Clinical and psychopathological correlates of duration of untreated illness (DUI) in affective spectrum disorders.

Affective disorders represent psychopathological entities lying on a continuum, characterized by high prevalence and functional impairment. A delay in treatment initiation might increase the burden associated with affective spectrum disorders. The present study was aimed at analyzing the correlates of a long duration of untreated illness (DUI) in these conditions. We recruited subjects diagnosed with affective disorders, both in- and outpatients, and collected information concerning socio-demographic, clinical, and psychopathological characteristics. Long DUI was defined according to previous research criteria as >2 years for Bipolar Disorders or >1 year for Depressive Disorders. Bivariate analyses were performed to compare subjects with a long and short DUI (p<0.05). A logistic regression was operated to evaluate the correlates of long DUI. In the present sample (n=135), 34.1% (n=46) subjects showed a long DUI. This subgroup presented with more physical comorbidities (p=0.003), higher body mass index (BMI) (p<0.001), more frequent anxiety onset (p=0.018), younger onset age (p=0.042), and more severe depressive symptoms (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale item 1-depressed mood (p=0.032) and item 2-guilt feelings (p=0.018)). At the logistic regression, higher severity of depressed mood (OR 1.568), higher BMI (OR 1.264), and younger age at onset (OR 0.935) were associated with long DUI. The present study confirmed a possible role of DUI as a construct underpinning higher clinical severity in affective spectrum disorders, possibly linked to worse illness course and unfavorable outcomes. Intervention strategies targeting physical comorbidities and depressive symptoms severity may decrease disease burden in subjects with a long DUI.

Does Post-Traumatic Spectrum Comorbidity Influence Symptom Severity in Bipolar Disorders? A Cross-Sectional Study in a Real-World Setting.

BACKGROUND: The present cross-sectional study investigates the relationship between post-traumatic spectrum comorbidity and the severity of symptoms in subjects diagnosed with Bipolar Disorders (BD). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In- and outpatients diagnosed with BD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) were consecutively recruited. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected. Psychopathology was evaluated by means of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Sociodemographic, clinical and psychopathological characteristics of BD subjects with and without sub-threshold PTSD were compared by means of bivariate analyses (p<0.05). RESULTS: BD subjects with post-traumatic spectrum comorbidity (n=24.49%) presented a significantly higher number of hospitalizations when compared to those who did not present the co-occurrence of the two conditions (2.67±2.3 versus 1.65±2.32, p=0.039). As for treatment features, subjects with subthreshold PTSD were more frequently prescribed benzodiazepines at the moment of evaluation or in the past (n=18, 100% versus n=22.55%, p=0.032). When assessing differences in terms of psychopathological characteristics, subjects with subthreshold PTSD showed higher HAM-D total score (16.22±9.06 versus 10.22±7.23, p=0.032) and higher PANSS negative symptom scale score (16.06±6.92 versus 11.41±4.68, p=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from the present study suggest that subthreshold PTSD may underpin higher symptom severity and worse outcomes when occurring as a comorbid condition in BD.

Searching for factors associated with the "Revolving Door phenomenon" in the psychiatric inpatient unit: A 5-year retrospective cohort study.

The revolving door (RD) phenomenon refers to subjects who undergo frequent rehospitalizations in psychiatric units. The main aim of this study was to analyze clinical factors associated with RD in acute inpatient psychiatric ward. In a 5-year cohort study, subjects hospitalized three or more times in 12 months (revolving door subjects-RDS) were identified. A total of 1,324 subjects were hospitalized. RDS represented 6.3% (n = 84) of the entire sample with a total of 337 RD hospitalizations (revolving door hospitalizations-RDH) (16.7% of all admissions). RDS were younger, unmarried, with comorbid substance related disorders, with mood or psychotic disorders and affected by comorbid medical conditions. After controlling for age, sex and marital status, the most strongly associated variable with RDH was the comorbidity between mood and substance use disorders. Other associated factors were the presence of a comorbid medical condition and a longer length of stay. The commitment to community residential facilities and the treatment with a first generation long-acting antipsychotic were also associated with RDH. On the contrary, admissions to the psychiatric unit for manic/hypomanic episode or for self-directed harmful behavior were inversely associated with RDH. Attention should be given to these clinical variables in order to reduce RD.

"Revolving door" and Bipolar Disorders: a retrospective study in an acute inpatient unit.

INTRODUCTION: The present retrospective study investigated clinical correlates of the revolving door (RD) phenomenon in a population of subjects affected by Bipolar Disorders (BDs). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Medical records of subjects with BDs admitted to a psychiatric inpatient unit over a 5-year period of time were retrospectively reviewed and clinical data were extracted into an electronic dataset. "Revolving Door Subjects" (RDS) were defined as those who presented three or more "Revolving Door Hospitalizations" (RDH) during twelve months. Features of RDH were compared with non-RDH in order to identify characteristics associated with RD phenomenon and possible risk factors for readmission. To explore predictors of RDH, a stepwise backword logistic regression model was built, including the variables that were significantly associated with RDH in the bivariate analyses. RESULTS: In our sample of 176 subjects affected by BDs, 53 (19.9%) RDH were identified. In the RDH group, a higher prevalence of mixed episodes (p=0.029) and medical co-morbidities (p=0.004) was detected. Subjects with repeated hospitalizations were more often committed to psychiatric residential facilities at discharge (p=0.002). Treatment features related to RDH were represented by a higher prescription rate of atypical antipsychotics (p=0.030), benzodiazepines (p=0.001) and antidepressants (p=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from the present study suggest that the early identification and treatment of medical comorbidities and specific clinical features of BDs may help reducing the RD phenomenon in this population of subjects.

Cannabis Use, Psychotic Like Experiences and Aberrant Salience in a Sample of Belgian Students.

The main goal of our study was to investigate the association between psychotic-like experiences, aberrant salience, and cannabis use in a nonclinical sample of Belgian students. The participants were asked to complete a self-report questionnaire on cannabis use. The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences and the Aberrant Salience Inventory were used to assess psychotic-like experiences and aberrant salience. The final sample was of 257 students. Cannabis users showed significantly higher Aberrant Salience Inventory score and, concerning the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences, higher total, positive, and negative dimension scores. Years of cannabis use and frequency of use showed a positive correlation with Aberrant Salience Inventory score. Our results support the evidence that cannabis use is associated with an increased rate of psychotic experiences in individuals without a clinical form of psychosis. Future studies are required to better investigate the meaning of the association between cannabis use, psychotic-like experiences, and aberrant salience.

Delusional sharing: a history focus-on and case report of folie à deux.

Folie à deux (FAD) is a clinical condition that was first described by Lasègue and Falret in 19th century. They reported a rare condition where two or more people shared delusional ideas from a person to another. Nowadays a trace of this historical diagnosis and its theoretical framework, could be found on ICD-10 where FAD is translated in "Shared Psychotic Disorder". Given the lack of literature and a well-defined set of symptoms it is hard to detect the clinical limits of FAD. Furthermore, the complex of comorbidities could lead to a misdiagnosis. In this paper we report a peculiar case of FAD with an historical focus trying to give a wider point of view and tools to recognize this unconventional psychiatric diagnosis.