatment-related complications. Recent advances in RCC management have integrated nivolumab, a programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor inhibitor, as a preferred treatment option in the second-line setting after failure of prior anti-angiogenic therapy; or in combination with ipilimumab, an anti-Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 antibody as first-line therapy for intermediate to poor risk patients with mRCC. The efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab in patients with mRCC and intracardiac metastases has never been reported previously. We herein present the first reported case of mRCC with intracardiac metastasis and a resultant excellent response to nivolumab treatment and discuss the imaging techniques and treatment options for this rare presentation.

5.
Tumour Biol ; 35(3): 2017-23, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24104502

ABSTRACT

Three models defining mucosal tolerance when radiotherapy alone is delivered have been published. Modelling studies have converted the contribution of synchronous chemotherapy to the rate of grade 3 mucositis to biologically effective dose (BED). The purpose of this study was to apply radiotherapy mucosal tolerance models to studies of synchronous chemoradiation. Trials of synchronous cisplatin and radiotherapy were identified. The BED for cell kill for each regime was calculated. Initially, this was done using the protocol parameters and a global value for the contribution of chemotherapy of 5.1 Gy10. These values were then compared with the BED cell kill ceiling values from each of the models calculated using the intended overall treatment time. These steps were then repeated using the delivered radiotherapy parameters and a value for the contribution from chemotherapy calculated to take into account dose intensity. Eight eligible treatment arms were identified. When using the intended radiotherapy parameters, six of these appeared to be tolerable when compared with the ceiling values for two of the models. All were found intolerable by one model. When using the actual delivered radiotherapy doses and overall treatment times and correcting for chemotherapy dose intensity, one treatment arm remained intolerable by all three models, a further treatment arm by two models and four treatment arms by one model. Two current models of mucosal tolerance derived from radiotherapy data predict a majority of previously reported chemoradiation study arms to be tolerable particularly when the delivered parameters are used for calculation.


Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Models, Biological , Mouth Mucosa/drug effects , Mouth Mucosa/radiation effects , Stomatitis/chemically induced , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Humans , Radiometry , Radiotherapy Dosage
6.
Biologics ; 7: 39-46, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23467578

ABSTRACT

A growing understanding of the biology of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has led to the development and US Food and Drug Administration approval of seven new molecular targeted agents over the past 7 years. Axitinib is a potent, selective, second-generation inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and the latest to join the armamentarium of drugs available for the treatment of metastatic RCC. Despite recent advances in the development of molecular targeted agents for metastatic RCC, the ideal sequencing of these agents remains unclear.

7.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 86(1): 157-63, 2013 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23332227

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Previous studies of synchronous chemoradiation therapy have modeled the additional effect of chemotherapy as additional radiation therapy biologically effective dose (BED). Recent trials of accelerated versus conventional fractionation chemoradiation have cast doubt on such modeling. The purpose of this study was to identify alternative models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine trials of platinum-based chemoradiation were identified. In radiation therapy-alone arms, the radiation therapy BED for tumor was calculated using standard parameters. In chemoradiation arms, 3 methods were used to calculate tumor BED (tBED): additional BED, addition of 9.3 Gy BED for tumor to the radiation therapy BED; zero repopulation, BED with no correction for repopulation; variable t(p) (the average doubling time during accelerated repopulation), values of t(p) 3-10 were used to examine a partial suppression of repopulation. The correlations between the calculated percentage change in tBED for each method and observed percentage change in local control were assessed using the Pearson product moment correlation. RESULTS: Significant correlations were obtained for all 3 methods but were stronger with zero repopulation (P=.0002) and variable tp (t(p) = 10) (P=.0005) than additional BED (P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Radiobiological models using modified parameters for accelerated repopulation seem to correlate strongly with outcome in chemoradiation studies. The variable tp method shows strong correlation for outcome in local control and is potentially a more suitable model in the chemoradiation setting. However, a lack of trials with an overall treatment time of more than 46 days inhibits further differentiation of the optimal model.


