Comparing the effectiveness of simulation as adjuncts to standardized lectures, on the identification and reporting of intimidation during surgical clerkship: A mixed method randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Intimidation constitutes a learning barrier for undergraduates and its reporting rate to authorities remains suboptimal. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of three interventions designed to increase reporting by undergraduates during their surgical rotation. As adjuncts to a standardized lecture, participants were assigned to a simulated intimidation scenario, a video of intimidation events, or a control group. Surveys were completed before the interventions, and at the end of the rotation. RESULTS: Of the 119 included participants, 17.6% reported that they had been intimidated during their previous rotation as compared to 37.0% after the surgical rotation. There were no statistically significant differences in the reporting of intimidation between the groups. However, 65.5% of all participants declared feeling more at ease to report intimidation, yet the reporting rate remained low. CONCLUSION: Intimidation during clerkship persists as a frequent problem although the best method to increase its reporting remains unclear.

Scapulohumeral rhythm relative to active range of motion in patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tears.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with rotator cuff tears feel pain without functional limitation, whereas others show a decrease in range of motion. To investigate this distinction, the scapulohumeral rhythm was used to conduct a functional evaluation of shoulder joints' coordination. The objective was to characterize patients according to their active range of motion without pain and their scapulohumeral rhythm compared with healthy individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with rotator cuff tears and 14 healthy individuals were set up with 35 reflective markers on the trunk and upper limb tracked by an optoelectronic system to measure the scapulohumeral rhythm. Five scapular plane maximal arm elevations were executed without pain. Patients were separated by maximal arm elevation of 85° (category A) and 40° (category B). Three-way mixed-design analysis of variance with factors of group (patients and healthy), arm elevation, and motion direction was applied to the scapulohumeral rhythm. RESULTS: A main effect of group (P = .032) was observed in patients in category A, who showed inferior scapulohumeral rhythm. An interaction between group and arm elevation (P = .044) was observed for patients in category B, where their scapulohumeral rhythm increased more during arm elevation than in the healthy individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who reached at least 85° compensated for the loss of glenohumeral motion by increased scapulothoracic contribution, suggesting that structural damage interferes with motion mechanics. In contrast, patients who reached less range of motion underused the scapulothoracic joint, which is likely to create subacromial impingement at low arm elevation. A patient's maximal range of motion without pain may indicate a pattern of scapulohumeral rhythm alteration.

3D shoulder kinematics for static vs dynamic and passive vs active testing conditions.

Shoulder motion analysis provides clinicians with references of normal joint rotations. Shoulder joints orientations assessment is often based on series of static positions, while clinicians perform either passive or active tests and exercises mostly in dynamic. These conditions of motion could modify joint coordination and lead to discrepancies with the established references. Hence, the objective was to evaluate the influence of static vs dynamic and passive vs active testing conditions on shoulder joints orientations. Twenty asymptomatic subjects setup with 45 markers on the upper limb and trunk were tracked by an optoelectronic system. Static positions (30°, 60°, 90° and 120° of thoracohumeral elevation) and dynamic motion both in active condition and passively mobilised by an examiner were executed. Three-dimensional sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, scapulothoracic and glenohumeral joint angles (12 in total) representing the distal segment orientation relative to the proximal segment orientation were estimated using a shoulder kinematical chain model. Separate four-way repeated measures ANOVA were applied on the 12 joint angles with factors of static vs dynamic, passive vs active, thoracohumeral elevation angle (30°, 60°, 90° and 120°) and plane of elevation (frontal and sagittal). Scapulothoracic lateral rotation progressed more during arm elevation in static than in dynamic gaining 4.2° more, and also in passive than in active by 6.6°. Glenohumeral elevation increased more during arm elevation in active than in passive by 4.4°. Shoulder joints orientations are affected by the testing conditions, which should be taken into consideration for data acquisition, inter-study comparison or clinical applications.

Elucidating the scapulo-humeral rhythm calculation: 3D joint contribution method.

