Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 30(9): 1998-2006, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33774171

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With increasing health care expenditures, knowledge about the benefit and costs of surgical interventions such as total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) becomes important for orthopedic surgeons, social insurance programs, and health policy decision makers. We examined the impact of TSA on quality of life (QOL), direct medical costs, and productivity losses and evaluated the cost-utility ratio of TSA compared with ongoing nonoperative management using real-world data. METHODS: Patients with shoulder osteoarthritis and/or rotator cuff tear arthropathy indicated for anatomic or reverse TSA were included in this prospective study. QOL (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5-Level questionnaire) and shoulder function (Constant score; Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; and Subjective Shoulder Value) were assessed preoperatively and up to 2 years postoperatively. Health insurance companies provided all-diagnosis direct medical costs for 2018 in Swiss francs (CHF), where 1 CHF was equivalent to US $1.02. Indirect costs were assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire. Baseline data at recruitment and the total costs of the preoperative year served as a proxy for nonoperative management. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as the total costs to gain 1 extra quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) based on both the health care system perspective and societal perspective. The relationship between QOL and shoulder function was assessed by regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean preoperative utility index for the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5-Level questionnaire of 0.68 for a total of 150 patients (mean age, 71 years; 21% working; 58% women) increased to 0.89 and 0.87 at 1 and 2 years postoperatively, respectively. Mean direct medical costs were 11,771 CHF (preoperatively), 34,176 CHF (1 year postoperatively), and 11,763 CHF (2 years postoperatively). The ICER was 63,299 CHF/QALY (95% confidence interval, 44,391-82,206 CHF/QALY). The mean productivity losses for 29 working patients decreased from 40,574 CHF per patient (preoperatively) to 26,114 CHF at 1 year postoperatively and 10,310 CHF at 2 years postoperatively. When considering these productivity losses, the ICER was 35,549 CHF/QALY (95% confidence interval, 12,076-59,016 CHF/QALY). QOL was significantly associated with shoulder function (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Using real-world direct medical cost data, we calculated a cost-utility ratio of 63,299 CHF/QALY for TSA in Switzerland, which clearly falls below the often-suggested 100,000-CHF/QALY threshold for acceptable cost-effectiveness. In view of productivity losses, TSA becomes highly cost-effective with an ICER of 35,546 CHF/QALY.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder , Quality of Life , Aged , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Treatment Outcome
2.
Z Orthop Unfall ; 159(4): 391-396, 2021 Aug.
Article in English, German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32207123

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation questionnaire (PRTEE) is a specific questionnaire available for assessing the health status of patients with lateral epicondylitis. An official German translation does not yet exist. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the English version of the PRTEE into German. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The translation and cross-cultural adaptation was completed by an expert committee comprising people of varying professional and linguistic backgrounds. According to international guidelines, the English original was first translated into German, then back-translated and the final version was pre-tested on patients. RESULTS: No major difficulties were encountered during the translation process and smaller linguistic discrepancies could be resolved in the expert committee. For the pre-validation testing, 11 patients with extensor repair due to persistent lateral epicondylitis were included. They rated the questionnaire as easy to understand and complete. The final version was approved by the developers of the original questionnaire as the official German translation. CONCLUSIONS: Although the measurement properties of the German version were not evaluated in this study, the original shows good reliability, validity and responsiveness. In summary, the PRTEE is a questionnaire quick and easy to complete for patients with lateral epicondylitis. Therefore, it is suitable for the clinical routine assessment of subjective health status or the outcome after an intervention.


