Safety evaluation of lenvatinib treatment after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy for patients with unresectable liver cancer: A comparison of lenvatinib as 1st­ or 2nd­line treatment.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/BV) as first-line therapy and lenvatinib (LEN) as second-line therapy are the recommended treatments for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Adverse immune events caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (such as Atez) generally only occur several months after administration; therefore, the potential influence of the first-line treatment on second-line treatment is not clear. The present study investigated the safety of second-line LEN treatment (2nd LEN) by comparing the adverse events (AEs) of 2nd LEN after first-line Atez/BV treatment for unresectable liver cancer, with those of first-line LEN treatment (1st LEN). Patients who received Atez/BV as first-line therapy and 2nd LEN, or those who received 1st LEN at Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan) between April 2018 and September 2023 were retrospectively evaluated for treatment duration and AEs. The median treatment duration for patients in the 1st LEN (n=39) and 2nd LEN (n=13) groups was 151.0 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 77-303 days] and 128.5 days (95% CI 68-270 days), respectively (P=0.385). A greater proportion of patients showed elevated aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase levels in the 2nd LEN group (76.9%) compared with those in the 1st LEN group (46.2%) (P=0.016). Hypothyroidism was more common in those receiving 2nd LEN (46.2%) than 1st LEN (12.8%) (P=0.016). In addition, grade 1 (three patients) and grade 2 (three patients) hypothyroidism was observed in patients receiving 2nd LEN. For these six patients, during first-line Atez/BV treatment, four patients had grade 0 hypothyroidism and two patients had grade 1 hypothyroidism (P=0.025). In conclusion, patients receiving 2nd LEN after treatment with Atez/BV are at an increased risk of hypothyroidism.

Relationship between Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors and Epileptic Seizure Disorder: A Post-Marketing Surveillance Study.

INTRODUCTION: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) has been to be involved in the uptake and regulation of dopamine 2 receptor (D2R), a G protein-coupled receptor expressed in various brain regions. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the relationship between ALK inhibitors and seizures is an important issue. This study investigated the relationship between ALK inhibitors and seizures. METHODS: This study investigated the relationship between ALK inhibitors and seizures through a disproportionality analysis using the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The target drugs were the ALK inhibitors crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib. The seizures covered were defined high-level group term (HLGT): "Seizures (incl. subtype)" including high-level term (HLT): "seizures and seizure disorders NEC." This study used the information component (IC), a signal score, as a Bayesian statistical method for disproportionality analysis. The signal detection criteria used in this study were the same as those reported previously: a lower limit of 95% credible interval (CrI) for IC >0. RESULTS: The signal scores of '"seizures and seizure disorders not elsewhere classified (NEC)" "for each ALK inhibitor were crizotinib (IC: -0.00052, 95% CrI: -0.38-0.27), ceritinib (IC: 1.18, 95% CrI: 0.68-1.54), alectinib (IC: 0.68, 95% CrI: 0.19-1.02), brigatinib (IC: 1.04, 95% CrI: 0.32-1.54), and lorlatinib (IC: 0.82, 95% CrI: 0.11-1.32). On the other hand, "generalized tonic-clonic seizures," "partial simple seizures NEC," "absence seizures," and "partial complex seizures" had no or few reported cases, and no signal was detected. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first report to evaluate the relationship between ALK inhibitors and seizures using post-marketing surveillance data. These results suggest that ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib, which are highly brain-migrating drugs, are associated with seizures.

Comparison of Safety and Treatment Continuity of Palbociclib and Abemaciclib for Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic/Recurrent Breast Cancer.

