Establishing a reproducible approach to study cellular functions of plant cells with 3D bioprinting.

Capturing cell-to-cell signals in a three-dimensional (3D) environment is key to studying cellular functions. A major challenge in the current culturing methods is the lack of accurately capturing multicellular 3D environments. In this study, we established a framework for 3D bioprinting plant cells to study cell viability, cell division, and cell identity. We established long-term cell viability for bioprinted Arabidopsis and soybean cells. To analyze the generated large image datasets, we developed a high-throughput image analysis pipeline. Furthermore, we showed the cell cycle reentry of bioprinted cells for which the timing coincides with the induction of core cell cycle genes and regeneration-related genes, ultimately leading to microcallus formation. Last, the identity of bioprinted Arabidopsis root cells expressing endodermal markers was maintained for longer periods. The framework established here paves the way for a general use of 3D bioprinting for studying cellular reprogramming and cell cycle reentry toward tissue regeneration.

Quantifying Intercellular Movement and Protein Stoichiometry for Computational Modeling.

Analyzing protein movement dynamics and their regulation has shown to be important in the study of cell fate decisions. Such analyses can be performed with scanning fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (scanning FCS), a versatile imaging methodology that has been applied in the animal kingdom and recently adapted to the plant kingdom. Specifically, scanning FCS allows for qualitatively capturing protein movement across barriers, such as the active transport through plasmodesmata, the analysis of protein movement rates, and the quantification of the stoichiometry of protein complexes, composed of one or more different proteins. Importantly, the quantifiable data generated with scanning FCS can be used to inform computational models, enhancing model simulations of in vivo events, such as cell fate decisions, during plant development.

Spatiotemporal Gene Expression Profiling and Network Inference: A Roadmap for Analysis, Visualization, and Key Gene Identification.

Gene expression data analysis and the prediction of causal relationships within gene regulatory networks (GRNs) have guided the identification of key regulatory factors and unraveled the dynamic properties of biological systems. However, drawing accurate and unbiased conclusions requires a comprehensive understanding of relevant tools, computational methods, and their workflows. The topics covered in this chapter encompass the entire workflow for GRN inference including: (1) experimental design; (2) RNA sequencing data processing; (3) differentially expressed gene (DEG) selection; (4) clustering prior to inference; (5) network inference techniques; and (6) network visualization and analysis. Moreover, this chapter aims to present a workflow feasible and accessible for plant biologists without a bioinformatics or computer science background. To address this need, TuxNet, a user-friendly graphical user interface that integrates RNA sequencing data analysis with GRN inference, is chosen for the purpose of providing a detailed tutorial.

A hybrid model connecting regulatory interactions with stem cell divisions in the root.

Stem cells give rise to the entirety of cells within an organ. Maintaining stem cell identity and coordinately regulating stem cell divisions is crucial for proper development. In plants, mobile proteins, such as WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX 5 (WOX5) and SHORTROOT (SHR), regulate divisions in the root stem cell niche. However, how these proteins coordinately function to establish systemic behaviour is not well understood. We propose a non-cell autonomous role for WOX5 in the cortex endodermis initial (CEI) and identify a regulator, ANGUSTIFOLIA (AN3)/GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR 1, that coordinates CEI divisions. Here, we show with a multi-scale hybrid model integrating ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and agent-based modeling that quiescent center (QC) and CEI divisions have different dynamics. Specifically, by combining continuous models to describe regulatory networks and agent-based rules, we model systemic behaviour, which led us to predict cell-type-specific expression dynamics of SHR, SCARECROW, WOX5, AN3 and CYCLIND6;1, and experimentally validate CEI cell divisions. Conclusively, our results show an interdependency between CEI and QC divisions.