Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 55
Filter
1.
Respir Med ; 177: 106289, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33421941

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Silicosis is a rapidly emerging major health concern for workers in the artificial stone benchtop industry. The association between serum angiotensin converting enzyme (sACE) levels and artificial stone silicosis is unknown. METHODS: We investigated 179 male workers (median age 40 years, interquartile range (IQR) 33-48 years) from the stone benchtop industry in Victoria, Australia. All had worked in an environment where dry processing of artificial stone had occurred and were registered with the Victorian Silica-associated Disease Registry between June 2019 and August 2020. Workers had undergone protocolised assessments including respiratory function testing, high resolution CT chest and blood tests panel, including sACE. FINDINGS: Sixty workers with artificial stone silicosis were identified and they had a higher median sACE level (64.1 U/L, IQR 51.5, 87.5), compared to 119 without silicosis (35.0 U/L, IQR 25.0, 47.0). Compared to those with a normal assessment, regression modelling noted significantly higher average differences in sACE levels for workers with lymphadenopathy alone (12.1 U/L, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3, 22.9), simple silicosis (28.7 U/L, 95% CI: 21.3, 36.0) and complicated silicosis (36.0 U/L, 95% CI 25.2, 46.9). There was a small negative association with gas transfer, but no associations with exposure duration or spirometry. CONCLUSION: sACE levels were noted to be higher in artificial stone workers with silicosis compared to those without disease and was highest in those with complicated silicosis. Longitudinal follow up is required to evaluate sACE as a prognostic biomarker for workers with this rapidly emerging occupational lung disease.

2.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 14(11): 863-872, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28650725

ABSTRACT

Cases of lymphohematopoietic cancer from three petroleum industry cohorts, matched to controls from the respective cohort, were pooled into single study. Average benzene exposure was quantitatively estimated in ppm for each job based on measured data from the relevant country, adjusted for the specific time period, site and job exposure characteristics and the certainty of the exposure estimate scored. The probability of dermal exposure and of peak exposure was also assessed. Before risk was examined, an exposure estimate comparison and rationalisation exercise was performed across the studies to ensure accuracy and consistency of approach. This article evaluates the final exposure estimates and their use in the risk assessments. Overall benzene exposure estimates were low: 90% of participants accumulated less than 20 ppm-years. Mean cumulative exposure was estimated as 5.15 ppm-years, mean duration was 22 years, and mean exposure intensity was 0.2 ppm. 46% of participants were allocated a peak exposure (>3 ppm at least weekly). 40% of participants had a high probability of dermal exposure (based on the relative probability of at least weekly exposure). There were differences in mean intensity of exposure, probability of peak, and/or dermal exposure associated with job category, job site, and decade of exposure. Terminal Operators handling benzene-containing products were the most highly exposed group, followed by Tanker Drivers carrying gasoline. Exposures were higher around 1940-1950 and lower in more recent decades. Overall confidence in the exposure estimates was highest for recently held jobs and for white-collar jobs. We used sensitivity analyses, which included and excluded case-sets on the basis of exposure certainty scores, to inform the risk assessment. The above analyses demonstrated that the different patterns of exposure across the three studies are largely attributable to differences in jobs, site types, and time frames rather than study. This provides reassurance that the previous rationalisation of exposures achieved inter-study consistency and that the data could be confidently pooled.


Subject(s)
Benzene/analysis , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Benzene/toxicity , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Hematologic Neoplasms/chemically induced , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Humans , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/chemically induced , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/epidemiology , Myeloproliferative Disorders/chemically induced , Myeloproliferative Disorders/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Oil and Gas Industry , Petroleum , Risk Assessment
3.
Occup Environ Med ; 73(11): 761-771, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27456156