Subject(s)
Cell Proliferation/radiation effects , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Models, Biological , Radiobiology/methods , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Platinum Compounds/therapeutic use , Time Factors
8.
Onkologie ; 34(8-9): 443-6, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21934344

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin in combination with either 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine is commonly used in the treatment of colorectal cancer and is rarely associated with pulmonary toxicity. This is the first reported case of oxaliplatin and capecitabine/5-fluorouracil causing pulmonary toxicity in a patient with pre-existing asymptomatic interstitial lung disease. CASE REPORT: We report a case of a man who was treated with oxaliplatin and capecitabine for 1 cycle, then subsequently with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil following a resected Dukes' C colon carcinoma. His preoperative computed tomography scan incidentally showed mild pulmonary interstitial changes for which he was asymptomatic. He developed pulmonary fibrosis during the course of his chemotherapy, and therefore further chemotherapy was stopped. He was treated with high dose steroids and immunosuppressants which initially stabilized his respiratory symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary fibrosis is a rare complication of oxaliplatin and capecitabine/5-fluorouracil. With the widespread use of oxaliplatin combinations in colorectal cancer, active assessment for interstitial lung disease is recommended and caution in its use should be exercised in those with pre-existing interstitial lung disease.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/toxicity , Lung/drug effects , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pulmonary Fibrosis/chemically induced , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Capecitabine , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Colectomy , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/toxicity , Drug Administration Schedule , Dyspnea/chemically induced , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/analogs & derivatives , Fluorouracil/toxicity , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/complications , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnostic imaging , Lung Volume Measurements , Male , Neoplasms/surgery , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Organoplatinum Compounds/toxicity , Oxaliplatin , Pulmonary Fibrosis/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
9.
Anticancer Agents Med Chem ; 11(3): 296-306, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21426298

ABSTRACT

Treatment of metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after progression on docetaxel chemotherapy is a challenging clinical scenario with limited availability of treatment options. Re-treatment with docetaxel, either as monotherapy or in combination with other cytotoxics or targeted agents has shown durable responses. However, most docetaxel re-treatment studies have been either retrospective or early phase non-randomised studies which have not formally assessed Quality of life or survival gain with re-treatment. Despite limited evidence for efficacy of mitoxantrone in the second-line, it continues to remain widely used, largely due to lack of available suitable alternatives. Cabazitaxel in combination with prednisolone is the only chemotherapy to have shown a significant survival benefit and receive approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for patients with mCRPC previously treated with a docetaxel-based regimen. Abiraterone acetate has recently demonstrated a significant improvement in survival when compared to placebo in patients with docetaxel-treated mCRPC. This review aims to summarize the current evidence and discuss future strategies for treatment of mCRPC patients following failure of docetaxel chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Androstenes , Androstenols/administration & dosage , Androstenols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Clinical Trials as Topic , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Docetaxel , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Forecasting , Humans , Male , Mitoxantrone/administration & dosage , Mitoxantrone/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prednisolone/administration & dosage , Prednisolone/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Quality of Life , Taxoids/administration & dosage , Taxoids/therapeutic use , Treatment Failure
10.
Lancet Oncol ; 11(1): 66-74, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19875337

