Rapid detection of the widely circulating B.1.617.2 (Delta) SARS-CoV-2 variant.

The emergence of the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of the severe acute syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) that emerged in 2019 (COVID-19), resulted in a surge of cases in India and has expanded and been detected across the world, including in the United States. The B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant has been seen to be twice more transmissible coupled with potential increases in disease severity and immune escape. As a result, case numbers and hospitalisations are once again on the rise in the USA. On 16 July 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported a 7-day average 69.3% increase in new cases and a 35% increase in hospitalisations. Although the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 variants identification remains genomic sequencing, this approach is not accessible to many clinical laboratories. The main goal of this study was to validate and implement the detection of the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant utilising an open reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) platform by explicitly detecting the S-gene target failure (SGTF) corresponding to the deletion of two amino acids (ΔE156/ΔF157) characteristic of B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant. This approach was conceived as a rapid screening of B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant in conjunction with CDC's recommended N1 (nucleocapsid gene), N2, and RP (human RNase P) genes, as a pre-screening tool prior to viral genomic sequencing. We assessed 4,937 samples from 5 July to 5 September 2021. We identified the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant in 435 of 495 positive samples (87.8%); the additional positive samples (7 samples, 1.4%) were found to belong to the B.1.1.7 (Alpha, UK) lineage and the remaining 53 samples (10.7%) were reported as 'other' lineages. Whole genome sequencing of 46 randomly selected samples validated the strains identified as positive and negative for the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant and confirmed the S gene deletion in addition to B.1.617.2 characteristic mutations including L452R, T478K, P681R and D950N located in the spike protein. This modality has been used as routine testing at the Riverside University System Health (RUHS) Medical Center as a method for detection of B.1.617.2 (Delta) to pre-screen samples before genome sequencing. The assay can be easily implemented in clinical laboratories, most notably those with limited economic resources and access to genomic platforms.

Incidence of nosocomial hemodialysis-associated bloodstream infections at a county teaching hospital.

BACKGROUND: Infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Limited information is to be found regarding nosocomial hemodialysis-associated bloodstream infections (HABSI). METHODS: We sought to determine the rate of nosocomial HABSI and its associated risk factors at Riverside County Regional Medical Center. Inpatients who received hemodialysis during 2011 and 2012 were included, and outcomes were recorded along with risk factors. Data was analyzed with SPSS Inc software. RESULTS: A total of 619 patients was included. Fourteen HABSI were detected, with a rate of 3.33/1,000 hemodialysis sessions and 1.03/1,000 patient-days. An association was detected between HABSI and vascular access type (highest risk with nontunneled catheters), length of hospital stay, number of hemodialysis sessions, and hemoglobin A1c level. A correlation was also noted between HABSI because of MRSA and colonization of nares with MRSA. A predominance of staphylococci infections was detected. CONCLUSION: The rate of HABSI observed at Riverside County Regional Medical Center was lower than similar studies (2.5 per 1,000 patient-days and 3.95 per 1,000 hemodialysis sessions). The most important risk factors were determined to be nontunneled catheters, hemoglobin A1c greater than 7%, and nares colonization for HABSI because of MRSA. Infection prevention efforts in the inpatient hemodialysis population should focus on control of hyperglycemia and decolonization of nares from MRSA.

Manual de control de infecciones y epidemiología hospitalaria

[Prólogo]. Este manual contribuye a llenar un espacio en la literatura de las ciencias de la salud, al recopilar y ofrecer a los profesionales las bases para la mejor preservación de la salud, la calidad de la atención y la prevención de la aparición de infecciones que tienen un alto costo en vidas humanas y en valor económico. El valor añadido de este texto es su inmediata aplicación práctica, y su impacto en la calidad de la atención de los pacientes. Se espera que las recomendaciones y guías del texto, tras la lectura por el profesional de salud, o por el future profesional de salud, sean puestas en práctica y que reviertan en una disminución de las infecciones relacionadas con la atención de la salud.

Reduction in surgical antibiotic prophylaxis expenditure and the rate of surgical site infection by means of a protocol that controls the use of prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention based on training and the use of a protocol with an automatic stop of antimicrobial prophylaxis to improve hospital compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines. DESIGN: An interventional study with a before-after trial was conducted in 3 stages: a 3-year initial stage (January 1999 to December 2001), during which a descriptive-prospective survey was performed to evaluate surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infections; a 6-month second stage (January to June 2002), during which an educational intervention was performed regarding the routine use of a surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis request form that included an automatic stop of prophylaxis (the "automatic-stop prophylaxis form"); and a 3-year final stage (July 2002 to June 2005), during which a descriptive-prospective survey of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infections was again performed. SETTING: An 88-bed teaching hospital in Entre Ríos, Argentina. PATIENTS: A total of 3,496 patients who underwent surgery were included in the first stage of the study and 3,982 were included in the final stage. RESULTS: Comparison of the first stage of the study with the final stage revealed that antimicrobial prophylaxis was given at the appropriate time to 55% and 88% of patients, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.27 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.25-0.30]; P<.01); the antimicrobial regimen was adequate in 74% and 87% of patients, respectively (RR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.45-0.55]; P<.01); duration of the prophylaxis was adequate in 44% and 55% of patients, respectively (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.77-0.84]; P<.01); and the surgical site infection rates were 3.2% and 1.9%, respectively (RR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.44-0.79]; P<.01). Antimicrobial expenditure was 10,678.66 US$ per 1,000 patient-days during the first stage and 7,686.05 US$ per 1,000 patient-days during the final stage (RR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.86-0.89]; P<.01). CONCLUSION: The intervention based on training and application of a protocol with an automatic stop of prophylaxis favored compliance with the hospital's current surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines before the intervention, achieving significant reductions of surgical site infection rates and substantial savings for the healthcare system.

Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections using non-technologic strategies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of nosocomial bacteremias related to the use of non-impregnated central venous catheters (CVCs) when only non-technologic strategies were used to prevent them. DESIGN: This was a prospective study of infectious complications of CVCs placed in intensive care unit (ICU) patients from April 1997 to December 2001. SETTING: The medical-surgical ICU of a tertiary-care, university-affiliated hospital in Argentina. METHODS: We studied all patients admitted to the ICU using non-impregnated CVCs. Maximal sterile barrier precautions (ie, use of cap, mask, sterile gown, sterile gloves, and large sterile drape), strict handwashing, preparation of the patients' skin with antiseptic solutions, insertion and management of catheters by trained personnel, and continuing quality improvement programs aimed at appropriate insertion and maintenance of catheters were employed. RESULTS: During the study period, 2,525 patients were admitted to the ICU. Eight hundred sixty-eight patients had 1,037 CVCs inserted. The number of CVC-related bloodstream infections (BSIs), acquired in the ICU, was 2.7 per 1,000 CVC-days (13 nosocomial CVC-related BSIs during 4,770 days of CVC use). Microorganisms isolated included methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (n = 6), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (n = 2), coagulase-negative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (n = 2), Escherichia coli (n = 1), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 1), and Enterobacter cloacae (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: A low rate of catheter-related BSI was achieved without antimicrobial-impregnated catheters. The incidence of CVC-associated bacteremias corresponded to the 10th to 20th percentile range of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System hospitals for the same type of ICU.