First--select the target: better choice of adjuvant treatments for breast cancer patients.

St Gallen Expert Consensus meetings update evidence on treatment of early breast cancer every 2 years and interpret its significance for treatment of individual patients. Such interpretation is controversial. Clinical decisions cannot, however, be postponed, and the harms of failing to tailor treatment must be balanced against those of overinterpretation. Since the ninth meeting in January 2005, an extraordinary year of progress has significantly changed the landscape in breast cancer therapy. The panel in January recommended a fundamental change in selection of adjuvant systemic therapy, giving prime attention to endocrine responsiveness. Primarily, three categories were acknowledged: endocrine responsive in which the primary treatment should be endocrine, endocrine non-responsive in which endocrine therapy should not be used, and an intermediate group for which both endocrine and other therapies should be offered. Secondarily, three risk groups were defined: low, intermediate, and high, slightly modifying the previous classification. In June 2005, three trials, supported in December by a fourth, demonstrated the additional contribution of targeted therapy with trastuzumab in appropriately selected patients. Reports from several trials strengthened the evidence supporting the inclusion of taxanes, though controversy persists concerning their use in endocrine-responsive disease. This commentary midway between St Gallen meetings, therefore, emphasizes how new information influences algorithms for selecting adjuvant therapy in a rapidly changing environment.

Meeting highlights: international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2005.

The ninth St Gallen (Switzerland) expert consensus meeting in January 2005 made a fundamental change in the algorithm for selection of adjuvant systemic therapy for early breast cancer. Rather than the earlier approach commencing with risk assessment, the Panel affirmed that the first consideration was endocrine responsiveness. Three categories were acknowledged: endocrine responsive, endocrine non-responsive and tumors of uncertain endocrine responsiveness. The three categories were further divided according to menopausal status. Only then did the Panel divide patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk categories. It agreed that axillary lymph node involvement did not automatically define high risk. Intermediate risk included both node-negative disease (if some features of the primary tumor indicated elevated risk) and patients with one to three involved lymph nodes without additional high-risk features such as HER 2/neu gene overexpression. The Panel recommended that patients be offered chemotherapy for endocrine non-responsive disease; endocrine therapy as the primary therapy for endocrine responsive disease, adding chemotherapy for some intermediate- and all high-risk groups in this category; and both chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for all patients in the uncertain endocrine response category except those in the low-risk group.

Economic analysis of conventional-dose chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer.

We performed an economic analysis of data from 180 women in a clinical trial of conventional-dose chemotherapy vs high-dose chemotherapy plus stem-cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer responding to first-line chemotherapy. Data on resource use, including hospitalizations, medical procedures, medications, and diagnostic tests, were abstracted from subjects' clinical trial records. Resources were valued using the Medicare Fee Schedule for inpatient costs at one academic medical center and average wholesale prices for medications. Monthly costs were calculated and stratified by treatment group and clinical phase. Mean follow-up was 690 days in the transplantation group and 758 days in the conventional-dose chemotherapy group. Subjects in the transplantation group were hospitalized for more days (28.6 vs 17.8, P=0.0041) and incurred higher costs (US dollars 84055 vs US dollars 28169) than subjects receiving conventional-dose chemotherapy, with a mean difference of US dollars 55886 (95% CI, US dollars 47298-US dollars 63666). Sensitivity analyses resulted in cost differences between the treatment groups from US dollars 36528 to US dollars 75531. High-dose chemotherapy plus stem-cell transplantation resulted in substantial additional morbidity and costs at no improvement in survival. Neither the survival results nor the economic findings support the use of this procedure outside of the clinical trial setting.

Bleomycin, lomustine, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone (BLEO-CCVPP) in patients with Hodgkin's disease who relapsed after radiotherapy alone: a long-term follow-up study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E3481).

Thirty-three evaluable patients with Hodgkin's disease who failed radiotherapy were treated on this phase II study with bleomycin, lomustine, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone given every 28 days for a minimum of eight courses. Twenty-five patients (76%; 95% CI=55.6-87.1%) achieved a complete remission, the median duration of which cannot yet be determined, but the probability of remaining in continuous complete remission at 10 years is.64. The median survival from entry on this study for all evaluable patients is 10 years, and 12 patients were alive at the time of this analysis with a median follow-up for them of 15.5 years. Of the 22 patients who died, 11 died of progressive or recurrent Hodgkin's disease and 11 died of other causes including 7 second primary neoplasms and at least one myocardial infarction. Both are now well known late complications of Hodgkin's disease treatment.

