Genetic mapping of pancreatic cancer by targeted next-generation sequencing in a cohort of patients managed with nab-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy or agents targeting the EGFR axis: a retrospective analysis of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG).

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most fatal malignancies ranking fourth among the leading causes of cancer death with diagnosis at late stages carrying a dismal prognosis. The aim of our retrospective study was to describe the nature and the incidence of gene mutations and genomic instability in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinomas of a Greek patient population fully annotated with clinicopathological data. We used a targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel encompassing genes commonly mutated in pancreatic tumours in a patient population managed with either nab-paclitaxel regimens or targeted compounds modulating the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/AKT/mTOR axis. We identified KRAS, TP53, SMAD4 and CDKN2A as being the most prevalent mutations in the study population with the exception of an intriguingly lower incidence regarding KRAS mutants. Homologous recombination gene mutations were found to be mutually exclusive with CDKN2A mutations. The coexistence of both KRAS and TP53 mutation seems to adversely affect the outcome of the patients whether treated with targeted therapy against EGFR/Akt/mTOR axis or cytotoxic drugs. The poor prognosis observed, correlated to late presentation, specific molecular mutations and to high mutational load warrant prospective validating studies and research into the mechanistic pathophysiology of pancreatic tumours for more effective therapeutic targeting.

Liver perivascular epithelioid cell tumor in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus.

INTRODUCTION: Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PECOMA) is a rare mesenchymal neoplasm which expresses both myogenic and melanocytic markers showing a benign course,although malignant tumors have also been reported. To date there are approximately 33 cases of published hepatic pecomas. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We describe a 47-year-old man with a 27-year past medical history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who underwent left liver lobectomy due to a liver pecoma. His postoperative course complicated with infection, thrombosis of hepatic artery and liver ischemia as well as drug fever. DISCUSSION: Treatment protocol especially for hepatic PECOMA has not reached a consensus although surgical resection is the preferred therapy. CONCLUSION: This is the first case of coexistence of liver pecoma and SLE.

Pancreatic resection for renal cell carcinoma metastasis: An exceptionally rare coexistence.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic metastases are uncommon and only found in a minority of patients with widespread metastatic disease at autopsy. The most common primary cancer site resulting in pancreatic metastases is the kidney, followed by colorectal cancer, melanoma, breast cancer, lung carcinoma and sarcoma. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Herein, we report a 63-year-old male patient who presented -3.5 years after radical nephrectomy performed for renal cell carcinoma (RCC)-with a well-defined lobular, round mass at the body of the pancreas demonstrated by abdominal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The patient underwent distal pancreatectomy combined with splenectomy and cholecystectomy. Histopathological examination revealed clusters of epithelial clear cells, immunohistochemically positive for RCC marker, and negative for CD10 and CA19-9. A final diagnosis of clear RCC metastasizing to pancreas was obtained in view of the past history of RCC, microscopy and the immunoprofile. This was the second metachronous disease recurrence after a previous metastatic involvement of the liver, developed 19 months from the initial diagnosis. The patient has remained well at a 6 month follow up post-resection. DISCUSSION: Solitary pancreatic metastases may be misdiagnosed as primary pancreatic cancer. However, imaging including computed tomography (CT) and MRI, may discriminate between them. Surgical procedures could differentiate solitary metastasis from neuroendocrine neoplasms. The optimal resection strategy involves adequate resection margins and maximal tissue preservation of the pancreas. CONCLUSION: Recently, an increasing number of surgical resections have been performed in selected patients with limited metastatic disease to the pancreas. In addition, a rigid follow-up scheme, including endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and CT is essential give patients a chance for a prolonged life.