Background: Appropriate adverse event (AE) management and maintenance of therapeutic intensity are necessary to achieve therapeutic benefits of CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib and abemaciclib) in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic/recurrent breast cancer. Objective: This study was aimed at clarifying the effect of AEs associated with palbociclib and abemaciclib on treatment. Methods: A total of 62 and 49 patients were prescribed palbociclib and abemaciclib, respectively, at our hospital from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2023. The rate and reasons for treatment discontinuation, interruption of administration, and changes in dose and dosing schedule, treatment duration, and relative dose intensity (RDI) were compared between the groups of patients prescribed the 2 treatments. Results: Treatment discontinuation due to AEs occurred more frequently with abemaciclib (12 patients) because of interstitial lung disease and hepatic and renal events than with palbociclib (5 patients; P = .008). Administration was interrupted in 57 (91.9%) and 35 (71.4%) patients treated with palbociclib and abemaciclib, respectively (P = .004). Dose reduction occurred in 37 (67.3%) and 19 (47.5%) patients treated with palbociclib and abemaciclib, respectively (P = .053). The median [range] treatment duration was 301 [21-1643] days for palbociclib and 238 [70-1526] days for abemaciclib (log-rank test, P = .581). The median RDI was 59.7% and 59.6% for palbociclib and abemaciclib, respectively (P = .539). Although the AEs of palbociclib and abemaciclib affected the treatment considerably, the treatment duration and RDI were similar. Conclusion: CDK4/6 inhibitors should be selected based on the tolerability and manageability of each AE.

The emerging emetogenicity of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS­102) from patient self-reporting: a multicenter, prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) is an oral anticancer drug with adequate efficacy in unresectable colorectal cancer, but frequently also induces chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). To investigate the occurrence of CINV and antiemetic therapy in patients with colorectal cancer treated with TAS-102 (JASCC-CINV 2001). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, observational study in patients with colorectal cancer who received TAS-102 without dose reduction for the first time. Primary endpoint was the incidence of vomiting during the overall period. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of nausea, significant nausea, anorexia, other adverse events (constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, fatigue, dysgeusia) and patient satisfaction. Patient diaries were used for primary and secondary endpoints. All adverse events were subjectively assessed using PRO-CTCAE ver 1.0. and CTCAE ver 5.0. RESULTS: Data from 100 of the 119 enrolled patients were analyzed. The incidence of vomiting, nausea, and significant nausea was 13%, 67%, and 36%, respectively. The incidence of vomiting in patients with and without prophylactic antiemetic therapy were 20.8% and 10.5%, respectively. Prophylactic antiemetics were given to 24% of patients, of whom 70% received D2 antagonists. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that experience of CINV in previous treatment tended to be associated with vomiting (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-58.5, P = 0.07), whereas prophylactic antiemetic administration was not (HR: 1.61, 95 CI: 0.50-5.21, P = 0.43). With regard to patient satisfaction, the proportion of patients who were "very satisfied," "satisfied," "slightly satisfied" or "somewhat satisfied" was 81.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The low incidence of vomiting and high patient satisfaction suggest that TAS-102 does not require the use of uniform prophylactic antiemetic treatments. However, patients with the experience of CINV in previous treatment might require prophylactic antiemetic treatment.

Association between CDK4/6 inhibitors and drug-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: A pharmacoepidemiological study using the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System.

