Incidental Findings Identified on Head MRI for Investigation of Cognitive Impairment: A Retrospective Review.

INTRODUCTION: Incidental findings are common in presumed healthy volunteers but are infrequently studied in patients in a clinical context. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, nature, and management implications of incidental findings on head MRI in patients presenting with cognitive symptoms, and to quantify and describe unexpected MRI abnormalities that are of uncertain relevance to the patient's cognitive symptoms. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective review of patients attending a regional early-onset cognitive disorders clinic between March 2012 and October 2018. Medical records of consecutive patients who underwent head MRI were reviewed. Unexpected MRI findings were classified according to their severity and likelihood of being incidental. Markers of small vessel disease and cerebral atrophy were excluded. RESULTS: Records of 694 patients were reviewed (median age 60 years, 49.9% female), of whom 514 (74.1%) underwent head MRI. 54% of the patients received a diagnosis of a neurodegenerative disorder. Overall 111 incidental findings were identified in 100 patients of whom 18 patients (3.5%, 95% CI 2.2-5.6%) had 18 incidental findings classified as requiring additional medical evaluation. 82 patients (16%, 95% CI 13.0-19.5%) had 93 incidental findings without clearly defined diagnostic consequences. 17 patients (3.3%) underwent further investigations, 14 patients (2.7%) were referred to another specialist clinic and 3 patients (0.6%) were treated surgically. Two patients had MRI findings of uncertain relevance to their cognitive symptoms, necessitating prolonged clinic follow-up. CONCLUSION: Incidental findings are common in patients with cognitive impairment from this large clinic-based series; however, few required additional medical evaluation. These data could help inform discussions between clinicians and people with cognitive symptoms regarding the likelihood and potential implications of incidental imaging findings.

A systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of the validity of anion gap as a screening tool for hyperlactatemia.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis seeks to determine the validity of the anion gap to screen for hyperlactatemia in critically ill patients. We have previously shown that the anion gap does not predict 31-day and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients. The present review aims to add confirmatory evidence to identify whether the anion gap is a suitable tool for risk stratification in low-resource countries. RESULTS: Nine studies reporting on 4504 samples from 2111 patients were included. The anion gap failed to detect hyperlactatemia defined as lactate above 2.5 mmol/l but showed good discriminatory ability for the detection of severe hyperlactatemia defined as lactate over 4 mmol/l. At the 2.5 mmol/l threshold, the anion gap had high specificity but low sensitivity for the detection of hyperlactatemia. A meta-analysis of correlation coefficients yielded high statistical heterogeneity. Therefore, in keeping with our previous findings, the use of the anion gap for risk stratification as an alternative to lactate cannot be recommended. However, the strength of the evidence we have synthesised is adversely affected by the small number of studies included, inconsistency of effect measures and positivity thresholds reported, and selection bias within individual studies. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42015016470 (registered on the 4th February 2015).

Predictors of survival in progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that investigated prognostic factors and survival in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and multiple system atrophy (MSA). METHODS: Publications of at least 10 patients with a likely or confirmed diagnosis of PSP or MSA were eligible for inclusion. Methodological quality was rated using a modified version of the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. For frequently examined prognostic factors, HRs derived by univariate and multivariate analysis were pooled in separate subgroups; other results were synthesised narratively and HRs could not be reported here. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies presenting findings on 6193 patients (1911 PSP, 4282 MSA) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We identified the following variables as unfavourable predictors of survival. In PSP, PSP-Richardson's phenotype (univariate HR 2.53; 95% CI 1.69 to 3.78), early dysphagia and early cognitive symptoms. In MSA, severe dysautonomia and early development of combined autonomic and motor features but not MSA phenotype (multivariate HR 1.22; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.80).In PSP and MSA, survival was predicted by early falls (multivariate HR 2.32; 95% CI 1.94 to 2.77), the Neuroprotection and Natural History in Parkinson Plus Syndromes Parkinson Plus Score and the Clinical Global Impression Disease Severity Score but not sex (multivariate HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.28). There was conflicting evidence regarding the prognostic effect of age at onset and stridor. CONCLUSION: Several clinical variables were strongly associated with shorter survival in PSP and MSA. Results on most prognostic factors were consistent across methodologically diverse studies; however, the lack of commonality of prognostic factors investigated is a significant limitation.

Anion gap as a prognostic tool for risk stratification in critically ill patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lactate concentration is a robust predictor of mortality but in many low resource settings facilities for its analysis are not available. Anion gap (AG), calculated from clinical chemistry results, is a marker of metabolic acidosis and may be more easily obtained in such settings. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we investigated whether the AG predicts mortality in adult patients admitted to critical care settings. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, The Cochrane Library and regional electronic databases from inception until May 2016. Studies conducted in any clinical setting that related AG to in-hospital mortality, in-intensive care unit mortality, 31-day mortality or comparable outcome measures were eligible for inclusion. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Descriptive meta-analysis was performed and the I(2) test was used to quantify heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was undertaken to identify potential sources of heterogeneity between studies. RESULTS: Nineteen studies reporting findings in 12,497 patients were included. Overall, quality of studies was poor and most studies were rated as being at moderate or high risk of attrition bias and confounding. There was substantial diversity between studies with regards to clinical setting, age and mortality rates of patient cohorts. High statistical heterogeneity was found in the meta-analyses of area under the ROC curve (I(2) = 99 %) and mean difference (I(2) = 97 %) for the observed AG. Three studies reported good discriminatory power of the AG to predict mortality and were responsible for a large proportion of statistical heterogeneity. The remaining 16 studies reported poor to moderate ability of the AG to predict mortality. Subgroup analysis suggested that intravenous fluids affect the ability of the AG to predict mortality. CONCLUSION: Based on the limited quality of available evidence, a single AG measurement cannot be recommended for risk stratification in critically ill patients. The probable influence of intravenous fluids on AG levels renders the AG an impractical tool in clinical practice. Future research should focus on increasing the availability of lactate monitoring in low resource settings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015015249 . Registered on 4th February 2015.