Subject(s)
Tennis Elbow , Disability Evaluation , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tennis Elbow/diagnosis , Translating
3.
BMJ Open ; 10(11): e040591, 2020 11 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33243805

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Clinical registries are essential for evaluation of surgical outcomes. The Schulthess Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry (SAR) was established in 2006 to evaluate safety, function, quality-of-life and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing anatomic or reverse shoulder joint replacement at the Schulthess Klinik, a high-volume, leading orthopaedic surgery centre in Zürich, Switzerland. FINDINGS TO DATE: Between March 2006 and December 2019, the registry covered 98% of eligible operations. Overall, 2332 patients were enrolled with a total of 2796 operations and 11 147 person-years of follow-up. Mean age at baseline was 71 (range: 20-95), 65% were women. Most common indication was rotator cuff tears with osteoarthritis (42%) and the mean preoperative Constant Score was 31 (±15). The most frequent arthroplasty type was reverse, increasing from 61% in 2006-2010 to 86% in 2015-2019. Functional recovery peaked at 12-month postoperatively and did not show a clinically relevant deterioration during the first ten follow-up years. Since its establishment, the registry was used to address multiple pertinent clinical and methodological questions. Primary focus was on comparing different implant configurations (eg, glenosphere diameter) and surgical techniques (eg, latissimus dorsi transfer) to maximise functional recovery. Additionally, the cohort contributed to the determination of the clinical relevance and validity of radiological monitoring of cortical bone resorption and scapular notching. Finally, SAR data helped to demonstrate that returning to sports was among key patient expectations after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. FUTURE PLANS: As first patients are approaching the 15 years follow-up landmark, the registry will continue providing essential data on long-term functional outcomes, implant stability, revision rates and aetiologies as well as patient satisfaction and quality-of-life. In addition to research and quality-control, the cohort data will be brought back to the patients by bolstering real-time clinical decision support.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder , Shoulder Joint , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Range of Motion, Articular , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Switzerland , Treatment Outcome
4.
Int Orthop ; 44(11): 2365-2370, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32661636

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Our primary aim was to describe the re-intervention and revision rates after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) documented in a local shoulder arthroplasty registry. We also identify the main indication for revision and re-intervention, which may be relevant for patient outcome post-RSA. METHODS: Since July 2006, RSAs are consecutively documented in our clinic registry and prospectively controlled with follow-ups. Any intervention after primary RSA requiring a return to the operating room for any shoulder-related indication was termed a re-intervention. Revisions were defined as surgeries involving any exchange, removal, or addition of at least one component. The study endpoints were survival rates at two, five and ten years follow-up for both definitions. RESULTS: Until July 2017, 63 from a total of 1480 primary RSAs required at least one re-intervention and 33 patients had a revision. Open reduction and internal fixation for fractures around the implant (n = 14) were the predominating indications for re-intervention. The re-intervention rate for instability was 0.5%. For re-interventions, survival rates were 97.7, 95.4 and 90.8% at two, five and ten years, respectively, and the respective rates for revisions were 98.7, 97.5 and 95.3%. CONCLUSION: The revision rate after primary RSA for our patient registry is low. A relevant number of additional interventions were noted that did not require any component revision but may impair the final outcome post-RSA. By only reporting revision rates, the number of post-RSA re-interventions is clearly underestimated. We recommend the documentation of all events leading to any re-intervention in arthroplasty registries.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder , Fractures, Bone , Shoulder Joint , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder/adverse effects , Humans , Registries , Reoperation , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 28(8): 1457-1467, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30713065

