Ankle arthrodesis or total ankle arthroplasty surgery for end stage ankle arthritis, which is best? A review of the best available evidence.

BACKGROUND: End Stage Ankle Arthritis (ESAA) causes pain and dysfunction. It is treated effectively with Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA) or Ankle Arthrodesis (AA). Currently there is no consensus on which surgical procedure is superior. This paper will provide a systematic review of all published high-quality studies directly comparing TAA and AA for the surgical treatment of ESAA to determine superiority. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review of the highest quality studies published that directly compare clinical outcomes of TAA and AA for surgical treatment of ESAA was conducted. Each study was assigned a Level of Evidence (LOE) rating (I-III) and then summarized to assign a grade of recommendation (A-C, I). Superiority was determined for the clinical outcomes of pain, activity, Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL), readmission to hospital, revision surgery and general complications. RESULTS: There is fair evidence (GOR B) that supports both TAA and AA for the surgical treatment of ESAA. However, TAA trended to be superior for pain relief (GOR B), activity (GOR B), health related quality of life (GOR B) and readmission rate (GOR B) while AA trended to be superior for revision rates (GOR B). Conflicting evidence was presented for general complications (GOR C) CONCLUSION: Due to the lack of level I papers and the findings from the papers reviewed not being consistent, no definitive conclusion on which procedure is better can be made. However, there is enough evidence to provide a basis for which procedure is more effective in each of the outcomes reviewed. This should be considered when deciding on which procedure is best suited for a patient on a case-by-case basis. To allow for a stronger recommendation, further studies-ideally, high-quality level I randomized control trials directly comparing Ankle Arthrodesis and Total Ankle Arthroplasty are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review.

Naturally Killing the Silent Killer: NK Cell-Based Immunotherapy for Ovarian Cancer.

Ovarian cancer (OC) is diagnosed in ~22,000 women in the US each year and kills 14,000 of them. Often, patients are not diagnosed until the later stages of disease, when treatment options are limited, highlighting the urgent need for new and improved therapies for precise cancer control. An individual's immune function and interaction with tumor cells can be prognostic of the response to cancer treatment. Current emerging therapies for OC include immunotherapies, which use antibodies or drive T cell-mediated cancer recognition and elimination. In OC, these have been limited by adverse side effects and tumor characteristics including inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity, lack of targetable antigens, loss of tumor human leukocyte antigen expression, high levels of immunosuppressive factors, and insufficient immune cell trafficking. Natural killer (NK) cells may be ideal as primary or collateral effectors to these nascent immunotherapies. NK cells exhibit multiple functions that combat immune escape and tumor relapse: they kill targets and elicit inflammation through antigen-independent pathways and detect loss of HLA as a signal for activation. NK cells are efficient mediators of tumor immune surveillance and control, suppressed by the tumor microenvironment and rescued by immune checkpoint blockade. NK cells are regulated by a variety of activating and inhibitory receptors and already known to be central effectors across an array of existing therapies. In this article, we highlight interactions between NK cells and OC and their potential to change the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and participate in durable immune control of OC.

Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review of the Quality and Quantity of the Current Literature for Surgical Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Anterior shoulder instability is the most common sequela of shoulder dislocation and can result in repeated dislocations or subluxation of the glenohumeral joint. Anterior shoulder instability can be treated conservatively or surgically with several procedures. PURPOSE: To date, arthroscopic Bankart is the most common surgical procedure for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability. No previous studies have compared all anterior shoulder surgical procedures. In this study, the authors performed a systematic review of journal articles describing all surgical procedures for anterior shoulder instability to determine the scientific evidence and level of recommendation. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHOD: A comprehensive literature search was conducted (July 19, 2016) with 4 reputed databases: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane databases, and Web of Science. The articles found in the literature search were screened by 2 reviewers on the basis of their titles, abstracts, and full text. Data were extracted from relevant studies, and potentially relevant records were selected for full-text review. Included articles were classified according to their scientific quality (level of evidence, 1-5). The studies were then combined for each surgical procedure, and a grade of recommendation was assigned for each procedure: grade A, treatment recommendation based on level 1 evidence studies; B, based on level 2 or 3 evidence studies; C, based on level 4 or 5 evidence and could represent conflicting results; or I, insufficient evidence to recommend a treatment. As such, the grade of recommendation provides a summary score for the quality and quantity of available literature to support the surgical procedures reviewed here. RESULTS: The systematic literature review generated 11,281 articles. After screening, 655 articles were included. Results revealed 31 surgical procedures for shoulder instability following dislocation: 10 surgical procedures were given an A or B recommendation; 11, a C recommendation; and 10, an I recommendation. CONCLUSION: This review identified many surgical procedures to treat anterior shoulder instability. Ten of these surgical procedures had an abundant amount of published articles to describe their safety and efficacy. Arthroscopic Bankart and open Bankart were the most commonly reported procedures that cite satisfactory postoperative outcomes and limited complications. Publications on the other surgical procedures were less common. Surgeons should be careful when recommending surgery, and they should choose the appropriate surgical procedure based on evidence-based literature.