Novel statistical approach for evaluating flow cytometric in vitro micronucleus data.

Statistical methods currently recommended for analysis of in vitro micronucleus data are based on small sample sizes. The tests are designed to evaluate linear trends and differences between treated and control samples. When using flow cytometric analysis, >5 times the number of cells are easily evaluated, and the variance estimates from these large samples are small. Application of these recommended tests to large samples resulted in statistically significant outcomes which were not considered to be biologically meaningful. Alternative statistical methods for testing trends and differences among treatments that were either widely used, or sample-size independent, were investigated. Using data from 95 experiments (from 2011-2013) where 19% of the experiments were considered positive, results for the various statistical methods were compared. When using either the recommended or alternate methods, 42-68% of the experiments resulted in statistically significant results (p < 0.05). A new concept was then tested using the same data sets: the "z' factor", designed to identify 'hits' during high throughput screening. Using this simple-to-compute statistic the number of significant calls was reduced to 27%. Then, when combined with a biological criterion based on historical vehicle control data, there was restoration of the original positive frequency (19%). Given the larger sample sizes evaluated using flow cytometry, we have demonstrated that traditional statistical tests may be overly sensitive to small changes in micronucleus induction, and that a simple-to-compute index of separation (z') may be a better tool for analysis, provided that the response is first determined to be biologically meaningful. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 57:589-604, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Effects of time of administration and posture on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil.

The effects of time of administration, sleep and posture on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil were evaluated in a single-dose 3-way crossover study. After a 6-hour fast, 12 healthy male volunteers received oral cefprozil 250mg at 1200h (treatment A), 1200h (treatment B) and 2400h (treatment C) with a 7-day washout interval between each treatment. During the study period, volunteers receiving treatment A remained in a sitting/standing position or were ambulatory, those receiving treatment B were in the supine position, and those receiving treatment C were sleeping. Blood samples were taken over an 8-hour period and the plasma samples were analysed for the concentrations of cefprozil by a high performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet method. Plasma concentration vs time data were analysed using noncompartmental analysis methods. Mean peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) were 4.51, 5.02 and 4.91 mg/L for treatments A, B and C, respectively. Corresponding mean values of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) were 12.6, 12.6 and 14.2 mg/L.h, respectively. The mean half-life (t1/2) values were 1.30, 1.23 and 1.50 hours for treatments A, B and C, respectively. Mean AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and t1/2 values following treatment B were not significantly different from those of treatment A. However, the mean AUC(0-infinity) and t1/2 values of cefprozil following treatment C were significantly greater than those of either treatment A or B. The mean Cmax value following treatment C was not significantly different than that of either treatments A or B. From these results, it was concluded that posture has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Simultaneous use of rheoencephalography and electroencephalography for the monitoring of cerebral function.

Many of the changes in human performance under stress or in hazardous environments may be attributed, in part, to altered cerebral functions. These changes may take place in either the cerebral neurologic or cerebral circulatory systems. Investigation of the interaction between intracranial blood flow and neural activity during these exposures would provide a better understanding of the human response to these conditions. Experimental and analytical procedures are described whereby the combination of rheoencephalography (REG) and electroencephalography (EEG) may provide additional information during the study of cerebral function. Examples are given to demonstrate the simultaneous use of these techniques during mental arithmetic and antiorthostatic bed rest. Results of these tests in both the time and frequency domains show that REG and EEG can be used to provide graded quantitative measures of cerebral responses to externally applied stressors.

Pharmacokinetics of cefepime after single and multiple intravenous administrations in healthy subjects.

The pharmacokinetics of cefepime in 31 young, healthy volunteers were assessed after the administration of single and multiple 250-, 500-, 1,000-, or 2,000-mg intravenous doses. Each subject received a single dose of cefepime via a 30-min intravenous infusion on day 1 of the study. Starting from day 2, subjects received multiple doses of cefepime every 8 h for 9 days, and on the morning of day 11, they received the last dose. Serial blood and urine samples were collected after administration of the first dose and on days 1, 6, and 11. Cefepime concentrations in plasma and urine were assayed by using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. Data were evaluated by noncompartmental methods to determine pharmacokinetic parameters. The mean half-life of cefepime was approximately 2 h and did not vary with the dose or duration of dosing. The regression analyses of peak levels (Cmax) in plasma at the end of the 30-min intravenous infusion and the area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUCo-infinity) showed a dose-proportional response. The steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) was approximately 18 liters and was independent of the administered dose. The multiple-dose pharmacokinetic data are suggestive of a lack of accumulation or change in clearance of cefepime on repeated dosing. Cefepime was excreted primarily unchanged in urine. The recovery of intact cefepime in urine was invariant with respect to the dose and accounted for over 80% of the dose. The values for renal clearance ranged from 99 to 132 ml/min and were suggestive of glomerular filtration as the primary excretion mechanism. It is concluded that cefepime linear pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects.

Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetic evaluation of cefepime after administration of single intravenous doses.