Glycine maintains mitochondrial activity and bile composition following warm liver ischemia-reperfusion injury.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Experimental studies have shown protective effect by the non-essential amino acid glycine to liver ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury but the mechanism of action is unknown. METHODS: A rabbit model of hepatic lobar I/R was used. Three groups of animals (n=6) were studied: Sham group (laparotomy alone), ischemia reperfusion (I/R) group (1 h of liver lobar ischemia and 6 h of reperfusion), and a glycine I/R group (intravenous glycine 5 mg/kg prior to the I/R protocol). Systemic and hepatic hemodynamics, degree of liver injury (bile flow, transaminases), hepatic microcirculation, mitochondrial activity (redox state of cytochrome oxidase), bile composition and cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-8) were measured during the experiment. RESULTS: Glycine administration increased portal blood flow, bile production, hepatic microcirculation and maintained cytochrome oxidase activity as compared with the I/R group during reperfusion. Glycine also reduced bile lactate surge and stimulated acetoacetate release in bile during reperfusion versus the I/R group. Cytokine levels (tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-8) and hepatocellular injury (aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase) were significantly reduced by glycine administration. CONCLUSION: Intravenous glycine administration reduces liver warm I/R injury by reducing the systemic inflammatory response, and maintaining cellular energy production.

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of pharmacological interventions to reduce ischaemia-reperfusion injury in elective liver resection with vascular occlusion.

BACKGROUND: Vascular occlusion during liver resection results in ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) injury, which can lead to liver dysfunction. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the benefits and harms of using various pharmacological agents to decrease IR injury during liver resection with vascular occlusion. METHODS: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating pharmacological agents in liver resections conducted under vascular occlusion were identified. Two independent reviewers extracted data on population characteristics and risk of bias in the trials, and on outcomes such as postoperative morbidity, hospital stay and liver function. RESULTS: A total of 18 RCTs evaluating 17 different pharmacological interventions were identified. There was no significant difference in perioperative mortality, liver failure or postoperative morbidity between the intervention and control groups in any of the comparisons. A significant improvement in liver function was seen with methylprednisolone use. Hospital and intensive therapy unit stay were significantly shortened with trimetazidine and vitamin E use, respectively. Markers of liver parenchymal injury were significantly lower in the methylprednisolone, trimetazidine, dextrose and ulinastatin groups compared with their respective controls (placebo or no intervention). DISCUSSION: Methylprednisolone, trimetazidine, dextrose and ulinastatin may have protective roles against IR injury in liver resection. However, based on the current evidence, they cannot be recommended for routine use and their application should be restricted to RCTs.

Intracellular oxygenation and cytochrome oxidase C activity in ischemic preconditioning of steatotic rabbit liver.

BACKGROUND: Mild to moderate steatotic livers are used as marginal donors in liver transplantation. Very little is known about the mechanisms of ischemia reperfusion (IR) injury (IRI) in fatty liver. This study aimed to establish whether cytochrome oxidase C (COX) activity is compromised by IRI in fatty liver and whether ischemic preconditioning (IPC) can protect COX activity. METHODS: New Zealand rabbits were fed on a high-cholesterol diet for 8 weeks to induce moderate hepatic steatosis. Three groups were tested. The IR group underwent 60 minutes of ischemia, followed by 7 hours of reperfusion. The IPC group (IPC + IR) underwent 5 minutes of ischemia, followed by 10 minutes of reperfusion and then 60 minutes of ischemia and 7 hours of reperfusion. The control group (sham) underwent the same surgical procedure, but ischemia was not induced. Deoxyhemoglobin, oxyhemoglobin, and change in the redox state of COX was continuously monitored in vivo by near-infrared spectroscopy. COX and citrate synthase (CS) activity assays were carried out on liver biopsy specimens in vitro. Bile was collected continuously during the procedure and analyzed using proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. RESULTS: The IR group had decreased COX activity and tissue oxygenation represented by deoxyhemoglobin, oxyhemoglobin, COX, and elevated redox ratios of lactate/pyruvate and ß-hydroxybutarate/acetoacetate in vivo and a decrease in COX and CS activity in vitro. The IPC + IR group showed higher levels of all measured parameters in vivo and showed a smaller decrease in COX and CS activity in vitro. CONCLUSION: This study shows that IRI affects COX activity in fatty livers. This is attenuated by IPC.

Pharmacological interventions versus no pharmacological intervention for ischaemia reperfusion injury in liver resection surgery performed under vascular control.

