ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: According to the TRILUMINATE (Clinical Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Treated With the Tricuspid Valve Repair System) trial, transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) improves quality of life beyond medical treatment, while no effects on heart failure hospitalization (HFH) and survival were observed at 1 year. However, the generalizability of the TRILUMINATE trial to real-world conditions remains a subject of discussion. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to apply the clinical TRILUMINATE inclusion and exclusion criteria to a real-world T-TEER patient group and evaluate symptomatic and survival outcome in TRILUMINATE-eligible and TRILUMINATE-ineligible patients. METHODS: Clinical TRILUMINATE inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to a cohort of patients who underwent T-TEER at 5 European centers from 2016 to 2022. Study patients were compared regarding baseline characteristics, survival, HFH, and symptomatic outcomes as measured by NYHA functional class, a quality-of-life questionnaire and 6-minute walk distance. RESULTS: Of 962 patients, 54.8% were classified as TRILUMINATE eligible, presenting with superior left ventricular function and fewer comorbidities compared with the ineligible population. Tricuspid regurgitation reduction, improvement in NYHA functional class, quality of life, and exercise capacity were comparable in both groups. However, the 1-year survival and HFH rates significantly differed (tricuspid regurgitation ≤2+ at discharge, 82% vs 85%; survival, 85% vs 75%; HFH, 14% vs 22% for eligible vs ineligible patients). CONCLUSIONS: The observed differences in survival and HFH outcomes suggest a limited generalizability of TRILUMINATE to real-world conditions and indicate the need for additional studies evaluating the outcomes after T-TEER in less selected patient populations.