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate mortality and cancer incidence of paid male Australian firefighters and of subgroups of firefighters by era of first employment, duration of employment and number and type of incidents attended. METHODS: Participating fire agencies supplied records of individual firefighters including their job histories and incidents attended. The cohort was linked to the Australian National Death Index and Australian Cancer Database. SMRs and SIRs were calculated. Firefighters were grouped into tertiles by duration of employment and by number of incidents attended and relative mortality ratios and relative incidence ratios calculated. Analyses were carried out separately for full-time and part-time male firefighters. RESULTS: Compared to the Australian population, there were significant increases in overall risk of cancer, for all paid firefighters SIR 1.09 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.14), in prostate cancer, full-time firefighters 1.23 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.37), part-time 1.51 (1.28 to 1.77), and melanoma full-time 1.45 (95% CI 1.26 to 1.66), part-time firefighters 1.43 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.76). Kidney cancer was associated with longer service in internal analyses for paid firefighters. Prostate cancer was associated with longer service and increased attendance at fires, particularly structural fires for full-time firefighters.The overall risk of mortality was significantly decreased and almost all major causes of death were significantly reduced for paid firefighters. CONCLUSIONS: Male paid firefighters have an increased risk of cancer. They have reduced mortality compared with the general population, which is likely to be a result of a strong healthy worker effect and likely lower smoking rates among firefighters compared with the Australian population.


Subject(s)
Firefighters/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Australia/epidemiology , Cause of Death , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/mortality , Occupational Diseases/mortality , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Young Adult
4.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 66(7): 536-42, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27371948

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An investigation into concerns about possible health effects of fire training practices at an Australian training facility recommended a study to investigate the risk of cancer and mortality of those with risk of chronic occupational exposure to several chemicals. AIMS: To investigate mortality and cancer incidence in firefighters at the Country Fire Authority (CFA) Fiskville training facility, Victoria, Australia, between 1971 and 1999. METHODS: CFA supplied human resources records, supplemented by self-reported information for a retrospective cohort, and allocated firefighters to low, medium or high groups based on probability of exposure. We linked the cohort to state and national cancer and mortality data. We calculated standardized mortality ratios and standardized cancer incidence ratios (SIRs). RESULTS: The high group (n = 95) had a clearly increased risk of overall cancers SIR = 1.85 (95% CI 1.20-2.73), testicular cancer SIR = 11.9 (1.44-42.9) and melanoma SIR = 4.59 (1.68-9.99) relative to the population of Victoria. Brain cancer was significantly increased for the medium group (n = 256): SIR = 5.74 (1.56-14.7). Mortality was significantly reduced for all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dealing with supplied records can be problematic but despite the small numbers, we identified an increased risk of cancer for the high group. The mortality data suggested that there was under-ascertainment for the medium and low groups which underestimated risk and a possible reporting bias for brain cancer. Small cohorts can still provide statistically significant findings when investigating locations for cancer risk.


Subject(s)
Firefighters/education , Incidence , Neoplasms/mortality , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Adult , Australia/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Melanoma/epidemiology , Melanoma/etiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Testicular Neoplasms/epidemiology , Testicular Neoplasms/etiology , Universities/organization & administration , Workforce
5.
BMC Public Health ; 15: 1017, 2015 Oct 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26438148

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In recent years, reduced participation has been encountered across all epidemiological study designs, both in terms of non-response as well as refusal. A low response rate may reduce the statistical power but, more importantly, results may not be generalizable to the wider community. METHODS: In a telephone survey of 1413 randomly selected members of the Australian general population and of 690 participants sourced from previous studies, we examined factors affecting people's stated willingness to participate in health research. RESULTS: The majority of participants (61 %) expressed willingness to participate in health research in general but the percentage increased when provided with more specific information about the research. People were more willing if they have personal experience of the disease under study, and if the study was funded by government or charity rather than pharmaceutical companies. Participants from previous studies, older people and women were the groups most willing to participate. Younger men preferred online surveys, older people a written questionnaire, and few participants in any age and sex groups preferred a telephone questionnaire. CONCLUSION: Despite a trend toward reduced participation rates, most participants expressed their willingness to participate in health research. However, when seeking participants, researchers should be concrete and specific about the nature of the research they want to carry out. The preferred method of recommended contact varies with the demographic characteristics.