BACKGROUND: Vascular occlusion to reduce blood loss is used during elective liver resection but results in significant ischaemia reperfusion injury. This, in turn, might lead to significant postoperative liver dysfunction and morbidity. Various pharmacological drugs have been used with an intention to ameliorate the ischaemia reperfusion injury in liver resections. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of different pharmacological agents versus no pharmacological interventions to decrease ischaemia reperfusion injury during liver resections where vascular occlusion was performed during the surgery. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until January 2009. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised clinical trials, irrespective of language or publication status, comparing any pharmacological agent versus placebo or no pharmacological agent during elective liver resections with vascular occlusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently identified trials for inclusion and independently extracted the data. We analysed the data with both the fixed-effect and the random-effects models using RevMan Analysis. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on intention-to-treat analysis or available case analysis. MAIN RESULTS: We identified a total of 15 randomised trials evaluating 11 different pharmacological interventions (methylprednisolone, multivitamin antioxidant infusion, vitamin E infusion, amrinone, prostaglandin E1, pentoxifylline, mannitol, trimetazidine, dextrose, allopurinol, and OKY 046 (a thromboxane A2 synthetase inhibitor)). All trials had high risk of bias. There were no significant differences between the groups in mortality, liver failure, or perioperative morbidity. The trimetazidine group had a significantly shorter hospital stay than control (MD -3.00 days; 95% CI -3.57 to -2.43). There were no significant differences in any of the clinically relevant outcomes in the remaining comparisons. Methylprednisolone improved the enzyme markers of liver function and trimetazidine, methylprednisolone, and dextrose reduced the enzyme markers of liver injury compared with controls. However, there is a high risk of type I and type II errors because of the few trials included, the small sample size in each trial, and the risk of bias. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Trimetazidine, methylprednisolone, and dextrose may protect against ischaemia reperfusion injury in elective liver resections performed under vascular occlusion, but this is shown in trials with small sample sizes and high risk of bias. The use of these drugs should be restricted to well-designed randomised clinical trials before implementing them in clinical practice.

Pharmacological interventions for ischaemia reperfusion injury in liver resection surgery performed under vascular control.

BACKGROUND: Vascular occlusion used during elective liver resection to reduce blood loss results in significant ischaemia reperfusion (IR) injury. This in turn leads to significant postoperative liver dysfunction and morbidity. Various pharmacological drugs have been used in experimental settings to ameliorate the ischaemia reperfusion injury in liver resections. OBJECTIVES: To assess the relative benefits and harms of using one pharmacological intervention versus another pharmacological intervention to decrease ischaemia reperfusion injury during liver resections where vascular occlusion was performed during the surgery. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until January 2009. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised clinical trials, irrespective of language or publication status, comparing one pharmacological agent versus another pharmacological agent during elective liver resections with vascular occlusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently identified trials for inclusion and independently extracted data. We analysed the data with both the fixed-effect and the random-effects models using RevMan Analysis. We planned to calculate the risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on intention-to-treat analysis or available case analysis. However, all outcomes were only reported on by single trials, and meta-analysis could not be performed. Therefore, we performed Fisher's exact test on dichotomous outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: We identified a total of five randomised trials evaluating nine different pharmacological interventions (amrinone, prostaglandin E1, pentoxifylline, dopexamine, dopamine, ulinastatin, gantaile, sevoflurane, and propofol). All trials had high risk of bias. There was no significant difference between the groups in mortality, liver failure, or perioperative morbidity. The ulinastatin group had significantly lower postoperative enzyme markers of liver injury compared with the gantaile group. None of the other comparisons showed any difference in any of the other outcomes. However, there is a high risk of type I and type II errors because of the few trials included, the small sample size in each trial, and the risk of bias. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Ulinastatin may have a protective effect against ischaemia reperfusion injury relative to gantaile in elective liver resections performed under vascular occlusion. The absolute benefit of this drug agent remains unknown. None of the drugs can be recommended for routine clinical practice. Considering that none of the drugs have proven to be useful to decrease ischaemia reperfusion injury, such trials should include a group of patients who do not receive any active intervention whenever possible to determine the pharmacological drug's absolute effects on ischaemia reperfusion injury in liver resections.