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Between 1990 and 2000, we examined the effect of timing of non-platinum chemotherapy when combined with radiotherapy. We aimed to determine whether giving chemotherapy concurrently with radiotherapy or as maintenance therapy, or both, affected clinical outcome. Here we report survival and recurrence after 10 years of follow-up. METHODS: Between Jan 15, 1990, and June 20, 2000, 966 patients were recruited from 34 centres in the UK and two centres from Malta and Turkey. Patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, and who had not previously undergone surgery, were randomly assigned to one of four groups in a 3:2:2:2 ratio, stratified by centre and chemotherapy regimen: radical radiotherapy alone (n=233); radiotherapy with two courses of chemotherapy given simultaneously on days 1 and 14 of radiotherapy (SIM alone; n=166); or 14 and 28 days after completing radiotherapy (SUB alone, n=160); or both (SIM+SUB; n=154). Chemotherapy was either methotrexate alone, or vincristine, bleomycin, methotrexate, and fluorouracil. Patients who had previously undergone radical surgery to remove their tumour were only randomised to radiotherapy alone (n=135) or SIM alone (n=118), in a 3:2 ratio. The primary endpoints were overall survival (from randomisation), and event-free survival (EFS; recurrence, new tumour, or death; whichever occurred first) among patients who were disease-free 6 months after randomisation. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered at www.Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00002476. FINDINGS: All 966 patients were included in the analyses. Among patients who did not undergo surgery, the median overall survival was 2.6 years (99% CI 1.9-4.2) in the radiotherapy alone group, 4.7 (2.6-7.8) years in the SIM alone group, 2.3 (1.6-3.5) years in the SUB alone group, and 2.7 (1.6-4.7) years in the SIM+SUB group (p=0.10). The corresponding median EFS were 1.0 (0.7-1.4), 2.2 (1.1-6.0), 1.0 (0.6-1.5), and 1.0 (0.6-2.0) years (p=0.005), respectively. For every 100 patients given SIM alone, there are 11 fewer EFS events (99% CI 1-21), compared with 100 given radiotherapy, 10 years after treatment. Among the patients who had previously undergone surgery, median overall survival was 5.0 (99% CI 1.8-8.0) and 4.6 (2.2-7.6) years in the radiotherapy alone and SIM alone groups (p=0.70), respectively, with corresponding median EFS of 3.7 (99% CI 1.1-5.9) and 3.0 (1.2-5.6) years (p=0.85), respectively. The percentage of patients who had a significant toxicity during treatment were: 11% (radiotherapy alone, n=25), 28% (SIM alone, n=47), 12% (SUB alone, n=19), and 36% (SIM+SUB, n=55) among patients without previous surgery; and 9% (radiotherapy alone, n=12) and 20% (SIM alone, n=24) among those who had undergone previous surgery. The most common toxicity during treatment was mucositis. The percentage of patients who had a significant toxicity at least 6 months after randomisation were: 6% (radiotherapy alone, n=13), 6% (SIM alone, n=10), 4% (SUB alone, n=7), and 6% (SIM+SUB, n=9) among patients who had no previous surgery; and 7% (radiotherapy alone, n=10) and 11% (SIM alone, n=13) among those who had undergone previous surgery. The most common toxicity 6 months after treatment was xerostomia, but this occurred in 3% or less of patients in each group. INTERPRETATION: Concurrent non-platinum chemoradiotherapy reduces recurrences, new tumours, and deaths in patients who have not undergone previous surgery, even 10 years after starting treatment. Chemotherapy given after radiotherapy (with or without concurrent chemotherapy) is ineffective. Patients who have undergone previous surgery for head and neck cancer do not benefit from non-platinum chemotherapy. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, with support from University College London and University College London Hospital Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bleomycin/administration & dosage , Bleomycin/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/secondary , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Head and Neck Neoplasms/secondary , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Malta , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Risk Assessment , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Turkey , United Kingdom , Vincristine/administration & dosage , Vincristine/adverse effects , Young Adult
12.
Oncol Rep ; 20(4): 891-6, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18813832