Subject(s)
Health Surveys/methods , Health Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Interviews as Topic , Research Design , Research Subjects/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Australia , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Distribution , Young Adult
6.
Br J Cancer ; 111(5): 998-1003, 2014 Aug 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24960405

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Parental occupational exposures have been associated with childhood brain tumours (CBT), but results are inconsistent. Few studies have studied CBT risk and parental solvent exposure, suggesting a possible association. We examined the association between CBT and parental occupational exposure to solvents in a case-control study. METHODS: Parents of 306 cases and 950 controls completed detailed occupational histories. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for both maternal and paternal exposure to benzene, other aromatics, aliphatics and chlorinated solvents in key time periods relative to the birth of their child. Adjustments were made for matching variables (child's age, sex and state of residence), best parental education and occupational exposure to diesel exhaust. RESULTS: An increased risk of CBT was observed with maternal occupational exposures to chlorinated solvents (OR=8.59, 95% CI 0.94-78.9) any time before birth. Paternal exposure to solvents in the year before conception was associated with an increased CBT risk: OR=1.55 (95% CI 0.99-2.43). This increased risk appeared to be mainly attributable to exposure to aromatic solvents: OR=2.72 (95% CI 0.94-7.86) for benzene and OR=1.76 (95% CI 1.10-2.82) for other aromatics. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that parental occupational exposures to solvents may be related to an increased risk of CBT.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/etiology , Maternal Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Paternal Exposure/adverse effects , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/etiology , Case-Control Studies , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Risk , Solvents/adverse effects
7.
Br J Cancer ; 110(3): 783-7, 2014 Feb 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24357793

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High benzene exposure causes acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Three petroleum case-control studies identified 60 cases (241 matched controls) for AML and 80 cases (345 matched controls) for chronic lymphoid leukaemia (CLL). METHODS: Cases were classified and scored regarding uncertainty by two haematologists using available diagnostic information. Blinded quantitative benzene exposure assessment used work histories and exposure measurements adjusted for era-specific circumstances. Statistical analyses included conditional logistic regression and penalised smoothing splines. RESULTS: Benzene exposures were much lower than previous studies. Categorical analyses showed increased ORs for AML with several exposure metrics, although patterns were unclear; neither continuous exposure metrics nor spline analyses gave increased risks. ORs were highest in terminal workers, particularly for Tanker Drivers. No relationship was found between benzene exposure and risk of CLL, although the Australian study showed increased risks in refinery workers. CONCLUSION: Overall, this study does not persuasively demonstrate a risk between benzene and AML. A previously reported strong relationship between myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (potentially previously reported as AML) at our study's low benzene levels suggests that MDS may be the more relevant health risk for lower exposure. Higher CLL risks in refinery workers may be due to more diverse exposures than benzene alone.


Subject(s)
Benzene/toxicity , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/pathology , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/pathology , Australia , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/chemically induced , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/chemically induced , Logistic Models , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure , Petroleum/toxicity , Risk Factors
8.
Br J Cancer ; 109(9): 2472-80, 2013 Oct 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24022188

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Research on the possible association between shiftwork and breast cancer is complicated because there are many different shiftwork factors, which might be involved including: light at night, phase shift, sleep disruption and changes in lifestyle factors while on shiftwork (diet, physical activity, alcohol intake and low sun exposure). METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-control study in Western Australia from 2009 to 2011 with 1205 incident breast cancer cases and 1789 frequency age-matched controls. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect demographic, reproductive, and lifestyle factors and lifetime occupational history and a telephone interview was used to obtain further details about the shiftwork factors listed above. RESULTS: A small increase in risk was suggested for those ever doing the graveyard shift (work between midnight and 0500 hours) and breast cancer (odds ratio (OR)=1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.97-1.39). For phase shift, we found a 22% increase in breast cancer risk (OR=1.22, 95% CI=1.01-1.47) with a statistically significant dose-response relationship (P=0.04). For the other shiftwork factors, risks were marginally elevated and not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: We found some evidence that some of the factors involved in shiftwork may be associated with breast cancer but the ORs were low and there were inconsistencies in duration and dose-response relationships.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Work Schedule Tolerance , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Life Style , Middle Aged , Risk , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Western Australia/epidemiology , Young Adult
9.
Br J Cancer ; 105(9): 1409-13, 2011 Oct 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21915123