The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience.

BACKGROUND: Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of breast carcinoma have led to a multidisciplinary approach to management for patients with breast carcinoma. To assess the effect of this approach, the authors performed an evaluation for a cohort of patients examined in a multidisciplinary breast cancer center. METHODS: An analysis was performed for the records of 75 consecutive women with 77 breast lesions examined in consultation in a multidisciplinary breast cancer center between January and June 1998. Each patient's case was evaluated by a panel consisting of a medical oncologist, surgical oncologist, radiation oncologist, pathologist, diagnostic radiologist, and, when indicated, plastic surgeon. A comprehensive history and physical examination was performed, and the relevant mammograms, pathology slides, and medical records were reviewed. Treatment recommendations made before this evaluation were compared with the consensus recommendations made by the panel. RESULTS: For the 75 patients, the multidisciplinary panel disagreed with the treatment recommendations from the outside physicians in 32 cases (43%), and agreed in 41 cases (55%). Two patients (3%) had no treatment recommendation before consultation. For the 32 patients with a disagreement, the treatment recommendations were breast-conservation treatment instead of mastectomy (n = 13; 41%) or reexcision (n = 2; 6%); further workup instead of immediate definitive treatment (n = 10; 31%); treatment based on major change in diagnosis on pathology review (n = 3; 9%); addition of postmastectomy radiation treatment (n = 3; 9%); or addition of hormonal therapy (n = 1; 3%). CONCLUSIONS: The multidisciplinary breast cancer evaluation program provided an integrated program in which individual patients were evaluated by a team of physicians and led to a change in treatment recommendation for 43% (32 of 75) of the patients examined. This multidisciplinary program provided important second opinions for many patients with breast carcinoma.

Conventional-dose chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer. Philadelphia Bone Marrow Transplant Group.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized trial in which we compared high-dose chemotherapy plus hematopoietic stem-cell rescue with a prolonged course of monthly conventional-dose chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Women 18 to 60 years of age who had metastatic breast cancer received four to six cycles of standard combination chemotherapy. Patients who had a complete or partial response to induction chemotherapy were then randomly assigned to receive either a single course of high doses of carboplatin, thiotepa, and cyclophosphamide plus transplantation of autologous hematopoietic stem cells or up to 24 cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in conventional doses. The primary end point was survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 37 months. Of 553 patients who enrolled in the study, 58 had a complete response to induction chemotherapy and 252 had a partial response. Of these, 110 patients were assigned to receive high-dose chemotherapy plus hematopoietic stem cells and 89 were assigned to receive conventional-dose chemotherapy. In an intention-to-treat analysis, we found no significant difference in survival overall at three years between the two treatment groups (32 percent in the transplantation group and 38 percent in the conventional-chemotherapy group). There was no significant difference between the two treatments in the median time to progression of the disease (9.6 months for high-dose chemotherapy plus hematopoietic stem cells and 9.0 months for conventional-dose chemotherapy). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with maintenance chemotherapy in conventional doses, high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem-cell transplantation soon after the induction of a complete or partial remission with conventional-dose chemotherapy does not improve survival in women with metastatic breast cancer.

A randomized Phase II study of interleukin-2 with and without beta-interferon for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study (PZ586).

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and beta-interferon (beta-IFN) are biologic agents with antitumor activity observed in preclinical models. Some studies of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with IL-2 report relatively long survival, despite low response rates. Seventy-six evaluable patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer were treated in a randomized Phase II study with either IL-2 alone or IL-2 plus beta-IFN. Patients received either IL-2 at 6 x 10(6) Cetus units/m2 3 days weekly or the combination of IL-2 at 5 x 10(6) Cetus units/m2 plus beta-IFN at 6 x 10(6) units/m2, both given 3 days weekly. Both biologic agents were administered by intravenous bolus injection on an outpatient basis. Objective responses were observed in 3/76 (4%)) patients. Grade 4 toxicity occurred in 3/39 patients treated with IL-2 alone, and in 4/37 patients treated with IL-2 plus beta-IFN. An additional lethal respiratory toxicity occurred in a patient who received IL-2 plus beta-IFN. The median survival of all patients treated on this study was 33 weeks. Despite producing only a 4% objective response rate. IL-2 appears to have a favorable impact on survival comparable to chemotherapy. The role for this immune therapy in the management of non-small cell lung cancer requires further study.