ABSTRACT

Three-weekly docetaxel chemotherapy with prednisolone is now considered standard of care for patients with metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer (MHRPC). This study reports the efficacy and toxicity of first-line docetaxel chemotherapy followed subsequently by re-treatment on biochemical disease progression (BDP). Forty-two patients with MHRPC were treated with three-weekly docetaxel chemotherapy 75 mg/m(2) and 10 mg of prednisolone daily. Median age 73 years (range 58-87) and median initial PSA 182 ng/ml (range 19.9-1500). Of these patients, 10 were re-treated with the same regimen (second-line chemotherapy) on BDP. A further 3 out of these 10 patients received 2nd re-treatment (third-line chemotherapy) with docetaxel chemotherapy on BDP. Fifty-four percent of patients responded to first-line docetaxel chemotherapy and all re-treated patients responded again with a PSA reduction >50%. Median treatment-free interval prior to second and third-line chemotherapy was 24 and 26 weeks, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 2.5, 7 and 12% of the total number of cycles in patients receiving first-, second- and third-line docetaxel chemotherapy, respectively. Median survival was 13 months (range 3-35) and one-year overall survival 52%. This is the first report of three-weekly docetaxel chemotherapy re-treatment in patients with MHRPC and demonstrates that patients who initially respond to docetaxel chemotherapy maintain their sensitivity to subsequent re-treatment without a significant rise in haematological toxicity.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Taxoids/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Docetaxel , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Palliative Care , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology
13.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 99(10): 765-76, 2007 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17505072

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The most frequent site of metastases from prostate cancer is bone. Adjuvant bisphosphonate treatment improves outcomes of patients with bone metastasis-negative breast cancer, but the effects of bisphosphonates on bone metastases in prostate cancer are not known. METHODS: We performed a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to determine whether a first-generation bisphosphonate could improve symptomatic bone metastasis-free survival (time to symptomatic bone metastases or death from prostate cancer) in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer who were at high risk of developing bone metastases. Between June 1, 1994, and December 31, 1997, 508 men from 26 UK sites and one New Zealand site who were within 3 years of initial prostate cancer diagnosis with no evidence of metastases from current bone scanning were randomly assigned to daily oral sodium clodronate (2080 mg/day, n = 254) or placebo (n = 254) for a maximum of 5 years. Estimates of outcome risks were compared using Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: The groups allocated to each treatment were well balanced. After a median follow-up of nearly 10 years, no evidence of benefit to the clodronate group was observed in terms of bone metastases-free survival (clodronate versus placebo, 80 events versus 68 events; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.88 to 1.68) or overall survival (clodronate versus placebo, 130 deaths versus 127 deaths; HR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.30). Adverse events, notably gastrointestinal problems and increased lactate dehydrogenase levels, were more frequent in the clodronate group than in the placebo group; otherwise, clodronate was well tolerated. Modification of trial drug dose was more frequent in the clodronate group than the placebo group (HR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.21 to 2.19). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant sodium clodronate does not modify the natural history of nonmetastatic prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Clodronic Acid/administration & dosage , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Clodronic Acid/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Progression , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Radiotherapy
14.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 67(5): 1342-51, 2007 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17241752

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the tumor control rates in locally advanced head-and-neck cancer using accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy with chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The data from patients with squamous cell cancer of the larynx, oropharynx, oral cavity, and hypopharynx (International Union Against Cancer Stage II-IV), who received accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy with chemotherapy between January 1, 1998, and April 1, 2005, were retrospectively analyzed. Two different chemotherapy schedules were used, carboplatin and methotrexate, both single agents administered on an outpatient basis. The endpoints were overall survival, local control, and disease-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients were analyzed. The 2-year overall survival rate was 71.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.5-81.8%). The 2-year disease-free survival rate was 68.6% (95% CI, 58.4-78.8%). The 2-year local control rate was 75.4% (95% CI, 65.6-85.1%). When excluding patients with Stage II oral cavity, larynx, and hypopharynx tumors, 68 patients remained. For these patients, the 2-year overall survival, local control, and disease-free survival rate was 67.6% (95% CI, 56.0-79.2%), 72.0% (95% CI, 61.0-83.0%), and 64.1% (95% CI, 52.6-75.7%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy and synchronous chemotherapy can achieve high tumor control rates while being resource sparing and should be the subject of prospective evaluation.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Combined Modality Therapy/adverse effects , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Male , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...