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Earlier studies have reported moderate increases in the risk of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) among children whose mothers have been occupationally exposed to extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic fields. Other studies examining parental occupational exposure to ELF and ALL have reported mixed results. METHODS: In an Australian case-control study of ALL in children aged < 15 years, parents were asked about tasks they undertook in each job. Exposure variables were created for any occupational exposure before the birth of the child, in jobs 2 years before birth, in jobs 1 year before birth and up to 1 year after birth. RESULTS: In all, 379 case and 854 control mothers and 328 case and 748 control fathers completed an occupational history. Exposure to ELF in all time periods was similar in case and control mothers. There was no difference in exposure between case and control fathers. There was no association between maternal (odds ratio (OR)=0.96; 95% CI=0.74-1.25) or paternal (OR=0.78; 95% CI=0.56-1.09) exposure to ELF any time before the birth and risk of childhood ALL. CONCLUSION: We did not find an increased risk of ALL in offspring of parents with occupational exposure to ELF.


Subject(s)
Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/epidemiology , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Time Factors
10.
Med Hypotheses ; 77(3): 430-6, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21723672

ABSTRACT

Shift work has been associated with various adverse health outcomes. In particular, there has been a recent flourish in investigating potential cancer risk associated with working night shifts and other shift schedules. Epidemiologic studies have revealed generally weak associations due to several methodological challenges such as lack of standard classifications of shift or night work. The field also has been hindered by a lack of clarity about the possible mechanisms by which shiftwork could have an effect on cancer risk. One possible mechanism is reduced production of melatonin caused by exposure to light at night. Although there is a growing body of evidence that provides some support for this mechanism, several other mechanisms also make sense from a biological point of view. Further, the relatively weak magnitude of the associations between light at night and melatonin level suggests that multiple factors may be operating along the pathway between shift work and adverse health consequences (including cancer risk). Here we propose four additional mechanisms that should be considered for a comprehensive investigation of these potential pathways. These are: phase shift; sleep disruption; lifestyle factors (such as poor quality diets, less physical activity and higher BMI); and lower vitamin D. Consideration of all these mechanisms is necessary in order to design effective preventative workplace strategies. In developed countries, approximately 20% of the population undertake shiftwork and, while we are unlikely to be able to eliminate shiftwork from current work practices, there are aspects of shiftwork that can be modified and there may be facets of individual susceptibility that we may be able to identify and target for prevention.


Subject(s)
Melatonin/metabolism , Models, Biological , Neoplasms/etiology , Sleep Deprivation/complications , Vitamin D Deficiency/complications , Work Schedule Tolerance/physiology , Humans , Life Style , Light , Risk Factors
11.
Chem Biol Interact ; 184(1-2): 101-11, 2010 Mar 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19914227

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Three case-control studies each nested within a cohort of petroleum workers assessed exposure to benzene in relation to risk of haematopoietic cancers. These studies have each been updated and the cases will be pooled to derive a more powerful study. The benzene exposure of new leukemia cases and controls was estimated in accordance with each respective study's original methods. An essential component of the process of pooling the data was comparison and rationalisation of the exposure estimates to ensure accuracy and consistency of approach. This paper describes this process and presents comparative estimates before and after appropriate revision took place. The original petroleum industry studies, in Canada, the UK and Australia, were conducted at different points in time by different study teams, but the industry used similar technology in similar eras in each of these countries. METHODS: A job history for each subject giving job title, dates of starting and leaving the job and location of work, was assembled. For each job or task, the average benzene exposure (Base Estimate (BE) in ppm) was derived from measurements collected at applicable worksites. Estimates of exposure intensity (workplace exposure estimates (WE)) were then calculated for each line of work history by adjusting the BEs for site- and era-specific exposure-related variables such as loading technology and percentage benzene in the product. To ensure that the exposure estimates were comparable among the studies, the WEs were allocated to generic Job Categories, e.g. Tanker Driver (by technology used e.g. bottom loading), Motor Mechanic. The WEs were stratified into eras, reflecting technological changes in the industry. The arithmetic mean (AM), geometric mean (GM) and range of the stratified WEs were calculated, by study, for each generic Job Category. These were then compared. The AMs of the WEs were regarded as substantially similar if they were within 20% in all three studies in one era or for at least two studies in two eras. If the AM of the WE group differed by more than 20%, the data were examined to see whether the difference was justified by differences in local exposure conditions, such as an enclosure versus open work area. Estimates were adjusted in the absence of justification for the difference. RESULTS: Reconciliation of differences resulted in changes to a small number of underlying BEs, particularly the background values, also the BEs attributed to some individuals and changes to the allocation of jobs between Job Categories. Although the studies covered some differing sectors of the industry and different time periods, for 22 Job Categories there was sufficient overlap, particularly in the downstream distribution sector, to make comparisons possible. After adjustment 12 Job Categories were judged to be similar and 10 were judged to be justifiably different. Job-based peak and skin exposure estimates were applied in a uniform way across the studies and a single approach to scoring the certainty of the exposure estimates was identified. CONCLUSIONS: The revised exposure estimates will be used in the pooled analysis to examine the risk of haematopoietic cancers and benzene exposure. This exercise provided an important quality control check on the exposure estimates and identified similarly exposed Job Categories that could be grouped for risk assessment analyses.


