Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Matern Child Health J ; 21(3): 509-515, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27449781

ABSTRACT

Objective The objective is to estimate the impact of maternal weight gain outside the 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations on perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies. Study Design Twin pregnancies with two live births between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2014 delivered after 23 weeks Finger Lakes Region Perinatal Data System (FLRPDS) and Central New York Region Perinatal Data System were included. Women were classified into three groups using pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI). Perinatal outcomes in women with low or excessive weekly maternal weight gain were assessed using normal weekly weight gain as the referent in each BMI group. Results Low weight gain increased the risk of preterm delivery, birth weight less than the 10th percentile for one or both twins and decreased risk of macrosomia across all BMI groups. There was a decreased risk of hypertensive disorders in women with normal pre-pregnancy weight and an increased risk of gestational diabetes with low weight gain in obese women. Excessive weight gain increased the risk of hypertensive disorders and macrosomia across all BMI groups and decreased the risk of birth weight less than 10th percentile one twin in normal pre-pregnancy BMI group. Conclusion Among twin pregnancies, low weight gain is associated with low birth weight and preterm delivery in all BMI groups and increased risk of gestational diabetes in obese women. Our study did not reveal any benefit from excessive weekly weight gain with potential harm of an increase in risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Normal weight gain per 2009 IOM guidelines should be encouraged to improve pregnancy outcome in all pre-pregnancy BMI groups.


Subject(s)
Guidelines as Topic , Twins/statistics & numerical data , Weight Gain , Adult , Birth Weight/physiology , Body Mass Index , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Female , Humans , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division/organization & administration , New York/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Twin/physiology , Pregnancy, Twin/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , United States
2.
Anesthesiology ; 106(1): 19-25; discussion 6-8, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17197841

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is strong evidence that pain is undertreated in black and Hispanic patients. The association between race and ethnicity and the use of epidural analgesia for labor is not well described. METHODS: Using the New York State Perinatal Database, the authors examined whether race and ethnicity were associated with the likelihood of receiving epidural analgesia for labor after adjusting for clinical characteristics, demographics, insurance coverage, and provider effect. This retrospective cohort study was based on 81,883 women admitted for childbirth between 1998 and 2003. RESULTS: Overall, 38.3% of the patients received epidural analgesia for labor. After adjusting for clinical risk factors, socioeconomic status, and provider fixed effects, Hispanic and black patients were less likely than non-Hispanic white patients to receive epidural analgesia: The adjusted odds ratio was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.93) for white/Hispanic and 0.78 (0.74-0.83) for blacks compared with non-Hispanic whites. Compared with patients with private insurance, patients without insurance were least likely to receive epidural analgesia (adjusted odds ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.89). Black patients with private insurance had similar rates of epidural use to white/non-Hispanic patients without insurance coverage: The adjusted odds ratio was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.53-0.82) for white/non-Hispanic patients without insurance versus 0.69 (0.57-0.85) for black patients with private insurance. CONCLUSION: Black and Hispanic women in labor are less likely than non-Hispanic white women to receive epidural analgesia. These differences remain after accounting for differences in insurance coverage, provider practice, and clinical characteristics.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural/statistics & numerical data , Analgesia, Obstetrical/statistics & numerical data , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Asian People/statistics & numerical data , Black People/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Multivariate Analysis , Pregnancy , White People/statistics & numerical data
3.
Gynecol Oncol ; 94(2): 383-6, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15297176

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of high-dose rate brachytherapy as adjuvant treatment for Stage I/II papillary serous or clear cell endometrial cancer. METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients with Stage I/II papillary serous or clear cell endometrial cancer treated with high-dose rate brachytherapy between 1995 and 2001 was performed. Following surgical staging, which included hysterectomy with pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy, all patients without extrauterine disease were treated with high-dose rate brachytherapy and followed for recurrence. The locations of recurrences were noted and were classified as local or distant. RESULTS: Three (13%) recurrences occurred among 24 patients with Stage I/II papillary serous or clear cell carcinoma. The risk of recurrence was similar for papillary serous and clear cell cancer (12% vs. 12%). Local control was achieved in 96%. The risk of recurrence for those with no myometrial invasion, less than 1/2, or more than 1/2 myometrial invasion was 0%, 10%, and 50%, respectively (P < 0.04). Two of the three recurrences were distant and all patients with recurrence died despite additional treatment. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR) as the sole adjuvant treatment of Stage I/II papillary serous or clear cell carcinoma is associated with a 13% risk of recurrence. Although local control with HDR is excellent, the risk of distant recurrence is increased with deep myometrial invasion. High-dose rate brachytherapy is adequate for Stage IA cases, but more aggressive treatment combining chemotherapy with HDR should be evaluated for more advanced Stage I/II cases.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/radiotherapy , Brachytherapy/methods , Cystadenocarcinoma, Papillary/radiotherapy , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/radiotherapy , Endometrial Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/pathology , Aged , Cystadenocarcinoma, Papillary/pathology , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Iridium Radioisotopes/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Radiopharmaceuticals/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies
4.
Obstet Gynecol ; 101(3): 445-50, 2003 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12636946

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cervical cytology, tumor grade from endometrial sampling, and myometrial invasion with the risk of nodal spread in endometrial cancer. METHODS: Cervical cytology was obtained in 300 patients with endometrial cancer before surgical staging, which included lymphadenectomy. Tumor grade and histology from endometrial sampling were compared with final pathology, and the risk of nodal spread in relation to cervical cytology, tumor grade, and myometrial invasion was assessed using chi(2) and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Endometrial cells on cervical cytology, deep myometrial invasion, and high-grade tumor were associated with 91%, 87%, and 83% of the cases with nodal spread, respectively. In patients with grade 1 tumor on biopsy, final pathology revealed grade 2 in 21%, and grade 3 in 2%. In patients with normal cervical cytology, no nodal metastases occurred with grade 1 tumor on biopsy, and no aortic metastases occurred, regardless of grade. Cervical cytology and tumor grade contributed independently to the likelihood of nodal metastases. CONCLUSION: All patients with endometrial cancer should undergo lymphadenectomy until a reliable system is found to identify those with negligible (less than 1%) risk of nodal spread. The risk of lymph node spread in those with normal cervical cytology is low (2%). Further study of those with normal cervical cytology is needed to determine if lymphadenectomy can be omitted with grade 1 tumor on biopsy, or whether aortic lymphadenectomy is necessary regardless of grade.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Vaginal Smears , Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/pathology , Aged , Aorta, Thoracic , Cystadenocarcinoma, Papillary/pathology , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Lymphatic Metastasis , Medical Records , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging , Pelvis , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Sarcoma/pathology , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...