Phase II study of mitoguazone, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone for patients with diffuse histologic subtypes of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (PE481).

Mitoguazone, an investigational agent with significant activity in advanced lymphoma, was added to a modified CHOP regimen (COPA) in an effort to improve the activity of standard therapy in 66 previously untreated patients with stages II-IV lymphoma and diffuse histology of intermediate or high grade other than lymphoblastic in this phase II pilot study. The regimen was well tolerated and the complete response rate in diffuse large cell lymphoma was 55%. Sixty-five percent of all complete responders were in complete response for at least one year. Despite these excellent results. it is unlikely that the addition of mitoguazone improved results compared with those obtained with standard therapy alone, since similar results have been frequently reported with the latter.

Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation for breast conservation treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The optimal sequencing of chemotherapy and radiation therapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing breast-conservation treatment remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of patients treated with one specific sequence of concurrent chemoradiation followed by additional chemotherapy. METHODS: Between 1977 and 1992, 210 patients with stage I and II breast cancer underwent lumpectomy and axillary lymph node dissection followed by treatment with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy, followed by further chemotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of two 28-day cycles of CF (oral cyclophosphamide, 100 mg/m2 day 1 to 14, and intravenous 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) during radiation therapy, followed in general by six cycles of CMF (CF doses as above plus intravenous methotrexate 40 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) after the completion of radiation therapy. Fifty patients also received hormonal therapy, predominantly tamoxifen. One hundred ten patients had clinical T1 lesions, and 100 had T2 lesions. Fifty-three patients were pathologic N0, and 157 patients were pathologic N1 (123 patients had one to three positive nodes, and 34 patients had four or more positive nodes). Median follow-up for node-negative patients (5.2 years) is shorter than for node-positive patients (7.6 years). Therefore, outcome is reported at 5 and 10 years for node-positive patients but only at 5 years for node-negative patients. RESULTS: For node-positive patients, outcomes at 5 and 10 years, respectively, were 86% and 70% for overall survival, 78% and 67% for no evidence of disease survival, and 82% and 69% for freedom from distant metastases. For node-negative patients, outcomes at 5 years were 94% for overall survival, 94% for no evidence of disease survival, and 94% for freedom from distant metastases. Pathologic nodal status was predictive of outcome after treatment. Local failure in the treated breast was 5% at 5 years and 13% at 10 years for all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent CF with radiation therapy followed by six cycles of CMF after radiation therapy results in excellent survival, freedom from distant metastases, and local control for both node-negative and node-positive patients. This regimen of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy is one option for sequencing, and it avoids the delays in administration of either modality that are associated with other sequencing regimens.

MOPP/ABV hybrid chemotherapy for advanced Hodgkin's disease significantly improves failure-free and overall survival: the 8-year results of the intergroup trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of sequential mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (MOPP) followed by doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) versus the MOPP/ABV hybrid regimen in advanced-stage Hodgkin's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 737 patients with previously untreated stages III2A, IIIB, IVA, or IVB Hodgkin's disease and patients in first relapse after radiotherapy were prospectively randomized to sequential MOPP-ABV or MOPP/ABV hybrid. Of 691 eligible patients, 344 received the sequential regimen and 347 received the hybrid. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 95%, with complete responses (CRs) in 79%: 83% on the MOPP/ABV hybrid and 75% on the sequential MOPP-ABVD arm (P = .02). With a median follow-up time of 7.3 years, the 8-year failure-free survival (FFS) rates were 64% for MOPP/ABV hybrid and 54% far sequential MOPP-ABVD (P = .01; 0.69 relative risk of failure, comparing MOPP/ABV hybrid v MOPP-ABVD). The 8-year overall survival rate was significantly better for the MOPP/ABV hybrid (79%) as compared with sequential MOPP-ABVD (71%) (P = .02; relative risk, 0.65). MOPP/ABV hybrid had significantly more life-threatening or fatal neutropenia and pulmonary toxicity than the sequential MOPP-ABVD arm, which was associated with significantly greater thrombocytopenia. Nine cases of acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplasia were reported on the sequential regimen as compared with only one on the hybrid (P = .01). CONCLUSION: MOPP/ABV hybrid chemotherapy was significantly more effective than sequential MOPP-ABVD. FFS and overall survival were significantly improved on the hybrid arm, which was also associated with a lower incidence of acute leukemia or myelodysplasia.