The scapulo-humeral rhythm quantifies shoulder joint coordination during arm elevation. The common method calculates a ratio of gleno-humeral (GH) elevation to scapulo-thoracic upward rotation angles. However the other rotations also contribute to arm elevation. The objective is to propose a 3D dynamic scapulo-humeral rhythm calculation method including all rotations of the shoulder joints and compare with the common method. Twenty-nine skin markers were placed on the trunk and dominant arm of 14 healthy males to measure shoulder kinematics. Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs were applied to compare the two methods of calculation of joint contributions and scapulo-humeral rhythm during arm elevation. Significant main effects (p < 0.05) were observed between methods in joint contribution angles and scapulo-humeral rhythms. A systematic overestimation of the GH contribution was observed when only using the GH elevation angle because the scapula is moved outside a vertical plane. Hence, the proposed 3D method to calculate the scapulo-humeral rhythm allows an improved functional shoulder evaluation.

The Impact of Superior Labral Anterior to Posterior Lesions on Functional Status in Shoulder Instability: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Type IV superior labral anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions, which are superior labral detachments associated with Bankart tears, are reported to occur in up to 25% of recurrent shoulder instability patients. However, the clinical implications of this finding are debatable. PURPOSE: To determine whether there are any functional differences between anterior instability patients with and without type IV SLAP lesions at the time of presentation and at short-term follow-up after surgical intervention. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter database was established to follow the clinical evolution of patients with shoulder instability. Patients were diagnosed as having a type IV SLAP lesion at the time of arthroscopic Bankart surgery (SLAP+). These patients were compared with a group of patients who simply had a Bankart lesion (SLAP-). The 2 groups had their functional outcomes (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index [WOSI]; Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [QuickDASH]; and Walch-Duplay) compared prior to surgery and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 103 subjects were included in the study; of these, 56 (43 men, 13 women) completed 1-year follow-up. Twenty-three subjects had a type IV SLAP tear, and most had this repaired along with their Bankart lesion. At baseline, SLAP+ subjects had inferior QuickDASH scores compared with SLAP- subjects (37.8 vs 29.0) as well as poorer pain subscores on both the WOSI and QuickDASH. At 1-year follow-up, however, there were no significant differences in any of the outcome measures. CONCLUSION: A type IV SLAP lesion can be expected in 22% of patients with recurrent shoulder instability. This finding implies that at baseline, the patient will have slightly worse functional scores related to pain. However, following surgical management of the labral pathology, these patients will have equivalent functional outcomes at short-term follow-up. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: With surgical management of the superior and anteroinferior labrum, patients with type IV SLAP lesions will do as well as those with only Bankart tears. Thus, the presence of SLAP lesions should not alter the decision to provide surgical management and should not change the prognosis for a specific patient.

Validation of the instability shoulder index score in a multicenter reliability study in 114 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND: Anterior shoulder stabilization surgery with the arthroscopic Bankart procedure can have a high recurrence rate in certain patients. Identifying these patients to modify outcomes has become a focal point of research. PURPOSE: The Instability Shoulder Index Score (ISIS) was developed to predict the success of arthroscopic Bankart repair. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores predicting a higher risk of recurrence after stabilization. The interobserver reliability of the score is not known. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: This is a prospective multicenter (North America and Europe) study of patients suffering from shoulder instability and waiting for stabilization surgery. Five pairs of independent evaluators were asked to score patient instability severity with the ISIS. Patients also completed functional scores (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index [WOSI], Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand-short version [QuickDASH], and Walch-Duplay test). Data on age, sex, number of dislocations, and type of surgery were collected. The test-retest method and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC: >0.75 = good, >0.85 = very good, and >0.9 = excellent) were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients with anterior shoulder instability were included, of whom 89 (78%) were men. The mean age was 28 years. The ISIS was very reliable, with an ICC of 0.933. The mean number of dislocations per patient was higher in patients who had an ISIS of ≥6 (25 vs 14; P = .05). Patients who underwent more complex arthroscopic procedures such as Hill-Sachs remplissage or open Latarjet had higher preoperative ISIS outcomes, with a mean score of 4.8 versus 3.4, respectively (P = .002). There was no correlation between the ISIS and the quality-of-life questionnaires, with Pearson correlations all >0.05 (WOSI = 0.39; QuickDASH = 0.97; Walch-Duplay = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Our results show that the ISIS is reliable when used in a multicenter study with anterior traumatic instability populations. There was no correlation between the ISIS and the quality-of-life questionnaires, but surgical decisions reflected its increased use.

