Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Virol ; 164: 105494, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37210881

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During active transcription, SARS-CoV-2 generates subgenomic regions of viral RNA. While standard SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR amplifies region(s) of genomic RNA, it cannot distinguish active infection from remnant viral genomic material. However, screening for subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) by RT-PCR may aid in the determination of actively transcribing virus. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical utility of SARS-CoV-2 sgRNA RT-PCR testing in a pediatric population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis was performed on inpatients from February-September 2022 positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR with a concomitant order for sgRNA RT-PCR. Chart abstractions were conducted to determine clinical outcomes, management, and infection prevention and control (IPC) practices. RESULTS: Of 95 SARS-CoV-2 positive samples from 75 unique patients, 27 (28.4%) were positive by sgRNA RT-PCR. A negative sgRNA RT-PCR test allowed for de-isolation in 68 (71.6%) patient episodes. Regardless of age or sex, a positive sgRNA RT-PCR result significantly correlated with disease severity (P = 0.007), generalized COVID-19 symptoms (P = 0.012), hospitalization for COVID-19 (P = 0.019), and immune status (P = 0.024). Moreover, sgRNA RT-PCR results prompted changes in management in 28 patients (37.3%); specifically, therapeutic escalation in 13/27 (48.1%) positives and de-escalation in 15/68 (22.1%) negatives. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these findings underscore the clinical utility of sgRNA RT-PCR testing in a pediatric population as we report significant associations between sgRNA RT-PCR results and clinical parameters related to COVID-19. These findings align with the proposed use of sgRNA RT-PCR testing to guide patient management and IPC practices in the hospital setting.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Child , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/diagnosis , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19 Testing , RNA, Viral/genetics , Subgenomic RNA
2.
Am J Crit Care ; 32(3): 157-165, 2023 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37121898

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Children with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery are at risk for laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infections (LCBIs). These infections can lead to morbidity, mortality, and increased health care costs. The role of mucosal barrier injury in causing LCBIs is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To describe characteristics of LCBIs in patients admitted to cardiac intensive care and step-down units and to assess frequencies of National Healthcare Safety Network infection types and associations with organism classification, patient clinical factors, and infection outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis using manual electronic medical record data abstraction included children with congenital heart disease who developed an LCBI while receiving inpatient cardiac care between August 2011 and November 2018 at one institution. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and outcome variables were collected and analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients with congenital heart disease developed 103 LCBIs during the study time frame. The most common causative microorganisms were gram-positive bacteria, including Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Sixty-three percent of causative organisms were characterized as originating from mucosal barrier injury, although no infections met National Healthcare Safety Network criteria for mucosal barrier injury LCBIs. CONCLUSIONS: Translocation of bacteria through injured gut mucosa may cause bloodstream infections in children with congenital heart disease. Further investigation is warranted to understand microbiome changes that adversely select pathogenic gut organisms. Preventive care to maintain intact gut function and a healthy microbiome should be explored for this patient population.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Catheter-Related Infections , Heart Defects, Congenital , Sepsis , Humans , Child , Infant , Catheter-Related Infections/complications , Bacteremia/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/complications , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Heart Defects, Congenital/surgery , Heart Defects, Congenital/complications
4.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 41(3): 395-405, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34816330

ABSTRACT

Viral respiratory tract infections cause significant morbidity in bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients. Speed and sensitivity of the FilmArray™ Respiratory Panel (FA-RP) can improve care but may prompt inappropriate testing. Studies describing FA-RP use in pediatric BMT patients are limited; we investigated FA-RP use, results, and clinical management to evaluate clinical significance of testing in pediatric BMT patients. Retrospective analysis of 671 respiratory specimens from 204 unique BMT patients between 01/01/2016 and 01/01/2019 was performed. Age, underlying diagnoses, FA-RP result, reason for FA-RP, and symptoms were abstracted. FA-RP impact on antimicrobial management, scheduled procedures, infection control measures, and hospital admission/discharge were investigated. Impacts of repeat testing were evaluated. Two hundred sixty-nine out of 671 specimens (40%) tested positive; human rhinovirus/enterovirus (hRV/hEV) was the most common (161/269, 60%). The primary reason for FA-RP was URI symptoms (402/671, 60%) with 54% testing positive. One hundred twenty-two out of 671 (18.2%) specimens were from asymptomatic patients; 14 (11.4%) tested positive. FA-RP informed antiviral initiation in 7/19 (36.8%), 7/8 (87.5%), and 5/30 (16.7%) of RSV, influenza, and human parainfluenza cases, respectively. In 11 cases, FA-RP informed azithromycin and ceftriaxone initiation, continuation, or discontinuation. BMT was delayed for three positives (two RSV, one hRV/hEV). In 22 instances, negative FA-RP cleared patients for BMT. In 70% of cases, repeats offered no new clinical information; all negative-to-positive cases had new or worsening respiratory symptoms. FA-RP was ordered on symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, provided rapid diagnosis in > 50% of symptomatic patients, and informed infection control measures for all inpatients and antiviral initiation in > 80% of influenza cases.


Subject(s)
Respiratory Tract Infections , Viruses , Bone Marrow Transplantation/adverse effects , Child , Humans , Infant , Respiratory System , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies
5.
Am J Infect Control ; 48(11): 1370-1374, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32512083

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mobile phones are known to carry pathogenic bacteria and viruses on their surfaces, posing a risk to healthcare providers (HCPs) and hospital infection prevention efforts. We utilize an Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) device to provide an effective method for mobile phone disinfection and survey HCPs about infection risk. METHODS: Environmental swabs were used to culture HCPs' personal mobile phone surfaces. Four cultures were obtained per phone: before and after the UV-C device's 30-second disinfecting cycle, at the beginning and end of a 12-hour shift. Surveys were administered to participants pre- and poststudy. RESULTS: Total bacterial colony forming units were reduced by 90.5% (P = .006) after one UV-C disinfection cycle, and by 99.9% (P = .004) after 2 cycles. Total pathogenic bacterial colony forming units were decreased by 98.2% (P = .038) after one and >99.99% (P = .037) after 2 disinfection cycles. All survey respondents were willing to use the UV-C device daily to weekly, finding it convenient and beneficial. DISCUSSION: This novel UV-C disinfecting device is effective in reducing pathogenic bacteria on mobile phones. HCPs would frequently use a phone disinfecting device to reduce infection risk. CONCLUSIONS: In light of the ongoing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, a standardized approach to phone disinfection may be valuable in preventing healthcare-associated infections.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/radiation effects , Betacoronavirus/radiation effects , Cell Phone , Disinfection/instrumentation , Ultraviolet Rays , Bacteria/pathogenicity , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , Colony Count, Microbial , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Disinfection/methods , Hospitals , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Virulence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...