Subject(s)
Benzene/analysis , Leukemia/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Benzene/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Humans , Leukemia/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Petroleum/adverse effects , Risk Assessment
12.
Occup Environ Med ; 64(1): 60-5, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17018583

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of selected occupational exposures with risk of prostate cancer and with risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: This population-based case-control study recruited 606 men with a diagnosis of confirmed prostate cancer, 400 men who had undergone their first prostatectomy for BPH and 471 male controls randomly selected from the electoral roll between 1 August 2001 and 1 October 2002 in Western Australia. chi(2) tests and logistic regressions were used for univariate and multivariate analyses to investigate the association of the two outcomes with occupational exposure to pesticides, fertilisers, metals, wood dust, oils, diesel exhaust and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). RESULTS: Exposure to toxic metals at a non-substantial level increased the risk of BPH (odds ratio (OR) 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 to 1.84) and led to a non-significant excess risk of prostate cancer (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.61). Non-significant excess risks were observed for prostate cancer after exposure to oils other than mineral oil (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.51) and for BPH after exposure to PAHs (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.58). A non-statistically significant protective effect for prostate cancer was seen after exposure to organophosphate pesticides (OR 0. 69, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.12). No other associations were found for either prostate cancer or BPH and no dose-response relationships were seen for the exposures investigated. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not provide evidence that any of the occupational factors examined are risk factors for either prostate cancer or BPH.


Subject(s)
Occupational Diseases/etiology , Prostatic Hyperplasia/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Age Distribution , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Epidemiological Monitoring , Hazardous Substances/analysis , Hazardous Substances/toxicity , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Prostatic Hyperplasia/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Western Australia/epidemiology
13.
Chem Biol Interact ; 153-154: 23-32, 2005 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15935797

ABSTRACT

A nested case-control study found that the excess of leukemia, identified among the male members of the Health Watch cohort, was associated with benzene exposure. Exposure had been retrospectively estimated for each individual occupational history using an algorithm in a relational database. Benzene exposure measurements, supplied by Australian petroleum companies, were used to estimate exposure for specific tasks. The tasks carried out within each job, the products handled, and the technology used, were identified from structured interviews with contemporary colleagues. More than half of the subjects started work after 1965 and had an average exposure period of 20 years. Exposure was low; nearly 85% of the cumulative exposure estimates were at or below 10 ppm-years. Matched analyses showed that leukemia risk increased with increasing cumulative benzene exposures and with increasing exposure intensity of the highest-exposed job. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma were not associated with benzene exposure. A reanalysis reported here, showed that for the 7 leukemia case-sets with greater than 16 ppm-years cumulative exposure, the odds ratio was 51.9 (5.6-477) when compared to the 2 lowest exposed categories combined to form a new reference category. The addition of occasional high exposures, e.g. as a result of spillages, increased exposure for 25% of subjects but for most, the increase was less than 5% of total exposure. The addition of these exposures reduced the odds ratios. Cumulative exposures did not range as high as those in comparable studies; however, the recent nature of the cohort and local handling practices can explain these differences.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Occupational/toxicity , Benzene/toxicity , Leukemia/chemically induced , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure , Australia/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Employment/classification , Humans , Leukemia/epidemiology , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/epidemiology , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/etiology , Male , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , Multiple Myeloma/etiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Petroleum
14.
Occup Environ Med ; 61(12): 1006-13, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15550607