The most common toxicities associated with cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor therapy include decreased leukopenia and neutropenia due to the inhibition of CDK6 of leukocyte and neutrophil precursors in bone marrow. These hematological toxicities are more commonly observed with palbociclib administration than with abemaciclib administration, which is approximately 13 times more selective against CDK4 than CDK6. Thus, even though both successfully inhibit CDK4/6, the side effects of palbociclib and abemaciclib differ due to differences in selectivity. Recent reports have suggested an association between palbociclib and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw; however, reports on this association are inconsistent. This study investigated the potential association of palbociclib and abemaciclib with MRONJ using the FAERS. Signals of "Osteonecrosis of jaw" were detected only in females using palbociclib (cROR025: 2.08). Other signals detected included stomatitis-related adverse events with abemaciclib and intraoral soft tissue damage and infection with palbociclib. As previous exploratory studies have reported MRONJ signals for bisphosphonates and denosumab, we calculated the aROR for palbociclib-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw using concomitant bisphosphonates and denosumab as covariates. A signal was detected even after adjusting for sex, age, and concomitant medications as covariates (aROR0025: 5.74). A proper understanding of the differences in CDK selectivity is necessary for the appropriate use of CDK4/6 inhibitors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on CDK4/6 inhibitors and drug-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. We believe that these results will offer new insights into adverse events related to the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, and may aid in the proper use of CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Evaluation of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Versus Modified Lenvatinib Therapy in Child-Pugh A Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Background/Aim: Atezolizumab/bevacizumab (Atez/BV) and lenvatinib (LEN) are the recommended first-line treatments for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Previous reports have suggested that the tolerability and therapeutic efficacy of LEN could be enhanced by modifying its administration method. Therefore, this study compared the efficacy and safety of Atez/BV, the standard LEN therapy (standard LEN), and modified LEN therapy (modified LEN). Patients and Methods: The overall survival (OS) and the rate of discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) were compared between groups treated with Atez/BV (n=36), standard LEN (n=30), and modified LEN (n=11). Results: Discontinuation due to AEs was required in 22.2%, 23.3%, and 9.1% of patients in the Atez/BV, standard LEN, and modified LEN groups (p=0.485). The median OS for the Atez/BV, standard LEN, and modified LEN groups was 523 [95% confidence interval (CI)=163-818], 382 (95%CI=330-547), and 604 (95% CI=257-656) days, respectively (log-rank test, p=0.949). Conclusion: Atez/BV and the standard and modified LEN regimens showed comparable efficacy and safety.

Proposal for Classifying the Emetogenicity of Oral Anticancer Agents with a Focus on PARP Inhibitors: A Prospective, Observational, Multicenter Study (JASCC-CINV 2002).

Background: Olaparib and niraparib (poly adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose polymerase [PARP] inhibitors) have significant antitumor action in patients with ovarian cancer. However, the incidence of nausea and vomiting among patients on these drugs in clinical trials is rather high. There are no guidelines on antiemetic treatment for nausea caused by oral anticancer agents. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of nausea and vomiting caused by PARP inhibitors and the actual situation of antiemetic therapy in patients with gynecologic cancer. Methods: Patients with gynecologic cancer who were scheduled to receive PARP inhibitors were enrolled. Data on PARP inhibitor-induced nausea and vomiting were collected from patient diaries for 21 days. The primary endpoint was the incidence of vomiting during the 21 days after starting olaparib and niraparib. Results: Overall, between January 2020 and March 2023, 134 patients were enrolled. Of the 129 patients who were evaluated, 28 (21.7%) received prophylactic antiemetics for 21 days, and 101 (78.3%) did not. The overall incidence of PARP inhibitor-induced vomiting was 16.3%. The incidence of vomiting in the group that did not receive antiemetic prophylaxis was 13.9%. On dividing the group that did not receive antiemetic prophylaxis into the olaparib and niraparib subgroups, the incidence of vomiting was found to be 18.6% for the olaparib group and 10.3% for the niraparib group. Conclusion: The incidence of emesis without antiemetic prophylaxis among patients on olaparib and niraparib ranged from 10% to 30%. Therefore, olaparib and niraparib can be classified in the low emetogenic risk and prophylactic antiemetic therapy at the time of treatment initiation may be unnecessary.

Evaluation of the therapeutic effects and tolerability of modified lenvatinib administration methods for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A preliminary study.