In this double-blind, single-dose phase I study, the safety and tolerance of cefepime were assessed in 24 healthy male subjects, with ceftazidime as the control drug. Four subjects in each of the six dose groups (62.5, 125, 250, 500, 1,000, or 2,000 mg as a 30-min intravenous infusion) received each antibiotic, according to a crossover design, with a 2-day washout period between treatments. Blood and urine samples were obtained to characterize the pharmacokinetics of cefepime. Plasma and urine samples were assayed for intact cefepime. Samples containing ceftazidime were discarded. The adverse effects observed in the study were mild and infrequent, with prompt recovery from adverse experiences and abnormal laboratory values. The cefepime pharmacokinetic parameters for the therapeutically significant doses of 250 to 2,000 mg appeared to be proportional to dose and similar to literature values for ceftazidime. The elimination half-life of about 2 h was independent of the dose. Urinary recovery of intact cefepime was invariant with respect to dose; an overall mean value of 82% of dose was obtained for the four highest levels. Mean renal clearance was 105 ml/min and suggestive of glomerular filtration as the primary excretion mechanism. In normal humans, the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of cefepime are very similar to those of ceftazidime.

Phase I study of multiple-dose cefprozil and comparison with cefaclor.

The objectives of this study were to assess the safety and tolerance of cefprozil, to characterize the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil after administration of multiple doses of the drug, and to compare these pharmacokinetic parameters with those obtained with cefaclor. The volunteers received 28 doses of 250, 500, or 1,000 mg of cefprozil or 500 mg of cefaclor every 8 h for 10 days. Serial blood samples and the total volume of urine voided by each individual were collected for pharmacokinetic evaluation on days 1, 5, and 10. Both cephalosporins were well tolerated after multiple oral dosing. The peak levels in plasma (Cmax) of cefprozil ranged from 5.7 to 18.3 micrograms/ml after oral administration of 250- to 1,000-mg doses. The regression analysis of Cmax on cefprozil dose showed a dose-linear response. The mean Cmax of cefaclor ranged from 15.2 to 16.7 micrograms/ml and did not change significantly on multiple dosing. The overall mean terminal half-life of cefprozil was 1.2 h and was invariant with respect to dose or duration of dosing. The area under the plasma-concentration-versus-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC0-infinity) of cefprozil increased in a dose-proportional manner with an increase in dose. The overall urinary recovery (61% of dose) and renal clearance values of cefprozil were generally invariant with respect to dose and duration of dosing. While cefprozil was apparently absorbed less rapidly and achieved lower Cmax values than cefaclor, the AUC0-infinity of cefprozil was nearly twofold greater than that of cefaclor. The half-life of cefprozil was also twofold longer than that observed for cefaclor. Although the urinary recovery of cefaclor (75% of dose) was significantly higher than that of cefprozil (61% of dose), the concentrations of cefprozil in urine remained significantly higher than those of cefaclor from 2 to 8 h postdosing. If the therapeutic concept is maintained that levels of beta-lactam antibiotics in plasma should exceed the MIC for the offending organisms over a period that approximates the dosing interval, then cefprozil would appear to be suitable for twice-daily administration, whereas cefaclor should probably be administered three or even four times a day.

Comparison of cefprozil and cefaclor pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration.

The pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration, as judged by skin blister fluid, of cefprozil and cefaclor were examined in 12 healthy male volunteers. Doses of 250 and 500 mg of each drug were given to fasting subjects in a crossover fashion. Serially obtained plasma, skin blister fluid, and urine samples were analyzed for cefprozil or cefaclor by validated high-pressure liquid chromatographic methods. After oral administration of 250 and 500 mg of cefprozil, mean concentrations in plasma rose to peak levels (Cmax) of 6.1 and 11.2 micrograms/ml, respectively, and those of cefaclor were 10.6 and 17.3 micrograms/ml, respectively. The elimination half-life of cefprozil (1.3 h) was significantly longer than that of cefaclor (0.6 h), and as a result, the area under the curve for cefprozil was about two times greater than that for cefaclor. Both cephalosporins were primarily excreted unchanged in urine. The mean skin blister Cmax values were 3.0 and 5.8 micrograms/ml for cefprozil and 3.6 and 6.5 micrograms/ml for cefaclor after the 250- and 500-mg oral doses, respectively. The mean Cmax values in skin blister fluid for both cephalosporins were comparable and were significantly lower than the corresponding Cmax values in plasma. However, the levels of cefprozil and cefaclor in skin blister fluid declined more slowly than they did in plasma. The skin blister fluid half-life estimates for cefprozil were significantly longer than they were for cefaclor. Parallel to the observation in plasma, the mean skin blister fluid areas under the curve for cefprozil were significantly higher than they were for cefaclor. The plasma and skin blister fluid pharmacokinetic analyses suggest that the exposure of humans to cefprozil is significantly greater than that to cefaclor at the same dose.

Comparison of the effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil and cefaclor.