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To investigate whether Australian Gulf War veterans have a higher than expected prevalence of recent symptoms and medical conditions that were first diagnosed in the period following the 1991 Gulf War; and if so, whether these effects were associated with exposures and experiences that occurred in the Gulf War. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 1456 Australian Gulf War veterans and a comparison group who were in operational units at the time of the Gulf War, but were not deployed to that conflict (n = 1588). A postal questionnaire was administered and the likelihood of the diagnosis of self-reported medical conditions was assessed and rated by a medical practitioner. RESULTS: Gulf War veterans had a higher prevalence of all self-reported health symptoms than the comparison group, and more of the Gulf War veterans had severe symptoms. Increased symptom reporting was associated with several exposures, including having more than 10 immunisations, pyridostigmine bromide tablets, anti-biological warfare tablets, pesticides, insect repellents, reportedly being in a chemical weapons area, and stressful military service experiences in a strong dose-response relation. Gulf War veterans reported psychological (particularly post-traumatic stress disorder), skin, eye, and sinus conditions first diagnosed in 1991 or later more commonly than the comparison group. Over 90% of medical conditions reported by both study groups were rated by a medical practitioner as having a high likelihood of diagnosis. CONCLUSION: More than 10 years after the 1991 Gulf War, Australian veterans self-report all symptoms and some medical conditions more commonly than the comparison group. Further analysis of the severity of symptoms and likelihood of the diagnosis of medical conditions suggested that these findings are not due to over-reporting or to participation bias.


Subject(s)
Gulf War , Immunization/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Persian Gulf Syndrome/etiology , Veterans , Adult , Australia/epidemiology , Chemoprevention/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Male , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Persian Gulf Syndrome/epidemiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/etiology , Veterans/psychology , Warfare
15.
Occup Environ Med ; 61(12): 1014-20, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15550608

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A recent report showed that Australian veterans of the 1991 Gulf War displayed a greater prevalence of a multitude of self-reported symptoms than a randomly sampled comparison group of military personnel who were eligible for deployment but were not deployed to the Gulf. AIMS: To investigate whether the pattern, rather than frequency, of symptom reporting in these Australian Gulf War veterans differed from that of the comparison group personnel. METHODS: Factor analysis was used to determine whether the co-occurrence of 62 symptoms in 1322 male Gulf War veterans can be explained by a number of underlying dimensions, called factors. The methodology was also applied to 1459 male comparison group subjects and the factor solutions of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: For the Gulf War veterans, a three factor solution displayed replicability and construct validity. The three factors were labelled as psycho-physiological distress, somatic distress, and arthro-neuromuscular distress, and were broadly similar to those described in previous studies of Gulf War veterans. A concordant three factor solution was also found for the comparison group subjects, with strong convergence of the factor loadings and factor scores across the two groups being displayed. CONCLUSION: Results did not display evidence of a unique pattern of self-reported symptoms among Gulf War veterans. Results also indicated that the differences between the groups lie in the degrees of expression of the three underlying factors, consistent with the well documented evidence of increased self-reported symptom prevalence in Gulf War veterans.


Subject(s)
Gulf War , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Persian Gulf Syndrome/etiology , Veterans , Adult , Australia/epidemiology , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Humans , Male , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Persian Gulf Syndrome/epidemiology , Prevalence , Reproducibility of Results , Veterans/psychology , Warfare
16.
Thorax ; 59(10): 897-903, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15454658