Lenvatinib (LEN), a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a standard therapeutic agent for hepatocellular carcinoma, but the high incidence of adverse events (AEs) related to LEN treatment often necessitates treatment discontinuation. The present study aimed to clarify the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of modified LEN dosing methods, such as alternate-day dosing, necessitated by AEs of LEN. A total of 66 patients who received LEN at Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan) between April 2018 and January 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. These patients were divided into those who completed treatment with the standard administration method (standard LEN, n=48) and those who changed from the standard administration method to a modified administration method in the middle of treatment [modified LEN (weekends off/alternate days), n=18]. The treatment duration and reasons for discontinuation of LEN treatment were analysed. The discontinuation rate due to AEs in the modified LEN group (1 patient) was less compared with that in the standard LEN group (16 patients) (P=0.022). The median treatment duration for patients in the standard LEN (n=48), modified LEN (weekends off, n=6) and modified LEN (alternate days, n=12) groups was 71 [95% confidence interval (CI) 55-134], 483 (95% CI: 193-644) and 222 (95% CI: 98-303) days, respectively (P=0.044). Modification of the administration method ensured fewer AE-related treatment discontinuations. However, weekends off dosing showed a longer treatment duration compared with standard dosing, whereas alternate day dosing showed no difference from standard dosing.

[A Survey of Health Food Use and Patient Satisfaction among Patients Undergoing Cancer Pharmacotherapy].

This study aimed to clarify the situation of use of health foods by patients and the level of satisfaction of patients in order to make use of information on cases where patients undergoing cancer medication therapy use health foods. Between May 7, 2018 and June 29, 2018, we conducted a questionnaire survey of patients with progressive cancer who were undergoing cancer chemotherapy at Ogaki Municipal Hospital. In addition, we conducted a multivariate analysis of patients who were using health foods and those who were not. The questionnaire items included the objectives of use, product effectiveness and satisfaction, and QOL. The rate of health food use was 81/281 (29.5%). The primary objectives of use were, "to maintain health" (29.8%) and "to alleviate symptoms" (24.0%). The primary sources of information about health foods were "a friend" (50.6%) and "TV" (13.5%). The satisfaction level was 0-3 points in 8.3% of patients, 4-6 points in 38.1% of patients, and 7-10 points in 53.6% of patients. For "stage of illness (recurrence)," the odds ratio was 1.810 (95% CI, 1.040-3.150; p=0.035), and for "QOL value," the odds ratio was 2.210 (95% CI, 1.220-4.020; p=0.009), indicating that these factors had a significant influence on health food use. Health foods tended to be used in patients who had recurring cancer with low QOL and various symptoms, and friends and other people close to the patient had a large influence on the patient's decision. It was clear that the patients' satisfaction level was high.

Effect of the timing of discontinuation of last-line chemotherapy on patient prognosis in advanced and recurrent gastric cancer.

The present study aimed to determine the effect of the timing of treatment discontinuation on the prognosis of patients with advanced and recurrent gastric cancer chemotherapy. Between July 2014 and March 2017, 127 patients who underwent chemotherapy for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer at Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan) were examined. To determine factors associated with survival, multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model, and hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. The reasons for discontinuation of last-line chemotherapy and the last hospitalization prior to mortality were surveyed. Age (≤51 years), number of treatment lines (≤1 line), and days between last dose of the final chemotherapy regimen and death (≤79 days) were independently and significantly associated with survival in the multivariate analysis. Compared with patients who did not receive chemotherapy in the last 79 days of life, those who received chemotherapy in the last 79 days of life days had a hazard ratio of 1.858 (95% CI, 1.059-3.261; P=0.031) for mortality. A decrease in the performance status was responsible for treatment discontinuation in 51 of 75 cases among patients who received chemotherapy in the last 79 days of life and 9 of 26 cases among patients who did not receive chemotherapy in this duration (P<0.001). Among patients who received chemotherapy in the last 79 days of life, 67 patients were hospitalized prior to mortality; among patients who did not receive chemotherapy in this duration, 15 patients were hospitalized prior to mortality (P<0.001). In conclusion, continuation of chemotherapy until just prior to mortality does not prolong the survival time in patients with advanced and recurrent gastric cancer.

The incidence and timing of leukocyte overshoot after pegfilgrastim administration.