The objective of this study was to assess the effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil and cefaclor. A group of 12 healthy male volunteers received a single 250-mg dose of cefprozil or cefaclor under fasting conditions as well as after the intake of food. There was a 1-week washout period between each treatment. Serial blood samples were collected and assayed for cefprozil or cefaclor by specific high-pressure liquid chromatographic methods. The mean +/- standard deviation peak concentration (Cmax) of cefprozil in plasma was 6.13 +/- 1.22 micrograms/ml under the fasting condition and 5.27 +/- 1.06 micrograms/ml after breakfast, and these values were not significantly different from each other. The corresponding median time to reach Cmax was prolonged after food intake, but this difference was not significant. The mean Cmax values of cefaclor decreased significantly from 8.70 +/- 2.72 micrograms/ml under the fasting condition to 4.29 +/- 1.52 micrograms/ml after breakfast, and the corresponding median times to reach Cmax were significantly prolonged. The mean half-lives of cefprozil and cefaclor were nearly identical for the two treatments, suggesting that the elimination kinetics of these cephalosporins remained unaltered when the drugs were administered with food. The area under the plasma-concentration-versus-time curves for fasted and fed conditions were not significantly different for both drugs. The results of this study indicate that the extent of absorption and rate of elimination of both cephalosporins remain unaltered in the presence of food. However, the absorption rate of cefaclor is significantly reduced in the presence of food, while that of cefprozil remains unaltered. As a result, the Cmax of cefaclor is significantly reduced in the presence of food, whereas that of cefprozil is not significantly affected. Cefprozil can be administered with a meal without markedly affecting levels in blood.

Phase I study of single-dose BMY-28100, a new oral cephalosporin.

The objective of this Phase I study was to evaluate the safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of BMY-28100 in 36 male subjects after the administration of single oral doses of 250, 500, and 1,000 mg. The subjects were divided into groups of 12 per dose group. All subjects completed the study, and BMY-28100 was well tolerated at all doses. The maximum concentration of the drug in plasma ranged from 6.2 to 17.7 micrograms/ml for the 250- and 1,000-mg doses, respectively, and the area under the curve increased in a dose-proportional manner. The elimination half-life and renal clearance averages were 1.2 h and 200 ml/min, respectively. The values for renal clearance suggest that BMY-28100 is excreted by glomerular filtration and tubular secretion. Mean concentrations of the drug in urine were highest during the first 4 h after the doses and ranged from 175 to 658 micrograms/ml following the 250- and 1,000-mg doses, respectively. The mean urinary recovery ranged from 57 to 70% of the dose. The results from this Phase I study indicate that BMY-28100 is well tolerated and exhibits linear pharmacokinetics.

Pharmacokinetics of the novel cephalosporin cefepime (BMY-28142) in rats and monkeys.

The disposition of the novel cephalosporin cefepime (BMY-28142) was characterized for intravenous administration of single doses to rats and cynomolgus monkeys, the species used most extensively for safety evaluation of the compound. Serial blood samples were collected from individual animals, and plasma was analyzed for intact cefepime by a high-pressure liquid chromatography-UV method. Assay results were evaluated by compartmental and noncompartmental methods to characterize pharmacokinetics for each species and dosage regimen. For intravenous (i.v.) bolus administration of 28 to 386 mg/kg (body weight) to rats, total body clearance (CL; 11.0 ml/min per kg) was essentially invariant with the dose; however, the terminal half-life (t1/2) and the steady-state distribution volume (Vss) increased with increasing dose level. After administration of 87 to 1,502 mg/kg by i.v. infusion, CL (12.5 ml/min per kg) was again similar for all dose groups. Mean t1/2 values (1.3 to 4.6 h) appeared unusually long for a cephalosporin in rats, and inordinately variable. No consistent differences among dose group mean Vss values were found. The maximal concentration of drug in plasma at the end of infusion was not a linear function of dose. For the cynomolgus monkey, kinetic parameters for 5-min i.v. infusions were linearly related to dose over the range of 10 to 600 mg/kg. Mean parameter values were t1/2 = 1.7 h, CL = 1.6 ml/min per kg, and Vss = 0.21 liters/kg. The pharmacokinetic results indicate substantive differences between the two species with respect to their response to toxicologic doses of cefepime.

Correlation between renal membrane binding and nephrotoxicity of aminoglycosides.

The kinetics of aminoglycoside binding to renal brush border and basolateral membrane vesicles from rat renal cortex were studied by using [3H]amikacin. [3H]amikacin binding to renal membranes was found to be a rapid, saturable process with a fourfold greater affinity for basolateral membranes than for brush border membranes (Kd basolateral = 607 microM; Kd brush border = 2,535 microM). Renal membranes prepared from immature rats (2 to 3 weeks old) exhibited a significantly lower affinity compared with membranes from adults (Kd basolateral = 2,262 microM; Kd brush border = 6,216 microM). Additionally, the inhibitory behavior of several aminoglycosides versus [3H]amikacin binding to brush border membranes revealed the following rank order of potency: neomycin greater than tobramycin approximately gentamicin approximately netilmicin greater than amikacin approximately neamine greater than streptomycin. The relative insensitivity of immature rats to aminoglycoside-induced nephrotoxicity in vivo and the comparative nephrotoxicity of the various aminoglycosides suggest that renal membrane-binding affinity is closely correlated to the nephrotoxic potential of these antibiotics.