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Radial head fractures lead to persisting disability in a considerable number of cases. This study aimed to investigate their most common revision causes and procedures. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study reviewed the cases of 466 adult patients who had undergone surgical revision after operative or nonoperative treatment of a radial head fracture. The initial diagnosis was a Mason type I fracture in 13.0%, Mason type II fracture in 14.6%, Mason type III fracture in 22.8%, Mason type IV fracture in 20.9%, terrible-triad injury in 12.8%, Monteggia-like lesion in 13.1%, and Essex-Lopresti lesion in 2.0%. Initial treatment was nonoperative in 30.2%, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in 44.9%, radial head arthroplasty in 16.6%, radial head resection in 3.7%, sole treatment of concomitant injuries in 2.6%, and fragment excision in 2.0%. Up to 3 revision causes and procedures were recorded per case. RESULTS: The most common complications were stiffness (67.4%), instability (36.5%), painful osteoarthritis (29.2%), ORIF related (14.8%), nonunion or necrosis (9.2%), radial head arthroplasty related (7.5%), ulnar neuropathy (6.0%), and infection (2.6%). Revision procedures frequently included arthrolysis (42.1%), arthroplasty (24.9%), implant removal (23.6%), ligament repair or reconstruction (23.0%), débridement (14.2%), repeated ORIF (8.2%), and/or radial head resection (7.7%). Mason type I or II fractures were primarily revised because of stiffness and painful osteoarthritis. Complications after Mason type III fractures were predominantly ORIF related. Fracture-dislocations showed a wide range of complications, with instability and stiffness comprising the most common causes of revision. CONCLUSIONS: The complications of radial head fractures are characteristic to their classification. Knowledge of these findings might guide surgeons in treating these injuries and may help counsel patients accordingly.


Subject(s)
Elbow Joint/surgery , Fracture Dislocation/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Open Fracture Reduction/methods , Radius Fractures/surgery , Adult , Elbow Joint/diagnostic imaging , Female , Fracture Dislocation/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Radius Fractures/diagnosis , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Elbow Injuries
6.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 25(11): 1795-1802, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27260994

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment of a failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is unclear. In the case of poor glenoid bone stock, retaining a RSA may be infeasible. We report our experience with conversions to hemiarthroplasty. METHODS: Within 7 years, 16 patients underwent conversion to hemiarthroplasty after failed RSA. All patients had insufficient bone stock for reimplantation of another RSA. Standard radiographs and Constant, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and the 11-item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores were assessed preoperatively and up to a minimum of 24 months after surgery. Postoperative superior migration and complications were also documented. RESULTS: Glenoid loosening was the primary reason for RSA failure in 11 patients. Three required revision surgery because of infection. Postoperative functional outcome was generally poor at the latest follow-up, with mean Constant, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and 11-item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores of 25, 37, and 63 points, respectively. Baseline pain also did not improve. Medialization progressed beyond the coracoid in 6 patients, and complete anterosuperior escape was reported in 3 patients. Three postoperative complications were recorded by the final follow-up, including 2 periprosthetic humeral fractures treated conservatively and 1 patient with painful humeral component medialization leading to resection arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: With excessive bone stock loss, hemiarthroplasty remains an option, despite the associated risks of uncertain pain relief and poor functional outcome. This technique offers a lower likelihood of undertaking further surgical interventions within the short-term to midterm postoperative period. Nevertheless, resection arthroplasty may still be considered another valuable solution.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder/adverse effects , Hemiarthroplasty , Salvage Therapy/methods , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Shoulder Prosthesis/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Satisfaction , Periprosthetic Fractures/surgery , Prosthesis Failure , Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery , Reoperation , Visual Analog Scale
7.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 135(12): 1637-45, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26318887

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Chronic lateral epicondylitis is generally treated using nonsurgical methods including physiotherapy and infiltrations of cortisone or platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The latter is known for its simple application as well as associated low risk of adverse events, which lend to its widespread use in treating various musculoskeletal conditions. There is limited evidence on the effectiveness of PRP injections to optimally treat chronic lateral epicondylitis. This study explored the effectiveness of single or repeated injections for patients with symptoms that spanned 6 months or more and were unresponsive to alternate conservative measures. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis received PRP injections in 4-week intervals that were complemented with standardized physical therapy. Patient-reported outcomes based on the patient-rated elbow evaluation (PREE), quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (qDASH), and EuroQol (five dimensions) 3-level version (EQ5D3L) questionnaires were documented at each visit including 6 months after the first injection. These outcomes were compared between patients receiving 1 vs. 2 or 3 PRP injections. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients received one (n = 36) or more (n = 26) PRP injections. The mean baseline to 6-month follow-up scores of the PREE and qDASH questionnaires improved significantly from 54.0 to 23.0 and 50.3 to 20.7, respectively. The mean baseline EQ5D3L-visual analogue scale score improved from 62.5 to 82.9 by 6 months post-injection. These outcomes did not significantly differ between the patients who received varying numbers of injections. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis reported significant pain relief and gain in function as well as quality of life 6 months after localized PRP treatment. A single PRP injection may be sufficient.