INTRODUCTION: Pegfilgrastim is a PEGylated formulation of filgrastim with a long half-life. It is highly convenient and less burdensome for patients. However, white blood cell count may temporarily increase after administration; in particular, a leukocyte overshoot may be observed. The present study retrospectively examined the incidence and timing of leukocyte overshoot after pegfilgrastim administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients (118 occasions of pegfilgrastim) were evaluated. Leukocyte overshoot was defined as white blood cell count ≥10,000/mm3 exceeding the reference value. RESULTS: Leukocyte overshoot was observed in 71.2% (84/118) occasions, in 76.4% (42/55) patients. The maximum white blood cell count ≥30,000/mm3 was observed in 30.5% (36/118) occasions in 45.5% (25/55) patients and was observed in 39.3% (33/84) occasions on day 1 after pegfilgrastim administration and 26.2% (22/84) on day 2. Leukocyte overshoot has been observed in only 23.1% (9/39) patients administered with normal granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. However, there were no patients with white blood cell counts ≥30,000/mm3. CONCLUSION: There was a higher frequency of occurrence of leukocyte overshoot in response to pegfilgrastim than in response to normal granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. High incidence of leukocyte overshoot was observed when blood was collected 1-2 days after administration of pegfilgrastim. It is important for patients to understand the characteristics of pegfilgrastim by conducting pharmaceutical guidance.

Usefulness of a pharmacist outpatient service for S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.

S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy is an outpatient treatment for gastric cancer. To evaluate the role of the pharmacist outpatient service in increasing medication adherence and reducing adverse events associated with S-1, the present study retrospectively analyzed prescription recommendations from pharmacists to physicians and the persistence rate of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy use in patients with gastric cancer. A total of 40 subjects who utilized the pharmacist outpatient service between November 2014 and March 2016 comprised the pharmacist group; and 94 patients who underwent S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer between September 2012 and October 2014, but not as pharmacist outpatients, comprised the control group. Data on the prescription recommendations, persistence rate of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for 1 year and relative dose intensity were collected. The number of interventions and consultations for the pharmacist outpatient group were 40 and 644, respectively. Prescription recommendations regarding dosage, drug administration interval, and supportive therapy were provided in 62, 15 and 132 cases, respectively. The prescription proposal acceptance rate was 92.5%. The persistence rate of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for 1 year was significantly higher in the pharmacist group (82.5%) compared with the control group (39.4%; P<0.0001). The discontinuation rate due to adverse events was significantly lower in the pharmacist group (7.5%) compared with the control group (31.9%; P=0.0015). In subjects who completed S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy, the relative dose intensities in the control and pharmacist groups were 82.9 and 84.7%, respectively. In conclusion, the continued pharmaceutical intervention ensured a high persistence rate of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.

[Medical Assistance Based on Interviews Conducted before Physician Examination by a Pharmacist for Outpatients with Thyroid Cancer Treated with Lenvatinib].

In municipal hospitals, there are few cases of thyroid cancer for which the multi-kinase inhibitor lenvatinib is used. Moreover, there are very few reports of lenvatinib use. We examined interventions related to the use of lenvatinib made at the pharmaceutical outpatient clinic in our facility. Seven patients received lenvatinib. The prescription proposals from the pharmacist( 45 cases)provided advice on dosage(15.6%), discontinuation of medication(11.1%), supportive care(64.4%), and other advice(9.0%). The prescription acceptance rate was 84.4%. Among the prescription proposals of supportive care, there were suggestions regarding blood pressure(26.7%), diarrhea(8.9%), nausea(8.9%), and oral hemorrhage(6.7%). Some patients also experienced side effects, such as abnormalities in equilibrioception and visual field defects; however, the relationship between such abnormalities and lenvatinib is unclear. In addition, we asked physicians to confirm if the outpatient pharmacists contributed to the examination process. We believe that lenvatinib administration can be continued safely with pharmaceutical outpatient clinic support for patients, even in municipal hospitals.

Evaluation of the role and usefulness of a pharmacist outpatient service for patients undergoing monotherapy with oral anti-cancer agents.

