ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The age of patients requiring surgery for spinal metastasis, primarily those over 65, has risen due to improved cancer treatments. Surgical intervention targets acute neurological deficits and instability. Anticoagulants are increasingly used, especially in the elderly, but pose challenges in managing bleeding complications. The study examines the correlation between preoperative anticoagulant/antiplatelet use and bleeding risks in spinal metastasis surgery, which is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective study at our department from 2010 to 2023, spinal tumor surgery patients were analyzed. Data included demographics, neurological status, surgical procedure, preoperative anticoagulant/antiplatelet use, intra-/postoperative coagulation management, and the incidence of rebleeding. Coagulation management involved blood loss assessment, coagulation factor administration, and fluid balance monitoring post-surgery. Lab parameters were documented at admission, preop, postop, and discharge. RESULTS: A cohort of 290 patients underwent surgical treatment for spinal metastases, predominantly males (63.8%, n = 185) with a median age of 65 years. Preoperatively, 24.1% (n = 70) were on oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet therapy. Within 30 days, a rebleeding rate of 4.5% (n = 9) occurred, unrelated to preoperative anticoagulation status (p > 0.05). A correlation was found between preoperative neurologic deficits (p = 0.004) and rebleeding risk and the number of levels treated surgically, with fewer levels associated with a higher incidence of postoperative bleeding (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical intervention for spinal metastatic cancer appears to be safe regardless of the patient's preoperative anticoagulation status. However, it remains imperative to customize preoperative planning and preparation for each patient, emphasizing meticulous risk-benefit analysis and optimizing perioperative care.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Femoral nerve (FN) injury is noted as a serious neurological complication following total hip arthroplasty performed via a direct anterior approach (DAA). Therefore, we aimed to clarify the anatomical course of the FN around the acetabular rim and in relation to retractor placement during DAA. METHODS: According to standard protocol, a DAA for total hip arthroplasty was performed on 69 hemipelves from formalin-preserved full-body donors. The surgery was halted after retractor placement at the anterior part of the acetabulum. Then dissection was performed to expose the FN and the iliopsoas muscle. Various measurements were taken using a reference line from the anterior superior iliac spine to the acetabulum's center. A total of 6 measurement points, one every 30° from 0° to 150° along the reference line were used to determine the association between the FN and the retractor tip (RT) and the anterior acetabular rim. RESULTS: The mean distance from the RT to the FN was 22.5 millimeters (mm). The distance from the FN to the anterior acetabular rim decreased from 0 to 90°, where it was 18.8 mm, before increasing again to 27.3 mm at 150°. CONCLUSIONS: In our cadaveric study, the FN was within 11 to 36 mm of the RT. Second, we found the FN to be closest to the anterior acetabular rim at 90° and 120°. Accordingly, special care should be taken during retractor placement, and if possible, placement at 90° and 120° avoided.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic vascular injury during total hip arthroplasty (THA) is rare, reported at rates of 0.05 to 0.3%, but a potentially limb-threatening and life-threatening complication. We aimed to describe safe and danger zones for the superior gluteal vessel bundle (SGV bundle) with reference to different THA approaches. METHODS: There were 27 formalin-fixed cadavers with 49 hemipelves dissected. The course and distribution of the SGV bundle were investigated with the help of anatomical landmarks like the greater trochanter, the iliac tubercle (IT), and the ischial tuberosity. RESULTS: We found and exposed the SGV bundle in all 49 specimens with no sex-specific differences. No SGV bundle was encountered up to 28 mm from the greater trochanter and up to 16 mm below the IT. The zone with the highest probability of finding the vessels was 25 to 65 mm below the IT in 39 (80%) cases - defining a danger zone (in relation to the skin incision) in the proximal fourth for the direct anterior approach, in the proximal half for the antero-lateral approach, in the proximal fifth for the direct lateral approach, and almost no danger zone for the posterior approach. CONCLUSIONS: Special care in proximal instrument placement should be taken during THA. When extending one of the surgical approaches, manipulations in the proximal, cranial surgical window should be performed with the utmost care to avoid SGV bundle injury.
