LITE SABR M1: Planning design and dosimetric endpoints for a phase I trial of lattice SBRT.

PURPOSE: Lattice stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a form of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) using SBRT methods. This study reports clinical dosimetric endpoints achieved for Lattice SBRT plans delivering 20 Gy in 5 fractions to the periphery of a tumor with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of 66.7 Gy, as part of a prospective Phase I clinical trial (NCT04133415). Additionally, it updates previously reported planning and delivery techniques based on extended experience with a broader patient population. METHODS: Patients were enrolled on a single-arm phase I trial conducted between November 2019 and August 2020. Eligibility was restricted to tumors >4.5 cm in the largest dimension. Characteristic SFRT dose gradients were achieved using a lattice of 1.5 cm diameter spheres spaced within the GTV in a regular pattern, with peak-to-valley dose varying from 66.7 Gy to 20 Gy within 1.5 cm. Organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing followed AAPM TG101 recommendations for 5-fraction SBRT. RESULTS: Twenty patients (22 plans) were enrolled on study, with one additional plan treated off study. All OAR and target coverage planning objectives were achieved, with the exception of a single small bronchus. Conformity of the 20 Gy isodose line significantly improved over the course of the study. The majority (85.2%) of treatment fractions were delivered in a 30 minutes timeslot, with 4 (3.5%) exceeding a total treatment time of 40 minutes. CONCLUSION: Lattice SBRT planning techniques produce consistent and efficient treatment plans. Refined techniques described here further improve the quality of the planning technique.

Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of independent dose calculation followed by machine log file analysis against conventional measurement based IMRT QA.

Experimental methods are commonly used for patient-specific IMRT delivery verification. There are a variety of IMRT QA techniques which have been proposed and clinically used with a common understanding that not one single method can detect all possible errors. The aim of this work was to compare the efficiency and effectiveness of independent dose calculation followed by machine log file analysis to conventional measurement-based methods in detecting errors in IMRT delivery. Sixteen IMRT treatment plans (5 head-and-neck, 3 rectum, 3 breast, and 5 prostate plans) created with a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) were recalculated on a QA phantom. All treatment plans underwent ion chamber (IC) and 2D diode array measurements. The same set of plans was also recomputed with another commercial treatment planning system and the two sets of calculations were compared. The deviations between dosimetric measurements and independent dose calculation were evaluated. The comparisons included evaluations of DVHs and point doses calculated by the two TPS systems. Machine log files were captured during pretreatment composite point dose measurements and analyzed to verify data transfer and performance of the delivery machine. Average deviation between IC measurements and point dose calculations with the two TPSs for head-and-neck plans were 1.2 ± 1.3% and 1.4 ± 1.6%, respectively. For 2D diode array measurements, the mean gamma value with 3% dose difference and 3 mm distance-to-agreement was within 1.5% for 13 of 16 plans. The mean 3D dose differences calculated from two TPSs were within 3% for head-and-neck cases and within 2% for other plans. The machine log file analysis showed that the gantry angle, jaw position, collimator angle, and MUs were consistent as planned, and maximal MLC position error was less than 0.5 mm. The independent dose calculation followed by the machine log analysis takes an average 47 ± 6 minutes, while the experimental approach (using IC and 2D diode array measurements) takes an average about 2 hours in our clinic. Independent dose calculation followed by machine log file analysis can be a reliable tool to verify IMRT treatments. Additionally, independent dose calculations have the potential to identify several problems (heterogeneity calculations, data corruptions, system failures) with the primary TPS, which generally are not identifiable with a measurement-based approach. Additionally, machine log file analysis can identify many problems (gantry, collimator, jaw setting) which also may not be detected with a measurement-based approach. Machine log file analysis could also detect performance problems for individual MLC leaves which could be masked in the analysis of a measured fluence.