Subject(s)
Platelet-Rich Plasma , Quality of Life , Tennis Elbow/therapy , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Injections , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
8.
J Orthop Sci ; 20(5): 830-6, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26063596

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the outcome of a third generation modular non-cemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in incongruent glenohumeral degeneration with severe rotator cuff deficiency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive RTSA with a mean age of 72 years (range 58-89 years) were prospectively enrolled. Mean follow-up was 24 months (range 21-29 months). Pain and standardized clinical functional scores were monitored. Radiographic and MRI findings have been scored and correlated to clinical outcome and complication rate. RESULTS: Preoperative pain decreased significantly from VAS 8 to 2 at 24 months postop., as ROM improved significantly, by at least doubling preoperative values of elevation, abduction, and external rotation. Nevertheless, internal rotation languished. The preoperative median constant was 18 points and 70 points 24 months postop. (p < 0.001). Initial median DASH was 95 vs. 50 2 years after surgery (p < 0.001). Median prospective ASES was 23 (IQR 8-33) vs. 70 points (p < 0.001) at final follow-up. Each outcome measurement improved significantly at 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up. There was no significant correlation between pre-operative radiographic findings of osseous and/or soft-tissue degeneration and short-term clinical outcome and/or complication rate (13 %). At final follow-up, 54 % showed radiographic signs of inferior scapular notching. There was no revision and/or loosening observed. CONCLUSION: RSTA with this modular system results in significant pain relief and improvement of functional clinical outcomes. However, longevity of the device is currently unknown.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Arthroplasty, Replacement/methods , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Range of Motion, Articular , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Reoperation , Rotator Cuff/surgery , Shoulder Joint/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
9.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 133(12): 1699-707, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24077779

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Persistent horizontal instability after acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint separation may provoke unsatisfactory results of conservative treatment. HYPOTHESIS: the arthroscopically assisted double flip button stabilization of acute horizontally unstable grade III and IV AC joint disruptions results in full functional restoration and stable radiological reposition. MATERIALS: 21 patients treated for an acute grade III or IV AC joint separation were enrolled. Clinical assessment at least 2-year postoperative included the constant score (CS) and the simple shoulder test. A panorama stress view, bilateral axial view and an AC view were obtained for radiographic evaluation. RESULTS: 19 individuals (mean 37 years; 17 men) with 16 Rockwood type III and 3 type IV injuries were available for examination 24­51 months postoperatively. The mean CS was 90.2 points (SD 6.5) with no statistically significant difference between CS and age-adjusted normative values. The mean Simple Shoulder Test scored 11.5 points (range 8­12). Loss of reduction of more than 2 mm in the coronal plane stress views was present in 6 patients (32 %) with no associated loss of functional outcome. Two of four reported complications in four patients were treated surgically (one open revision with graft augmentation for coracoid implant break out, one arthroscopic capsular release for persistent glenohumeral stiffness). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopically assisted double flip button stabilization for acute grade III and IV AC joint separation restores fully horizontal stability and age-expected shoulder function, resulting in high patient satisfaction, despite a loss of reduction observed radiographically in approximately one-third of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.