Introduction When rapid feedback to physicians must be provided, e.g. monitoring therapy with the oral anticoagulant warfarin or providing therapeutic support for patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy, the involvement of pharmacists is required for outpatients. We launched a pharmacist outpatient service for patients with cancer taking oral anti-cancer agents. We evaluated the role and usefulness of the pharmacist outpatient service for these patients undergoing oral monotherapy with anti-cancer agents. Methods Data regarding prescription recommendations were collected from the drug management guidance records of 154 patients who consulted the pharmacist outpatient service between July 2013 and September 2015. In addition, the rates of prescription recommendation adherence were calculated. Between April and August 2015, a self-reported questionnaire was administered to 47 patients undergoing therapy with oral anti-cancer agents who were visiting the pharmacist outpatient service at the Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan). Results Prescription recommendations were given to 235 cases. The total rate of adherence to the prescription recommendations was 94.9% (223/235 cases). The majority of prescription recommendations regarding supportive care were those for moisturizing agents (20.9%), analgesics (20.9%), steroid ointments (12.7%), and antihypertensive agents (10.8%). When continued guidance was provided, significant changes were observed for survey items 3 (knowing the side effects of the medication), 8 (worrying about side effects), and 12 (interest in prescribed medicine) ( p = 0.0049, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.0164, respectively). Conclusion Our study showed that continued pharmaceutical intervention resulted in a deeper understanding of the medications' side effects, and it reduced anxiety levels in patients undergoing monotherapy with oral anti-cancer agents.

Comparison of cost-effectiveness of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet for treating advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer.

Regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet regimens are standard third-line or later treatments for advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer with no significant difference in efficacy. The present study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of using regorafenib vs. the trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet. The expected cost was calculated based on data from patients with advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer who were treated with regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet. The median survival time (MST) from the CORRECT and the RECOURSE study was used to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the regimens. The cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated from the expected cost and MST for the two regimens. The expected cost per patient for the regorafenib and the trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet regimen was ¥705,330.3 and ¥371,198.7, respectively, and the cost-effectiveness ratio was ¥110,207.9/MST and ¥52,281.5/MST, respectively. In conclusion, the findings of the present study demonstrated that the trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet regimen is more cost-effective compared with the regorafenib regimen.

[Continuation of chemotherapy with bevacizumab for advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer].

We evaluated the association between the number of treatment courses with the concomitant use of bevacizumab(BV) and the reasons for discontinuation of the regimen in patients who received FOLFOX with or without BV as first-line chemotherapy and FOLFIRI with or without BV as second-line chemotherapy for advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer. In first-line treatment, 12 (2-46) and 10 (2-60) treatment courses were administered with and without BV, respectively, and this difference was not significant (p=0.60). In second-line treatment after first-line treatment with the concomitant use of BV, 11 (1-23) and 3 (1-12) treatment courses were administered with and without BV, respectively, and this difference was significant (p<0.01). Discontinuation due to adverse reactions was more frequent for first-line treatment (34.9%) than for second-line treatment (6.2%; p<0.01). The reasons for discontinuation due to adverse reactions during first-line treatment with BV were often associated with BV, and those during first-line treatment without BV were most often associated with peripheral neuropathy. Therefore, we conclude that early detection and prevention of adverse reactions are important in first-line treatment and that pharmacists as well should be involved in the monitoring and management of adverse reactions, although continued administration of BV even during second-line treatment after first-line treatment with BV is recommended.

Structure and physicochemical properties of diastereomeric isomers of ApA.

Heterochiral ApAs (ALpAD and ADpAL) together with homochiral D-(ApA) and L-(ApA) were synthesized and their helical structures were investigated by using spectroscopic techniques. The results indicate that the chirality of the 3'-end residue is the primary determinant for the helical sense of adenylyl-(3'-5')-adenosine (ApA).

Helical structure of heterochiral RNA dimers: helical sense of ApA is determined by chirality of 3'-end residue.

Heterochiral ApAs (ALpAL and ALpAL) have been synthesized and investigation of their helical structures by means of spectroscopic techniques indicates that the chirality of the 3'-end residue is the primary factor for determining the helical sense of ApA.