Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 51(6): 668-674, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36075295

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Effective approaches to reduce Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) in hospitalized patients are needed. We report data from 3 years preceding and 3 years following interventions that proved successful, with detailed analysis of all cases the first year after implementation. METHODS: Interventions included a nursing protocol to identify cases present on admission by asking if the patient had 1 or more liquid stools in the last 24 hours, and a 2-step testing algorithm with samples positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the C. difficile toxin gene reflexing to an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the toxin antigen. RESULTS: Healthcare-associated infections due to CDI fell from ∼160 in each of the preceding 3 years to <65 in each of the subsequent 3 years (P < .001), while the ratio of observed-to-expected hospital-onset cases diminished to ∼0.50 (P < .02). In the first year, 395 samples were PCR(+), but only 118 (29.9%) of these were EIA(+). 55 (46.6%) of the PCR(+)/EIA(+) samples were from hospital day 1 or 2 and classified as present on admission. The mean time from stool collection to report of PCR results was ∼7.5 hours, and the EIA took on average only 68 additional minutes to be reported. CONCLUSIONS: The number of incident CDI cases can be dramatically decreased by implementing an admission screening question and a 2-step testing algorithm.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Toxins , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Humans , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Incidence , Bacterial Toxins/analysis , Feces , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Clostridium Infections/prevention & control , Clostridium Infections/complications , Immunoenzyme Techniques
2.
Am J Med ; 134(6): e366-e373, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33359273

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multiple registries have reported that >40% of high-risk atrial fibrillation patients are not taking oral anticoagulants. The purpose of our study was to determine the presence or absence of active atrial fibrillation and CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥75 y, Diabetes mellitus, prior Stroke [or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism], Vascular disease, Age 65-74 y, Sex category) risk factors to accurately identify high-risk atrial fibrillation (CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2) patients requiring oral anticoagulants and the magnitude of the anticoagulant treatment gap. METHODS: We retrospectively adjudicated 6514 patients with atrial fibrillation documented by at least one of: billing diagnosis, electronic medical record encounter diagnosis, electronic medical record problem list, or electrocardiogram interpretation. RESULTS: After review, 4555/6514 (69.9%) had active atrial fibrillation, while 1201 had no documented history of atrial fibrillation and 758 had a history of atrial fibrillation that was no longer active. After removing the 1201 patients without a confirmed atrial fibrillation diagnosis, oral anticoagulant use in high-risk patients increased to 71.1% (P < .0001 compared with 62.9% at baseline). Oral anticoagulant use increased to 79.7% when the 758 inactive atrial fibrillation patients were also eliminated from the analysis (P < .0001 compared with baseline). In the active high-risk atrial fibrillation group, there was no significant difference in the use of oral anticoagulants between men (80.7%) and women (78.8%) with a CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2, or in women with a CHA2DS2-VASc ≥3 (79.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Current registries and health system health records with unadjudicated diagnoses over-report the number of high-risk atrial fibrillation patients not taking oral anticoagulants. Expert adjudication identifies a smaller treatment gap than previously described.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , False Positive Reactions , Risk Assessment/methods , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Blood Coagulation/drug effects , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment/standards , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Thromboembolism/prevention & control
3.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 6(8)2019 Aug 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31375823

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Documenting the actions and effects of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) is essential for quality improvement and support by hospital leadership. Thus, our ASP tallies the number of charts reviewed, types of recommendations, how and to whom they were communicated, whether they were followed, and any effects on antimicrobial days of therapy. Here we describe how we customized the electronic medical record at our institution to facilitate our workflow and data analysis, while highlighting principles that should be adaptable to other ASPs. METHODS: The documentation system involves creation of a novel and intuitive ASP form in each chart reviewed and 2 mutually exclusive tracking systems: 1 for active forms to facilitate the daily ASP workflow and 1 for finalized forms to generate cumulative reports. The ASP form is created by the ASP pharmacist, edited by the ASP physician, reopened by the pharmacist to assess whether the recommendation was followed and to quantify any antimicrobial days avoided or added, then reviewed and finalized by the ASP physician. Active forms are visible on a real-time "MPage," whereas all finalized forms are compiled nightly into 65 informative tables and associated graphs. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: This system and its underlying principles have automated much of the documentation, facilitated follow-up of interventions, improved the completeness and validity of recorded data and analysis, enabled our ASP to expand its activities, and been associated with decreased antimicrobial usage, drug resistance, and C. difficile infections.

4.
J Gen Intern Med ; 30(12): 1795-802, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25990190

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many academic hospitals have implemented overnight hospitalists to supervise house staff and improve outcomes, but few studies have described the impact of this role. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of an overnight academic hospitalist program on patient-level outcomes. Secondary objectives were to describe the program's revenue generation and work tasks. DESIGN: Retrospective interrupted time-series analysis of patients admitted to the medicine service before and after implementation of the program. PARTICIPANTS: All patients aged 18 and older admitted to the acute or intermediate care units between 7:00 p.m. and 6:59 a.m. during the period before (April 2011-August 2012) and after (September 2012-April 2014) program implementation. INTERVENTION: An on-site attending-level physician directly supervising medicine house staff overnight, providing clinical care during high-volume periods, and ensuring safe handoffs to daytime providers. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, 30-day hospital readmissions, length of stay, and upgrades in care on the night of admission and during hospitalization. Multivariable models estimated the effect on outcomes after adjusting for secular trends. Revenue generation and work tasks are reported descriptively. KEY RESULTS: During the study period, 6484 patients were admitted to the medicine service: 2722 (42 %) before and 3762 (58 %) after implementation. No differences were found in mortality (1.1 % vs. 0.9 %, p=0.38), 30-day readmissions (14.8 % vs. 15.6 %, p=0.39), mean length of stay (3.09 vs. 3.08 days, p=0.86), or upgrades to intensive care on the night of admission (0.4 % vs. 0.7 %, p=0.11) or during hospitalization (3.5 % vs. 4.2 %, p=0.20). During the first year, hospitalists billed 1209 patient encounters (3.3/shift) and 63 procedures (0.2/shift), and supervised 1939 patient admissions (6.12/shift) while supervising house staff 3-h/shifts. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an overnight academic hospitalist program showed no impact on several important clinical outcomes, and revenue generation was modest. As overnight hospitalist programs develop, investigations are needed to delineate the return on investment and focus on other outcomes that may be more sensitive to change, such as errors and provider/patient satisfaction.


Subject(s)
After-Hours Care/organization & administration , Hospitalists/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers/economics , Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Health Services Research/methods , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Humans , Internal Medicine/organization & administration , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Outcome Assessment , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Program Evaluation , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...