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since the 1991 Gulf War concerns have been raised about the effects on veterans' health of exposures to Kuwaiti oil fire smoke and to dust storms. METHODS: A cross sectional study compared 1456 Australian Gulf War veterans with a randomly sampled military comparison group (n = 1588). A postal questionnaire asked about respiratory conditions, exposures, medications, tobacco use, demographic characteristics, and military service details. During a medical assessment, spirometric tests and a physical examination were performed and a respiratory questionnaire was administered. RESULTS: The response rate for the Gulf War veteran group was 80.5% and for the comparison group 56.8%. Australian Gulf War veterans had a higher than expected prevalence of respiratory symptoms and respiratory conditions suggesting asthma (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1 to 1.9) and bronchitis first diagnosed since the Gulf War (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.2 to 3.1) but did not have poorer lung function or more ventilatory abnormalities than the comparison group. Veterans who reported exposure to oil fire smoke had slightly poorer forced vital capacity (difference between means -0.10 l; 95% CI -0.18 to -0.03) and those exposed to dust storms had a slightly better peak expiratory flow rate (difference between means 12.0 l/min; 95% CI 0.6 to 23.4) than veterans who did not report exposure. Veterans who were in the Gulf at or after the start of the oil fires had more respiratory conditions suggesting asthma (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.0 to 2.9) than those who completed their deployment before this time. CONCLUSIONS: Increased self-reporting of respiratory symptoms, asthma, and bronchitis by veterans was not reflected in poorer lung function. The findings do not suggest major long term sequelae of exposure to oil fire smoke or dust storms.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Persian Gulf Syndrome/epidemiology , Respiration Disorders/epidemiology , Adult , Australia/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dust , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume/physiology , Health Status , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/epidemiology , Male , Odds Ratio , Oils/adverse effects , Persian Gulf Syndrome/physiopathology , Respiration Disorders/physiopathology , Smoke/adverse effects , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/epidemiology , Vital Capacity/physiology
17.
Psychol Med ; 34(8): 1419-30, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15724873

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Elevated rates of psychological morbidity and symptomatology have been widely reported in 1991 Gulf War veterans. The present study used brief self-report instruments to compare the psychological health of Australian Gulf War veterans with that of a randomly sampled military comparison group. METHOD: The 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist--Specific (PCL-S) and Military Service Experience (MSE) questionnaire were administered to 1424 male Australian Gulf War veterans and 1548 male Australian Defence Force members who were operational at the time of the Gulf War conflict, but were not deployed there. RESULTS: The Gulf War veterans exhibited poorer psychological health, as measured by the above three instruments, than the comparison group members. For Gulf War veterans, the number of stressful experiences, as measured by the MSE questionnaire, was correlated with scores on the three instruments. SF-12 mental health component summary scores and PCL-S caseness, but not GHQ-12 caseness, differed significantly between Gulf War veterans and comparison group members who had been on at least one active deployment. CONCLUSIONS: More than a decade after the 1991 Gulf War, Australian Gulf War veterans are exhibiting higher levels of current (past month) psychological ill-health, as measured using the GHQ-12 and PCL-S, as well as lower mental health status, as measured by the SF-12, than the comparison group. Although not a replacement for formal psychiatric diagnosis, instruments such as those above may aid in the assessment of veterans' psychological health.


Subject(s)
Gulf War , Mental Disorders/psychology , Veterans/psychology , Adult , Australia , Case-Control Studies , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Incidence , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/etiology , Mental Health , Morbidity , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
18.
Ann Occup Hyg ; 45(4): 275-82, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11378148

ABSTRACT

A retrospective assessment of exposure to benzene was carried out for a nested case control study of lympho-haematopoietic cancers, including leukaemia, in the Australian petroleum industry. Each job or task in the industry was assigned a Base Estimate (BE) of exposure derived from task-based personal exposure assessments carried out by the company occupational hygienists. The BEs corresponded to the estimated arithmetic mean exposure to benzene for each job or task and were used in a deterministic algorithm to estimate the exposure of subjects in the study. Nearly all of the data sets underlying the BEs were found to contain some values below the limit of detection (LOD) of the sampling and analytical methods and some were very heavily censored; up to 95% of the data were below the LOD in some data sets. It was necessary, therefore, to use a method of calculating the arithmetic mean exposures that took into account the censored data. Three different methods were employed in an attempt to select the most appropriate method for the particular data in the study. A common method is to replace the missing (censored) values with half the detection limit. This method has been recommended for data sets where much of the data are below the limit of detection or where the data are highly skewed; with a geometric standard deviation of 3 or more. Another method, involving replacing the censored data with the limit of detection divided by the square root of 2, has been recommended when relatively few data are below the detection limit or where data are not highly skewed. A third method that was examined is Cohen's method. This involves mathematical extrapolation of the left-hand tail of the distribution, based on the distribution of the uncensored data, and calculation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the arithmetic mean. When these three methods were applied to the data in this study it was found that the first two simple methods give similar results in most cases. Cohen's method on the other hand, gave results that were generally, but not always, higher than simpler methods and in some cases gave extremely high and even implausible estimates of the mean. It appears that if the data deviate substantially from a simple log-normal distribution, particularly if high outliers are present, then Cohen's method produces erratic and unreliable estimates. After examining these results, and both the distributions and proportions of censored data, it was decided that the half limit of detection method was most suitable in this particular study.


