Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Cancer Educ ; 32(3): 571-579, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28110419

ABSTRACT

In cancer care, where patients and their families experience significant emotional distress and patients have to deal with complex medical information, patient centeredness is an important aspect of quality of care. The aim of this study is to examine the impact of patients' trust in their oncologists and patients' enablement on changes in health-related quality of life of colon cancer patients during follow-up care. We conducted a prospective study in a representative sample of private practices of German oncologists (N = 44). Patients (N = 131) filled out a standardized questionnaire prior to their first consultation (T0), directly after the first consultation (T1) and after two months (T2). Data were analyzed by structural equation modeling. Significant associations were found between trust in physician and changes in physical functioning between T1 and T2, and between trust in physician and patient enablement. Patient enablement is significantly associated with changes in physical functioning between T1 and T2. The results underline the importance of building a close and trustful patient-physician relationship in the oncology encounter. A central mechanism of the association between the quality of the relationship and health outcomes seems to be patient enablement. To enable patients to cope with their situation by making them understand their diagnosis, treatments, and side effects can impact health-related quality of life in physical domains.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms/therapy , Oncologists/statistics & numerical data , Physician-Patient Relations , Quality of Life , Trust , Adaptation, Psychological , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Medical Oncology , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Support Care Cancer ; 23(4): 977-84, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25253087

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A common phenomenon among cancer patients is a fear of cancer recurrence or cancer progression (FOP). The aim of the present study was to analyze whether the oncologist is able to reduce patients' FOP at the initial clinical interview. METHOD: A prospective, longitudinal study included patients who were consulting private-practice oncologists in Germany for the first time. Recruitment was carried out by 44 members of the Professional Organization of Office-Based Hematologists and Oncologists. In the patient surveys, data on colon cancer patients' perceptions of communications with their oncologist and on patient-reported outcomes were collected over a period of 6 months. The present study analyzed the patients' data before their first consultation (T 0) and within 3 days after the first consultation (T 1). RESULTS: A total of 169 patients agreed to participate in the study. Backwards multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine whether the change (T 0-T 1) in FOP is associated with demographic, medical, or psychosocial determinants, or with the physician-patient communication. A significant association was found between the change in FOP and interruptions to the conversation, the comprehensibility of the information provided, the extent of perceived empathy from the physician, and the patient's social support and family status. CONCLUSION: Private social support and the initial medical encounter can help reduce FOP. Particularly, oncologists should ensure that they facilitate the presentation of information in a comprehensible way while avoiding interruptions and that they take particular care of patients with poor social support.


Subject(s)
Fear , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/psychology , Neoplasms/psychology , Physician-Patient Relations , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/organization & administration , Survivors/psychology , Adult , Aged , Fear/psychology , Female , Germany , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Referral and Consultation , Social Support
3.
Stroke ; 45(11): 3389-94, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25342028

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stroke is costly, although little is known about the long-term costs of survivors of stroke. In previous cost-of-illness studies, lifetime costs have been modeled based on estimates to 5 years after stroke. Building on previous work from the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS), we aimed to describe resource use at 10 years and recalculate the lifetime societal costs of ischemic and hemorrhagic (intracerebral hemorrhage) stroke. METHODS: Ten-year patient-level resource use data were obtained and updated prices and population demographic statistics for 2010 were applied to our cost-of-illness models. We incorporated incidence data from a larger study region of NEMESIS than that used in the previous model and new 10-year survival and recurrent stroke rates. One-way sensitivity and probabilistic multivariable uncertainty analyses were undertaken. RESULTS: For ischemic stroke, the overall average annual direct costs at 10 years (US dollars [USD] 5207) were comparable to those for survivors between 3 and 5 years (USD5438). However, the contribution of some costs varied (eg, medications contributed 13% at 5 years and 20% at 10 years). For intracerebral hemorrhage, annual direct costs were considerably (24%) greater at 10 years than estimated using 3 to 5 year data. Greater average lifetime costs per case were found using the updated models (ischemic stroke: previous model USD51806 and current USD68 769; intracerebral hemorrhage: previous model USD43 786 and current USD54 956 per case). Following sensitivity and multivariable uncertainty analyses, the findings were robust. CONCLUSIONS: Costs to 10 years after stroke have not previously been reported. Our findings demonstrate the importance of estimating resource use over longer periods for forecasting lifetime estimates.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Stroke/economics , Stroke/epidemiology , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Stroke/diagnosis , Time Factors , Victoria/epidemiology
4.
J Interprof Care ; 27(2): 171-6, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23016540

ABSTRACT

Effective coordination among all members of hospital staff has been shown to be associated with better quality of care. The literature indicates that social capital, a form of organizational resource, may facilitate the task of coordination. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has yet examined this link within a healthcare setting. Thus, the objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between social capital and coordination among hospital staff, as perceived by the medical director being a key informant of the hospital. In 2008, we surveyed the medical directors of 1224 German hospitals by the use of a standardized questionnaire. We conducted stepwise multivariate linear regression and controlled for hospital size, ownership and teaching status. In total, 551 medical directors (45%) responded to the survey. We found social capital to be a significant predictor of coordination (ß = 0.444, p < 0.001). The regression model explained 28% of the variance in coordination. Higher levels of social capital can be associated with better coordination among members of hospital staff, as perceived by the medical director. Therefore, investment in social capital may facilitate better organization of work processes in hospitals and may therefore help to improve patient outcomes. However, longitudinal studies are needed in order to explain the causal relationship between social capital and coordination among hospital staff.


Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Medical Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Physician Executives/psychology , Social Support , Germany , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , Trust
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...