Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hum Reprod ; 38(7): 1305-1317, 2023 07 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37203432

ABSTRACT

STUDY QUESTION: Does a personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by tests for endometrial receptivity (TER) increase the effectiveness of ART procedures? SUMMARY ANSWER: The use of TER-guided pET is not supported by current published evidence in women without repeated implantation failure (RIF), while in women with RIF more research is needed to assess a potential benefit. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Implantation rates are still far from ideal, especially in some patients that have RIF with good-quality embryos. As a potential solution, a wide range of diverse TER use different sets of genes to identify displacements of the window of implantation to adjust the individual length of progesterone exposure in a pET. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed. Search terms included endometrial receptivity analysis, ERA, personalized embryo transfer. CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, reference lists, clinical trials registers, and conference proceedings (search date October 2022) were searched, with no language restrictions. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing a pET guided by TER vs standard embryo transfer (sET) in different subgroups that undergo ART were identified. We also investigated pET in non-receptive-TER vs sET in receptive-TER, and pET in a specific population vs sET in a general population. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed with the Cochrane tool and ROBINS-I. Only those with low/moderate RoB underwent meta-analysis. The GRADE approach was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence (CoE). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We screened 2136 studies and included 35 (85% used ERA and 15% used other TER). Two studies were RCTs comparing endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA)-guided pET vs sET in women with no history of RIF. In women without RIF, no important differences (moderate-CoE) were found in live birth rates and clinical pregnancy rates (CPR). We also performed a meta-analysis of four cohort studies that were adjusted for confounding. In agreement with the RCTs, no benefits were found in women without RIF. However, in women with RIF, low CoE suggests that pET might improve the CPR (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.42-4.40). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We found few studies with low RoB. Only two RCTs in women without RIF were published, and none in women with RIF. Furthermore, the heterogeneity observed in populations, interventions, co-interventions, outcomes, comparisons, and procedures limited the pooling of many of the included studies. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In the population of women without RIF, in agreement with previously published reviews, pET did not prove to be more effective than sET and, therefore, it precludes the routine use of this strategy in this population until more evidence is available. However, more research is advisable in women with RIF as low-certainty evidence from observational studies adjusted for confounders suggests that the CPR might be higher with pET guided by TER in this population. Although this review presents the best available evidence, it is still insufficient to change current policies. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was obtained for this study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42022299827.


Subject(s)
Embryo Implantation , Embryo Transfer , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Pregnancy Rate , Embryo Transfer/methods , Embryo Implantation/genetics , Endometrium/diagnostic imaging , Progesterone , Live Birth/epidemiology
2.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 12(6): 384-8, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12683648

ABSTRACT

Gestational diabetes mellitus is a common disorder of pregnancy affecting 3-5% of pregnant women. Although significant controversy exists regarding its diagnosis and treatment, macrosomia has been consistently associated with maternal hyperglycemia. Numerous studies have addressed different approaches to monitoring blood glucose levels, but data on the ideal timing for postprandial determinations are scarce. This article reviews current recommendations and recent findings on the implications of 1- versus 2-h blood glucose determinations in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Preliminary studies have shown a statistically significant reduction in macrosomia and decreased need for emergency Cesarean section among women monitored 1 h after meals. Until larger studies confirm these benefits, compliance is of the utmost importance for successful treatment. Therefore, patient preferences should be considered in planning a monitoring strategy.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Diabetes, Gestational/blood , Fasting , Female , Glucose Tolerance Test , Humans , Postprandial Period , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...