Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Agric Environ Med ; 26(3): 392-395, 2019 Sep 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31559791

ABSTRACT

Existing research for using the protective antigen (PA) of Bacillus anthracis as a vaccine component shows that protection against anthrax may be obtained using fragments of this protein. The aim of the research is to check whether the selected protein fragment of the protective antigen (domain 4) encoded by an appropriate nucleotide sequence of gene pag of B. anthracis, was expressed in the bacterial system of E. coli. In order to examine the selected sequence of the pag gene, a PCR reaction and a highly effective TOPO cloning strategy were used, followed by purification of the recombinant proteins and their detection by a western-blot method. In the planning of the PA4 antigen expression a higher level of effectiveness in production of small protein - domain 4 - was anticipated. As a result, the 139 amino acids protein fragment of B. anthracis PA (domain 4) was isolated. The research may have found the basis for in vivo research aimed at finding potential anthrax vaccine components.


Subject(s)
Anthrax Vaccines/immunology , Anthrax/microbiology , Antigens, Bacterial/immunology , Bacillus anthracis/immunology , Bacterial Toxins/immunology , Animals , Anthrax/immunology , Anthrax/prevention & control , Anthrax Vaccines/administration & dosage , Anthrax Vaccines/genetics , Anthrax Vaccines/isolation & purification , Antibodies, Bacterial/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antigens, Bacterial/administration & dosage , Antigens, Bacterial/genetics , Antigens, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Bacillus anthracis/chemistry , Bacillus anthracis/genetics , Bacterial Toxins/administration & dosage , Bacterial Toxins/genetics , Bacterial Toxins/isolation & purification , Blotting, Western , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/metabolism , Gene Expression , Humans , Immunization , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Protein Domains
2.
Pol J Microbiol ; 67(4): 529-534, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30550240

ABSTRACT

This work presents results of the research on the occurrence of Coxiella burnetii and Francisella tularensis in the tissues of wild-living animals and ticks collected from Drawsko County, West Pomeranian Voivodeship. The real-time PCR testing for the pathogens comprised 928 samples of animal internal organs and 1551 ticks. The presence of C. burnetii was detected in 3% of wild-living animals and in 0.45-3.45% (dependent on collection areas) of ticks. The genetic sequences of F. tularensis were present in 0.49 % of ticks (only in one location - Drawa) and were not detected in animal tissues. The results indicate respectively low proportion of animals and ticks infected with C. burnetii and F. tularensis .This work presents results of the research on the occurrence of Coxiella burnetii and Francisella tularensis in the tissues of wild-living animals and ticks collected from Drawsko County, West Pomeranian Voivodeship. The real-time PCR testing for the pathogens comprised 928 samples of animal internal organs and 1551 ticks. The presence of C. burnetii was detected in 3% of wild-living animals and in 0.45­3.45% (dependent on collection areas) of ticks. The genetic sequences of F. tularensis were present in 0.49 % of ticks (only in one location ­ Drawa) and were not detected in animal tissues. The results indicate respectively low proportion of animals and ticks infected with C. burnetii and F. tularensis.


Subject(s)
Animals, Wild/microbiology , Coxiella burnetii/isolation & purification , Disease Reservoirs/veterinary , Francisella tularensis/isolation & purification , Q Fever/veterinary , Ticks/microbiology , Tularemia/veterinary , Animals , Coxiella burnetii/genetics , Disease Reservoirs/microbiology , Female , Francisella tularensis/genetics , Male , Poland/epidemiology , Q Fever/epidemiology , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Tularemia/epidemiology
3.
Pol J Microbiol ; 67(2): 151-161, 2018 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30015453

ABSTRACT

Brucellae are Gram-negative, small rods infecting mammals and capable of causing disease called brucellosis. The infection results in abortion and sterility in domestic animals (sheeps, pigs, rams etc). Especially dangerous for humans are: Brucella melitensis, Brucella suis, Brucella abortus, and Brucella canis that trigger unspecific symptoms (flu-like manifestation). Brucella rods are introduced via host cells, by inhalation, skin abrasions, ingestion or mucosal membranes. The most important feature of Brucella is the ability to survive and multiply within both phagocytic and non-phagocytic cells. Brucella does not produce classical virulence factors: exotoxin, cytolisins, exoenzymes, plasmids, fimbria, and drug resistant forms. Major virulence factors are: lipopolysaccharide (LPS), T4SS secretion system and BvrR/BvrS system, which allow interaction with host cell surface, formation of an early, late BCV (Brucella Containing Vacuole) and interaction with endoplasmic reticulum (ER) when the bacteria multiply. The treatment of brucellosis is based on two-drug therapy, the most common combinations of antibiotics are: doxycycline with rifampicin or fluoroquinolones with rifampicin. Currently, also other methods are used to disrupt Brucella intracellular replication (tauroursodeoxycholic acid or ginseng saponin fraction A).


Subject(s)
Brucella/pathogenicity , Brucellosis/drug therapy , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Virulence Factors , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Brucella/genetics , Endoplasmic Reticulum/microbiology , Humans , Lipopolysaccharides , Macrophages/microbiology , Sheep , Swine , Type IV Secretion Systems
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...