Objective grading of the pivot shift phenomenon using a support vector machine approach.

The pivot shift test is the only clinical test that has been shown to correlate with subjective criteria of knee joint function following rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. The grade of the pivot shift is important in predicting short- and long-term outcome. However, because this grade is established by a clinician in a subjective manner, the pivot shift's value as a clinical tool is reduced. The purpose of this study was to develop a system that will objectively grade the pivot shift test based on recorded knee joint kinematics. Fifty-six subjects with different degrees of knee joint stability had the pivot shift test performed by one of eight different orthopaedic surgeons while their knee joint kinematics were recorded. A support vector machine based algorithm was used to objectively classify these recordings according to a clinical grade. The grades established by the surgeons were used as the gold standard for the development of the classifier. There was substantial agreement between our classifier and the surgeons in establishing the grade (weighted kappa=0.68). Seventy-one of 107 recordings (66%) were given the same grade and 96% of the time our classifier was within one grade of that given by the surgeons. Moreover, grades 0 and 1 were distinguished from grade 2 to 3 with 86% sensitivity and 90% specificity. Our results show the feasibility of automatically grading the pivot shift in a manner similar to that of an experienced clinician, based on knee joint kinematics.

Accounting for velocity of the pivot shift test manoeuvre decreases kinematic variability.

The pivot shift test is the only clinical test which correlates with knee function following rupture of the ACL. A grade is given to the pivot shift in a subjective manner, leading to efforts to quantify the bone movements and correlate them to the grade. However, the dynamic and unconstrained nature of the manoeuvre introduces important kinematic variability. Our main objective was to develop a method to lessen the variability attributable to clinician technique, therefore increasing inter-grade differences. Three different orthopaedic surgeons each performed the pivot shift test on 12 subjects. Knee joint kinematics were recorded using electromagnetic motion capture devices. Inter-clinician variability was quantified and a method was developed to diminish it, using the angular velocity of flexion. This method was then applied to a larger population composed of 127 knees with various degrees of instability, evaluated by one of eight different orthopaedic surgeons. The clinical grades given by the clinicians were in almost perfect agreement (kappa=0.83). Normalization of kinematic parameters using the angular velocity of knee joint flexion produced by the clinicians reduced the intra-clinician variability by 20%, resulting in an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.52, up from 0.41 before normalization. This allowed for more significant differences between the grades of pivot shift. Simple normalisation of pivot shift kinematics using the angular velocity of flexion reduces clinician-related variability and allows for significant differences between the different grades. These results are an important step towards developing an objective measurement tool for the pivot shift phenomenon.

Feature selection using a principal component analysis of the kinematics of the pivot shift phenomenon.

The pivot shift test reproduces a complex instability of the knee joint following rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. The grade of the pivot shift test has been shown to correlate to subjective criteria of knee joint function, return to physical activity and long-term outcome. This severity is represented by a grade that is attributed by a clinician in a subjective manner, rendering the pivot shift test poorly reliable. The purpose of this study was to unveil the kinematic parameters that are evaluated by clinicians when they establish a pivot shift grade. To do so, eight orthopaedic surgeons performed a total of 127 pivot shift examinations on 70 subjects presenting various degrees of knee joint instability. The knee joint kinematics were recorded using electromagnetic sensors and principal component analysis was used to determine which features explain most of the variability between recordings. Four principal components were found to account for most of this variability (69%), with only the first showing a correlation to the pivot shift grade (r = 0.55). Acceleration and velocity of tibial translation were found to be the features that best correlate to the first principal component, meaning they are the most useful for distinguishing different recordings. The magnitudes of the tibial translation and rotation were amongst those that accounted for the least variability. These results indicate that future efforts to quantify the pivot shift should focus more on the velocity and acceleration of tibial translation and less on the traditionally accepted parameters that are the magnitudes of posterior translation and external tibial rotation.