Subject(s)
Acromioclavicular Joint/injuries , Acromioclavicular Joint/surgery , Arthroscopy/instrumentation , Joint Instability/surgery , Suture Anchors , Acromioclavicular Joint/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
10.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 21(9): 1213-21, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22047789

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to report early functional and radiographic results of a small series of patients who underwent autologous chondrocyte transplantation-collagen membrane seeding (ACT-Cs) for focal chondral defects of the shoulder. METHODS: The outcome of 4 consecutive male patients (mean age, 29.3 ± 6.2 years; range, 21-36 years) who underwent ACT-Cs for treatment of large symptomatic glenohumeral cartilage defects was retrospectively evaluated with clinical and radiographic measures at a mean of 41.3 ± 24.9 months (range, 11-71 months) after surgery. The evaluation included a visual analog scale for pain, the Constant score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder index, the Rowe score, and a satisfaction scale. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation was performed according to the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue scoring system. RESULTS: There were 3 humeral full-thickness cartilage defects (each 6.0 cm(2)) and 1 glenoid full-thickness cartilage defect (2.0 cm(2)). The mean postoperative visual analog scale score (0.3 of 10), the mean unweighted Constant score (83.3 ± 9.9), and the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons index (95.3 ± 8.1) were representative of satisfactory shoulder function. The Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue score was indicative of satisfactory defect coverage with signs of fibrocartilaginous repair tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Autologous chondrocyte transplantation at the glenohumeral joint is a remote option for young adults with symptomatic, isolated, large-diameter cartilage lesions. Potential complications as a result of the open approach and 2-step procedure have to be considered carefully. Long-term data, larger patient populations, and randomized studies are required to determine the potential for chondrocyte transplantation techniques to be standard procedure for treatment of symptomatic, large-diameter, full-thickness cartilage defects in the glenohumeral joint.


Subject(s)
Cartilage Diseases/surgery , Cartilage, Articular/surgery , Chondrocytes/transplantation , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Adult , Cartilage Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Orthopedic Procedures , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Shoulder Joint/diagnostic imaging , Transplantation, Autologous , Young Adult
12.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 19(3): 439-45, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19734058

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Various open and arthroscopic techniques for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears have been described. Muscle-tendon transfers may be considered in order to improve range of motion and strength. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed retrospectively the functional and structural results of 31 deltoid flap transfers for massive postero-superior rotator cuff tears at 2 time points: Mid- and long-term follow-up exams were performed after a mean of 53 and 175 months, respectively. RESULTS: Functional gains were minor, but improvement in pain and patient satisfaction was high. The mean Constant score improved from 31 preoperatively to 46 points at mid-term follow-up. At long-term follow-up, 16 shoulders were still available for exam and presented with a mean Constant score of 66 points. Survival rates of the deltoid flap, confirmed by ultrasound, were 16.5% at mid-term and 12.5% at long-term follow-up, and correlated with better clinical outcome. Cranial migration of the humeral head progressed in all cases and could not be prevented by the interposition of a deltoid flap. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this series, we no longer use nor recommend this technique.


Subject(s)
Muscle, Skeletal/surgery , Rotator Cuff Injuries , Rotator Cuff/surgery , Surgical Flaps , Tendon Injuries/surgery , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
14.
J Child Orthop ; 1(2): 97-100, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19308480

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of flexible intramedullary nailing for unicameral bone cysts in terms of function and osseous consolidation. METHODS: Twenty-two unicameral bone cysts in children's long bones were treated by flexible intramedullary nailing. In 13 cases the bone cyst was diagnosed in a traumatic event leading to a pathologic fracture. Fifteen patients were referred to our clinic after failed conservative treatment. In 16 patients the cyst was located in the humerus, and in 6 patients in the femur. Mean duration of follow-up after surgery was 24 months. RESULTS: According to Capanna's criteria healing was obtained in 20 cases with a mean time of 16 months. Sixteen cysts healed completely. Four lesions were classified as grade 2, meaning that residual radiolucencies were radiographically visible at the latest follow-up. Two recurrences of humeral cysts were seen at 16 and 18 months postoperatively. The complication rate was minimal. CONCLUSION: Due to the immediate stabilization of the lesion aftercare becomes facile. This method allows prompt mobilization and early weight bearing without the necessity of a plaster cast. Further it prevents effectively the most common complication, a re-fracture or a pathologic fracture. Therefore we propose this surgical procedure as the treatment of choice for unicameral bone cysts in children's long bones.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...