Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 63(1): 151-7, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25537919

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the oral health status, use of dental care, and dental needs of homebound elderly adults and to determine whether medical diagnoses or demographic factors influenced perceived oral health. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Participants' homes in New York City. PARTICIPANTS: Homebound elderly adults (N = 125). MEASUREMENTS: A trained dental research team conducted a comprehensive clinical examination in participants' homes and completed a dental use and needs survey and the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. RESULTS: Participants who reported a high level of unmet oral health needs were more likely to be nonwhite, although this effect was not significant in multivariate analysis. Individual medical diagnoses and the presence of multiple comorbidities were not associated with unmet oral health needs. CONCLUSION: The oral health status of homebound elderly adults was poor regardless of their medical diagnoses. High unmet oral health needs combined with strong desire to receive dental care suggests there is a need to improve access to dental care for this growing population. In addition to improving awareness of geriatricians and primary care providers who care for homebound individuals, the medical community must partner with the dental community to develop home-based programs for older adults.


Subject(s)
Dental Care for Aged/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Needs and Demand , Homebound Persons , Oral Health , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Male , Medicare , Middle Aged , New York City , United States
2.
Spec Care Dentist ; 33(3): 133-40, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23600985

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This literature review summarizes the effectiveness of the seven leading root caries preventive agents and provides recommendations for use of those agents in clinical practice with older adults and vulnerable elderly. METHOD: Studies were eligible if they assessed the effectiveness of either fluoride, chlorhexidine, xylitol, amorphous calcium phosphate, sealants, saliva stimulators, or silver diamine fluoride to prevent/control root caries in an English language articles between 1979 and 2010. RESULTS: In the 31 eligible studies, the most effective primary (1°) prevention agents had reductions in RC incidence ranging from 72% to nearly 200% as compared to a placebo while for secondary (2°) prevention, the best agents demonstrated arrest rates between 67 and 80%. CONCLUSION: For 1° prevention of root caries the recommended "best choice" is a 38% Silver Diamine Fluoride solution professionally applied annually, while for the 2° prevention of root caries, the recommended "best choice" is a 22,500 ppm Sodium Fluoride varnish professionally applied every 3 months.


Subject(s)
Cariostatic Agents/therapeutic use , Dental Care for Aged , Root Caries/epidemiology , Root Caries/prevention & control , Aged , Calcium Phosphates/therapeutic use , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Fluorides, Topical , Humans , Middle Aged , Pit and Fissure Sealants/therapeutic use , Prevalence , Primary Prevention , Quaternary Ammonium Compounds/therapeutic use , Secondary Prevention , Silver Compounds , Sodium Fluoride/therapeutic use , Xylitol/therapeutic use
3.
Health Educ Behav ; 38(6): 629-36, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21482701

ABSTRACT

This report explores the level of detailed knowledge about the Tuskegee Syphilis Study (TSS) among 848 Blacks and Whites in three U.S. cities across an array of demographic variables. The Tuskegee Legacy Project (TLP) Questionnaire was used, which was designed to explore the willingness of minorities to participate in biomedical studies. A component of the TLP Questionnaire, the TSS Facts & Myths Quiz, consisting of seven yes/no factual questions, was used to establish respondents' level of detailed knowledge on the TSS. Both Blacks and Whites had similar very low mean quiz score on the 7-point scale, with Blacks' scores being slightly higher than Whites (1.2 vs. 0.9, p = .003). When analyzing the level of knowledge between racial groups by various demographic variables, several patterns emerged: (a) higher education levels were associated with higher levels of detailed knowledge and (b) for both Blacks and Whites, 30 to 59 years old knew the most about TSS compared with younger and older adult age groups. The findings show that much of the information that circulates in the Black and White communities about the TSS is false, often minimizing or understating the most egregious injustices that occurred. Health promotion and educational implications of these findings are offered and conclude that the findings should be used as a catalyst to explore local realities and sentiments regarding participation in biomedical research within the research philosophy and framework of community-based participatory research.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/ethics , Black or African American , Research Subjects/psychology , Syphilis/history , White People , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alabama , Biomedical Research/history , Connecticut , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice/ethnology , History, 20th Century , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
4.
J Periodontol ; 80(6): 907-14, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19485820

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study examined conditions under which gingival crevicular blood (GCB) could be used to obtain a useful glucose reading to screen for undiagnosed diabetes during routine dental visits. METHODS: GCB and capillary finger-stick blood (CFB) glucose readings obtained with a glucometer were compared for 46 patients recruited from an urban university dental clinic. Study participants were divided into two groups based on probing depth or bleeding on probing (BOP) at the site of collection of the GCB sample. Group 1 participants had blood collected from sites with adequate BOP to obtain a sample without touching the tooth or gingival margin, whereas group 2 participants had blood collected from sites with little or no bleeding. For each group, Pearson correlations were calculated for glucose readings obtained using GCB and CFB samples, and the limits of agreement between the two samples were examined. RESULTS: For group 1 participants, correlations between CFB and GCB glucose readings were high (0.89), and the limits of agreement were acceptable (-27.1 to 29.7). By contrast, for participants in group 2, correlations between the glucose readings were lower (0.78), and limits of agreement were much broader (-25.1 to 80.5). CONCLUSION: GCB samples were suitable to screen for diabetes in persons with sufficient BOP to obtain a sample without touching the tooth or gingival margin (i.e., in patients having the basic clinical signs of gingivitis or periodontal disease).


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Specimen Collection/methods , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Gingival Crevicular Fluid/chemistry , Adult , Aged , Diabetes Mellitus/blood , Feasibility Studies , Female , Fingers/blood supply , Gingiva/blood supply , Gingival Hemorrhage/blood , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Periodontal Attachment Loss/blood , Periodontal Pocket/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...