Phase II trial of biweekly paclitaxel and cisplatin in advanced breast carcinoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of a biweekly paclitaxel and cisplatin regimen in patients with advanced breast carcinoma, which has previously been reported to produce an 85% response rate in such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with metastatic breast carcinoma who had relapsed after prior doxorubicin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy were treated with paclitaxel (90 mg/m2) by intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 3 hours followed by cisplatin (60 mg/m2) given by i.v. infusion over 1 hour on an outpatient basis. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks if the absolute neutrophil count was > or = 750/microL and platelet count > or = 75,000/microL. After a maximum of eight cycles of paclitaxel/cisplatin, patients received biweekly paclitaxel alone (90 mg/m2 with dose escalation). Thirteen patients were assessable for response and all for toxicity. Nine of 13 patients assessable for response (69%) had at least three sites of metastases and 10 patients (77%) had visceral-dominant disease. RESULTS: Partial response occurred in three of 13 assessable patients (23%; 90% confidence interval, 7% to 49%). All responders had two or fewer sites of metastases. The median time to progression was 4.3 months and the median survival duration was 11.4 months. Patients received a median of seven cycles of therapy (range, two to 21). Severe and/or life-threatening toxicity occurred in 50% and 38%, respectively, and consisted primarily of granulocytopenia, anemia, and neuropathy. The trial was terminated after the first interim analysis as per its two-stage design, since it was unlikely that the response rate would exceed 70%. CONCLUSION: Biweekly paclitaxel/cisplatin is not likely to produce a response rate greater than 70% in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have relapsed after prior doxorubicin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy and who have multiple sites of metastases and/or visceral-dominant disease.

Comparison of melphalan and prednisone with vincristine, carmustine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone in the treatment of multiple myeloma: results of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E2479.

BACKGROUND: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performed a Phase III comparison of melphalan and prednisone (MP) with vincristine, carmustine (BCNU), melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (VBMCP) in an attempt to determine which of these regimens should be the standard treatment for multiple myeloma. METHODS: Four hundred seventy-nine previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma from 23 ECOG institutions were enrolled. Treatment, assigned by randomization, consisted of either 4-week cycles of MP or 5-week cycles of VBCMP. After 1 year of induction therapy, patients received MP or VBMCP maintenance therapy at 6- and 8- week intervals, respectively, until relapse. Patients who experienced treatment failure with MP were eligible for crossover therapy with VBMCP. RESULTS: Objective responses were obtained for 51% of patients receiving MP, as compared with 72% of patients receiving VBMCP (P < 0.001). Response duration was also longer with VBMCP (median, 18 months with MP vs. 24 months with VBMCP; P = 0.007). Overall survival was not significantly different between MP and VBMCP (P = 0.30). The 5-year survival for VBMCP was 26%, as compared with 19% for MP. VBMCP was associated with more nausea, peripheral nerve toxicity, alopecia, and neutropenia, but the infection rate was equal to that observed with MP. Both regimens were generally well tolerated. The main exception was that elderly patients who were confined to bed had a higher risk of death with VBMCP. The two regimens produced a similar incidence of late secondary myelodysplastic syndrome and acute leukemia. Crossover VBMCP for patients failing with MP was only minimally effective, with an objective response rate of 20% and median survival of 11 months after crossover. CONCLUSIONS: VBMCP is more effective than MP in producing and sustaining remission of multiple myeloma. It is associated with a marginal survival advantage and an apparently greater chance of surviving 5 years for patients who can tolerate moderately intensive combination chemotherapy. Cancer 1997;79:1561-7. 1997 American Cancer Society.

Tamoxifen's impact on the management of breast cancer: the oncologist's perspective.

Breast cancer treatment has evolved greatly within the last 25 years. Tamoxifen was first introduced for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in the 1970s and later became accepted as standard adjuvant therapy. The emergence of tamoxifen as first-line hormonal therapy for metastatic disease and in the adjuvant setting occurred due to its efficacy in achieving prolonged overall survival as well as improved disease-free survival, the latter of which improves the psychological and physical quality of life of the patient. Tamoxifen is currently being studied for the prevention of breast cancer. Completion of this important trial is eagerly awaited.