The role of thiols in liver ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Thiol-containing compounds have an essential role in many biochemical reactions due to their ability to be easily oxidised and then quickly regenerated. Main representatives are glutathione, lipoic acid and thioredoxin which are synthesised de novo in mammalian cells. N-acetylcysteine and Bucillamine are synthetic thiols which have been administered in experimental and clinical studies for treatment of conditions associated with oxidative stress. Ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury is characterised by significant oxidative stress, characteristic changes in the antioxidant system and organ injury leading to significant morbidity and mortality. I/R occurs in a variety of clinical settings such as liver resection, organ transplantation, haemorrhagic shock with fluid resuscitation, heart surgery, myocardial infarction followed by reperfusion and laparoscopic surgery. In these circumstances, the administration of antioxidant agents such as thiols, could provide protection from the harmful effects of I/R injury. However, the ability of thiol compounds to reduce free radicals is associated with the formation of thiyl radicals and the rate and efficiency of removal of thiyl radicals has a critical effect on antioxidant or prooxidant actions of thiols in the cells. The aim of this review is to present the mechanisms by which thiols act as antioxidants and signalling molecules and the experimental and clinical evidence regarding their role in I/R injury with a particular emphasis on liver I/R. The current evidence suggests that thiols ameliorate I/R injury and that their clinical significance should be further evaluated in large scale randomised clinical trials.

N-Acetylcysteine ameliorates the late phase of liver ischaemia/reperfusion injury in the rabbit with hepatic steatosis.

Steatotic livers are highly susceptible to I/R (ischaemia/reperfusion) injury and, therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the in vivo effect of NAC (N-acetylcysteine) on hepatic function in the early and initial late phase of warm liver I/R injury in steatotic rabbits. Twelve New Zealand White rabbits were fed a high-cholesterol (2%) diet. The control group (n=6) underwent lobar liver ischaemia for 1 h, followed by 6 h of reperfusion. In the treated group receiving NAC (n=6), an intravenous infusion of NAC was administered prior to and during the 6 h reperfusion period. Systemic and hepatic haemodynamics were monitored continuously. ALT (alanine aminotransferase) activity and bile production were measured. NMR spectroscopy was used to analyse bile composition. Oxidation of DHR (dihydrorhodamine) to RH (rhodamine) was used as a marker of production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Moderate centrilobular hepatic steatosis was demonstrated by histology. The results showed that NAC administration significantly improved portal flow, hepatic microcirculation, bile composition and bile flow after 5 h of reperfusion. NAC administration was also associated with less hepatocellular injury, as indicated by ALT serum activity, and decreased the oxidation of DHR to RH. In conclusion, NAC administration decreased the extent of I/R injury in the steatotic liver, particularly during the late phase of reperfusion.

Ultrasonically activated shears in extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer.

Gastrectomy, followed by extended lymphadenectomy, is the treatment of choice in some stages of advanced gastric cancer. Lymphorrhea, as a result of the many divided lymphatic vessels, increases the morbidity. Ultrasonically activated coagulated shears (UACS) may divide all small vessels followed by immediate sealing of the coapted vessel walls. We designed a prospective randomized study to determine the effectiveness of the UACS versus monopolar electrosurgery in D2 dissection. Forty patients with gastric cancer stage II or stage IIIA were enrolled and randomized into 2 groups of 20 patients each. Group A underwent lymphatic dissection with monopolar cautery. Group B underwent lymphatic dissection with UACS. Subhepatic and left sudiaphragmatic closed drains were left until lymphorrhea and/or oozing stopped. Total gastrectomy was performed in 16 patients of group A and 14 of group B; subtotal gastrectomy was performed in 4 patients in group A and 6 patients in group B. The drains were removed after 6-17 days (mean 9.7 +/- 2.9) in group Aand after 4-8 days (mean 5.6 +/- 1.2) in group B(p < 0.001). The total amount of drained fluid was 300-2050 ml (mean 985 +/- 602) in group A and 230-1080 ml (mean 480 +/- 242) in group B (p < 0.002). Eight patients in group A and 5 in group B had postoperative fever, while 3 and 1 patients, respectively, had wound infections. In conclusion the use of UACS is a safe method of lymphatic dissection which reduces operative blood loss, postoperative lymphorrhea, blood transfusions,and hospital stay.