Subject(s)
Benzene/adverse effects , Epidemiologic Methods , Leukemia/chemically induced , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Australia/epidemiology , Humans , Leukemia/epidemiology , Likelihood Functions , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Petroleum , Retrospective Studies
19.
Toxicol Ind Health ; 17(4): 113-27, 2001 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12479507

ABSTRACT

A nested case-control study was undertaken to investigate whether an excess of lympho-haematopoietic cancers in the Australian petroleum industry was associated with benzene exposure. The benzene exposures of the cases and controls were estimated using a quantitative algorithm based largely on exposures measured in the Australian petroleum industry. The algorithm was used to estimate, for each subject, the benzene exposure in parts per million (ppm) for each job held in the industry, and the cumulative exposure in ppm years. Because of the critical importance of the exposure assessment in this design of epidemiological study, particular attention was paid to the reliability of the inputs to the algorithm. The inputs [base estimates (BEs) of exposure and technology-specific exposure modifiers (EMs)] were compared to data from other sources including the occupational hygiene literature. Where such comparison data were available, they were generally found to confirm the values used in the algorithm, although four input values were changed as a result of the validation exercise. The integrity of the task-based algorithm was validated by employing it to calculate the exposures of the tanker drivers in the study and comparing these with measured daily exposure for tanker drivers in the Australian petroleum industry and exposure values found in the occupational hygiene literature. After adjustment for the mix of products carried by the Australian tanker drivers, the estimates from the algorithm were found to be comparable to the measured and literature values. This exercise provided evidence that the exposure assessment for the epidemiological study was reliable and that the results of the study can be used as the basis for evaluating the relationship between exposure to benzene and the risk of lympho-haematopoietic cancer.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Benzene/analysis , Hematologic Neoplasms/etiology , Lymphoma/etiology , Occupational Exposure , Petroleum , Australia/epidemiology , Benzene/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Humans , Industry , Lymphoma/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies
20.
Ann Occup Hyg ; 44(4): 301-20, 2000 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10831734

ABSTRACT

An excess of lympho-haematopoietic (LH) cancers has been identified in the Australian petroleum industry through the Health Watch surveillance programme. A nested case-control study is being conducted to investigate this excess. This paper describes the methods used to provide quantitative estimates of benzene exposure for each of the subjects in the case-control study. Job histories were compiled for each subject from interviews and company employment records. Site visits and telephone interviews were used to identify the tasks included in each job title. Details about the tasks such as their frequency, the technology in use and about changes that had taken place over the years were also gathered. Exposure dated back to the late 1940s for a few subjects. Collaborating petroleum companies provided recent benzene exposure monitoring data. These were used to generate Base Estimates of exposure for each task, augmented with data from the literature where necessary. Past exposures were estimated from the Base Estimates by means of an exposure algorithm. The modifying effects of technological changes and changes to the product were used in the algorithm. The algorithm was then computed to give, for each job, for each subject, an estimate of average benzene exposure in ppm in the workplace atmosphere (Workplace Estimate). This value was multiplied by the years for which the job was held and these values summed to give an estimate of Cumulative Estimate of benzene in ppm-years. The occupational hygienists performing the exposure assessment did so without knowledge of the case or control status of subjects. Overall exposures to benzene in the Australian petroleum industry were low, and virtually all activities and jobs were below a time-weighted average of 5 ppm. Exposures in terminals were generally higher than at refineries. Exposures in upstream areas were extremely low. Estimates of Cumulative Estimate to benzene ranged from 0.005 to 50.9 ppm-years.


Subject(s)
Benzene/analysis , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Petroleum , Australia , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Leukemia/prevention & control , Models, Theoretical , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...